<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomers find most massive star ever discovered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:42:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-227218</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-227218</guid>
		<description>that was the BIGEST STAR I EVER SAW 



                                

                                    [-_-][-_-]:-] =-]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was the BIGEST STAR I EVER SAW </p>
<p>                                    [-_-][-_-]:-] =-]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-37873</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37873</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty massive star, but if 114 solar masses is the greatest mass known to this date, how many times the Sun&#039;s mass does LBV 1806-20 have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty massive star, but if 114 solar masses is the greatest mass known to this date, how many times the Sun&#8217;s mass does LBV 1806-20 have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-37872</link>
		<dc:creator>SCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37872</guid>
		<description>A bit late now but in case people check later ...

Frank Said : [On June 7th, 2007 at 8:07 am]
&quot;Any real possibility that these two stars could collide someday?&quot;

If their orbits decay quickly enough they may actually _merge_  forming a peanut shaped contact binary like W Ursae majoris or ER Vulpeculae forming an FK Comae Berenice type star with the combined masses of both stars ... !!

So 114 + 84 = A single 198 mass hypergiant --- WHOOOAAAA!!!!

That &#039;s assuming the fusion of the twain doesn&#039;t then blow itself apart having grossly exceeded the Eddington limit ... as would Isuppose probabaly happen -creating some sort of huge nebula or perhaps a supernova .. ??? Any modelling done yet on these stars evolution over time  ... ??

Eta Carinae, incidentally, was listed by James B. Kaler, a stellar expert  (author, Professor &amp; sometimes &#039;Astronomy&#039; magazine contributer)
as a binary with a 60 solarmass Wolf-Rayet star &amp; an 80 solar mass B0 blue hypergiant star orbiting each other every 5.6 years.

So &#039;Macz&#039; &amp; y&#039;all, Stellar mergers or collisions can and do happen   - with the provisio that this happens in binary and multiple stellar systems.

BTW. These must be astonishing super-luminous stars - any idea of th absolute Magnitudes (visual &amp; bolometric) and spectral types, folks?

Finally, is it true that there are no stars &quot;earlier&quot; than type O3 (ie no O0, O1, O2 stars) known? Could these be the first  examples ever found?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit late now but in case people check later &#8230;</p>
<p>Frank Said : [On June 7th, 2007 at 8:07 am]<br />
&#8220;Any real possibility that these two stars could collide someday?&#8221;</p>
<p>If their orbits decay quickly enough they may actually _merge_  forming a peanut shaped contact binary like W Ursae majoris or ER Vulpeculae forming an FK Comae Berenice type star with the combined masses of both stars &#8230; !!</p>
<p>So 114 + 84 = A single 198 mass hypergiant &#8212; WHOOOAAAA!!!!</p>
<p>That &#8217;s assuming the fusion of the twain doesn&#8217;t then blow itself apart having grossly exceeded the Eddington limit &#8230; as would Isuppose probabaly happen -creating some sort of huge nebula or perhaps a supernova .. ??? Any modelling done yet on these stars evolution over time  &#8230; ??</p>
<p>Eta Carinae, incidentally, was listed by James B. Kaler, a stellar expert  (author, Professor &amp; sometimes &#8216;Astronomy&#8217; magazine contributer)<br />
as a binary with a 60 solarmass Wolf-Rayet star &amp; an 80 solar mass B0 blue hypergiant star orbiting each other every 5.6 years.</p>
<p>So &#8216;Macz&#8217; &amp; y&#8217;all, Stellar mergers or collisions can and do happen   &#8211; with the provisio that this happens in binary and multiple stellar systems.</p>
<p>BTW. These must be astonishing super-luminous stars &#8211; any idea of th absolute Magnitudes (visual &amp; bolometric) and spectral types, folks?</p>
<p>Finally, is it true that there are no stars &#8220;earlier&#8221; than type O3 (ie no O0, O1, O2 stars) known? Could these be the first  examples ever found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Science Discoveries &#171; darwinian remiix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-37871</link>
		<dc:creator>New Science Discoveries &#171; darwinian remiix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37871</guid>
		<description>[...] Astronomers find most massive star ever discovered. 114 solar masses! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Astronomers find most massive star ever discovered. 114 solar masses! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-37870</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37870</guid>
		<description>Excellent entry, Phil! Nice to read REAL science admist all the creation nonsense.

I&#039;m also enlightened by the insight about star masses. I didn&#039;t know that Eta Car&#039;s mass wasn&#039;t actually confirmed like this star was. The same holds true for the Pistol star, I assume?

Well, even 114 solar masses is BIG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent entry, Phil! Nice to read REAL science admist all the creation nonsense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also enlightened by the insight about star masses. I didn&#8217;t know that Eta Car&#8217;s mass wasn&#8217;t actually confirmed like this star was. The same holds true for the Pistol star, I assume?</p>
<p>Well, even 114 solar masses is BIG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Double dipped supernova &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-37869</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Double dipped supernova &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37869</guid>
		<description>[...] Car is one of the most massive stars in the sky, and one of the most massive stars possible, in fact. But how common are objects like Eta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Car is one of the most massive stars in the sky, and one of the most massive stars possible, in fact. But how common are objects like Eta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Claude</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/comment-page-2/#comment-37868</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37868</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for such a wonderful, enlightening explanation of the findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for such a wonderful, enlightening explanation of the findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
