<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nu nu nu nu nu nu nu nu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:14:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36875</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 08:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36875</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Come on, MOST TV is crap&lt;/i&gt;

Interesting in a thread on SF that no one quoted Sturgeon&#039;s Law&quot;
90% of SF is crap, but then 90% of everything is crap

Though, remembering some more obscure SF on TV, I thing there&#039;s a mathematical increase in 90% and 90%....

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Come on, MOST TV is crap</i></p>
<p>Interesting in a thread on SF that no one quoted Sturgeon&#8217;s Law&#8221;<br />
90% of SF is crap, but then 90% of everything is crap</p>
<p>Though, remembering some more obscure SF on TV, I thing there&#8217;s a mathematical increase in 90% and 90%&#8230;.</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36874</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36874</guid>
		<description>My favorites are currently Star Gate 1, Atlantis, Heros, Battlestar Galactica, and Bones. Old favs: Firefly, Farscape, Star Trek Next Gen.,
SG1 is wrapping up, Atlantis MAY be able to continue the tradition. Heros is a tv version of a comic book(the tv version of Crow , with MArk Decoscos, was quite good as well). It&#039;s really obvious Hollywierd is in a declining creative flux. At least the comics are still doing well.

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorites are currently Star Gate 1, Atlantis, Heros, Battlestar Galactica, and Bones. Old favs: Firefly, Farscape, Star Trek Next Gen.,<br />
SG1 is wrapping up, Atlantis MAY be able to continue the tradition. Heros is a tv version of a comic book(the tv version of Crow , with MArk Decoscos, was quite good as well). It&#8217;s really obvious Hollywierd is in a declining creative flux. At least the comics are still doing well.</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36873</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36873</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And then they cancel Jericho *sigh*&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, they are considering doing a &#039;wrap up&#039; of the series
&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=1&amp;id=41591&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SciFi Wire&lt;/a&gt;

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And then they cancel Jericho *sigh*</i></p>
<p>Actually, they are considering doing a &#8216;wrap up&#8217; of the series<br />
<a HREF="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=1&amp;id=41591" rel="nofollow">SciFi Wire</a></p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36872</link>
		<dc:creator>flak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36872</guid>
		<description>Katee Sackhoff&#039;s in it? Well hell, now I have to give it a shot. She&#039;s my favorite actress on Battlestar Galactica, and with the good actors on that show that&#039;s saying something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katee Sackhoff&#8217;s in it? Well hell, now I have to give it a shot. She&#8217;s my favorite actress on Battlestar Galactica, and with the good actors on that show that&#8217;s saying something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36871</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36871</guid>
		<description>Katee Sackhoff - Battlestar Galactica&#039;s Starbuck - will have a recurring role as a baddie on the series.

We haven&#039;t come a long way, baby:

Jamie is now a hot bartender, with a rebellious younger deaf sister she is responsible for, and the doctor boyfriend. I guess the &#039;independent tennis pro&#039; doesn&#039;t go over as well with the Maxim crowd?

Nice photo of Katee though:
http://www.nbc.com/Fall_Preview/Bionic_Woman/photos.shtml?img=2#photos_sec</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katee Sackhoff &#8211; Battlestar Galactica&#8217;s Starbuck &#8211; will have a recurring role as a baddie on the series.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t come a long way, baby:</p>
<p>Jamie is now a hot bartender, with a rebellious younger deaf sister she is responsible for, and the doctor boyfriend. I guess the &#8216;independent tennis pro&#8217; doesn&#8217;t go over as well with the Maxim crowd?</p>
<p>Nice photo of Katee though:<br />
<a href="http://www.nbc.com/Fall_Preview/Bionic_Woman/photos.shtml?img=2#photos_sec" rel="nofollow">http://www.nbc.com/Fall_Preview/Bionic_Woman/photos.shtml?img=2#photos_sec</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36870</link>
		<dc:creator>JSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36870</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œThe Day the Earth Stood Stillâ€ is indeed a classic and I doubt a remake could offer anything to improve the original. However, this is not the best classic sci-fi movie ever made. I think Forbidden Planet is the best and if I ever hear about them attempting a remake of THAT, Iâ€™ll check out permanentlyâ€¦no really, Iâ€™ll just have to take the long journey into the dark chasm. That would be a complete disaster. Then again, if Peter Jackson gave it a go maybe it would be okâ€¦nope, not even then.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, there was that Forbidden Planet TV series that ran for a few years in the &#039;60s and was then revived in the &#039;80s. I&#039;m pretty sure they made a few movies based off of it, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>â€œThe Day the Earth Stood Stillâ€ is indeed a classic and I doubt a remake could offer anything to improve the original. However, this is not the best classic sci-fi movie ever made. I think Forbidden Planet is the best and if I ever hear about them attempting a remake of THAT, Iâ€™ll check out permanentlyâ€¦no really, Iâ€™ll just have to take the long journey into the dark chasm. That would be a complete disaster. Then again, if Peter Jackson gave it a go maybe it would be okâ€¦nope, not even then.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, there was that Forbidden Planet TV series that ran for a few years in the &#8217;60s and was then revived in the &#8217;80s. I&#8217;m pretty sure they made a few movies based off of it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrillTech</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/comment-page-1/#comment-36869</link>
		<dc:creator>GrillTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/05/21/nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu-nu/#comment-36869</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t put any hope in a Science Fiction show lasting on fox.  Firefly - Gone, Drive - Gone.  If Summer is going to be on fox again she might want to have a chat with Nathan Fillon about how safe it is as a career move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t put any hope in a Science Fiction show lasting on fox.  Firefly &#8211; Gone, Drive &#8211; Gone.  If Summer is going to be on fox again she might want to have a chat with Nathan Fillon about how safe it is as a career move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
