Comments on: Peer-reviewed creationist research? HAHAHAhahahahaha!

By: Phil Plait

Phil Plait — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:15:31 +0000

Dr. Tim (#64): You are incorrect; science is NOT faith based and is therefore not a religion.

By: Dr. Tim

Dr. Tim — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:05:13 +0000

Science, in all its might, is a religion.

The initial premise, that the world started with a bang is faith based.

I don’t really care who started what and when.

Just admit that scientific assumptions (the universe started x number of years ago) are based upon conjecture (guessing) and faith.

Science. The new religion. (Actually, one of the oldest religions)

By: Kmuzu

Kmuzu — Wed, 27 May 2009 18:29:22 +0000

I believe in the young earth model. Let’s see the Universe is about 15 billion years old and the earth is around 4 billion years old .. seems sorta young to me.

What’s all the fuss about?

Kmuzu – USA

By: Pierre

Pierre — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:41:59 +0000

I like how they are doing research to find correlations with the Bible. Even if it wasn’t on religious principles, it’d be biased “research” right from the beginning…

By: ldopa.net » archive » Man, I Love the Internet (Part 2 in a series)

ldopa.net » archive » Man, I Love the Internet (Part 2 in a series) — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:21:13 +0000

[...] a blog post about Creationists that don’t quite understand what science is but are claiming to use it) [...]

By: Sadistix

Sadistix — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:46:30 +0000

I’m sure the “peers” who review those research have to be Creationists themselves. If they’re going to keep the discussions amongst themselves and ignore counterarguments, what’s the point?

By: carlos

carlos — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:22:53 +0000

Only in US.