<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A non-theist in Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32596</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32596</guid>
		<description>Aw!  (sniff, sniff. (cry) )

:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw!  (sniff, sniff. (cry) )<br />
 <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32595</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32595</guid>
		<description>Darth Robo: I find it ridiculous the way you carry-on repeating your nonsense. (Whining, better than others etc.) With this comment I am severing all comments to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darth Robo: I find it ridiculous the way you carry-on repeating your nonsense. (Whining, better than others etc.) With this comment I am severing all comments to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32594</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32594</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re still whining about the apparent hostility you get, but what do you call this?

â€œSo we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesnâ€™t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I canâ€™t believe the stupidity!  It doesnâ€™t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.â€

And when you group a whole load of non-believers together by calling them &quot;stupid&quot;, you have the gall to say that they are the ones being hostile and you just say that you&#039;re &quot;naive&quot;?  Well, I could probably agree with you on that one, fundamentalism can breed naivete of the worst kind.  Along with the arrogance of thinking that your opinion is better than anyone else&#039;s.  If you didn&#039;t think that your opinion was better than anyone else&#039;s you could have explained yourself by answering my questions.

I&#039;m sure you can say I&#039;m arrogant, and heck, maybe you&#039;re right - I&#039;m also stubborn and opinionated when I want to be.  I know I&#039;m flawed, but I also know that Jesus ain&#039;t telling me where to improve.  If anyone it would be the FSM (praise the Lord, Ramen).  But we&#039;re not really getting anywhere here, and Phil is probably getting sick of having to moderate this old thread that everyone else has forgotten about while we&#039;re still here bickering like a couple of daft gits.  I&#039;m sure that we&#039;ll both have plenty of  opportunities to express differing opinions in the future.  See ya around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re still whining about the apparent hostility you get, but what do you call this?</p>
<p>â€œSo we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesnâ€™t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I canâ€™t believe the stupidity!  It doesnâ€™t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.â€</p>
<p>And when you group a whole load of non-believers together by calling them &#8220;stupid&#8221;, you have the gall to say that they are the ones being hostile and you just say that you&#8217;re &#8220;naive&#8221;?  Well, I could probably agree with you on that one, fundamentalism can breed naivete of the worst kind.  Along with the arrogance of thinking that your opinion is better than anyone else&#8217;s.  If you didn&#8217;t think that your opinion was better than anyone else&#8217;s you could have explained yourself by answering my questions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you can say I&#8217;m arrogant, and heck, maybe you&#8217;re right &#8211; I&#8217;m also stubborn and opinionated when I want to be.  I know I&#8217;m flawed, but I also know that Jesus ain&#8217;t telling me where to improve.  If anyone it would be the FSM (praise the Lord, Ramen).  But we&#8217;re not really getting anywhere here, and Phil is probably getting sick of having to moderate this old thread that everyone else has forgotten about while we&#8217;re still here bickering like a couple of daft gits.  I&#8217;m sure that we&#8217;ll both have plenty of  opportunities to express differing opinions in the future.  See ya around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32593</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32593</guid>
		<description>Darth Robo: Your right, I&#039;ve expressed my opinion about Pete Stark and the electorate. Its just that. I don&#039;t give my reasons and won&#039;t, because your still looking to &quot;tear me to pieces&quot;, like Jesus said.

I&#039;ve neither &quot;preached&quot;, nor &quot;whined&quot;. I&#039;ve expressed my opinion. You contradict yourself by calling my opinion, &quot;preaching&quot;. Further, my opinion, you call &quot;whining&quot;, when the hostility is an obvious fact. It is truly unfortunate that naivete is met with such defensive hostility. I&#039;ll keep the hostility in mind should I express an opinion on any future BA blog.

Quote: &quot;Youâ€™ve got Jesus by your side telling you youâ€™re always right, right?&quot; Wrong! Jesus is telling me where I need improvement, and you too.

Quote: &quot;You are as human as the rest of us..&quot; Pardon me while I enjoy a good belly laugh at that one. Gee, I didn&#039;t know I was merely human! Job had said, &quot;...All the days of my hard service I will wait, Till my change comes.&quot; Job: 14:14. Whoops, another relevent quotation!!! I suspect this one is over your head!!! Oh, and by the way, I&#039;m not preaching, I&#039;m just quoting since you say I&#039;m &quot;just as human as the rest of us&quot;.

You read a lot into my comments that really isn&#039;t there. You and I will never agree!!! For sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darth Robo: Your right, I&#8217;ve expressed my opinion about Pete Stark and the electorate. Its just that. I don&#8217;t give my reasons and won&#8217;t, because your still looking to &#8220;tear me to pieces&#8221;, like Jesus said.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve neither &#8220;preached&#8221;, nor &#8220;whined&#8221;. I&#8217;ve expressed my opinion. You contradict yourself by calling my opinion, &#8220;preaching&#8221;. Further, my opinion, you call &#8220;whining&#8221;, when the hostility is an obvious fact. It is truly unfortunate that naivete is met with such defensive hostility. I&#8217;ll keep the hostility in mind should I express an opinion on any future BA blog.</p>
<p>Quote: &#8220;Youâ€™ve got Jesus by your side telling you youâ€™re always right, right?&#8221; Wrong! Jesus is telling me where I need improvement, and you too.</p>
<p>Quote: &#8220;You are as human as the rest of us..&#8221; Pardon me while I enjoy a good belly laugh at that one. Gee, I didn&#8217;t know I was merely human! Job had said, &#8220;&#8230;All the days of my hard service I will wait, Till my change comes.&#8221; Job: 14:14. Whoops, another relevent quotation!!! I suspect this one is over your head!!! Oh, and by the way, I&#8217;m not preaching, I&#8217;m just quoting since you say I&#8217;m &#8220;just as human as the rest of us&#8221;.</p>
<p>You read a lot into my comments that really isn&#8217;t there. You and I will never agree!!! For sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32590</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32590</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just a re-hash of your preconceptions, that have nothing to do with my reality.&quot;

I could say the same, however in the end, that&#039;s just me and you stating our opinions.

&quot;Thanks for confirming that Jesus was right&quot;

For you maybe.  And that&#039;s fine.  Like I said, not everyone here is interested.  If we wanted to listen to preaching, we&#039;d go to the appropriate forum.  So if you&#039;ve finished whining, perhaps you could answer my questions?  I&#039;ll remind you of them if you&#039;ve forgotten.

(ahem)

You said:

â€œSo we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesnâ€™t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I canâ€™t believe the stupidity!â€

And the reason heâ€™s not entitled to his religious opinions isâ€¦ ?  Also, other than stating he is a non-theist, has he made any indication that he wants to use his position to force his own personal philosophies onto anyone else?  Then you said:

â€œIt doesnâ€™t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.â€

About what exactly?  And you are also just as ignorant to assume your opinions are better than his or anyone elseâ€™s. Why are they any better?  Then you said:

â€œIâ€™ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.â€

I&#039;m sorry you feel that way, but I simply have a different point of view than you do and so therefore I asked these questions.  So, nearly 3 weeks later and I still haven&#039;t had any answers.  All I&#039;ve had is complaints about your &quot;ill treatment&quot;.  But hey, you&#039;ll survive.  You&#039;ve got Jesus by your side telling you you&#039;re always right, right?.  So, do you have an answer to back up your original opinions?  Until then, remember that your opinions are just exactly that.  Your opinions.  They are no better than Stark&#039;s or mine or anyone else&#039;s.  You are as human as the rest of us, whatever &#039;reality&#039; you think you live in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just a re-hash of your preconceptions, that have nothing to do with my reality.&#8221;</p>
<p>I could say the same, however in the end, that&#8217;s just me and you stating our opinions.</p>
<p>&#8220;Thanks for confirming that Jesus was right&#8221;</p>
<p>For you maybe.  And that&#8217;s fine.  Like I said, not everyone here is interested.  If we wanted to listen to preaching, we&#8217;d go to the appropriate forum.  So if you&#8217;ve finished whining, perhaps you could answer my questions?  I&#8217;ll remind you of them if you&#8217;ve forgotten.</p>
<p>(ahem)</p>
<p>You said:</p>
<p>â€œSo we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesnâ€™t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I canâ€™t believe the stupidity!â€</p>
<p>And the reason heâ€™s not entitled to his religious opinions isâ€¦ ?  Also, other than stating he is a non-theist, has he made any indication that he wants to use his position to force his own personal philosophies onto anyone else?  Then you said:</p>
<p>â€œIt doesnâ€™t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.â€</p>
<p>About what exactly?  And you are also just as ignorant to assume your opinions are better than his or anyone elseâ€™s. Why are they any better?  Then you said:</p>
<p>â€œIâ€™ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.â€</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry you feel that way, but I simply have a different point of view than you do and so therefore I asked these questions.  So, nearly 3 weeks later and I still haven&#8217;t had any answers.  All I&#8217;ve had is complaints about your &#8220;ill treatment&#8221;.  But hey, you&#8217;ll survive.  You&#8217;ve got Jesus by your side telling you you&#8217;re always right, right?.  So, do you have an answer to back up your original opinions?  Until then, remember that your opinions are just exactly that.  Your opinions.  They are no better than Stark&#8217;s or mine or anyone else&#8217;s.  You are as human as the rest of us, whatever &#8216;reality&#8217; you think you live in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32589</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32589</guid>
		<description>Darth Robo: Your comments are not even worth consideration, they&#039;re total nonsense! Just a re-hash of your preconceptions, that have nothing to do with my reality. Thanks for confirming that Jesus was right, not that I needed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darth Robo: Your comments are not even worth consideration, they&#8217;re total nonsense! Just a re-hash of your preconceptions, that have nothing to do with my reality. Thanks for confirming that Jesus was right, not that I needed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32586</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32586</guid>
		<description>(sigh)  &quot;Their&quot; &quot;hostility&quot; (I assume you are refferring to people who agree with evolution) has only come about because of fundies pushing their non-scientific religious nonsense where it does not belong (the science class).  If it makes you feel better (to feed your martyr complex - again) to call it hostility, that&#039;s fine, go ahead and whine.

&quot;You complain of my quoting literature, what is wrong with that?&quot;

I wasn&#039;t really complaining as such, just pointing out that it&#039;s just pointless quoting non-relevant literature around.  But If you think that makes you look smart, then you carry on.

&quot;I donâ€™t offer my personal beliefs based upon Jesusâ€™ advice.&quot;

Okay, but you sure like to preach the Bible alot.  As if any here are really interested.  Remember, this is a science forum.

&quot;Your real desire is to â€œtear me to piecesâ€, as He said. I can see through you like I can see through a pane of glass.&quot;

And now we&#039;re back to the old martyr complex again.  Round and round in circles we go.  That&#039;s all you seem to be here for, to complain about science you don&#039;t like (we don&#039;t care) and then complain that we are all hostile towards you for making flawed, bad points because of your lack of understanding of the scientific method or making absolutely no point at all.  If you really want to make a point, you could argue your original case you made on this thread and answer my damn questions.  Because so far on this thread you have only been blowing out hot air.  If I am only here to â€œtear you to piecesâ€ then, for God&#039;s sake, stop making it so easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(sigh)  &#8220;Their&#8221; &#8220;hostility&#8221; (I assume you are refferring to people who agree with evolution) has only come about because of fundies pushing their non-scientific religious nonsense where it does not belong (the science class).  If it makes you feel better (to feed your martyr complex &#8211; again) to call it hostility, that&#8217;s fine, go ahead and whine.</p>
<p>&#8220;You complain of my quoting literature, what is wrong with that?&#8221;</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t really complaining as such, just pointing out that it&#8217;s just pointless quoting non-relevant literature around.  But If you think that makes you look smart, then you carry on.</p>
<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t offer my personal beliefs based upon Jesusâ€™ advice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, but you sure like to preach the Bible alot.  As if any here are really interested.  Remember, this is a science forum.</p>
<p>&#8220;Your real desire is to â€œtear me to piecesâ€, as He said. I can see through you like I can see through a pane of glass.&#8221;</p>
<p>And now we&#8217;re back to the old martyr complex again.  Round and round in circles we go.  That&#8217;s all you seem to be here for, to complain about science you don&#8217;t like (we don&#8217;t care) and then complain that we are all hostile towards you for making flawed, bad points because of your lack of understanding of the scientific method or making absolutely no point at all.  If you really want to make a point, you could argue your original case you made on this thread and answer my damn questions.  Because so far on this thread you have only been blowing out hot air.  If I am only here to â€œtear you to piecesâ€ then, for God&#8217;s sake, stop making it so easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32592</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32592</guid>
		<description>Darth Robo, I originally got onto these Bad Astronomy blogs because of my naivete regarding their hostility concerning evolution. You of course would not call it &quot;hostility&quot;, but I would. You complain of my quoting literature, what is wrong with that? I don&#039;t offer my personal beliefs based upon Jesus&#039; advice. Your real desire is to &quot;tear me to pieces&quot;, as He said. I can see through you like   I can see through a pane of glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darth Robo, I originally got onto these Bad Astronomy blogs because of my naivete regarding their hostility concerning evolution. You of course would not call it &#8220;hostility&#8221;, but I would. You complain of my quoting literature, what is wrong with that? I don&#8217;t offer my personal beliefs based upon Jesus&#8217; advice. Your real desire is to &#8220;tear me to pieces&#8221;, as He said. I can see through you like   I can see through a pane of glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32521</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32521</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have no response.&quot;

Well, I&#039;m disappointed (that happens alot from fundies).  And still quoting from literature I see.  Doesn&#039;t mean much if you can&#039;t use real world arguments to back up your points.  I&#039;d just like to remind you that not everyone who comes here is an atheist - I myself have no particular problem with your religion, you can believe what you like.  I DO have a problem if someone tries to push their particular religious opinions as being better than anyone elses.  I&#039;m sorry if you feel that all your posts get &quot;trampled on&quot; but that again sounds like another martyr comment to me.  (yawn)

I&#039;ll say again, if you talk nonsense you&#039;ll get an appropriate response.  If you feel your views are correct then feel free to back them up (or concede the point), you&#039;ll get alot more respect that way.  Otherwise, learn to stop whinging.

&quot;You must unlearn what you have learned.&quot;  Yoda:E:5.  Nice day you have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have no response.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m disappointed (that happens alot from fundies).  And still quoting from literature I see.  Doesn&#8217;t mean much if you can&#8217;t use real world arguments to back up your points.  I&#8217;d just like to remind you that not everyone who comes here is an atheist &#8211; I myself have no particular problem with your religion, you can believe what you like.  I DO have a problem if someone tries to push their particular religious opinions as being better than anyone elses.  I&#8217;m sorry if you feel that all your posts get &#8220;trampled on&#8221; but that again sounds like another martyr comment to me.  (yawn)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say again, if you talk nonsense you&#8217;ll get an appropriate response.  If you feel your views are correct then feel free to back them up (or concede the point), you&#8217;ll get alot more respect that way.  Otherwise, learn to stop whinging.</p>
<p>&#8220;You must unlearn what you have learned.&#8221;  Yoda:E:5.  Nice day you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32591</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32591</guid>
		<description>Darth Robo: Upon taking Jesus&#039; advice, I have no response. Anything I write will get &quot;trampled on&quot;, Matt:7:6. Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darth Robo: Upon taking Jesus&#8217; advice, I have no response. Anything I write will get &#8220;trampled on&#8221;, Matt:7:6. Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32520</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32520</guid>
		<description>&quot; â€œAh, the obligatory martyr commentsâ€, are only in your mind, not in mine.&quot;

Then could you explain this?  :

â€œIâ€™ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.â€

If you come onto a pro-science blog and start spouting cr*p, then what else do you expect?  Ah yes, you can&#039;t explain yourself:

&quot;Any further discussion along these lines would be pointless. â€œEast is east and west is west and never the twain will meetâ€.

Indeed.  So, so far we have extablished that you came along here to troll just because you happen to disagree with Pete Stark&#039;s philosophical views.  So, if you want to prove you are not a troll, then perhaps you could answer my questions.  I&#039;ll remind you if you have forgotten them already.

(Ahem)

So, you disagree with Pete Stark&#039;s religious opinions.  Your entitled to your choice.  And the reason heâ€™s not entitled to his religious opinions isâ€¦ ?  Also, as Stark stated at any point he&#039;s going to try and force his religious opinions on anyone else?

You also claimed that Stark and anyone who votes for him is ignorant just because your theological position differs to his.  And you are also just as ignorant to assume your opinions are better than his or anyone elseâ€™s. Why are they any better?

So uh,  are you just keep on whining and pretending to be smart just because you can quote literature, or are you going to answer my damn questions?  If not, then get lost and stop trolling.

And whatever you decide to do - have a nice day.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; â€œAh, the obligatory martyr commentsâ€, are only in your mind, not in mine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then could you explain this?  :</p>
<p>â€œIâ€™ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.â€</p>
<p>If you come onto a pro-science blog and start spouting cr*p, then what else do you expect?  Ah yes, you can&#8217;t explain yourself:</p>
<p>&#8220;Any further discussion along these lines would be pointless. â€œEast is east and west is west and never the twain will meetâ€.</p>
<p>Indeed.  So, so far we have extablished that you came along here to troll just because you happen to disagree with Pete Stark&#8217;s philosophical views.  So, if you want to prove you are not a troll, then perhaps you could answer my questions.  I&#8217;ll remind you if you have forgotten them already.</p>
<p>(Ahem)</p>
<p>So, you disagree with Pete Stark&#8217;s religious opinions.  Your entitled to your choice.  And the reason heâ€™s not entitled to his religious opinions isâ€¦ ?  Also, as Stark stated at any point he&#8217;s going to try and force his religious opinions on anyone else?</p>
<p>You also claimed that Stark and anyone who votes for him is ignorant just because your theological position differs to his.  And you are also just as ignorant to assume your opinions are better than his or anyone elseâ€™s. Why are they any better?</p>
<p>So uh,  are you just keep on whining and pretending to be smart just because you can quote literature, or are you going to answer my damn questions?  If not, then get lost and stop trolling.</p>
<p>And whatever you decide to do &#8211; have a nice day.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32588</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32588</guid>
		<description>Dogs &amp; Swine: Apt figures of speech.

TheBlackCat: Thanks for proving Jesus was right. Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dogs &amp; Swine: Apt figures of speech.</p>
<p>TheBlackCat: Thanks for proving Jesus was right. Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32519</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32519</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dogs &amp; Swine: Apt figures of speech.&quot;

Thank you for proving my point.  You are a troll.  Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dogs &amp; Swine: Apt figures of speech.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you for proving my point.  You are a troll.  Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32587</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32587</guid>
		<description>Dogs &amp; Swine: Apt figures of speech.
Darth Robo: &quot;Ah, the obligatory martyr comments&quot;, are only in your mind, not in mine. Any further discussion along these lines would be pointless. &quot;East is east and west is west and never the twain will meet&quot;. Rudyard Kipling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dogs &amp; Swine: Apt figures of speech.<br />
Darth Robo: &#8220;Ah, the obligatory martyr comments&#8221;, are only in your mind, not in mine. Any further discussion along these lines would be pointless. &#8220;East is east and west is west and never the twain will meet&#8221;. Rudyard Kipling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32585</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32585</guid>
		<description>&quot;You guys have anything but an open mind.&quot;

That&#039;s rich.  Nice to know you can read a dictionary aswell as the Bible.  So.  You open minded enough to answer my questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You guys have anything but an open mind.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s rich.  Nice to know you can read a dictionary aswell as the Bible.  So.  You open minded enough to answer my questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32584</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32584</guid>
		<description>Coming here and insulting us definitely fits that definition, no matter how you try to justify it.

I see, so not only are the atheists who visit here &quot;stupid&quot; and &quot;out of touch with reality&quot;, but all the people who visit this board are &quot;dogs&quot; and &quot;swine&quot;.  You don&#039;t see how that might just be &quot;annoying&quot; or &quot;cause trouble&quot;?  If you honestly cannot see the results of insulting the entire blog and everyone who visits it then there is really nothing anyone here can do to get through to you and we are all wasting our time.

You are not required to tell us your beliefs.  But unless you do no one will take you seriously.  Make no mistake.  What you are saying you believe will require that we abandon everything we know about ancient history and everything we know about biology and much of several other fields of science.  If you will not tell us what your beliefs are or why you have them, do you really expect us to just casually toss away that much knowledge for no reason whatsoever?  You have given us absolutely no reason to take you seriously, so why are you so surprised that we don&#039;t?  We are not going to abandon so much based solely on the fact that you tell us to.  You have no authority on biology, history, or theology, and even if you did on all three unless you give us some reason to accept what you say other than cherry-picked biblical passages than we will not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming here and insulting us definitely fits that definition, no matter how you try to justify it.</p>
<p>I see, so not only are the atheists who visit here &#8220;stupid&#8221; and &#8220;out of touch with reality&#8221;, but all the people who visit this board are &#8220;dogs&#8221; and &#8220;swine&#8221;.  You don&#8217;t see how that might just be &#8220;annoying&#8221; or &#8220;cause trouble&#8221;?  If you honestly cannot see the results of insulting the entire blog and everyone who visits it then there is really nothing anyone here can do to get through to you and we are all wasting our time.</p>
<p>You are not required to tell us your beliefs.  But unless you do no one will take you seriously.  Make no mistake.  What you are saying you believe will require that we abandon everything we know about ancient history and everything we know about biology and much of several other fields of science.  If you will not tell us what your beliefs are or why you have them, do you really expect us to just casually toss away that much knowledge for no reason whatsoever?  You have given us absolutely no reason to take you seriously, so why are you so surprised that we don&#8217;t?  We are not going to abandon so much based solely on the fact that you tell us to.  You have no authority on biology, history, or theology, and even if you did on all three unless you give us some reason to accept what you say other than cherry-picked biblical passages than we will not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32518</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32518</guid>
		<description>TheBlackCat: You use the word &quot;troll&quot; in your entry. The Cambridge Dictionary defines &quot;troll&quot; as: &quot;to leave an intentionally annoying message on a part of the Internet in order to get attention or cause trouble:&quot; You guys have anything but an open mind. I don&#039;t regard my entries as &quot;intentionally annoying&quot; or its my attempt to cause &quot;trouble&quot;. I know that, even if you and others don&#039;t.
Now as for why I don&#039;t go into detail about my beliefs, Jesus Himself said it better than I ever could: Matt 7:6  &quot;Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TheBlackCat: You use the word &#8220;troll&#8221; in your entry. The Cambridge Dictionary defines &#8220;troll&#8221; as: &#8220;to leave an intentionally annoying message on a part of the Internet in order to get attention or cause trouble:&#8221; You guys have anything but an open mind. I don&#8217;t regard my entries as &#8220;intentionally annoying&#8221; or its my attempt to cause &#8220;trouble&#8221;. I know that, even if you and others don&#8217;t.<br />
Now as for why I don&#8217;t go into detail about my beliefs, Jesus Himself said it better than I ever could: Matt 7:6  &#8220;Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32583</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32583</guid>
		<description>&quot;So we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesnâ€™t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I canâ€™t believe the stupidity!&quot;

And the reason he&#039;s not entitled to his religious opinions is... ?

&quot;It doesnâ€™t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.&quot;

And you are also just as ignorant to assume your opinions are better than his or anyone else&#039;s.  Why are they any better?

&quot;Iâ€™ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.&quot;

Ah, the obligatory martyr comments.  I have no problem with your pro-God POV (I don&#039;t consider myself athiest).  But when you barge in screaming that people who disagree with your religious opinions must be stupid, then yes, you will be attacked.  Now, if you lived in the days when the christians were fed to the lions, then maybe we&#039;d cut you some slack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesnâ€™t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I canâ€™t believe the stupidity!&#8221;</p>
<p>And the reason he&#8217;s not entitled to his religious opinions is&#8230; ?</p>
<p>&#8220;It doesnâ€™t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.&#8221;</p>
<p>And you are also just as ignorant to assume your opinions are better than his or anyone else&#8217;s.  Why are they any better?</p>
<p>&#8220;Iâ€™ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, the obligatory martyr comments.  I have no problem with your pro-God POV (I don&#8217;t consider myself athiest).  But when you barge in screaming that people who disagree with your religious opinions must be stupid, then yes, you will be attacked.  Now, if you lived in the days when the christians were fed to the lions, then maybe we&#8217;d cut you some slack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32582</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32582</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are going to be attacked.  You come here and insult many members of the blog, calling them &quot;stupid&quot; and &quot;ignorant of reality&quot;, and you expect us to welcome you with open arms?  You have given absolutely not reason why we should take your ideas seriously.  Come on.  It is like you are trying to make a martyr of yourself.  You have not told us why you think these ideas are stupid, or what aspects of them are stupid.  You drag out long-disproven, centuries-old creationist canards like &quot;chance&quot;.  You have systematically avoided any attempt by us to get the slightest bit of detail out of you.  You call the blog &quot;highly biased&quot;, but don&#039;t tell us what its bias is or what makes you think these biases exist.  You come here trolling the blog, insulting people, and yet offering us no reason to take you seriously.  Until you do so, you will be attacked.  Respect is not a right you get by default, it is something that must be earned.

It seems to me like you want us to attack you.  Maybe it is so you can go tell people how biased and closed-minded your enemies are.  Maybe it is so you can go criticize us for not having an open mind, for attacking someone just for having opposing views.  Maybe it is so you can feel justified in your beliefs (if all those people who are &quot;ignorant of reality&quot; attack me I must be right).  Of course you will conveniently forget about or fail to mention that this post was nothing more than a bunch of insults.  You will ignore the fact that the had no substance to it.  You are a troll, pure and simple.  And trolls are attacked, and rightly so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are going to be attacked.  You come here and insult many members of the blog, calling them &#8220;stupid&#8221; and &#8220;ignorant of reality&#8221;, and you expect us to welcome you with open arms?  You have given absolutely not reason why we should take your ideas seriously.  Come on.  It is like you are trying to make a martyr of yourself.  You have not told us why you think these ideas are stupid, or what aspects of them are stupid.  You drag out long-disproven, centuries-old creationist canards like &#8220;chance&#8221;.  You have systematically avoided any attempt by us to get the slightest bit of detail out of you.  You call the blog &#8220;highly biased&#8221;, but don&#8217;t tell us what its bias is or what makes you think these biases exist.  You come here trolling the blog, insulting people, and yet offering us no reason to take you seriously.  Until you do so, you will be attacked.  Respect is not a right you get by default, it is something that must be earned.</p>
<p>It seems to me like you want us to attack you.  Maybe it is so you can go tell people how biased and closed-minded your enemies are.  Maybe it is so you can go criticize us for not having an open mind, for attacking someone just for having opposing views.  Maybe it is so you can feel justified in your beliefs (if all those people who are &#8220;ignorant of reality&#8221; attack me I must be right).  Of course you will conveniently forget about or fail to mention that this post was nothing more than a bunch of insults.  You will ignore the fact that the had no substance to it.  You are a troll, pure and simple.  And trolls are attacked, and rightly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32581</link>
		<dc:creator>James J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32581</guid>
		<description>So we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesn&#039;t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I can&#039;t believe the stupidity! It doesn&#039;t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.
I&#039;ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we have another representative in Congress ignorant of reality, he assumes God doesn&#8217;t exist. We are the product of chance acording to him. I can&#8217;t believe the stupidity! It doesn&#8217;t say much about the electorate that elected him. They are just as ignorant as he is.<br />
I&#8217;ve learned that expressing a pro-God view on these highly biased blogs is like placing raw flesh in a south American river containing Piranha fish. Immediately attacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32580</link>
		<dc:creator>rash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32580</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_earth#The_Early_Church
From Late Antiquity, and from the beginnings of Christian theology, knowledge of the sphericity of the Earth had become widespread.[14] As in secular culture a small minority contended with the flatness of the Earth.
...
The scarcity of references to their beliefs in later medieval writings convinces most of today&#039;s historians that their influence was slight.

--------------------------------------
Why try to create controversy where there is none?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_earth#The_Early_Church" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_earth#The_Early_Church</a><br />
From Late Antiquity, and from the beginnings of Christian theology, knowledge of the sphericity of the Earth had become widespread.[14] As in secular culture a small minority contended with the flatness of the Earth.<br />
&#8230;<br />
The scarcity of references to their beliefs in later medieval writings convinces most of today&#8217;s historians that their influence was slight.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Why try to create controversy where there is none?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32579</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32579</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; DenverAstro:
I cant understand why it is such an awful thing to believe that the Big Bang was the result of God having one too many bean burritos. One gigantic gaseous outburst and this whole stinkin universe is on its way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, cosmologists should be studying the Great Big Fart of Space and Time, eh? Has a ring to it.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> DenverAstro:<br />
I cant understand why it is such an awful thing to believe that the Big Bang was the result of God having one too many bean burritos. One gigantic gaseous outburst and this whole stinkin universe is on its way.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, cosmologists should be studying the Great Big Fart of Space and Time, eh? Has a ring to it.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32578</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32578</guid>
		<description>Itâ€™s just as likely as any other hypothosis.

That&#039;s right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itâ€™s just as likely as any other hypothosis.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DenverAstro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32577</link>
		<dc:creator>DenverAstro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32577</guid>
		<description>Well, I feel obligated to make a short statement here. Im a Druid monk and sacrifice virgins every full moon. The only problem is that I havent come across a virgin since I was in grade school. Do you guys know any? If ya do, lemme know and I polish my stone dagger :o)
All this talk of athiest, agnostic, woo woo whatever kinda depresses me. I cant understand why it is such an awful thing to believe that the Big Bang was the result of God having one too many bean burritos. One gigantic gaseous outburst and this whole stinkin universe is on its way. Hey, comeon, it coulda happened. It&#039;s just as likely as any other hypothosis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I feel obligated to make a short statement here. Im a Druid monk and sacrifice virgins every full moon. The only problem is that I havent come across a virgin since I was in grade school. Do you guys know any? If ya do, lemme know and I polish my stone dagger <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )<br />
All this talk of athiest, agnostic, woo woo whatever kinda depresses me. I cant understand why it is such an awful thing to believe that the Big Bang was the result of God having one too many bean burritos. One gigantic gaseous outburst and this whole stinkin universe is on its way. Hey, comeon, it coulda happened. It&#8217;s just as likely as any other hypothosis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/comment-page-2/#comment-32576</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/12/a-non-theist-in-congress/#comment-32576</guid>
		<description>Matthew 4:8  Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;

Luke 4:5  And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world  in a moment of time.

You can&#039;t see all the kingdoms of the world from a mountain if the world is not flat, no matter how high it is.  That is not &quot;phenomenal language&quot;, that is a direct and unambiguous historical account.  Seeing the whole Earth from one high place or the whole Earth being able to see one high object is common in the bible but not possible in a nearly spherical Earth.

You are also skipping most of Isiah 40:22.  The complete verse:

40:22  It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:

You can&#039;t spread the heavens out like a curtain or tent over a spherical Earth.  Only a flat Earth can have something like tent stretched over it.  Whatever they meant by &quot;circle&quot;, the latter parts are only consistent with a flat Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew 4:8  Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;</p>
<p>Luke 4:5  And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world  in a moment of time.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t see all the kingdoms of the world from a mountain if the world is not flat, no matter how high it is.  That is not &#8220;phenomenal language&#8221;, that is a direct and unambiguous historical account.  Seeing the whole Earth from one high place or the whole Earth being able to see one high object is common in the bible but not possible in a nearly spherical Earth.</p>
<p>You are also skipping most of Isiah 40:22.  The complete verse:</p>
<p>40:22  It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t spread the heavens out like a curtain or tent over a spherical Earth.  Only a flat Earth can have something like tent stretched over it.  Whatever they meant by &#8220;circle&#8221;, the latter parts are only consistent with a flat Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 12:54:43 -->
