<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AAS Report #3: Things that go boom!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:30:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-141138</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-141138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a guy who barely passed high-school algebra and physics, but I have a basic understanding of how the universe works, the speed of light as a constant, etc.  What I&#039;d like to know is whether gravity has a &quot;speed.&quot;  
That is, when a star explodes, is the gravitational effect of that event felt instantaneously by all the objects near enough to be measurably effected, or is there a time lag before the nearest star knows by the effect on its path through space that its neighbor has exploded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a guy who barely passed high-school algebra and physics, but I have a basic understanding of how the universe works, the speed of light as a constant, etc.  What I&#8217;d like to know is whether gravity has a &#8220;speed.&#8221;<br />
That is, when a star explodes, is the gravitational effect of that event felt instantaneously by all the objects near enough to be measurably effected, or is there a time lag before the nearest star knows by the effect on its path through space that its neighbor has exploded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubble&#8217;s impact &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-113208</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubble&#8217;s impact &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-113208</guid>
		<description>[...] 1) We&#8217;ve watched the evolution of the supernova 1987A from just three years after it detonated to the present. We&#8217;ve seen the changes in the supernova debris at it has expanded, and we&#8217;re seeing the impact &#8212; literally &#8212; of it on the surrounding ring of material. It&#8217;s that ring that I studied to get my degree, which is why I thought of this particular example right away. We also saw that the supernova is surrounded by three rings, which made it unique&#8230; until more objects like it were found using Hubble and Spitzer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1) We&#8217;ve watched the evolution of the supernova 1987A from just three years after it detonated to the present. We&#8217;ve seen the changes in the supernova debris at it has expanded, and we&#8217;re seeing the impact &#8212; literally &#8212; of it on the surrounding ring of material. It&#8217;s that ring that I studied to get my degree, which is why I thought of this particular example right away. We also saw that the supernova is surrounded by three rings, which made it unique&#8230; until more objects like it were found using Hubble and Spitzer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [English Edition] &#187; Episode 20: What We Learned from the American Astronomical Society</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-27422</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [English Edition] &#187; Episode 20: What We Learned from the American Astronomical Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-27422</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait on the news release and type Ia supernovae. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Plait on the news release and type Ia supernovae. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomy Cast</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-27421</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomy Cast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-27421</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait on the news release and type Ia supernovae. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Plait on the news release and type Ia supernovae. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-27420</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-27420</guid>
		<description>Can anyone track down when the AAS plenaries will be on iTunes, and if they will be free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone track down when the AAS plenaries will be on iTunes, and if they will be free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys Musings &#187; Worst rollout of a software update ever?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-27419</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys Musings &#187; Worst rollout of a software update ever?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-27419</guid>
		<description>[...] It really sucks when your spacecraft is taken out, man. Still, I don&#8217;t have it as bad as Phil Plait, who spent years investigating supernovae remnants and had a good lead on one that had never been photographed in detail yet, but never followed up on it &#8212; and thus missed getting one of Hubble&#8217;s most iconic and recognizable images named after him. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It really sucks when your spacecraft is taken out, man. Still, I don&#8217;t have it as bad as Phil Plait, who spent years investigating supernovae remnants and had a good lead on one that had never been photographed in detail yet, but never followed up on it &mdash; and thus missed getting one of Hubble&#8217;s most iconic and recognizable images named after him. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Solis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-27418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Solis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/09/aas-report-2-things-that-go-boom/#comment-27418</guid>
		<description>@Donnie B.
I think these say it best

From the Angry Astronomer:
The area cleared out by the supernova looks like it will expand into the pillars in about 1000 years. However, given that it takes light 7,000 years to reach Earth from this region, that means that the pillars were actually destroyed 6,000 years ago.

From Space.com:
Astronomers think the supernova&#039;s shock wave knocked the pillars down about 6,000 years ago. But because the Eagle Nebula is located some 7,000 light years away, the majestic pillars will appear intact to observers on Earth for another 1,000 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donnie B.<br />
I think these say it best</p>
<p>From the Angry Astronomer:<br />
The area cleared out by the supernova looks like it will expand into the pillars in about 1000 years. However, given that it takes light 7,000 years to reach Earth from this region, that means that the pillars were actually destroyed 6,000 years ago.</p>
<p>From Space.com:<br />
Astronomers think the supernova&#8217;s shock wave knocked the pillars down about 6,000 years ago. But because the Eagle Nebula is located some 7,000 light years away, the majestic pillars will appear intact to observers on Earth for another 1,000 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
