DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Deutsch testified before Congress
Take down of a wootritionist »

BREAKING: SpaceX to launch Falcon 1 (maybe) at 4:45 Pacific time

Update (4:48 Pacific time) The launch was scrubbed. I’m not sure why, and the new target launch date/time but when I find out I’ll post more.

I dropped by the SpaceX site to see what’s what, and as I write this they are planning to launch the Falcon 1 at 4:00 4:45 Pacific time! They also have a link to the live webcast of the launch on their front page, and something weird is going on though: it says the time is T+29 minutes (or possibly seconds; the countdown clock units are not labeled), yet the rocket is sitting right there on the pad. It looks windy, too, so they may have to postpone. Stay Tuned! Update: I complained to my sooper sekrit source inside SpaceX, and the clock is now working. T-18 minutes as I write this!

Share

March 19th, 2007 2:59 PM by Phil Plait in Cool stuff, Science | 25 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

25 Responses to “BREAKING: SpaceX to launch Falcon 1 (maybe) at 4:45 Pacific time”

  1. 1.   bearcub Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    They just posted a 4:45 (Pacific) launch time on the updates page.

    [URL]http://www.spacex.com/updates.php#demoflight_2_launch_update_8[\URL]

  2. 2.   bearcub Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Fracking tags! :)

  3. 3.   TAW Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    woot! sometimes it does pay being a compulsive favorites clicker :D

  4. 4.   wailashi Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    The countdown just started.

  5. 5.   Kurt Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    T -3:30!

  6. 6.   Arto Bendiken Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:54 pm

    Watching it here from Spain – T-3min now, ignition enabled :-)

  7. 7.   Kurt Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    Launch aborted?

  8. 8.   wailashi Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    Abort!!

  9. 9.   TAW Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Oh no! what happened? I have no clue what they’re saying, does anyone?

  10. 10.   wailashi Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    It seemed it was going well and the they aborted.

  11. 11.   bearcub Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    I had my boss come over and I missed the call. Did anyone catch the reason?

  12. 12.   TAW Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 4:06 pm

    lol, it seems even they don’t know. woman said something to the effect of: we’re going to take the next 10 minutes to asses why we aborted during the terminal countdown.

  13. 13.   Walter Brameld IV Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    Scrubbed for the day :(

  14. 14.   TAW Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    scrubbed for the day. Darn.

  15. 15.   rachel Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    Aww, aborted. Too bad.

  16. 16.   bearcub Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    Oh well, it was interesting while it lasted. Sounds like 24 to 48 hours before we’ll know more.

  17. 17.   Mori Says:
    March 19th, 2007 at 11:54 pm

    Theory is the data link went down when they switched from the land line to RF comms at about T- 1:30. They’d been having considerable problems with the landline comms earlier which was why the launch got delayed for 45 minutes.

    Disregarding my disappointment, I find it vaguely amusing that the company founded by an internet tycoon is having persistent connectivity problems ;)

  18. 18.   icemith Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 12:10 am

    BA, could you please share with us, the Universal times at least. Some of us live in other regions of the world, but we are just as interested in the launches etc.

    Just having the time as 4:45 (even Pacific Time) does not convey whether it is daytime or nightime. We, around the world, then have to add or subtract hours to have some idea of the actual time of the event. So could you Zulu it, and we can all work off the same page? Pretty Please?

    But we still appreciate that you do keep us up to date with these events, just would like to see it as it happens if possible. And we do have to sleep sometimes, even if the rest of the world is happening.

    Ivan.

  19. 19.   MKR Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 7:50 am

    And maybe ask them to provide the feed in a format that I can actually use? :(

    It’s disheartening that a company that seems so progressive has completely ignored Linux users. :\

  20. 20.   almurray1958 Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 9:04 am

    reason: s/w simulation did NOT take into account the real h/w takes some time to switch from one mode to another.

    S/w =
    1) mode 1 (land line)
    2) switch from mode 1 to mode 2 (RF)
    3) check: if we are i nmode 2 then continue
    if nOT: then ABORT

    should have been
    1) mode 1
    2) switch fro mmode 1 to mode 2
    3) wait (reasonable amount of time)
    4) Check.

    this is a basic s/w test scenario. Sad that SpaceX missed it

  21. 21.   bearcub Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 9:07 am

    The latest updates indicates that the software did not account for the minor delay, due to hardware, when they switched to radio telemetry.

    They’re going to try again for a launch today at 16:00 (Pacific), That should be 23:00 UTC.

    Explanation on the SpaceX web page.

  22. 22.   Walter Brameld IV Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 9:36 am

    MKR, I run Linux and I was able to view the video feed. Have you tried using vlc?

  23. 23.   MKR Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 10:33 am

    Walter, I didn’t think about using VLC to view it until after I posted that. :P

    The link has vanished from the site, but I’m assuming they’ll post an update once they’re ready to try again.

  24. 24.   wailashi Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 11:44 am

    MKR, it’s a windows media feed, so I think you need the w32codecs.

  25. 25.   bearcub Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 2:44 pm

    For those still following this. The launch has been pushed back an hour and five minutes.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us