Comments on: Cloverfield?

By: Captain Tim

Captain Tim — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:08:41 +0000

Well this is a little bit late but yea…

It’s confirmed that this is America’s version of Godzilla bascially. The director “thought we needed our own monster”

Name is Cloverfield after changing it to sluho, then alias,then cheese (to tyr and maintain secretive) and now post production back to Cloverfield.

Kthx

By: Norman Coady

Norman Coady — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:00:26 +0000

Hey guys,

Check out my premise if you get a chance. This is not a spoof video. One reason I feel certain I know what the monster is that I’ve been working on a very similar premise.

Check it out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb8O6HpWEgs

By: Brodie

Brodie — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:27:01 +0000

JJ Abrams is too clever to make a simple Godzilla ripoff. there is some twist here, and I’m putting money on the fact that we’re all supposed to think it’s a Godzilla ripoff.

By: owlbear1

owlbear1 — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:30:01 +0000

Light~ 300,000 km/sec
Sound~ .3 km/sec

By: Astrolink [Global Edition] » Cloverfield images? | Latest astronomy news in 11 languages

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:04:04 +0000

[...] these be location shoots for the much-blogged "Cloverfield" movie? I’m not sure. It seems possible, though it also seems to be [...]

By: Ted

Ted — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 05:40:00 +0000

UPDATE ON 1-18-08.com!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you shake the picture on top of the stack, it eventually flips over with a message. The same can be done with all pictures but only the pics of the party have writing. A huge development on the story? No, but an interesting one at least. I’m positive the pictures will keep coming and I’m sure messages will as well. If you read this, send this to as many as you can.

Long live ARGs.

By: Lance

Lance — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:58:59 +0000

At the 1-18 website there are three pictures. There’s been no update there since the release of these three photos.

Take a clue from the Slusho website and flip those three pictures upside down. Each of these images contains the number six embedded within it (only viewable upside down).

I can’t believe there’s been no analysis of this. In the first photo of the two girls, there’s a six visible under the eye of the girl on the right (when you flip the image). On the second, there’s a much more obvious image of the number six which has been much ballyhooed-about.

On the third, there’s a six on the face of the woman in the center of the picture.

666. LOOK.