<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q and BA Episode 7: By Any Other Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32992</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32992</guid>
		<description>Jeff, my pleasure. That was a great shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, my pleasure. That was a great shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32991</guid>
		<description>Phil

What a surprise when my tracking started to show hits from badastronomy.com.
My first thought was W.T.F. did I do wrong.

I was pleased to see you used one of my photos for your video blog .
I was also very pleased to see the flickr creative commons license guidelines adhered to with a link as well.

Not many people follow those guidelines so thanks also for being on the &quot;up and up&quot;.

Best Regards from the middle of Canada
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil</p>
<p>What a surprise when my tracking started to show hits from badastronomy.com.<br />
My first thought was W.T.F. did I do wrong.</p>
<p>I was pleased to see you used one of my photos for your video blog .<br />
I was also very pleased to see the flickr creative commons license guidelines adhered to with a link as well.</p>
<p>Not many people follow those guidelines so thanks also for being on the &#8220;up and up&#8221;.</p>
<p>Best Regards from the middle of Canada<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drbuzz0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32987</link>
		<dc:creator>Drbuzz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32987</guid>
		<description>Phil!   You completely forgot that the names of stars are recorded in book form in the US patent office and.... oh yea... nevermind.

I really liked that Q and BA, though.     I assume that pretty much all the stars or other objects visible by the naked eye or a nominal telescope probably have been given some sort of label and cataloged by this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil!   You completely forgot that the names of stars are recorded in book form in the US patent office and&#8230;. oh yea&#8230; nevermind.</p>
<p>I really liked that Q and BA, though.     I assume that pretty much all the stars or other objects visible by the naked eye or a nominal telescope probably have been given some sort of label and cataloged by this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Barred for life &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32986</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Barred for life &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32986</guid>
		<description>[...] form Hubble. It&#8217;s NGC 1672, a barred spiral galaxy (NGC stands for New General Catalog, as my last real episode of Q and BA notes). All by themselves, normal spirals are weird enough. We know that stars closer in to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] form Hubble. It&#8217;s NGC 1672, a barred spiral galaxy (NGC stands for New General Catalog, as my last real episode of Q and BA notes). All by themselves, normal spirals are weird enough. We know that stars closer in to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: names girl boy &#187; Q and BA Episode 7: By Any Other Name</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32959</link>
		<dc:creator>names girl boy &#187; Q and BA Episode 7: By Any Other Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32959</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by The Bad Astronomer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by The Bad Astronomer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32954</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32954</guid>
		<description>Phil, what I think you were struggling for was this:
&quot;That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet...&quot;

Anyway, that was a good one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, what I think you were struggling for was this:<br />
&#8220;That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, that was a good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32990</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 04:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32990</guid>
		<description>A couple of things:

1) I know about the Rosette nebula, of course. It&#039;s a famous one. But it&#039;s not the &lt;b&gt;Rose&lt;/b&gt; nebula. Evidently there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a &lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/09/12/hubble.rose/&quot; target=&quot;_Blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rose Nebula&lt;/a&gt;. I knew of this nebula itself, but not the name.

2) I marked Virginia&#039;s post as spam, since it linked to a link farm.

3) Transcripts of many of the Q and BA episodes have been made, but I haven&#039;t uploaded them yet because I&#039;m still trying to figure out how to organize all this. I&#039;ll do it at some point. As Jack Hagerty pointed out, I don&#039;t have a script to work from; this is all ad lib. Jon Voisey from &lt;a href=&quot;http://angryastronomer.blogspot.com/&quot; target=&quot;_Blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Angry Astronomer&lt;/a&gt; has sent me transcripts after I post the episodes, so I&#039;ve got them, I just need to get organized.

4) Bee, I just use a webcam and edit the file using Windows Movie Maker, one of the truly most awful pieces of crappy software it has ever been my misfortune to use. In the future I will use different software, but I&#039;m too busy to learn it now. Eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of things:</p>
<p>1) I know about the Rosette nebula, of course. It&#8217;s a famous one. But it&#8217;s not the <b>Rose</b> nebula. Evidently there <i>is</i> a <a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/09/12/hubble.rose/" target="_Blank" rel="nofollow">Rose Nebula</a>. I knew of this nebula itself, but not the name.</p>
<p>2) I marked Virginia&#8217;s post as spam, since it linked to a link farm.</p>
<p>3) Transcripts of many of the Q and BA episodes have been made, but I haven&#8217;t uploaded them yet because I&#8217;m still trying to figure out how to organize all this. I&#8217;ll do it at some point. As Jack Hagerty pointed out, I don&#8217;t have a script to work from; this is all ad lib. Jon Voisey from <a href="http://angryastronomer.blogspot.com/" target="_Blank" rel="nofollow">The Angry Astronomer</a> has sent me transcripts after I post the episodes, so I&#8217;ve got them, I just need to get organized.</p>
<p>4) Bee, I just use a webcam and edit the file using Windows Movie Maker, one of the truly most awful pieces of crappy software it has ever been my misfortune to use. In the future I will use different software, but I&#8217;m too busy to learn it now. Eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32989</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 04:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32989</guid>
		<description>First off, I don&#039;t think these videos are too long, in fact, they could be longer and it wouldn&#039;t bother me - I think they&#039;re engaging and something different than the usual posting. I also like that people point out Phil&#039;s errors and/or add additional information; it means people are paying attention!

One thing I knew (wow, I knew &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt; the BA didn&#039;t!) is what &lt;b&gt;Irishman pointed out - the Rose and Rosette nebulas. Thanks, &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Irishman&lt;/b&gt;, you&#039;ve been one of the most prolific commenters here since the start of this blog and you always have good and relevant information! :-)

And what book is that? I hate not being to tell what it is. I wonder, too, does Mrs. BA and Little BA watch you do these? Or do they have to leave the room to keep from giggling out loud? I kind of wish you&#039;d &quot;share&quot; Little BA - I&#039;d love to see a father/daughter video. Being that some people are sharing these videos with kids, that might be fun.   ~8-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I don&#8217;t think these videos are too long, in fact, they could be longer and it wouldn&#8217;t bother me &#8211; I think they&#8217;re engaging and something different than the usual posting. I also like that people point out Phil&#8217;s errors and/or add additional information; it means people are paying attention!</p>
<p>One thing I knew (wow, I knew <i>something</i> the BA didn&#8217;t!) is what <b>Irishman pointed out &#8211; the Rose and Rosette nebulas. Thanks, </b><b>Irishman</b>, you&#8217;ve been one of the most prolific commenters here since the start of this blog and you always have good and relevant information! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And what book is that? I hate not being to tell what it is. I wonder, too, does Mrs. BA and Little BA watch you do these? Or do they have to leave the room to keep from giggling out loud? I kind of wish you&#8217;d &#8220;share&#8221; Little BA &#8211; I&#8217;d love to see a father/daughter video. Being that some people are sharing these videos with kids, that might be fun.   ~8-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phobos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32988</link>
		<dc:creator>Phobos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32988</guid>
		<description>Phil - Funny you didn&#039;t mention StarRegistry names...

(love these videos!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil &#8211; Funny you didn&#8217;t mention StarRegistry names&#8230;</p>
<p>(love these videos!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tukla in Iowa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32985</link>
		<dc:creator>Tukla in Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32985</guid>
		<description>I love these little videos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these little videos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godwhacker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32984</link>
		<dc:creator>Godwhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32984</guid>
		<description>Wow ~ great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow ~ great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32983</guid>
		<description>David Vanderschel Says: &quot;Phil, I like you; but, after having seen more of it than I care for, your talking head is not particularly entertaining.&quot;

and

Virginia Says: &quot;Iâ€™m in agreement with David Vanderscelâ€™s comment: to some of us, video presentations are just a major annoyance.&quot;

Have we reached BA media burnout? Sartorial knowledge saturation? My only comment is that you don&#039;t HAVE to watch them, although David&#039;s suggestion of a text version would be helpful to those that prefer it.

I don&#039;t want to be speaking for Phil here, but if he does these spots the same way he did his talks at WordCon, there isn&#039;t a script per se, just some bullet points that he talks from.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Vanderschel Says: &#8220;Phil, I like you; but, after having seen more of it than I care for, your talking head is not particularly entertaining.&#8221;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Virginia Says: &#8220;Iâ€™m in agreement with David Vanderscelâ€™s comment: to some of us, video presentations are just a major annoyance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Have we reached BA media burnout? Sartorial knowledge saturation? My only comment is that you don&#8217;t HAVE to watch them, although David&#8217;s suggestion of a text version would be helpful to those that prefer it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be speaking for Phil here, but if he does these spots the same way he did his talks at WordCon, there isn&#8217;t a script per se, just some bullet points that he talks from.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32958</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32958</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the info :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the info <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32957</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32957</guid>
		<description>This is great! I never made the connection between Messier and messy, that&#039;s funny actually :-)

Totally off-topic question: how do you get the quality of the video to be so good? I&#039;m trying to figure out how that stuff works, but doing so very inefficiently. If you have the time and don&#039;t want to answer here, feel free to send me an email.

Best,

B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! I never made the connection between Messier and messy, that&#8217;s funny actually <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Totally off-topic question: how do you get the quality of the video to be so good? I&#8217;m trying to figure out how that stuff works, but doing so very inefficiently. If you have the time and don&#8217;t want to answer here, feel free to send me an email.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32956</link>
		<dc:creator>RAF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32956</guid>
		<description>The Bad Astronomer said: Due to my travel schedule, I am posting this one early.

Going somewhere, BA? It sure is NOT on your calendar...&quot;hint, hint&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bad Astronomer said: Due to my travel schedule, I am posting this one early.</p>
<p>Going somewhere, BA? It sure is NOT on your calendar&#8230;&#8221;hint, hint&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32982</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32982</guid>
		<description>Virginia:Ah yes, Vista,,,another piece of crud from the Grate(no misspelling here) One,,,

As soon as I can afford it, I&#039;m getting a Mac.

DSL may not be the fastest way to download, but it is fairly cheap. I have a 1.5 Mbit line which is fast enough for practical purposes, though for on line, real time video I should probably go to 6 Mbit. That&#039;s in the wish bucket,,,

The video is a cool way to expound upon the ineffable, Phil. Besides, passion for ones subject comes across better in a visual/audio mode than in HTML or other text. I say, keep going for it, Phil.

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia:Ah yes, Vista,,,another piece of crud from the Grate(no misspelling here) One,,,</p>
<p>As soon as I can afford it, I&#8217;m getting a Mac.</p>
<p>DSL may not be the fastest way to download, but it is fairly cheap. I have a 1.5 Mbit line which is fast enough for practical purposes, though for on line, real time video I should probably go to 6 Mbit. That&#8217;s in the wish bucket,,,</p>
<p>The video is a cool way to expound upon the ineffable, Phil. Besides, passion for ones subject comes across better in a visual/audio mode than in HTML or other text. I say, keep going for it, Phil.</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vanderschel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32981</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vanderschel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32981</guid>
		<description>I suppose that some folks may appreciate these audio and video presentations.  However, I don&#039;t.  It takes too long to listen to or view one, and I cannot skim over stuff I am already familiar with.  Though the BA is offering these Q&amp;BA episodes in many forms, he is not offering them in the form that I would find most useful - namely HTML text with links to the illustrations (which are relatively infrequent).  Phil, I like you; but, after having seen more of it than I care for, your talking head is not particularly entertaining.  Could you not also post the scripts (with links) you use for these presentations?  I would read those; but I don&#039;t see myself playing the videos or audios anymore.  Posting the text of the Q&amp;BA episodes would also create a more thoroughly searchable archive for these tutorial efforts.  If you are actually ad libbing these programs, I imagine that there are folks who would volunteer to prepare transcripts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that some folks may appreciate these audio and video presentations.  However, I don&#8217;t.  It takes too long to listen to or view one, and I cannot skim over stuff I am already familiar with.  Though the BA is offering these Q&amp;BA episodes in many forms, he is not offering them in the form that I would find most useful &#8211; namely HTML text with links to the illustrations (which are relatively infrequent).  Phil, I like you; but, after having seen more of it than I care for, your talking head is not particularly entertaining.  Could you not also post the scripts (with links) you use for these presentations?  I would read those; but I don&#8217;t see myself playing the videos or audios anymore.  Posting the text of the Q&amp;BA episodes would also create a more thoroughly searchable archive for these tutorial efforts.  If you are actually ad libbing these programs, I imagine that there are folks who would volunteer to prepare transcripts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32980</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32980</guid>
		<description>Gee, astronomers is the most funniest people,,,you should have consistant nomenclature, like physics,,,mu-meson,pi-mesons,quarks, cake-mesons,,,er, oops,,,maybe not cake,,,

OK, so, I prefer everything be named after chocolate,,,

Cool clarificatoin(???) Phil. Now I think I&#039;ll just go back to bed,,,

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, astronomers is the most funniest people,,,you should have consistant nomenclature, like physics,,,mu-meson,pi-mesons,quarks, cake-mesons,,,er, oops,,,maybe not cake,,,</p>
<p>OK, so, I prefer everything be named after chocolate,,,</p>
<p>Cool clarificatoin(???) Phil. Now I think I&#8217;ll just go back to bed,,,</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32979</link>
		<dc:creator>jayem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32979</guid>
		<description>Phil...that was explained irrefutably, indubitably, decidedly, incontrovertibly...clear. I&#039;ve had the HR catalogues for years now and consider them very useful for referencing...no matter what name a star or galaxy has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil&#8230;that was explained irrefutably, indubitably, decidedly, incontrovertibly&#8230;clear. I&#8217;ve had the HR catalogues for years now and consider them very useful for referencing&#8230;no matter what name a star or galaxy has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFlimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32978</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFlimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32978</guid>
		<description>Angelo, I regret telling you that we won&#039;t be able to see the Big Bang what ever we do! The problem is that we can only detect electromagnetic waves (the entire spectrum of light). And the universe became transparent for light 300,000 years AFTER the Big Bang So this is the earliest point in the history of the universe we can see. And we SEE it. It is the Cosmic Microwave Background and it perfectly fits in the Big Bang Theory by now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelo, I regret telling you that we won&#8217;t be able to see the Big Bang what ever we do! The problem is that we can only detect electromagnetic waves (the entire spectrum of light). And the universe became transparent for light 300,000 years AFTER the Big Bang So this is the earliest point in the history of the universe we can see. And we SEE it. It is the Cosmic Microwave Background and it perfectly fits in the Big Bang Theory by now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32977</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32977</guid>
		<description>For a moment, I figured this was going to be about a race of aliens that hijack a starship and take it to another galaxy. Right? :)

I had no idea so many alternate names existed for Sirius. Wow! All I knew was, of course, Sirius, and &quot;The Dog Star&quot;. Well, that&#039;s the highlight of Q &amp; BA; it provides interesting education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a moment, I figured this was going to be about a race of aliens that hijack a starship and take it to another galaxy. Right? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I had no idea so many alternate names existed for Sirius. Wow! All I knew was, of course, Sirius, and &#8220;The Dog Star&#8221;. Well, that&#8217;s the highlight of Q &amp; BA; it provides interesting education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32976</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32976</guid>
		<description>One day we will have a telescope powerful enough to see right back to the actual Big Bang. The question is, will we actually see the  &#039;&#039; Vacuum Fluctuation &#039;&#039;tha triggered the B/B?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One day we will have a telescope powerful enough to see right back to the actual Big Bang. The question is, will we actually see the  &#8221; Vacuum Fluctuation &#8221;tha triggered the B/B?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32975</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32975</guid>
		<description>OK, for some reason the LibSyn posts didn&#039;t go live. I just fixed that, so they should be good.

I don&#039;t know why iTunes is still showing one feed. I think this may be because iTunes sucks, since most problems I have with it are due to that. However, I can&#039;t rule out some mistake I made. I&#039;ll look into it when I can.

And just a note: I know what PPM stands for. Sometimes I make jokes on my videos. :-)

I didn&#039;t know there was a Rose nebula. I&#039;ll look into that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, for some reason the LibSyn posts didn&#8217;t go live. I just fixed that, so they should be good.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why iTunes is still showing one feed. I think this may be because iTunes sucks, since most problems I have with it are due to that. However, I can&#8217;t rule out some mistake I made. I&#8217;ll look into it when I can.</p>
<p>And just a note: I know what PPM stands for. Sometimes I make jokes on my videos. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know there was a Rose nebula. I&#8217;ll look into that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32974</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32974</guid>
		<description>It strikes me that this conflagration of designations may make initial discussions harder but might actually help Astronomy as a study. Since most objects in the sky don&#039;t have conversational names like &quot;Crab Nebula,&quot; &quot;Horse Head Nebula&quot; or &quot;Andromeda Galaxy&quot; the myriad numbering systems could prevent researchers from making assumptions about the object before reading findings and conclusions about that object. We do all make certain assumptions based on our familiarity with wording. Much of the hullaballo about Pluto stems from the number of people, astronomer and layperson alike, that were just used to thinking of it as a planet all this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that this conflagration of designations may make initial discussions harder but might actually help Astronomy as a study. Since most objects in the sky don&#8217;t have conversational names like &#8220;Crab Nebula,&#8221; &#8220;Horse Head Nebula&#8221; or &#8220;Andromeda Galaxy&#8221; the myriad numbering systems could prevent researchers from making assumptions about the object before reading findings and conclusions about that object. We do all make certain assumptions based on our familiarity with wording. Much of the hullaballo about Pluto stems from the number of people, astronomer and layperson alike, that were just used to thinking of it as a planet all this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-32973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/03/18/q-and-ba-episode-7-by-any-other-name/#comment-32973</guid>
		<description>Well, with astronomy the challenge is probably the inability to categorize objects consistently. With biology, we could probably set up a statistical rubric for DNA or Biochemical composition for classification. Life is rarely amorphous, it has to fit a set of criteria just to function as a living thing. The only requirement for something to be astronomical is that it just has to be in space (i.e. really really high, Tom Leary probably counted for God&#039;s sake!) So EVERYTHING gets classified, and unfortunately, EVERYTHING moves. Take the Tunguska NEO, we&#039;re not sure whether it was an asteroid or a comet, though the &quot;History&quot; Channel is sure it was a Russian Roswell.

My point is that if we create a singular unified classification system, we&#039;re going to encounter something that won&#039;t fit. Could you imagine if we could somehow use a magical tooth fairy to detect dark matter and it flows in streams like water and does have an unforeseen effect on the universe  (It may as well, since we don&#039;t really know that much), then we&#039;ll need to map that too, and either change the system, or create yet another system. Ta-Da! We&#039;re back to square one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, with astronomy the challenge is probably the inability to categorize objects consistently. With biology, we could probably set up a statistical rubric for DNA or Biochemical composition for classification. Life is rarely amorphous, it has to fit a set of criteria just to function as a living thing. The only requirement for something to be astronomical is that it just has to be in space (i.e. really really high, Tom Leary probably counted for God&#8217;s sake!) So EVERYTHING gets classified, and unfortunately, EVERYTHING moves. Take the Tunguska NEO, we&#8217;re not sure whether it was an asteroid or a comet, though the &#8220;History&#8221; Channel is sure it was a Russian Roswell.</p>
<p>My point is that if we create a singular unified classification system, we&#8217;re going to encounter something that won&#8217;t fit. Could you imagine if we could somehow use a magical tooth fairy to detect dark matter and it flows in streams like water and does have an unforeseen effect on the universe  (It may as well, since we don&#8217;t really know that much), then we&#8217;ll need to map that too, and either change the system, or create yet another system. Ta-Da! We&#8217;re back to square one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 18:19:59 -->
