<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remains to be seen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36076</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36076</guid>
		<description>kingNOR, I share your personal opinion as my own. The intent of this type profile is you get a portion flown in space and then returned to you, with a certificate of authenticity. Then you can proudly display them on the mantle, which many people do anyway.  How is displaying space-flown ashes on the mantle any sillier than non-space-flown ashes?  True, it might seem more fitting to release them into space, or send them on a probe like Voyager. But you get what you pay for (and what is available).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kingNOR, I share your personal opinion as my own. The intent of this type profile is you get a portion flown in space and then returned to you, with a certificate of authenticity. Then you can proudly display them on the mantle, which many people do anyway.  How is displaying space-flown ashes on the mantle any sillier than non-space-flown ashes?  True, it might seem more fitting to release them into space, or send them on a probe like Voyager. But you get what you pay for (and what is available).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mytho</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36075</link>
		<dc:creator>Mytho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36075</guid>
		<description>I think that the capsule with the ashes is waiting for the &quot;Genesis&quot; efecto to take place, so Cpt Kirk woul come to retrieve a much younger version of Scotty.

That&#039;s gotta be... rrrright...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the capsule with the ashes is waiting for the &#8220;Genesis&#8221; efecto to take place, so Cpt Kirk woul come to retrieve a much younger version of Scotty.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s gotta be&#8230; rrrright&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36074</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 16:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36074</guid>
		<description>Irishman, Astrolinks is actually some sort of news aggregator. It takes other peoples&#039; blog posts and collects them. A lot of sites do that.

Tom, the LiveScience article is actually a week old, so I&#039;m not sure if winds are still a problem there or not. But clearly finding this payload is hard for some reason; I can&#039;t imagine the company wants publicity like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irishman, Astrolinks is actually some sort of news aggregator. It takes other peoples&#8217; blog posts and collects them. A lot of sites do that.</p>
<p>Tom, the LiveScience article is actually a week old, so I&#8217;m not sure if winds are still a problem there or not. But clearly finding this payload is hard for some reason; I can&#8217;t imagine the company wants publicity like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingNOR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36073</link>
		<dc:creator>kingNOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36073</guid>
		<description>Irishman, you&#039;re very right.  Actually my real point is just that i dont&#039; see why the ashes had to be launched up in a tiny capsule only to fall back to earth where some guys pick it up and bring it back.

If I were to want my ashes in space, i&#039;d want them to stay in space... or at least have the ashes themselves exposed to space.  I can see how it would be meaningful to them though.

It&#039;s just not what i&#039;d want i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irishman, you&#8217;re very right.  Actually my real point is just that i dont&#8217; see why the ashes had to be launched up in a tiny capsule only to fall back to earth where some guys pick it up and bring it back.</p>
<p>If I were to want my ashes in space, i&#8217;d want them to stay in space&#8230; or at least have the ashes themselves exposed to space.  I can see how it would be meaningful to them though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just not what i&#8217;d want i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36072</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36072</guid>
		<description>I was wondering why Astrolink was posting a verbatim copy of your column. Then I figured out &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; posted it on Astrolink.

BradC, there was some discussion of this earlier.  The relatives who pay for the launch know what they are getting. Some fraction of the ashes make it briefly &quot;into space&quot;.  They are then returned to the relative.  Other packages (that cost more) put some ashes on a space satellite that orbits for a while doing some other science payload, and still other packages (that cost even more) put some ashes on a probe that goes out into the solar system or to another planet (like Gene Shoemaker).

As for why, that&#039;s a personal choice.  The relatives feel it a tribute to their loved ones.  How is that any different than scattering ashes at a favorite spot, or embalming and then sealing in an air-tight crypt?

KingNor, you&#039;re welcome to tell all &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; loved ones you&#039;d rather have the money go to charity than to send &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; ashes into space.  It&#039;s not a choice I would make, but I can see how it could be meaningful to those family members, so worthwhile to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering why Astrolink was posting a verbatim copy of your column. Then I figured out <i>you</i> posted it on Astrolink.</p>
<p>BradC, there was some discussion of this earlier.  The relatives who pay for the launch know what they are getting. Some fraction of the ashes make it briefly &#8220;into space&#8221;.  They are then returned to the relative.  Other packages (that cost more) put some ashes on a space satellite that orbits for a while doing some other science payload, and still other packages (that cost even more) put some ashes on a probe that goes out into the solar system or to another planet (like Gene Shoemaker).</p>
<p>As for why, that&#8217;s a personal choice.  The relatives feel it a tribute to their loved ones.  How is that any different than scattering ashes at a favorite spot, or embalming and then sealing in an air-tight crypt?</p>
<p>KingNor, you&#8217;re welcome to tell all <i>your</i> loved ones you&#8217;d rather have the money go to charity than to send <i>your</i> ashes into space.  It&#8217;s not a choice I would make, but I can see how it could be meaningful to those family members, so worthwhile to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36071</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36071</guid>
		<description>&quot;Remains to be seen&quot;
LOL. It&#039;s worth visiting this site just for the puns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remains to be seen&#8221;<br />
LOL. It&#8217;s worth visiting this site just for the puns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-36070</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/10/remains-to-be-seen/#comment-36070</guid>
		<description>If you read the LiveScience article, it mentions that high winds forced the team to abandon its search of the mountains until Monday, and that the radio transmissions were bouncing around and foiling a directional search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the LiveScience article, it mentions that high winds forced the team to abandon its search of the mountains until Monday, and that the radio transmissions were bouncing around and foiling a directional search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
