<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloverfield redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:45:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: husto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43912</link>
		<dc:creator>husto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43912</guid>
		<description>Do have someone information about the new viral campaigne of J.J. abrams, &quot;aladygma&quot; ? that should be the new cloverfield or alien movie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do have someone information about the new viral campaigne of J.J. abrams, &#8220;aladygma&#8221; ? that should be the new cloverfield or alien movie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43911</guid>
		<description>the easter egg is that if u look at the top right side on the corner u can see the monsters head and side if the face thats as close as youll get to see the monster til u got to tha theters to see it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the easter egg is that if u look at the top right side on the corner u can see the monsters head and side if the face thats as close as youll get to see the monster til u got to tha theters to see it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43910</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43910</guid>
		<description>Colossus? That&#039;s the name of the poem on the statue of liberty, &quot;The New Colossus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colossus? That&#8217;s the name of the poem on the statue of liberty, &#8220;The New Colossus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cambias</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43909</link>
		<dc:creator>Cambias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43909</guid>
		<description>Can anybody think of a classic monster-movie monster whose name ends in &quot;-us&quot; or &quot;-ous&quot;?  Because the whole poster title progression (Monstrous, Barbarous, Ferocious) leads me to suspect they&#039;re going to finish with a movie title which fits the pattern.

But I can&#039;t think of any monsters which qualify.  Surely not Tyrannosaurus, or any other -sauruses.  I&#039;d be hard-pressed to believe a dinosaur capable of swatting the Statue of Liberty&#039;s head clear across the harbor.

And yet I have this nagging feeling that there was some fifties creature feature which had a name like that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anybody think of a classic monster-movie monster whose name ends in &#8220;-us&#8221; or &#8220;-ous&#8221;?  Because the whole poster title progression (Monstrous, Barbarous, Ferocious) leads me to suspect they&#8217;re going to finish with a movie title which fits the pattern.</p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t think of any monsters which qualify.  Surely not Tyrannosaurus, or any other -sauruses.  I&#8217;d be hard-pressed to believe a dinosaur capable of swatting the Statue of Liberty&#8217;s head clear across the harbor.</p>
<p>And yet I have this nagging feeling that there was some fifties creature feature which had a name like that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43908</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43908</guid>
		<description>*cough cough* Hype *cough cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*cough cough* Hype *cough cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Cloverfield images? &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43892</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Cloverfield images? &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43892</guid>
		<description>[...] these be location shoots for the much-blogged &quot;Cloverfield&quot; movie? I&#8217;m not sure. It seems possible, though it also seems to be pretty late to still be filming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] these be location shoots for the much-blogged &quot;Cloverfield&quot; movie? I&#8217;m not sure. It seems possible, though it also seems to be pretty late to still be filming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-43893</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/28/cloverfield-redux/#comment-43893</guid>
		<description>Denny - in order to destroy Chicago (aside from completely dashing my CubHopes), you&#039;d need a REASON to destroy it.  Lost Angeles, San Dunksisco, New Dark - and others - have ample reason for destruction (that&#039;s as close to politics as I&#039;ll get here).

But Chicago is such a benign town that nobody wants to see it destroyed.  Especially after we&#039;ve left it to live elsewhere.

The large body of water, unfortunately, isn&#039;t terribly deep- and is much less so after &#039;Beginning of The End&quot; (all those dead grasshoppers...)

Also, when you consider it, it IS harder to destroy.. coastal cities are threatened when something hits the ocean - and there&#039;s a LOT of ocean.  The mishigami is keen, but not a lot more likely to be hit than Chicago itself... that is, anything devestating that hits one will immediately affect the other.  No drama there.. just &gt;poof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denny &#8211; in order to destroy Chicago (aside from completely dashing my CubHopes), you&#8217;d need a REASON to destroy it.  Lost Angeles, San Dunksisco, New Dark &#8211; and others &#8211; have ample reason for destruction (that&#8217;s as close to politics as I&#8217;ll get here).</p>
<p>But Chicago is such a benign town that nobody wants to see it destroyed.  Especially after we&#8217;ve left it to live elsewhere.</p>
<p>The large body of water, unfortunately, isn&#8217;t terribly deep- and is much less so after &#8216;Beginning of The End&#8221; (all those dead grasshoppers&#8230;)</p>
<p>Also, when you consider it, it IS harder to destroy.. coastal cities are threatened when something hits the ocean &#8211; and there&#8217;s a LOT of ocean.  The mishigami is keen, but not a lot more likely to be hit than Chicago itself&#8230; that is, anything devestating that hits one will immediately affect the other.  No drama there.. just &gt;poof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
