<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gas cramps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Lensman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38828</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Lensman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38828</guid>
		<description>A point of history from a fugitive from the early 60&#039;s...I lived in SE Texas where a lot of gas was produced. Texaco and Mobil would have &quot;gas wars&quot;. Gas was sometimes 15 cents a gallon and you got a set of 6 drink glasses with a fill up and a kid would fill the car and clean your windshield.

I had a &#039;63 Austin-Healey Sprite roadster ($1800 new) with an 1100cc motor that would get 40+ miles/gallon if driven carefully (which I didn&#039;t). My gas expenses would be $3 a month and I could put it on my Texaco credit card.

I was teaching junior high math and making $4800 dollars a year. My rent was $65/month. My beautiful 500cc Triumph bike cost $1200 and my Rolex Submariner (which I still have) cost $185 new.

JFK was murdered during my first semester as a teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A point of history from a fugitive from the early 60&#8242;s&#8230;I lived in SE Texas where a lot of gas was produced. Texaco and Mobil would have &#8220;gas wars&#8221;. Gas was sometimes 15 cents a gallon and you got a set of 6 drink glasses with a fill up and a kid would fill the car and clean your windshield.</p>
<p>I had a &#8217;63 Austin-Healey Sprite roadster ($1800 new) with an 1100cc motor that would get 40+ miles/gallon if driven carefully (which I didn&#8217;t). My gas expenses would be $3 a month and I could put it on my Texaco credit card.</p>
<p>I was teaching junior high math and making $4800 dollars a year. My rent was $65/month. My beautiful 500cc Triumph bike cost $1200 and my Rolex Submariner (which I still have) cost $185 new.</p>
<p>JFK was murdered during my first semester as a teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38827</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38827</guid>
		<description>It will only get worse untill our government and industry both figure out how to make money out of emerging technologies. Did you know that Edisons original idea for servicing homes with electricity was to install a crude form on electrolizer (iron plates in acid) and then service that unit on site for you?  He was over ruled by his business partners because  the knew that they could make more money be installing a meter on your house and charging you by the unit. Visit my site to learn how save gas and what you can do about high gas prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will only get worse untill our government and industry both figure out how to make money out of emerging technologies. Did you know that Edisons original idea for servicing homes with electricity was to install a crude form on electrolizer (iron plates in acid) and then service that unit on site for you?  He was over ruled by his business partners because  the knew that they could make more money be installing a meter on your house and charging you by the unit. Visit my site to learn how save gas and what you can do about high gas prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icemith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38826</link>
		<dc:creator>icemith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38826</guid>
		<description>Yes, we in Australia do pay more for our petrol (gas to you), but I admit it is still a lot less than most of the world is paying. Nobody seems to have quoted anything from the tables in the link by *dunc* at 04:13am:-



That table is an eye-opener, and though it is not comprehensive, it does give the equivalent cost per gallon in $US, ranging from 0.19c in Venzuela to $7.69 in Norway! Now that is an obscenely large range in anybody&#039;s books.

WE recently drove to Adelaide from Sydney, and starting with a tankfull, costing around A$1.30 liter,(about US$5.20 per gal.), needed to refill - 50 liters - halfway across (700km of the total distance of just over 1400km), and, so as not to runout within spitting distance of our daughter&#039;s home, and on a freeway, went for a splash and dash, at what we (rightly) assumed was the last servo before the end of the freeway. A bit over two tankfulls.

It was a near new Nissan Tiida, 1.8 liter motor, auto everything, and it went faultlessly. I consider it to be a &quot;big&quot; small car. And the wife chose it all on her own! For herself. It is the latest version of the Pulsar, and as usual, comes with various extra appointments as you go up the range.

The return trip, covering a different route from halfway, ended up using not much more fuel at all, maybe two and a quarter fills. The maximum cost per liter was the splash before the refill on the return trip, (our favored brand not being available in the small town), was $1.50liter, about $6.00 US/gallon.

It was a just run-in car, two on board and not a great deal of luggage, an efficient new design engine, (I suspect to be made to Renault specs, as they have a controlling interest in Nissan Motors now), though I personally would have preferred a larger engine, this one seemed to fill the bill anyway, and I was pleasantly surprised. We both drove at, or under the legal speeds (most of the time!) - the max on Australian roads is 110km/hr - about 70mph.

Ivan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we in Australia do pay more for our petrol (gas to you), but I admit it is still a lot less than most of the world is paying. Nobody seems to have quoted anything from the tables in the link by *dunc* at 04:13am:-</p>
<p>That table is an eye-opener, and though it is not comprehensive, it does give the equivalent cost per gallon in $US, ranging from 0.19c in Venzuela to $7.69 in Norway! Now that is an obscenely large range in anybody&#8217;s books.</p>
<p>WE recently drove to Adelaide from Sydney, and starting with a tankfull, costing around A$1.30 liter,(about US$5.20 per gal.), needed to refill &#8211; 50 liters &#8211; halfway across (700km of the total distance of just over 1400km), and, so as not to runout within spitting distance of our daughter&#8217;s home, and on a freeway, went for a splash and dash, at what we (rightly) assumed was the last servo before the end of the freeway. A bit over two tankfulls.</p>
<p>It was a near new Nissan Tiida, 1.8 liter motor, auto everything, and it went faultlessly. I consider it to be a &#8220;big&#8221; small car. And the wife chose it all on her own! For herself. It is the latest version of the Pulsar, and as usual, comes with various extra appointments as you go up the range.</p>
<p>The return trip, covering a different route from halfway, ended up using not much more fuel at all, maybe two and a quarter fills. The maximum cost per liter was the splash before the refill on the return trip, (our favored brand not being available in the small town), was $1.50liter, about $6.00 US/gallon.</p>
<p>It was a just run-in car, two on board and not a great deal of luggage, an efficient new design engine, (I suspect to be made to Renault specs, as they have a controlling interest in Nissan Motors now), though I personally would have preferred a larger engine, this one seemed to fill the bill anyway, and I was pleasantly surprised. We both drove at, or under the legal speeds (most of the time!) &#8211; the max on Australian roads is 110km/hr &#8211; about 70mph.</p>
<p>Ivan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clair</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38825</link>
		<dc:creator>Clair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38825</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the government should stay out of the pricing of gasoline and let the market decide. If one or two places decide to &quot;gouge&quot;, they won&#039;t get customers. If the price rises across the board, it&#039;ll hurt, and people should learn to drive less.

The profit margin made by the oil companies, if what I read was correct, is (substantially) less than the amount made by several other industries, including pharmaceutical companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the government should stay out of the pricing of gasoline and let the market decide. If one or two places decide to &#8220;gouge&#8221;, they won&#8217;t get customers. If the price rises across the board, it&#8217;ll hurt, and people should learn to drive less.</p>
<p>The profit margin made by the oil companies, if what I read was correct, is (substantially) less than the amount made by several other industries, including pharmaceutical companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Eye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38824</link>
		<dc:creator>The Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38824</guid>
		<description>note: one guy said he needs the big heavy frame and big heavy engine in order to protect himself from accidents... this is simply wrong, it doesn&#039;t work that way. I don&#039;t know how a big engine is supposed to keep you from having accidents in the first place, but an SUV is actually more dangerous in case of an accident than e.g. a minivan (some Brit motoring show once tried crashing a Landrover into a Renaul Espace. Passengers in the Espace won!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note: one guy said he needs the big heavy frame and big heavy engine in order to protect himself from accidents&#8230; this is simply wrong, it doesn&#8217;t work that way. I don&#8217;t know how a big engine is supposed to keep you from having accidents in the first place, but an SUV is actually more dangerous in case of an accident than e.g. a minivan (some Brit motoring show once tried crashing a Landrover into a Renaul Espace. Passengers in the Espace won!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38823</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38823</guid>
		<description>Americans and their complaining about petrol prices...

I wish we paid that little for petrol, but even 5 years ago it cost more than that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans and their complaining about petrol prices&#8230;</p>
<p>I wish we paid that little for petrol, but even 5 years ago it cost more than that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38822</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38822</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Iâ€™m frankly appalled to see milages of 20 MPG.&lt;/i&gt;

Especially when you consider that that&#039;s right in the same ballpark as the original Model T Ford....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Iâ€™m frankly appalled to see milages of 20 MPG.</i></p>
<p>Especially when you consider that that&#8217;s right in the same ballpark as the original Model T Ford&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erlando</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38766</link>
		<dc:creator>erlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38766</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m frankly appalled to see milages of 20 MPG. That&#039;s 8.4 km/l..!!!! :-( You would get taxed out of your skin in emission-taxes for such a car in Denmark. And with good reason too!

You should be really ashamed of yourselves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m frankly appalled to see milages of 20 MPG. That&#8217;s 8.4 km/l..!!!! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  You would get taxed out of your skin in emission-taxes for such a car in Denmark. And with good reason too!</p>
<p>You should be really ashamed of yourselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thaumaturge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38821</link>
		<dc:creator>thaumaturge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38821</guid>
		<description>Sell your car and live in a grass hut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sell your car and live in a grass hut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38820</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38820</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; Im over 50 yrs and not in perfect health

&gt;&gt;&gt; However, I would just love to see some of you folks
&gt;&gt;&gt; who are complaining about these vehicles get thru 2
&gt;&gt;&gt; feet of snow on a bicycle.

A few years back here in Southern California the local government had a &quot;alternative commuting&quot; shindig (probably at taxpayer&#039;s expense) and the star of the show was &quot;SuperCommuter&quot;. It was some super in-shape guy in his early 20s wearing some sort of olympic speed skating outfit and roller blades.

Yeah, the 40-60 year old scientists and engineers at my workplace are going to go that route

&gt;&gt;&gt; In a city like L.A., it is quite impossible to ride a bike to
&gt;&gt;&gt; work. Not difficult; impossible.

And to be perfectly blunt, between my home and my work, there are some areas that would be very dangerous (as in crime) to bike through. And as others have mentioned, there&#039;s just too many loose nuts behind wheels out there on the roads.

I actually have a very nice Trek bicycle that I ride for exercise. I put it into the Caliber and *drive* it to a local park, and ride there, away from cars and with the ducks and squirrels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; Im over 50 yrs and not in perfect health</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; However, I would just love to see some of you folks<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; who are complaining about these vehicles get thru 2<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; feet of snow on a bicycle.</p>
<p>A few years back here in Southern California the local government had a &#8220;alternative commuting&#8221; shindig (probably at taxpayer&#8217;s expense) and the star of the show was &#8220;SuperCommuter&#8221;. It was some super in-shape guy in his early 20s wearing some sort of olympic speed skating outfit and roller blades.</p>
<p>Yeah, the 40-60 year old scientists and engineers at my workplace are going to go that route</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; In a city like L.A., it is quite impossible to ride a bike to<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; work. Not difficult; impossible.</p>
<p>And to be perfectly blunt, between my home and my work, there are some areas that would be very dangerous (as in crime) to bike through. And as others have mentioned, there&#8217;s just too many loose nuts behind wheels out there on the roads.</p>
<p>I actually have a very nice Trek bicycle that I ride for exercise. I put it into the Caliber and *drive* it to a local park, and ride there, away from cars and with the ducks and squirrels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38819</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38819</guid>
		<description>Denver - 60mpg sounds really low for a 49cc scooter.  My 1967 Honda CB160 got better than 100mpg with an engine over 3 times as big.

Les Dalrymple (and everyone else) I think you might have been using imperial gallons rather than US gallons in your calculation, which makes your gas a
little cheaper, or US gas a little more expensive.  1 US gallon = 3.785 liters
1 Imperial gallon = 4.545 liters

Sounds like most of the world is paying over double US prices, Australia gets off easy with about 1.5 times US price.  :-)

I agree US gas taxes should probably be raised a lot to encourage efficiency and to reduce the cross-subsidies (pro-rate the cost of the Iraq war per gallon!) not to mention highway construction and maintenance, hidden subsidies to oil companies, etc, etc.  $16 sounds like a lot to me, but I&#039;ve seen $8 or so cited as the true cost.  But it would be political suicide to try to raise gas taxes.  Lots of politicians are talking about *lowering* gas taxes (which is just a direct transfer to oil companies), and a few years ago some one (Kerry?) was rumored to be in favor of a 50 cent raise in the gas tax and had to back-pedal furiously.

A guy I know is slowly losing his vision due to a hereditary condition.  (Not sure exactly what, but it sets in your 20&#039;s or 30&#039;s and takes 20 or more years to go completely blind.)  He had to stop driving about 20 years ago and commuted by bicycle in the Phoenix/Tempe area.  He had a lot of close calls (not due to his eyesight, which was still plenty good enough to ride a bike) and everyone was terribly concerned someone would run him over.  I don&#039;t think he cycles any more - buses or taxis, which are either tremendously inconvenient or really expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denver &#8211; 60mpg sounds really low for a 49cc scooter.  My 1967 Honda CB160 got better than 100mpg with an engine over 3 times as big.</p>
<p>Les Dalrymple (and everyone else) I think you might have been using imperial gallons rather than US gallons in your calculation, which makes your gas a<br />
little cheaper, or US gas a little more expensive.  1 US gallon = 3.785 liters<br />
1 Imperial gallon = 4.545 liters</p>
<p>Sounds like most of the world is paying over double US prices, Australia gets off easy with about 1.5 times US price.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree US gas taxes should probably be raised a lot to encourage efficiency and to reduce the cross-subsidies (pro-rate the cost of the Iraq war per gallon!) not to mention highway construction and maintenance, hidden subsidies to oil companies, etc, etc.  $16 sounds like a lot to me, but I&#8217;ve seen $8 or so cited as the true cost.  But it would be political suicide to try to raise gas taxes.  Lots of politicians are talking about *lowering* gas taxes (which is just a direct transfer to oil companies), and a few years ago some one (Kerry?) was rumored to be in favor of a 50 cent raise in the gas tax and had to back-pedal furiously.</p>
<p>A guy I know is slowly losing his vision due to a hereditary condition.  (Not sure exactly what, but it sets in your 20&#8242;s or 30&#8242;s and takes 20 or more years to go completely blind.)  He had to stop driving about 20 years ago and commuted by bicycle in the Phoenix/Tempe area.  He had a lot of close calls (not due to his eyesight, which was still plenty good enough to ride a bike) and everyone was terribly concerned someone would run him over.  I don&#8217;t think he cycles any more &#8211; buses or taxis, which are either tremendously inconvenient or really expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Holt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38818</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38818</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your complaints aboout the price of fuel fall on deaf ears here too. Currently in Sydney, Australia we are payng about $1.40 AUD per litre (ie $6.37 AUD per gallon â€” or $5.35 USD per gallon)

At 4.55 litres to the gallon, in USD your 15 gallons = 68 litres would have cost nearly $81- USD here. Only the small matter of being $32 dearer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Les, your calculations on equivalence with Australia are wrong.  BA is talking US gallons (3.78 litres) not imperial gallons (4.55 litres), a difference of about 17%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your complaints aboout the price of fuel fall on deaf ears here too. Currently in Sydney, Australia we are payng about $1.40 AUD per litre (ie $6.37 AUD per gallon â€” or $5.35 USD per gallon)</p>
<p>At 4.55 litres to the gallon, in USD your 15 gallons = 68 litres would have cost nearly $81- USD here. Only the small matter of being $32 dearer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Les, your calculations on equivalence with Australia are wrong.  BA is talking US gallons (3.78 litres) not imperial gallons (4.55 litres), a difference of about 17%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DenverAstro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38817</link>
		<dc:creator>DenverAstro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38817</guid>
		<description>Ok, I have to comment here. I now live about 1.5 miles from my workplace. I was telling myself 6 months ago that I should have another option but for me, biking is out. Im over 50 yrs and not in perfect health so, I decided a small motor bike might be the ticket. Two weeks ago, I purchased a 49cc scooter and have begun driving it to work. It gets about 60mpg and is a real hoot to drive. My other vehicle is a Chevy TrailBlazer. Yep, I know..a Yank Tank SUV. However, I would just love to see some of you folks who are complaining about these vehicles get thru 2 feet of snow on a bicycle. Come on, show me. This last year was one of the worst I can remember here in Colorado and we had, no kidding, 5 blizzards in about 8 weeks. The snow and ice didnt melt off for months. I&#039;ll keep my paid-for TrailBlazer with the 20k miles on it. I want to be able to get to the grocery store next winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I have to comment here. I now live about 1.5 miles from my workplace. I was telling myself 6 months ago that I should have another option but for me, biking is out. Im over 50 yrs and not in perfect health so, I decided a small motor bike might be the ticket. Two weeks ago, I purchased a 49cc scooter and have begun driving it to work. It gets about 60mpg and is a real hoot to drive. My other vehicle is a Chevy TrailBlazer. Yep, I know..a Yank Tank SUV. However, I would just love to see some of you folks who are complaining about these vehicles get thru 2 feet of snow on a bicycle. Come on, show me. This last year was one of the worst I can remember here in Colorado and we had, no kidding, 5 blizzards in about 8 weeks. The snow and ice didnt melt off for months. I&#8217;ll keep my paid-for TrailBlazer with the 20k miles on it. I want to be able to get to the grocery store next winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38816</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38816</guid>
		<description>&quot;Almost all U.S. cities are constructed around the assumption that everybody owns cars.&quot;

That&#039;s true enough, and it&#039;s a fine explanation of why American cities are so poorly designed, but it isn&#039;t a good reason for continuing with policies that support the problem.  Instead of waiting for gas prices to rise due to scarcity, apply some real gas taxes.  The tax money can be used to fund public transit, there would be popular demand for better city design when there&#039;s time enough to do something, and it may reverse the trend of buying gas guzzlers.


BA and others brought up the economic damage high gas prices can bring.  Sure.  But that&#039;s inevitable.  By keeping gas prices low, you are encouraging/supporting the problem which got you into this mess: SUVs, suburban sprawl, and single-occupant vehicles.  The longer that gas prices stay low (and $3/gallon is still low), the more SUVs go on the road, the more the suburbs sprawl, and the worse the impact will be when people seriously address the problem.

Let&#039;s face it: there is going to be a big economic impact coming.  It&#039;s unavoidable.  What we can do is try to reduce the impact, and the easiest way to do that is raise the gas tax and fund mass transit.  At least when $6/gallon or $8/gallon hits, the communities will get some revenues to cope with the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Almost all U.S. cities are constructed around the assumption that everybody owns cars.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s true enough, and it&#8217;s a fine explanation of why American cities are so poorly designed, but it isn&#8217;t a good reason for continuing with policies that support the problem.  Instead of waiting for gas prices to rise due to scarcity, apply some real gas taxes.  The tax money can be used to fund public transit, there would be popular demand for better city design when there&#8217;s time enough to do something, and it may reverse the trend of buying gas guzzlers.</p>
<p>BA and others brought up the economic damage high gas prices can bring.  Sure.  But that&#8217;s inevitable.  By keeping gas prices low, you are encouraging/supporting the problem which got you into this mess: SUVs, suburban sprawl, and single-occupant vehicles.  The longer that gas prices stay low (and $3/gallon is still low), the more SUVs go on the road, the more the suburbs sprawl, and the worse the impact will be when people seriously address the problem.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it: there is going to be a big economic impact coming.  It&#8217;s unavoidable.  What we can do is try to reduce the impact, and the easiest way to do that is raise the gas tax and fund mass transit.  At least when $6/gallon or $8/gallon hits, the communities will get some revenues to cope with the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38815</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38815</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t gas is expensive, dollars are becoming worthless.  The dollar is in freefall.  The canadian Loonie is nearly on par with the U.S. dollar something that hasn&#039;t occured since 1976.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t gas is expensive, dollars are becoming worthless.  The dollar is in freefall.  The canadian Loonie is nearly on par with the U.S. dollar something that hasn&#8217;t occured since 1976.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-2/#comment-38814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38814</guid>
		<description>Sean, if I had looked over the data first and then picked my starting point, &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; would be cherry picking. As it was, I had the date in mind first. Click the link in the entry to see why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, if I had looked over the data first and then picked my starting point, <i>that</i> would be cherry picking. As it was, I had the date in mind first. Click the link in the entry to see why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slang</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38813</link>
		<dc:creator>slang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38813</guid>
		<description>MarshallDog Says: &quot; I see a lot of people outside the US on this board telling people like me to shut up because you have to pay closer to 7 dollars per gallon. I understand that as a spoiled American, I really shouldnâ€™t bitch when things might suck worse somewhere else.&quot;

I wouldn&#039;t dare suggest that. Our countries differ way too much to make such remarks on a whim. All I intended was to give a reference to what it&#039;s like elsewhere. (And to your other question, yes the prices have skyrocketed here too in the last several years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MarshallDog Says: &#8221; I see a lot of people outside the US on this board telling people like me to shut up because you have to pay closer to 7 dollars per gallon. I understand that as a spoiled American, I really shouldnâ€™t bitch when things might suck worse somewhere else.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t dare suggest that. Our countries differ way too much to make such remarks on a whim. All I intended was to give a reference to what it&#8217;s like elsewhere. (And to your other question, yes the prices have skyrocketed here too in the last several years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38812</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38812</guid>
		<description>It is true that there are some places that are more bicycle friendly... I happen to live in a very hippie town - bikes and bikepaths are everywhere.  But I still get the occasional &quot;run her off the road!!&quot; idiot in a car... I make myself as visible as possible, follow all traffic laws, and do my best to not cut off drivers in the event I have to turn left or something.  However, there are still times when I&#039;m pretty sure somebody is trying to knock me over or run me off the road.  I&#039;ve driven in Phoenix (my parents lived in Mesa) - it&#039;s a nightmare!  Not just the heat, but the fact that people don&#039;t know how to drive there is scary.  It&#039;s mostly flat, which is nice, but I probably wouldn&#039;t risk biking, either.  Not until I harassed the local government enough to make it safer for pedestrians/cyclists.

It truly is sad that we are so... so... mean?  Wasteful?  Ignorant?  Rude?  I dunno, take your pick, I guess.

Shame, shame on US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that there are some places that are more bicycle friendly&#8230; I happen to live in a very hippie town &#8211; bikes and bikepaths are everywhere.  But I still get the occasional &#8220;run her off the road!!&#8221; idiot in a car&#8230; I make myself as visible as possible, follow all traffic laws, and do my best to not cut off drivers in the event I have to turn left or something.  However, there are still times when I&#8217;m pretty sure somebody is trying to knock me over or run me off the road.  I&#8217;ve driven in Phoenix (my parents lived in Mesa) &#8211; it&#8217;s a nightmare!  Not just the heat, but the fact that people don&#8217;t know how to drive there is scary.  It&#8217;s mostly flat, which is nice, but I probably wouldn&#8217;t risk biking, either.  Not until I harassed the local government enough to make it safer for pedestrians/cyclists.</p>
<p>It truly is sad that we are so&#8230; so&#8230; mean?  Wasteful?  Ignorant?  Rude?  I dunno, take your pick, I guess.</p>
<p>Shame, shame on US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bolo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38811</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38811</guid>
		<description>&quot;Les Dalrymple makes an excellent point. Almost all U.S. cities are constructed around the assumption that everybody owns cars. Much of the real estate in most American cities wasnâ€™t inhabited before cars became ubiquitous. Millions of Americans simply canâ€™t get to work on a bicycle. The bike paths are bad or non-existent, the distances are too long, and sometimes you even get people in their cars trying to run you off the road. This is certainly the case in Albuquerque, which is one of the few cities thatâ€™s actually made an attempt to provide decent bike paths. In a city like L.A., it is quite impossible to ride a bike to work. Not difficult; impossible.&quot;

Repeated for truth.  I live in Phoenix and would love to bike to work.  But I also don&#039;t want to get hit by a car and die.  The entire city is made for cars and is sprawled out to the point where single blocks are sometimes 1 or 2 miles long.  No biking or walking, and public transit is a joke here.

So, there&#039;s a reason that you hear Americans complaining about high gas prices that are only half or less of what the rest of the world pays--many of us have no other choice.  It sucks and needs to be changed, but the fact of the matter is that gas at $3 per gallon is painful for a lot of people in the US.  If it ever gets higher we&#039;re going to see economic disruption--not because we&#039;re all spoiled idiots (though I&#039;ll admit that could be a part of it), but because we have few other transit options available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Les Dalrymple makes an excellent point. Almost all U.S. cities are constructed around the assumption that everybody owns cars. Much of the real estate in most American cities wasnâ€™t inhabited before cars became ubiquitous. Millions of Americans simply canâ€™t get to work on a bicycle. The bike paths are bad or non-existent, the distances are too long, and sometimes you even get people in their cars trying to run you off the road. This is certainly the case in Albuquerque, which is one of the few cities thatâ€™s actually made an attempt to provide decent bike paths. In a city like L.A., it is quite impossible to ride a bike to work. Not difficult; impossible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Repeated for truth.  I live in Phoenix and would love to bike to work.  But I also don&#8217;t want to get hit by a car and die.  The entire city is made for cars and is sprawled out to the point where single blocks are sometimes 1 or 2 miles long.  No biking or walking, and public transit is a joke here.</p>
<p>So, there&#8217;s a reason that you hear Americans complaining about high gas prices that are only half or less of what the rest of the world pays&#8211;many of us have no other choice.  It sucks and needs to be changed, but the fact of the matter is that gas at $3 per gallon is painful for a lot of people in the US.  If it ever gets higher we&#8217;re going to see economic disruption&#8211;not because we&#8217;re all spoiled idiots (though I&#8217;ll admit that could be a part of it), but because we have few other transit options available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38810</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38810</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My point was that the price has gone up substantially since 2001, far faster than inflation, which I find curious&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fintrend.com/inflation/images/charts/Oil/Gasoline_inflation_chart.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this chart&lt;/a&gt; that shows gas prices in adjusted dollars. Prices in 2001 were about as far below the historic average as current prices are above, so by choosing it as your reference point you&#039;re cherry-picking the data. Prices have certainly spiked in the last few years, but people think it&#039;s worse than it is because we&#039;ve gone from one extreme to the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My point was that the price has gone up substantially since 2001, far faster than inflation, which I find curious</p></blockquote>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.fintrend.com/inflation/images/charts/Oil/Gasoline_inflation_chart.htm" rel="nofollow">this chart</a> that shows gas prices in adjusted dollars. Prices in 2001 were about as far below the historic average as current prices are above, so by choosing it as your reference point you&#8217;re cherry-picking the data. Prices have certainly spiked in the last few years, but people think it&#8217;s worse than it is because we&#8217;ve gone from one extreme to the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet_Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38809</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet_Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38809</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; I didnâ€™t see a SINGLE car with a smaller engine than a V6 2.0 litres

FWIW, my Caliber has 2.0L 4-cylinder with the continuously variable transmission you see in some hybrids. It&#039;s actually beating the crap out of the EPA estimates. I hear Dodge is selling a lot of them in Europe.

I *hoping* for higher gas prices here in the US, but I have to admit to selfish reasoning. I think it will cut down on freeway traffic at some point. :)

People need to relax a bit. Science and tech will deliver. There&#039;s starting to be a profit motive in addressing people&#039;s desires to be green. That&#039;s why the last thing you want to do is hobble your economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; I didnâ€™t see a SINGLE car with a smaller engine than a V6 2.0 litres</p>
<p>FWIW, my Caliber has 2.0L 4-cylinder with the continuously variable transmission you see in some hybrids. It&#8217;s actually beating the crap out of the EPA estimates. I hear Dodge is selling a lot of them in Europe.</p>
<p>I *hoping* for higher gas prices here in the US, but I have to admit to selfish reasoning. I think it will cut down on freeway traffic at some point. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>People need to relax a bit. Science and tech will deliver. There&#8217;s starting to be a profit motive in addressing people&#8217;s desires to be green. That&#8217;s why the last thing you want to do is hobble your economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark UK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38808</guid>
		<description>Smaller cars. Smaller engines. It&#039;s not rocket science. Anyway, why would oil companies build more refineries? Everybody is wanting to use less of their products and tax it. The government wants to move to biofuels. Building a refinery can easily take 10 years. No way of saying the market will be there for the gasoline. Prices are up and they are unlikely to go down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smaller cars. Smaller engines. It&#8217;s not rocket science. Anyway, why would oil companies build more refineries? Everybody is wanting to use less of their products and tax it. The government wants to move to biofuels. Building a refinery can easily take 10 years. No way of saying the market will be there for the gasoline. Prices are up and they are unlikely to go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38807</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38807</guid>
		<description>My 1980 Blazer(curb weight 4500 lbs.) gets around 14 mpg. I still drive it because I can&#039;t see spending 15 to $ 25000 for a new car which only gets twice as good millage. I only put about 6000 miles per year on the truck, so fuel costs(at $1285/year and $3.00/gallon) aren&#039;t a significant problem. If I could modify the vehicle to run on a completely rechargeable battery system, for less than $10,000, it MIGHT be economically feasible to make the upgrade. That type of conversion may come but likely only if fuel prices make an all electric much more economically attractive.

Note that when I last worked in Saudi Arabia(1990) gas there was 30 cents per gallon. I expect it&#039;s not that much higher today,,,

The major, national, oil producers must walk a tight rope, between raising fuel costs so high they impact world economic development or keeping them so low the oil producers are screwed by world wide inflation.
High prices encourage alternative energy production. Solar cells are becoming increasingly attractive as production rises and efficiency increases but they will require a major shift in how we USE the energy in order to make all that enviro. safe energy production useful.

Yes, Americans ARE spoiled. We likes our cars big, powerful and fast. It&#039;s a freedom thing, Y&#039;All,,,and yes, there are few cities compact enough to allow for usable public transit. In Los Angeles it takes 2.5 hours to travel 20 miles by bus.

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 1980 Blazer(curb weight 4500 lbs.) gets around 14 mpg. I still drive it because I can&#8217;t see spending 15 to $ 25000 for a new car which only gets twice as good millage. I only put about 6000 miles per year on the truck, so fuel costs(at $1285/year and $3.00/gallon) aren&#8217;t a significant problem. If I could modify the vehicle to run on a completely rechargeable battery system, for less than $10,000, it MIGHT be economically feasible to make the upgrade. That type of conversion may come but likely only if fuel prices make an all electric much more economically attractive.</p>
<p>Note that when I last worked in Saudi Arabia(1990) gas there was 30 cents per gallon. I expect it&#8217;s not that much higher today,,,</p>
<p>The major, national, oil producers must walk a tight rope, between raising fuel costs so high they impact world economic development or keeping them so low the oil producers are screwed by world wide inflation.<br />
High prices encourage alternative energy production. Solar cells are becoming increasingly attractive as production rises and efficiency increases but they will require a major shift in how we USE the energy in order to make all that enviro. safe energy production useful.</p>
<p>Yes, Americans ARE spoiled. We likes our cars big, powerful and fast. It&#8217;s a freedom thing, Y&#8217;All,,,and yes, there are few cities compact enough to allow for usable public transit. In Los Angeles it takes 2.5 hours to travel 20 miles by bus.</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38806</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38806</guid>
		<description>I bike nearly everywhere: school, work, the store, etc.  I keep trying to get my boyfriend to do the same.  Even in this heat, biking is better for me and the environment.  I take the bus when it&#039;s raining or I don&#039;t have my bike.

I drive a Ford Explorer that I bought in 2004.  I bought it because I was constantly going back and forth between school and home with a large dog, a rabbit cage, and suitcases to visit family 1-5 hours away.  At the time it made sense.  It still does, sometimes.  I would love for public transportation to be easier - I would visit friends in other areas of NC more often if it were cheaper to get there.

However, the thing that really ticks me off is that commercials for new cars are so excited about the 25mpg or 30mpg the cars get, now.  Didn&#039;t cars get that kind of mileage back in the day, too?  Or better?  I mean, come on - we can make a more fuel efficient engine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bike nearly everywhere: school, work, the store, etc.  I keep trying to get my boyfriend to do the same.  Even in this heat, biking is better for me and the environment.  I take the bus when it&#8217;s raining or I don&#8217;t have my bike.</p>
<p>I drive a Ford Explorer that I bought in 2004.  I bought it because I was constantly going back and forth between school and home with a large dog, a rabbit cage, and suitcases to visit family 1-5 hours away.  At the time it made sense.  It still does, sometimes.  I would love for public transportation to be easier &#8211; I would visit friends in other areas of NC more often if it were cheaper to get there.</p>
<p>However, the thing that really ticks me off is that commercials for new cars are so excited about the 25mpg or 30mpg the cars get, now.  Didn&#8217;t cars get that kind of mileage back in the day, too?  Or better?  I mean, come on &#8211; we can make a more fuel efficient engine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/comment-page-1/#comment-38805</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/06/18/gas-cramps/#comment-38805</guid>
		<description>BA, I&#039;m trying to determine which of the Skeptic&#039;s Guide to the Universe top 20 logical fallacies you are committing.  Is it &quot;Confusing Association with Causation&quot; or &quot;Post-Hoc ergo propter hoc&quot;?  I can&#039;t quite determine it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BA, I&#8217;m trying to determine which of the Skeptic&#8217;s Guide to the Universe top 20 logical fallacies you are committing.  Is it &#8220;Confusing Association with Causation&#8221; or &#8220;Post-Hoc ergo propter hoc&#8221;?  I can&#8217;t quite determine it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 20:07:53 -->
