<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illinois meteoritewrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Raine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34171</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Raine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34171</guid>
		<description>Did  ABR saysomething about an accomplice in the woodchipper ... OUCH!

Not to mention ... mess-ssy! ;-)

 Plus, umm .. Phil .. don&#039;t you write for &#039;Astronomy&#039; magazine sometimes? Not sure why you&#039;d knock them then ... Okay they&#039;re not the &#039;Washington Post&#039; but then I don&#039;t think there&#039; that kind of magazine /newspaper ... More artic les and science essays &amp; news releases than investigative journalism and fast-breaking news.

Personally, I prefer &#039;Sky &amp; Space&#039; but then considering *I* write for them  I&#039;m biased there! Not that my writing for &#039;em should put anyone off I hasten to add - I&#039;m all astronomy in that and no politics folks! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did  ABR saysomething about an accomplice in the woodchipper &#8230; OUCH!</p>
<p>Not to mention &#8230; mess-ssy! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p> Plus, umm .. Phil .. don&#8217;t you write for &#8216;Astronomy&#8217; magazine sometimes? Not sure why you&#8217;d knock them then &#8230; Okay they&#8217;re not the &#8216;Washington Post&#8217; but then I don&#8217;t think there&#8217; that kind of magazine /newspaper &#8230; More artic les and science essays &amp; news releases than investigative journalism and fast-breaking news.</p>
<p>Personally, I prefer &#8216;Sky &amp; Space&#8217; but then considering *I* write for them  I&#8217;m biased there! Not that my writing for &#8216;em should put anyone off I hasten to add &#8211; I&#8217;m all astronomy in that and no politics folks! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drbuzz0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34170</link>
		<dc:creator>drbuzz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34170</guid>
		<description>You know... this is way too good a story to let the facts get in the way of.   If I had a meteorite hit my house.... but then turn out to not be a meteorite and not very interesting.... I think I&#039;d hold onto the story.   And also pick up a real one on ebay to pass off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know&#8230; this is way too good a story to let the facts get in the way of.   If I had a meteorite hit my house&#8230;. but then turn out to not be a meteorite and not very interesting&#8230;. I think I&#8217;d hold onto the story.   And also pick up a real one on ebay to pass off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennyMo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34169</link>
		<dc:creator>DennyMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34169</guid>
		<description>http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;id=5264
I love the &quot;Anybody know a good lawyer?&quot; bit.  Hey, my uncle&#039;s a lawyer in that part of the world.  Hmm.  At least we can all agree that it was a UFO...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&#038;id=5264" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&#038;id=5264</a><br />
I love the &#8220;Anybody know a good lawyer?&#8221; bit.  Hey, my uncle&#8217;s a lawyer in that part of the world.  Hmm.  At least we can all agree that it was a UFO&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drbuzz0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34168</link>
		<dc:creator>drbuzz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34168</guid>
		<description>I really hope that with the aid of x-ray florescence, neutron activation, electron scatter, electron spin resonance, microscopic analysis, ultrasonic imaging, ion counting, mass spectrography, polarized light imaging, laser spectroscopy and all sorts of other expensive tests we may finally be able to put the whole chunk of steal/meteorite mystery to rest.   Or at the very least... have some idea which is the more likely candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that with the aid of x-ray florescence, neutron activation, electron scatter, electron spin resonance, microscopic analysis, ultrasonic imaging, ion counting, mass spectrography, polarized light imaging, laser spectroscopy and all sorts of other expensive tests we may finally be able to put the whole chunk of steal/meteorite mystery to rest.   Or at the very least&#8230; have some idea which is the more likely candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34167</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 08:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34167</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;it may have been a chunk of steel from a wood chipper.

Wow.

How did a chunk of steel from a wood chipper get out into space?

...

(crickets)


I&#039;ll go now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;it may have been a chunk of steel from a wood chipper.</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>How did a chunk of steel from a wood chipper get out into space?</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>(crickets)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34166</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 07:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34166</guid>
		<description>From prior pictures it looked about the size of a deck of cards.

If the chipper pitched it mostly straight up (say around 80 degrees), it would have a fairly steep reentry angle. Not sure how high a wood chipper can through a card-deck-sized chunk of steel.

A Phil, what do you mean you want to see the explanation?  Their saying so isn&#039;t justification enough? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From prior pictures it looked about the size of a deck of cards.</p>
<p>If the chipper pitched it mostly straight up (say around 80 degrees), it would have a fairly steep reentry angle. Not sure how high a wood chipper can through a card-deck-sized chunk of steel.</p>
<p>A Phil, what do you mean you want to see the explanation?  Their saying so isn&#8217;t justification enough? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeMover</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34165</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeMover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 04:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34165</guid>
		<description>OK I&#039;m having a hard time getting a sense of size on this &quot;meterorwrong&quot;  Are there any pictures with it next to a rule for scale.  How much does this thing weigh??  The damage it did to the computer desk looks fairly small.  I guess the point I&#039;m trying to get too is how hard would the wood chipper have to have to still throw it 300 meters &amp; still have it come into the house at a &quot;steep&quot; angle.  300 meters is quite a distance to throw a chunk of metal.  I wish I could hit an aerodynamic light golf ball that far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I&#8217;m having a hard time getting a sense of size on this &#8220;meterorwrong&#8221;  Are there any pictures with it next to a rule for scale.  How much does this thing weigh??  The damage it did to the computer desk looks fairly small.  I guess the point I&#8217;m trying to get too is how hard would the wood chipper have to have to still throw it 300 meters &amp; still have it come into the house at a &#8220;steep&#8221; angle.  300 meters is quite a distance to throw a chunk of metal.  I wish I could hit an aerodynamic light golf ball that far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34164</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34164</guid>
		<description>In real life, unlike CSI, 99% of labs always are already busy doing something else when the evidence arrives...

&quot;But, I&#039;m in a hurry!&quot; &quot;M&#039;kay, tell that to the other 50 guys who&#039;ve been waiting their results for 6 months. See you in september if you&#039;re lucky...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In real life, unlike CSI, 99% of labs always are already busy doing something else when the evidence arrives&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;But, I&#8217;m in a hurry!&#8221; &#8220;M&#8217;kay, tell that to the other 50 guys who&#8217;ve been waiting their results for 6 months. See you in september if you&#8217;re lucky&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34163</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34163</guid>
		<description>Analyses STILL on the way?
How flipping hard is it to analyze a chunk of steel?

I mean, we can get faster analyses of the atmosphere of planets 200 light years away.

 Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analyses STILL on the way?<br />
How flipping hard is it to analyze a chunk of steel?</p>
<p>I mean, we can get faster analyses of the atmosphere of planets 200 light years away.</p>
<p> Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34162</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34162</guid>
		<description>Interesting development... I&#039;d love to hear what they find out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting development&#8230; I&#8217;d love to hear what they find out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34161</link>
		<dc:creator>ABR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 04:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34161</guid>
		<description>Both links sent me to the previous BA Blog entry for the &quot;meteorite&quot;. Does the Astronomy Magazine article suggest some sort of fraud? Was there an accomplice in the woodchipper? Or is Illinois not far enough North for that sort of thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both links sent me to the previous BA Blog entry for the &#8220;meteorite&#8221;. Does the Astronomy Magazine article suggest some sort of fraud? Was there an accomplice in the woodchipper? Or is Illinois not far enough North for that sort of thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Voisey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Voisey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34160</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we should just ask the Disco Institute to tell us if it&#039;s &quot;Intelligently Designed&quot; since they&#039;re &lt;i&gt;sooooo&lt;/i&gt; good at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we should just ask the Disco Institute to tell us if it&#8217;s &#8220;Intelligently Designed&#8221; since they&#8217;re <i>sooooo</i> good at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/comment-page-1/#comment-34159</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/04/06/illinois-meteoritewrong/#comment-34159</guid>
		<description>-We found a list of the bomber&#039;s plans at the scene.
                We analysed the paper.
              - And?
              -The paper is from Statesville Prison.
              - Are you sure?
              - Positive, the wood is from the rare Canary Island Pine.
                It only grows in Oregon.
                Contacting paper mills led us to a distribution centre in Tacoma.
                There the trail ended.
              - How did you trace it to Statesville?
              - The letterhead.

Naked Gun 33 1/3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-We found a list of the bomber&#8217;s plans at the scene.<br />
                We analysed the paper.<br />
              &#8211; And?<br />
              -The paper is from Statesville Prison.<br />
              &#8211; Are you sure?<br />
              &#8211; Positive, the wood is from the rare Canary Island Pine.<br />
                It only grows in Oregon.<br />
                Contacting paper mills led us to a distribution centre in Tacoma.<br />
                There the trail ended.<br />
              &#8211; How did you trace it to Statesville?<br />
              &#8211; The letterhead.</p>
<p>Naked Gun 33 1/3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 16:39:43 -->
