<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peer-reviewed creationist research? HAHAHAhahahahaha!</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kmuzu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-186391</link>
		<dc:creator>Kmuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-186391</guid>
		<description>I believe in the young earth model. Let's see the Universe is about 15 billion years old and the earth is around 4 billion years old .. seems sorta young to me. 

What's all the fuss about?

Kmuzu - USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in the young earth model. Let&#8217;s see the Universe is about 15 billion years old and the earth is around 4 billion years old .. seems sorta young to me. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s all the fuss about?</p>
<p>Kmuzu - USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-166073</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-166073</guid>
		<description>I like how they are doing research to find correlations with the Bible. Even if it wasn't on religious principles, it'd be biased "research" right from the beginning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how they are doing research to find correlations with the Bible. Even if it wasn&#8217;t on religious principles, it&#8217;d be biased &#8220;research&#8221; right from the beginning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ldopa.net &#187; archive &#187; Man, I Love the Internet (Part 2 in a series)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-166014</link>
		<dc:creator>ldopa.net &#187; archive &#187; Man, I Love the Internet (Part 2 in a series)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-166014</guid>
		<description>[...] a blog post about Creationists that don&#8217;t quite understand what science is but are claiming to use it) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a blog post about Creationists that don&#8217;t quite understand what science is but are claiming to use it) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadistix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-165597</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadistix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-165597</guid>
		<description>I'm sure the "peers" who review those research have to be Creationists themselves. If they're going to keep the discussions amongst themselves and ignore counterarguments, what's the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the &#8220;peers&#8221; who review those research have to be Creationists themselves. If they&#8217;re going to keep the discussions amongst themselves and ignore counterarguments, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-165591</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-165591</guid>
		<description>Only in US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only in US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creationist (heh) Master of Science (haha) degree (HAHAHAHAHA!) &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-165376</link>
		<dc:creator>Creationist (heh) Master of Science (haha) degree (HAHAHAHAHA!) &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-165376</guid>
		<description>[...] a wretched hive of scum and villainy &#8212; thinks that it&#8217;s doing science research (and boy is it not), and it&#8217;s not fair that they can&#8217;t grant science degrees! Now, this is not really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a wretched hive of scum and villainy &#8212; thinks that it&#8217;s doing science research (and boy is it not), and it&#8217;s not fair that they can&#8217;t grant science degrees! Now, this is not really [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate science: a Fundamentalist/creation science approach (update) - TheTokyoTominator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-35573</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate science: a Fundamentalist/creation science approach (update) - TheTokyoTominator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/#comment-35573</guid>
		<description>[...] http://scienceantiscience.blogspot.com/2007/02/institute-of-creation-research-launches.html http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/ 3. BYW, this was not a rhetorical question in my last comment to you: &#34;Austrians are compelled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://scienceantiscience.blogspot.com/2007/02/institute-of-creation-research-launches.html" rel="nofollow">http://scienceantiscience.blogspot.com/2007/02/institute-of-creation-research-launches.html</a> <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/" rel="nofollow">http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/05/01/peer-reviewed-creationist-research-hahahahahahahaha/</a> 3. BYW, this was not a rhetorical question in my last comment to you: &quot;Austrians are compelled [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
