<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A hex on Saturn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Allen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-133821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-133821</guid>
		<description>Following on the discussion and the question of &quot;walls&quot; to the container.

I think we&#039;d find that a combination of gravity and pressure produce a very nice &quot;virtual&quot; container.  In stead of thinking of the atmosphere pressing against the planet surface as a limit, think instead of gravity and the volume of atmosphere as producing a shell instead.  In fact, you could consider it in terms of three rotations.  1) that of the planet surface  2) the different rotation rate of gas moving around the same axis of rotation and 3) the effectively &quot;non-rotating&quot; limit presented by attenuation of atmosphere and Saturn&#039;s gravity.

Might be an opportunity for some fluid physicist to see what patterns emerge in a fluid when you have a sphere rotating within a second sphere, with the fluid sandwiched between them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following on the discussion and the question of &#8220;walls&#8221; to the container.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;d find that a combination of gravity and pressure produce a very nice &#8220;virtual&#8221; container.  In stead of thinking of the atmosphere pressing against the planet surface as a limit, think instead of gravity and the volume of atmosphere as producing a shell instead.  In fact, you could consider it in terms of three rotations.  1) that of the planet surface  2) the different rotation rate of gas moving around the same axis of rotation and 3) the effectively &#8220;non-rotating&#8221; limit presented by attenuation of atmosphere and Saturn&#8217;s gravity.</p>
<p>Might be an opportunity for some fluid physicist to see what patterns emerge in a fluid when you have a sphere rotating within a second sphere, with the fluid sandwiched between them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-100409</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-100409</guid>
		<description>The article: “Saturn&#039;s north polar hexagon” Mar. 28, 2007, by Emily Lakdawalla, in The Planetary Society Weblog, and the comment by DoctorAtlantis [May 28th, 2008 at 5:10 pm] in Blogs/Bad Astronomy (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/) require clarifications. Richard Hendricks, a space enthusiast, pointed out in Emily’s article an arXiv paper, published in 2006, titled &quot;Polygons on a Rotating Fluid Surface&quot;, by Thomas Jansson et al. This paper was the precursor of a subsequent article that appeared in Physical Review Letters [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 2006, 174502] by the same authors: http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&amp;id=PRLTAO000096000017174502000001&amp;idtype=cvips&amp;gifs=yes. The erratum that accompanies the previously mentioned paper clarifies DoctorAtlantis’s comment.

Emily’s hesitation whether or not the bucket experiments is applicable to Saturn’s stable hexagon because the planet “has no edges” can be argued as follows. The first to study mathematically the problem with an arbitrary number of polygon sides was J.J. Thomson [Treatise on Vortex Rings (Macmillan, London, 1883), p. 94]. Havelock [Philos. Mag. 11, 1931, 617] generalized Thomson’s treatment including also (among other things) an external confining wall. His analytical results indicated that besides the heptagon (N = 7), an external retaining wall is not expected to change the &#039;quality&#039; of the rest of the N-gons. Furthermore, based on the work of Polvani et al. [J. Fluid Mech. 255, 1993, 35-64] we can also conclude that the planetary curvature is not anticipated to affect the basic features of the event either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article: “Saturn&#8217;s north polar hexagon” Mar. 28, 2007, by Emily Lakdawalla, in The Planetary Society Weblog, and the comment by DoctorAtlantis [May 28th, 2008 at 5:10 pm] in Blogs/Bad Astronomy (<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/</a>) require clarifications. Richard Hendricks, a space enthusiast, pointed out in Emily’s article an arXiv paper, published in 2006, titled &#8220;Polygons on a Rotating Fluid Surface&#8221;, by Thomas Jansson et al. This paper was the precursor of a subsequent article that appeared in Physical Review Letters [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 2006, 174502] by the same authors: <a href="http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&#038;id=PRLTAO000096000017174502000001&#038;idtype=cvips&#038;gifs=yes" rel="nofollow">http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&#038;id=PRLTAO000096000017174502000001&#038;idtype=cvips&#038;gifs=yes</a>. The erratum that accompanies the previously mentioned paper clarifies DoctorAtlantis’s comment.</p>
<p>Emily’s hesitation whether or not the bucket experiments is applicable to Saturn’s stable hexagon because the planet “has no edges” can be argued as follows. The first to study mathematically the problem with an arbitrary number of polygon sides was J.J. Thomson [Treatise on Vortex Rings (Macmillan, London, 1883), p. 94]. Havelock [Philos. Mag. 11, 1931, 617] generalized Thomson’s treatment including also (among other things) an external confining wall. His analytical results indicated that besides the heptagon (N = 7), an external retaining wall is not expected to change the &#8216;quality&#8217; of the rest of the N-gons. Furthermore, based on the work of Polvani et al. [J. Fluid Mech. 255, 1993, 35-64] we can also conclude that the planetary curvature is not anticipated to affect the basic features of the event either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorAtlantis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33977</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorAtlantis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33977</guid>
		<description>Funny that Emily found a group doing that fluid theory study.  I just heard a different guy (Dr. Georgios Vatistas ) on CBC&#039;s Quirks and Quarks doing the same thing, finding stable geometric shapes in a fluid vortex, and he said he was merely validating the work of Nobel Prize winner J.J. Thomson.

But it certainly does seem like various pressure regions could serve the purpose of generating the same effects that a beaker-wall serves in the lab.

Or it&#039;s a very big Carbon molecule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that Emily found a group doing that fluid theory study.  I just heard a different guy (Dr. Georgios Vatistas ) on CBC&#8217;s Quirks and Quarks doing the same thing, finding stable geometric shapes in a fluid vortex, and he said he was merely validating the work of Nobel Prize winner J.J. Thomson.</p>
<p>But it certainly does seem like various pressure regions could serve the purpose of generating the same effects that a beaker-wall serves in the lab.</p>
<p>Or it&#8217;s a very big Carbon molecule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McDade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McDade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33976</guid>
		<description>What a beautiful sight! We will continue to discover amazing things as we continue our exploration of space. I can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a beautiful sight! We will continue to discover amazing things as we continue our exploration of space. I can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceticismoaberto.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; O Grande Hex&#225;gono de Saturno</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33975</link>
		<dc:creator>ceticismoaberto.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; O Grande Hex&#225;gono de Saturno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33975</guid>
		<description>[...] Saturno n&#227;o &#233; um cilindro com um fundo girat&#243;rio, e seus gases n&#227;o s&#227;o l&#237;quidos, mas o trabalho de Hendricks mostra que fluidos rotat&#243;rios podem sim produzir pol&#237;gonos regulares de forma espont&#226;nea nas condi&#231;&#245;es adequadas. Como exatamente isto ocorre em Saturno parece assim um mist&#233;rio especial sol&#250;vel atrav&#233;s da explora&#231;&#227;o espacial. [via The Planetary Society blog, do qual este post &#233; um pl&#225;gio, visto no Bad Astronomy blog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saturno n&atilde;o &eacute; um cilindro com um fundo girat&oacute;rio, e seus gases n&atilde;o s&atilde;o l&iacute;quidos, mas o trabalho de Hendricks mostra que fluidos rotat&oacute;rios podem sim produzir pol&iacute;gonos regulares de forma espont&acirc;nea nas condi&ccedil;&otilde;es adequadas. Como exatamente isto ocorre em Saturno parece assim um mist&eacute;rio especial sol&uacute;vel atrav&eacute;s da explora&ccedil;&atilde;o espacial. [via The Planetary Society blog, do qual este post &eacute; um pl&aacute;gio, visto no Bad Astronomy blog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tormenta hexagonal en Saturno &#171; Un pequeÃ±o paso para Neil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33974</link>
		<dc:creator>Tormenta hexagonal en Saturno &#171; Un pequeÃ±o paso para Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 10:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33974</guid>
		<description>[...] Tormenta hexagonal en&#160;Saturno 8 abril 2007 Posted by Javier ArÃ¡ntegui in Espacio, Humor. trackback  Hace unos dÃ­as apareciÃ³ en todas partes la imagen de una gigantesca tormenta hexagonal en el polo norte de Saturno: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tormenta hexagonal en&nbsp;Saturno 8 abril 2007 Posted by Javier ArÃ¡ntegui in Espacio, Humor. trackback  Hace unos dÃ­as apareciÃ³ en todas partes la imagen de una gigantesca tormenta hexagonal en el polo norte de Saturno: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33973</link>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33973</guid>
		<description>Josie Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 1:34 pm
I always think itâ€™s funny when people see something with angles, and assume it has to be â€˜unnaturalâ€™ in some way. Havenâ€™t these people ever looked at a beeâ€™s hive, or a sunflower?

I wonder what it is about our brains that assume things like that have to be messed with by something outside natural forces?

Well, Saturn is a gas planet, You would expect gas plantets to have a swirl. Yes, A lot of things in nature are geometric, I agree, but in this particular case, it is interesting, because it has been going on for a while(I think at least 30 years) and it&#039;s on a different planet made of gases</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josie Says:<br />
April 3rd, 2007 at 1:34 pm<br />
I always think itâ€™s funny when people see something with angles, and assume it has to be â€˜unnaturalâ€™ in some way. Havenâ€™t these people ever looked at a beeâ€™s hive, or a sunflower?</p>
<p>I wonder what it is about our brains that assume things like that have to be messed with by something outside natural forces?</p>
<p>Well, Saturn is a gas planet, You would expect gas plantets to have a swirl. Yes, A lot of things in nature are geometric, I agree, but in this particular case, it is interesting, because it has been going on for a while(I think at least 30 years) and it&#8217;s on a different planet made of gases</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33972</link>
		<dc:creator>Spook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33972</guid>
		<description>The hexagon is pretty neat on it&#039;s own, but if you want a real circus sideshow, you&#039;ve got to hear Hoagland&#039;s downright wacky ranting on the subject.  NASA doesn&#039;t know what it is, but Hoagland just jumps out there and says that it&#039;s free energy from another plane.  What a kook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hexagon is pretty neat on it&#8217;s own, but if you want a real circus sideshow, you&#8217;ve got to hear Hoagland&#8217;s downright wacky ranting on the subject.  NASA doesn&#8217;t know what it is, but Hoagland just jumps out there and says that it&#8217;s free energy from another plane.  What a kook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33971</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33971</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s obviously a distress signal from the crashed Zetan spacecraft under the south pole of Enceladus (it isn&#039;t tidal forces driving the geysers, its the decay of radioactive elements in the hyperdrive).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s obviously a distress signal from the crashed Zetan spacecraft under the south pole of Enceladus (it isn&#8217;t tidal forces driving the geysers, its the decay of radioactive elements in the hyperdrive).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth and the Devil &#187; Saturn&#8217;s mysterious hexagon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33970</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth and the Devil &#187; Saturn&#8217;s mysterious hexagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33970</guid>
		<description>[...] (via Bad Astronomy) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via Bad Astronomy) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tukla in Iowa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33969</link>
		<dc:creator>Tukla in Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33969</guid>
		<description>At least it&#039;s not an inverted pentagram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it&#8217;s not an inverted pentagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HenrikOlsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33968</link>
		<dc:creator>HenrikOlsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33968</guid>
		<description>Emily&#039;s blog ends with a comment that the experiment isn&#039;t directly applicable, as the polygons in the experiments are caused by interference between the stationary walls and the rotating plate.
From what I remember, Saturn&#039;s atmosphere rotates at different speeds at different latitudes so there will still be a shear effect, so I think it&#039;s applicable, though probably with some modifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily&#8217;s blog ends with a comment that the experiment isn&#8217;t directly applicable, as the polygons in the experiments are caused by interference between the stationary walls and the rotating plate.<br />
From what I remember, Saturn&#8217;s atmosphere rotates at different speeds at different latitudes so there will still be a shear effect, so I think it&#8217;s applicable, though probably with some modifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dengler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33967</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dengler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33967</guid>
		<description>Oops! I mean &quot;million&quot; in the last post, not &quot;billion&quot;. The numerical values were right, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I mean &#8220;million&#8221; in the last post, not &#8220;billion&#8221;. The numerical values were right, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dengler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33966</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dengler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33966</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia, &quot;the straight sides of the northern polar hexagon are each about 13,800 kilometers long.&quot;

By my calculations, that makes the area of the hex a little under 500 billion kmÂ². (494,777,633.69 kmÂ²)

Which makes it... almost exactly the same size as the surface area of the Earth, at 510,065,600 kmÂ². (Just 3% variance.)

Pretty cool coincidence! (Unless my math is wrong...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia, &#8220;the straight sides of the northern polar hexagon are each about 13,800 kilometers long.&#8221;</p>
<p>By my calculations, that makes the area of the hex a little under 500 billion kmÂ². (494,777,633.69 kmÂ²)</p>
<p>Which makes it&#8230; almost exactly the same size as the surface area of the Earth, at 510,065,600 kmÂ². (Just 3% variance.)</p>
<p>Pretty cool coincidence! (Unless my math is wrong&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33965</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33965</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget Earth still generates its own internal heat via a process of fissioning of heavy elements. We don&#039;t know the composition of the core of Jupiter, but I expect it has a number of heavy elements collected way down deep.
Well, someday we may know for sure,,,

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget Earth still generates its own internal heat via a process of fissioning of heavy elements. We don&#8217;t know the composition of the core of Jupiter, but I expect it has a number of heavy elements collected way down deep.<br />
Well, someday we may know for sure,,,</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33964</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33964</guid>
		<description>Awesome, maybe pointing this out in geometry class will get me brownie points?  :)

I do love posts like this - things I wouldn&#039;t have come across on my own but that are fascinating to me.

It&#039;ll be interesting to see if it&#039;s still there in another 20 or so years... when it was noticed in &#039;80 and &#039;81, was it the same season at Saturn&#039;s north pole?  I would think that if it was noticed in different seasons, that would support a conjecture that it&#039;s always there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, maybe pointing this out in geometry class will get me brownie points?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I do love posts like this &#8211; things I wouldn&#8217;t have come across on my own but that are fascinating to me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if it&#8217;s still there in another 20 or so years&#8230; when it was noticed in &#8217;80 and &#8217;81, was it the same season at Saturn&#8217;s north pole?  I would think that if it was noticed in different seasons, that would support a conjecture that it&#8217;s always there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aiabx</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33957</link>
		<dc:creator>aiabx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33957</guid>
		<description>To me, this is incontrovertible proof that God did not create the universe.
He bought it at Ikea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, this is incontrovertible proof that God did not create the universe.<br />
He bought it at Ikea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerald miller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33959</link>
		<dc:creator>gerald miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33959</guid>
		<description>&quot;Old Hoagieâ€™s getting excited with â€œMajor Paper to be Published Soonâ€ posted on his website. &quot;

Yes it oviously something sinister about to happen. Always nice to hear from the
CtC science advisor.

Ger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Old Hoagieâ€™s getting excited with â€œMajor Paper to be Published Soonâ€ posted on his website. &#8221;</p>
<p>Yes it oviously something sinister about to happen. Always nice to hear from the<br />
CtC science advisor.</p>
<p>Ger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RapidEye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33960</link>
		<dc:creator>RapidEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33960</guid>
		<description>I though it was the head of the big bolt that is holding Saturn together!
Can you imagine the size of the socket wrench?!?!  =-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I though it was the head of the big bolt that is holding Saturn together!<br />
Can you imagine the size of the socket wrench?!?!  =-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33962</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33962</guid>
		<description>Thomas - The Sun, without fusion to keep it warm would cool off much more quickly than Jupiter or Saturn because objects radiate heat proportional to the
4th power of their temperature (the Stefan-Boltzmann Law), and the Sun is about 30 times as hot as they are.

As the Sun cools off, it would radiate less, and so takes longer to cool off more.  Once if got down to Jupiter&#039;s temperature, it would take just as long to cool further.  In fact, it would take an infinite amount of time to reach absolute 0, just like any other body.  (This doesn&#039;t happen in real life because any object is exposed to external heat, such as Jupiter and Saturn being warmed by the Sun in addition to their residual internal heat of formation, which makes computing their temperature as a function of time more complicated.)

I think when people say &quot;Without internal fusion (or some other energy source) to keep it warm, the Sun would cool off in a million years&quot;,  they mean &quot;cool off to room temperature&quot;.  It wouldn&#039;t stop there, though.  It would keep cooling off (at a slower and slower rate) forever.  Jupiter and Saturn are already well below room temperature (after 4 billion years) and are continuing to cool.  (Actually, Jupiter is.  I&#039;m not sure about whether Saturn is still cooling off or if it has reached equilibrium.  I could look it up, but I&#039;ve already googled one thing for this post (couldn&#039;t remember the name of the Stefan-Boltzmann law), and that&#039;s enough for one day :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas &#8211; The Sun, without fusion to keep it warm would cool off much more quickly than Jupiter or Saturn because objects radiate heat proportional to the<br />
4th power of their temperature (the Stefan-Boltzmann Law), and the Sun is about 30 times as hot as they are.</p>
<p>As the Sun cools off, it would radiate less, and so takes longer to cool off more.  Once if got down to Jupiter&#8217;s temperature, it would take just as long to cool further.  In fact, it would take an infinite amount of time to reach absolute 0, just like any other body.  (This doesn&#8217;t happen in real life because any object is exposed to external heat, such as Jupiter and Saturn being warmed by the Sun in addition to their residual internal heat of formation, which makes computing their temperature as a function of time more complicated.)</p>
<p>I think when people say &#8220;Without internal fusion (or some other energy source) to keep it warm, the Sun would cool off in a million years&#8221;,  they mean &#8220;cool off to room temperature&#8221;.  It wouldn&#8217;t stop there, though.  It would keep cooling off (at a slower and slower rate) forever.  Jupiter and Saturn are already well below room temperature (after 4 billion years) and are continuing to cool.  (Actually, Jupiter is.  I&#8217;m not sure about whether Saturn is still cooling off or if it has reached equilibrium.  I could look it up, but I&#8217;ve already googled one thing for this post (couldn&#8217;t remember the name of the Stefan-Boltzmann law), and that&#8217;s enough for one day <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33963</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33963</guid>
		<description>thanks all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33961</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33961</guid>
		<description>Grr, I wish this blog had a preview function...
Anyway, &quot;this;ll&quot; should have read &quot;this&#039;ll&quot; in case it wasn&#039;t obvious.

Also, you may wish to scroll up &amp; down the page I linked to for other planets &amp; moons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grr, I wish this blog had a preview function&#8230;<br />
Anyway, &#8220;this;ll&#8221; should have read &#8220;this&#8217;ll&#8221; in case it wasn&#8217;t obvious.</p>
<p>Also, you may wish to scroll up &amp; down the page I linked to for other planets &amp; moons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33958</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33958</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know if this;ll help, Evolving Squid, but here are some handy, basic PDFs you might be interested in. http://www.eso.org/outreach/eduoff/edu-materials/info-solsys/eng/index.html#jupiter-eng</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if this;ll help, Evolving Squid, but here are some handy, basic PDFs you might be interested in. <a href="http://www.eso.org/outreach/eduoff/edu-materials/info-solsys/eng/index.html#jupiter-eng" rel="nofollow">http://www.eso.org/outreach/eduoff/edu-materials/info-solsys/eng/index.html#jupiter-eng</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33956</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 03:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33956</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the messy link above. &lt;b&gt;Evolving Squid&lt;/b&gt;, do a Google image search with &quot;cutaway,&quot; too. Like this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=jupiter%20cutaway%20jpl&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jupiter and moons&lt;/a&gt;. Then do the same for Saturn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the messy link above. <b>Evolving Squid</b>, do a Google image search with &#8220;cutaway,&#8221; too. Like this: <a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=jupiter%20cutaway%20jpl&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi" rel="nofollow">Jupiter and moons</a>. Then do the same for Saturn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-33955</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/03/a-hex-on-saturn/#comment-33955</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Evolving Squid&lt;/b&gt;, do a Google image search for &quot;Jupiter schematic&quot; or &quot;Saturn schematic.&quot; There are lots. NASA has both.

Here&#039;s an example of Jupiter: http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/jupiter/images/interior_image.html&amp;edu=elem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Evolving Squid</b>, do a Google image search for &#8220;Jupiter schematic&#8221; or &#8220;Saturn schematic.&#8221; There are lots. NASA has both.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of Jupiter: <a href="http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/jupiter/images/interior_image.html&#038;edu=elem" rel="nofollow">http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/jupiter/images/interior_image.html&#038;edu=elem</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 12:22:42 -->
