<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: epi &#8211; pi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:08:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bas Joosten</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-2/#comment-224368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas Joosten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-224368</guid>
		<description>In reply to Adam:
“Also, I hear the 4th root of (9^2 + 19^2/22) is pi.”
I have no mathematica, but I can do high precision calculations. Found out it is approximately pi up to the 9th digit. Aproximately equal is still unequal, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Adam:<br />
“Also, I hear the 4th root of (9^2 + 19^2/22) is pi.”<br />
I have no mathematica, but I can do high precision calculations. Found out it is approximately pi up to the 9th digit. Aproximately equal is still unequal, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElBosso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-2/#comment-219419</link>
		<dc:creator>ElBosso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-219419</guid>
		<description>1111,1111^2 = 1234567,87654       &#124;*7,2
                          = 8888888,71109       &#124;sqrt (4 times)
                          = 2,718335  -&gt; nearly e^1 !
cool, isn´t it?
found out by myself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1111,1111^2 = 1234567,87654       |*7,2<br />
                          = 8888888,71109       |sqrt (4 times)<br />
                          = 2,718335  -> nearly e^1 !<br />
cool, isn´t it?<br />
found out by myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eikinkloster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-2/#comment-208664</link>
		<dc:creator>Eikinkloster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-208664</guid>
		<description>For those who are pissed because they don&#039;t get the whole fuss:

1) Click on the image. It will take you to the actual comic. The image is only the first of three frames.
2)  The joke in a nutshell: e^pi - pi = 19.999099979, which is very very close to 20. So close that if you don&#039;t know better, you&#039;ll feel tempted to believe you&#039;ve introduced some rounding error on the calculation. The math guy exploits this to drive the computer guys from ACM nuts trying to find where they were making the mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are pissed because they don&#8217;t get the whole fuss:</p>
<p>1) Click on the image. It will take you to the actual comic. The image is only the first of three frames.<br />
2)  The joke in a nutshell: e^pi &#8211; pi = 19.999099979, which is very very close to 20. So close that if you don&#8217;t know better, you&#8217;ll feel tempted to believe you&#8217;ve introduced some rounding error on the calculation. The math guy exploits this to drive the computer guys from ACM nuts trying to find where they were making the mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-1/#comment-201811</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-201811</guid>
		<description>Hey, no one&#039;s mentioned the alt-text in that XKCD comic yet:

&quot;Also, I hear the 4th root of (9^2 + 19^2/22) is pi.&quot;

Someone with Mathematica try that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, no one&#8217;s mentioned the alt-text in that XKCD comic yet:</p>
<p>&#8220;Also, I hear the 4th root of (9^2 + 19^2/22) is pi.&#8221;</p>
<p>Someone with Mathematica try that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-1/#comment-159806</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-159806</guid>
		<description>http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AlmostInteger.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AlmostInteger.html" rel="nofollow">http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AlmostInteger.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Action Lyrics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-1/#comment-157201</link>
		<dc:creator>Action Lyrics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-157201</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, I think it&#039;s just a coincidence.

There are plenty of them if u look for them.

Eg sqrt(10) approx = 22/7 approx = pi.

Even though none of those are integers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, I think it&#8217;s just a coincidence.</p>
<p>There are plenty of them if u look for them.</p>
<p>Eg sqrt(10) approx = 22/7 approx = pi.</p>
<p>Even though none of those are integers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/comment-page-1/#comment-128134</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/01/31/epi-pi/#comment-128134</guid>
		<description>The most explicit definition of e is e = 1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + ...

This is a rapidly converging sum (remember n! = n times (n-1) times ... times 1).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most explicit definition of e is e = 1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + &#8230;</p>
<p>This is a rapidly converging sum (remember n! = n times (n-1) times &#8230; times 1).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
