DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« The Devil’s work
Star found, older than Abe Vigoda »

Remains to be seen

“The more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain.”

Remember I wrote a while back on how James Doohan (Star Trek’s Scotty) had some of his ashes launched on a suborbital rocket into space?

Well, it turns out that the payload is, um, missing. It fell in some difficult to reach terrain, evidently, and the rocket company, UP Aerospace, can’t find it. It’s in dense vegetation, and while they know where it is to within a few hundred meters, they’re having a hard time tracking it down (thought the article linked above implies there is a transmitter on the rocket payload which should make finding it a lot easier). They’ll try again next week, though it’s unclear why they’re waiting that long. The weather there looks pretty clear right now.

LiveScience.com has an earlier article about this, too. Not so incidentally, Mercury astronaut Gordon Cooper’s remains were on the payload, too.

Share

May 10th, 2007 7:33 PM by Phil Plait in Time Sink | 15 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

15 Responses to “Remains to be seen”

  1. 1.   BradC Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 8:02 pm

    So… they blasted the ashes up TOWARD space a little ways…. and then came back down.

    Jeesh. I’d be asking for my money back.

  2. 2.   Cosmic Log Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 8:12 pm

    Supernova nightmares…

    Some astronomers would be delighted if a super-bright supernova blast like the one reported this week were to occur in our own galaxy. One says it could be “the best star-show in the history of modern civilization.” But if the blast was pointed right…

  3. 3.   Cameron Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 8:34 pm

    Ouch! That’s gotta hurt!

  4. 4.   Christian Burnham Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 8:53 pm

    I think the BA’s got a pun in the oven.

  5. 5.   KingNor Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 10:15 pm

    i just don’t see why they couldn’t deposit the ashes in space, and let them disipate in the atmosphere, from that high up there’s no way they could pose any threat as a biohazard.

    or spend that money on charity.

  6. 6.   PK Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 10:53 pm

    Ashes do not form a biohazard anywhere, high or low. That’s the whole point of cremation.

  7. 7.   bassmanpete Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 1:44 am

    I’ve heard of talk to ban cremations in some European countries because of the mercury in dental fillings being released into the atmosphere.

  8. 8.   Jonathan Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 4:22 am

    I just know the Klingons are up to this…

  9. 9.   Tom Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 5:21 am

    If you read the LiveScience article, it mentions that high winds forced the team to abandon its search of the mountains until Monday, and that the radio transmissions were bouncing around and foiling a directional search.

  10. 10.   Michael H Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 5:46 am

    “Remains to be seen”
    LOL. It’s worth visiting this site just for the puns.

  11. 11.   Irishman Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 7:03 am

    I was wondering why Astrolink was posting a verbatim copy of your column. Then I figured out you posted it on Astrolink.

    BradC, there was some discussion of this earlier. The relatives who pay for the launch know what they are getting. Some fraction of the ashes make it briefly “into space”. They are then returned to the relative. Other packages (that cost more) put some ashes on a space satellite that orbits for a while doing some other science payload, and still other packages (that cost even more) put some ashes on a probe that goes out into the solar system or to another planet (like Gene Shoemaker).

    As for why, that’s a personal choice. The relatives feel it a tribute to their loved ones. How is that any different than scattering ashes at a favorite spot, or embalming and then sealing in an air-tight crypt?

    KingNor, you’re welcome to tell all your loved ones you’d rather have the money go to charity than to send your ashes into space. It’s not a choice I would make, but I can see how it could be meaningful to those family members, so worthwhile to them.

  12. 12.   kingNOR Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 7:23 am

    Irishman, you’re very right. Actually my real point is just that i dont’ see why the ashes had to be launched up in a tiny capsule only to fall back to earth where some guys pick it up and bring it back.

    If I were to want my ashes in space, i’d want them to stay in space… or at least have the ashes themselves exposed to space. I can see how it would be meaningful to them though.

    It’s just not what i’d want i guess.

  13. 13.   The Bad Astronomer Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 8:05 am

    Irishman, Astrolinks is actually some sort of news aggregator. It takes other peoples’ blog posts and collects them. A lot of sites do that.

    Tom, the LiveScience article is actually a week old, so I’m not sure if winds are still a problem there or not. But clearly finding this payload is hard for some reason; I can’t imagine the company wants publicity like this!

  14. 14.   Mytho Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 9:18 am

    I think that the capsule with the ashes is waiting for the “Genesis” efecto to take place, so Cpt Kirk woul come to retrieve a much younger version of Scotty.

    That’s gotta be… rrrright…

  15. 15.   Irishman Says:
    May 14th, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    kingNOR, I share your personal opinion as my own. The intent of this type profile is you get a portion flown in space and then returned to you, with a certificate of authenticity. Then you can proudly display them on the mantle, which many people do anyway. How is displaying space-flown ashes on the mantle any sillier than non-space-flown ashes? True, it might seem more fitting to release them into space, or send them on a probe like Voyager. But you get what you pay for (and what is available).

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us