Comments on: It’s Eva Longoria, not Shortgoria http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/ I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:18:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Cristiano Brasco http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32953 Cristiano Brasco Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:35:48 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32953 She is way too short...i don't know what you people like about her..:-? BTW her head is kinda big compared to her body...can`t you see? She is way too short…i don’t know what you people like about her..:-?
BTW her head is kinda big compared to her body…can`t you see?

]]> By: ruta http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32952 ruta Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:21:31 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32952 omg i love this but email me some time loL i love you shoes omg i love this but email me some time
loL

i love you shoes

]]> By: Irishman http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32927 Irishman Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:01:38 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32927 Wow, how'd I screw that up so bad? It's written on the picture above. :-? Wow, how’d I screw that up so bad? It’s written on the picture above. :-?

]]> By: David Vanderschel http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32926 David Vanderschel Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:24:04 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32926 The Irishman: "David, the pics are from theFlyOnline.com, ..." Well, that was confusing. I eventually figured out that the correct reference is to FlynetOnline.com. There, I found the following: "Flynet Pictures grants people the rights to use only watermarked images along with a link to FlynetOnline.com." The Superficial does provide the required link, but the BA does not. I don't think that linking the photo from The Superficial's site (as opposed to having a copy on the BA site) is sufficient to avoid the copyright holder's linking requirement. This should be easy for Phil to fix. The Irishman: “David, the pics are from theFlyOnline.com, …” Well, that was confusing. I eventually figured out that the correct reference is to FlynetOnline.com. There, I found the following: “Flynet Pictures grants people the rights to use only watermarked images along with a link to FlynetOnline.com.” The Superficial does provide the required link, but the BA does not. I don’t think that linking the photo from The Superficial’s site (as opposed to having a copy on the BA site) is sufficient to avoid the copyright holder’s linking requirement. This should be easy for Phil to fix.

]]> By: Irishman http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32951 Irishman Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:55:10 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32951 David, the pics are from TheFlyOnline.com, paparazzi filled site. From the candid appearance of the pics, these do not appear to be expected photos. Thus, I would argue they are. What that says about the camera, camera distance, and lens configuration, I do not guess. David, the pics are from TheFlyOnline.com, paparazzi filled site. From the candid appearance of the pics, these do not appear to be expected photos. Thus, I would argue they are. What that says about the camera, camera distance, and lens configuration, I do not guess.

]]> By: Will http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32950 Will Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:02:48 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32950 Well, she may not be short, but she still can't act *ba-doomp-ssst!* Well, she may not be short, but she still can’t act *ba-doomp-ssst!*

]]> By: David Vanderschel http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32949 David Vanderschel Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:15:13 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/16/its-eva-longoria-not-shortgoria/#comment-32949 BA: "The distance to the camera is probably not important here. Paprazzi (sic) tend to take pictures from far away using a big telephoto." And yet a wide angled lens would explain the apparent slope of the driveway, in which case the distance is important. Is there evidence that a paparazzo was responsible for taking this photo? BA: “The distance to the camera is probably not important here. Paprazzi (sic) tend to take pictures from far away using a big telephoto.” And yet a wide angled lens would explain the apparent slope of the driveway, in which case the distance is important. Is there evidence that a paparazzo was responsible for taking this photo?

]]>