Come to think of it, the ’scope and/or the imageing equipment didn’t have its “red-eye reduction” botton enabled. Shame, I’ll have to do it myself. (Should be a smiley here).
Also on matters pointless, why am I supposedly saying :
“Your comment is awaiting moderation?”
when that’s not what I said at all?
Moderate? Me? Never!
BTW. Does someone still moderate these?
——
“All things in moderation including moderation.”
- Socrates
Leave a Reply
About Bad Astronomy
If you went to BadAstronomy.com and found yourself here, never fear: the BA Blog has moved to its new home at Discover Blogs. The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking and all that) is still online, too.
Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He has written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic, and fights misuses of science as well as praising the wonder of real science.
Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com
Bad Astronomy is a Wikio Top Blog! Clearly, Wikio has excellent taste.
"If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?" -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters
"Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating." -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising
Disclaimer
The opinions and ideas expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of Discover Magazine and/or the James Randi Educational Foundation, of which Dr. Plait serves as President.
June 20th, 2007 at 7:28 am
Way cool! Five trillion solar masses? That’s one big momma. Is the red galaxy just really old or are the stars principally low mass?
GAry 7
June 20th, 2007 at 6:43 pm
Is there anyway to describe how amazing this find really is? Boggles the mind.
Bob
June 20th, 2007 at 11:41 pm
Forgive me for borrowing your own line from your later Eta car: tick tock, tick tock post;
“in case you’re not getting enough awesome in your diet.”
June 21st, 2007 at 2:12 am
Gives new meaning to “Eye in the Sky” doesn’t it?
I just hope the “woo-woo”s are too scared to comment.
Ivan. (I’m watching you…..)
June 21st, 2007 at 2:18 am
Come to think of it, the ’scope and/or the imageing equipment didn’t have its “red-eye reduction” botton enabled. Shame, I’ll have to do it myself. (Should be a smiley here).
Ivan.
June 21st, 2007 at 2:20 am
Ooops, for “botton” read “button”, though it probably doesn’t matter.
Ivan.
July 19th, 2007 at 9:31 am
Nup.
& given the lateness of this response neither, probably does this …
Am I the only one to view this thread (if that’s what you call these comments / feedblitzx-y thingy’s?) halfway thro’ July?
???
July 19th, 2007 at 9:35 am
Also on matters pointless, why am I supposedly saying :
“Your comment is awaiting moderation?”
when that’s not what I said at all?
Moderate? Me? Never!
BTW. Does someone still moderate these?
——
“All things in moderation including moderation.”
- Socrates