Comments on: You just can’t StopSylviaBrowne

By: Go Robert Lancaster | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine

Go Robert Lancaster | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:29:21 +0000

[...] run-in with this awful person. He is the creator of the website Stop Sylvia Browne (for which he has taken some heat), where he gently but firmly shows that Browne’s claims about her abilities are at the very [...]

By: StopSylviaBrowne.com Now Promotes Alleged “Psychics” « CNY Skeptics

Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:36:11 +0000

[...] a call to action. Sylvia may have had something to do with what has transpired, as she has been a vocal opponent of what was on the original site. While this site does speak out against her personally, there are [...]

By: StopSylviaBrowne.com Now Promotes Alleged Psychics « In Case You’re Interested…

Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:28:14 +0000

By: cic

cic — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:44:20 +0000

I’m not a lawyer, which is probably why I don’t understand why these liars and thieves such as Browne can’t be charged with fraud and do cold reading on the rats in their cells nibbling on their fingers and toes while waiting for a court date to prove they have the powers they claim.

Having failed to prove they are what they claim, they can be sent back to their cells as the thieves, frauds, liars, and cons they are to continue to do cold reading on rats and roaches for a number of years.

There are a number of laws dealing with those who do basically what so called psychics do, lie in order to separate people from their money, why aren’t those laws applicable to the Sylvia Brownes?

By: Nick

Nick — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:34:16 +0000

Actually, there’s more than the Anti-SLAPP stipulation.

StopSylviaBrowne.com has the right to use her name or any trademarked name in regards to copyrighted materials. Per copyright law (USC Title 17, Chapter 1, Â§107 [Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair], Robert Lancaster is not in infringing on any rights. It seems that his website deals with the “criticism” of a trademarked name (Sylvia Browne), which is protected under this section of fair use.

By: Stanley Cobb

Stanley Cobb — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:39:01 +0000

Good for them. Sylvia Browne should be burned at the stake. Just kidding. It looks like she ate all the “steaks”. She is a sham and should be stopped.

By: Irishman

Irishman — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:39:56 +0000

The numbers preceding the quoted bits are superscripts. The coding wasn’t accepted.