<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Exploration computer drawings!</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Capper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36780</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Capper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36780</guid>
		<description>Although a Pastafarian I do fear for our national icon, the New Zealand Kiwi (Apteryx), after reading the FSM Gospel. I hope NASA donâ€™t try the Kiwi Motivation Testâ€¦.

Save the Kiwi (Apteryx) from the Flying Spaghetti Monster Kiwi Motivation Test
http://rcd.typepad.com/personal/2007/05/save_the_kiwi_a.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although a Pastafarian I do fear for our national icon, the New Zealand Kiwi (Apteryx), after reading the FSM Gospel. I hope NASA donâ€™t try the Kiwi Motivation Testâ€¦.</p>
<p>Save the Kiwi (Apteryx) from the Flying Spaghetti Monster Kiwi Motivation Test<br />
<a href="http://rcd.typepad.com/personal/2007/05/save_the_kiwi_a.html" rel="nofollow">http://rcd.typepad.com/personal/2007/05/save_the_kiwi_a.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Linked by His Noodliness &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36779</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Linked by His Noodliness &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36779</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week I linked to some new NASA images of the Exploration vehicles, and commented how one looks like the Flying Spaghetti Monster&#8230; and now that post is linked from the FSM main page! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Last week I linked to some new NASA images of the Exploration vehicles, and commented how one looks like the Flying Spaghetti Monster&#8230; and now that post is linked from the FSM main page! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36778</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36778</guid>
		<description>Hmm...  If I remember correctly, a lot of the snarkieness of the original S.M. post wasn't actually BA's, but that of various other contributors jumping to false  conclusions based on little or no evidence.  Such as she probably wasn't wearing a  seatbelt, or alcohol or drugs or speeding may have been a factor or other such innuendo (turned out she was a passenger, not the driver.)

Now a bunch of people (the same ones?) are jumping to conclusions about BA's motivations for the SM fund.  How about applying a proper degree of skepticism and actually look at the evidence before drawing a conclusion?  Isn't that what this blog is all about?

To try to draw this whole diversion a little bit back towards the topic at hand, what about a decent health care system that covers people like Shannon so she   doesn't have to worry about funding her own surgery and rehab after surviving such a traumatic accident?  How many hospitals could the Constellation program fund?  And how many flights to the Moon or Mars could the war in Iraq fund?  (I personally feel that if we got our priorities straight, we could easily fund both health care and space exploration.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;  If I remember correctly, a lot of the snarkieness of the original S.M. post wasn&#8217;t actually BA&#8217;s, but that of various other contributors jumping to false  conclusions based on little or no evidence.  Such as she probably wasn&#8217;t wearing a  seatbelt, or alcohol or drugs or speeding may have been a factor or other such innuendo (turned out she was a passenger, not the driver.)</p>
<p>Now a bunch of people (the same ones?) are jumping to conclusions about BA&#8217;s motivations for the SM fund.  How about applying a proper degree of skepticism and actually look at the evidence before drawing a conclusion?  Isn&#8217;t that what this blog is all about?</p>
<p>To try to draw this whole diversion a little bit back towards the topic at hand, what about a decent health care system that covers people like Shannon so she   doesn&#8217;t have to worry about funding her own surgery and rehab after surviving such a traumatic accident?  How many hospitals could the Constellation program fund?  And how many flights to the Moon or Mars could the war in Iraq fund?  (I personally feel that if we got our priorities straight, we could easily fund both health care and space exploration.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA drawing resembles FSM at Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36777</link>
		<dc:creator>NASA drawing resembles FSM at Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36777</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait&#8217;s Bad Astronomy Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Phil Plait&#8217;s Bad Astronomy Blog [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Powell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36776</link>
		<dc:creator>John Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36776</guid>
		<description>NASA built it, now Doctor Octopus has to re-program it to hunt down that pesky Spider-Man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA built it, now Doctor Octopus has to re-program it to hunt down that pesky Spider-Man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Burnham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36775</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Burnham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36775</guid>
		<description>I'd like to point out that it would have been just as great to help Shannon out if she were a creationist Biblical literalist.

There should be no religious test for compassion.  Shannon's religious beliefs or lack thereof are of no importance whatsoever to her medical needs and should be of no concern to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to point out that it would have been just as great to help Shannon out if she were a creationist Biblical literalist.</p>
<p>There should be no religious test for compassion.  Shannon&#8217;s religious beliefs or lack thereof are of no importance whatsoever to her medical needs and should be of no concern to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36774</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 05:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/18/new-exploration-computer-drawings/#comment-36774</guid>
		<description>eewolf, you're pretty much much dead on target there. People do seem to be ascribing motivations to me that aren't there, or at least making assumptions that are unwarranted from the available evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eewolf, you&#8217;re pretty much much dead on target there. People do seem to be ascribing motivations to me that aren&#8217;t there, or at least making assumptions that are unwarranted from the available evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
