<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomers find most massive star ever discovered</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37873</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37873</guid>
		<description>That's a pretty massive star, but if 114 solar masses is the greatest mass known to this date, how many times the Sun's mass does LBV 1806-20 have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty massive star, but if 114 solar masses is the greatest mass known to this date, how many times the Sun&#8217;s mass does LBV 1806-20 have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37872</link>
		<dc:creator>SCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37872</guid>
		<description>A bit late now but in case people check later ...

Frank Said : [On June 7th, 2007 at 8:07 am]
"Any real possibility that these two stars could collide someday?"

If their orbits decay quickly enough they may actually _merge_  forming a peanut shaped contact binary like W Ursae majoris or ER Vulpeculae forming an FK Comae Berenice type star with the combined masses of both stars ... !!

So 114 + 84 = A single 198 mass hypergiant --- WHOOOAAAA!!!!

That 's assuming the fusion of the twain doesn't then blow itself apart having grossly exceeded the Eddington limit ... as would Isuppose probabaly happen -creating some sort of huge nebula or perhaps a supernova .. ??? Any modelling done yet on these stars evolution over time  ... ??

Eta Carinae, incidentally, was listed by James B. Kaler, a stellar expert  (author, Professor &#38; sometimes 'Astronomy' magazine contributer)
as a binary with a 60 solarmass Wolf-Rayet star &#38; an 80 solar mass B0 blue hypergiant star orbiting each other every 5.6 years.

So 'Macz' &#38; y'all, Stellar mergers or collisions can and do happen   - with the provisio that this happens in binary and multiple stellar systems.

BTW. These must be astonishing super-luminous stars - any idea of th absolute Magnitudes (visual &#38; bolometric) and spectral types, folks?

Finally, is it true that there are no stars "earlier" than type O3 (ie no O0, O1, O2 stars) known? Could these be the first  examples ever found?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit late now but in case people check later &#8230;</p>
<p>Frank Said : [On June 7th, 2007 at 8:07 am]<br />
&#8220;Any real possibility that these two stars could collide someday?&#8221;</p>
<p>If their orbits decay quickly enough they may actually _merge_  forming a peanut shaped contact binary like W Ursae majoris or ER Vulpeculae forming an FK Comae Berenice type star with the combined masses of both stars &#8230; !!</p>
<p>So 114 + 84 = A single 198 mass hypergiant &#8212; WHOOOAAAA!!!!</p>
<p>That &#8217;s assuming the fusion of the twain doesn&#8217;t then blow itself apart having grossly exceeded the Eddington limit &#8230; as would Isuppose probabaly happen -creating some sort of huge nebula or perhaps a supernova .. ??? Any modelling done yet on these stars evolution over time  &#8230; ??</p>
<p>Eta Carinae, incidentally, was listed by James B. Kaler, a stellar expert  (author, Professor &amp; sometimes &#8216;Astronomy&#8217; magazine contributer)<br />
as a binary with a 60 solarmass Wolf-Rayet star &amp; an 80 solar mass B0 blue hypergiant star orbiting each other every 5.6 years.</p>
<p>So &#8216;Macz&#8217; &amp; y&#8217;all, Stellar mergers or collisions can and do happen   - with the provisio that this happens in binary and multiple stellar systems.</p>
<p>BTW. These must be astonishing super-luminous stars - any idea of th absolute Magnitudes (visual &amp; bolometric) and spectral types, folks?</p>
<p>Finally, is it true that there are no stars &#8220;earlier&#8221; than type O3 (ie no O0, O1, O2 stars) known? Could these be the first  examples ever found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Science Discoveries &#171; darwinian remiix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37871</link>
		<dc:creator>New Science Discoveries &#171; darwinian remiix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37871</guid>
		<description>[...] Astronomers find most massive star ever discovered. 114 solar masses! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Astronomers find most massive star ever discovered. 114 solar masses! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37870</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37870</guid>
		<description>Excellent entry, Phil! Nice to read REAL science admist all the creation nonsense.

I'm also enlightened by the insight about star masses. I didn't know that Eta Car's mass wasn't actually confirmed like this star was. The same holds true for the Pistol star, I assume?

Well, even 114 solar masses is BIG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent entry, Phil! Nice to read REAL science admist all the creation nonsense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also enlightened by the insight about star masses. I didn&#8217;t know that Eta Car&#8217;s mass wasn&#8217;t actually confirmed like this star was. The same holds true for the Pistol star, I assume?</p>
<p>Well, even 114 solar masses is BIG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Double dipped supernova &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37869</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Double dipped supernova &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37869</guid>
		<description>[...] Car is one of the most massive stars in the sky, and one of the most massive stars possible, in fact. But how common are objects like Eta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Car is one of the most massive stars in the sky, and one of the most massive stars possible, in fact. But how common are objects like Eta [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Claude</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37868</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37868</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for such a wonderful, enlightening explanation of the findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for such a wonderful, enlightening explanation of the findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogosphere: This Week in Astronomy at Orbiting Frog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37867</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogosphere: This Week in Astronomy at Orbiting Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/07/astronomers-find-most-massive-star-ever-discovered/#comment-37867</guid>
		<description>[...] Astronomers Find most Massive Star Ever Discovered, from Bad Astronomy. This post is exactly what it says on the tin. At time of writing, this post had racked up 1339 diggs too! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Astronomers Find most Massive Star Ever Discovered, from Bad Astronomy. This post is exactly what it says on the tin. At time of writing, this post had racked up 1339 diggs too! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
