Comments on: Cloverfield redux

By: husto

husto — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:56:01 +0000

Do have someone information about the new viral campaigne of J.J. abrams, “aladygma” ? that should be the new cloverfield or alien movie

By: Jae

Jae — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:39:46 +0000

the easter egg is that if u look at the top right side on the corner u can see the monsters head and side if the face thats as close as youll get to see the monster til u got to tha theters to see it

By: Ren

Ren — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:24:06 +0000

Colossus? That’s the name of the poem on the statue of liberty, “The New Colossus.

By: Cambias

Cambias — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:27:11 +0000

Can anybody think of a classic monster-movie monster whose name ends in “-us” or “-ous”? Because the whole poster title progression (Monstrous, Barbarous, Ferocious) leads me to suspect they’re going to finish with a movie title which fits the pattern.

But I can’t think of any monsters which qualify. Surely not Tyrannosaurus, or any other -sauruses. I’d be hard-pressed to believe a dinosaur capable of swatting the Statue of Liberty’s head clear across the harbor.

And yet I have this nagging feeling that there was some fifties creature feature which had a name like that…

By: Kevin F.

Kevin F. — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:26:21 +0000

*cough cough* Hype *cough cough*

By: Astrolink [Global Edition] » Cloverfield images? | Latest astronomy news in 11 languages

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:05:12 +0000

[…] these be location shoots for the much-blogged "Cloverfield" movie? I’m not sure. It seems possible, though it also seems to be pretty late to still be filming […]

By: Lurchgs

Lurchgs — Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:47:21 +0000

Denny - in order to destroy Chicago (aside from completely dashing my CubHopes), you’d need a REASON to destroy it. Lost Angeles, San Dunksisco, New Dark - and others - have ample reason for destruction (that’s as close to politics as I’ll get here).

But Chicago is such a benign town that nobody wants to see it destroyed. Especially after we’ve left it to live elsewhere.

The large body of water, unfortunately, isn’t terribly deep- and is much less so after ‘Beginning of The End” (all those dead grasshoppers…)

Also, when you consider it, it IS harder to destroy.. coastal cities are threatened when something hits the ocean - and there’s a LOT of ocean. The mishigami is keen, but not a lot more likely to be hit than Chicago itself… that is, anything devestating that hits one will immediately affect the other. No drama there.. just >poof