A friend and I were speaking earlier today, and he pointed out that “Cloverfield” is a compounds of two words. Well, obviously. But look at the initials of those two words: C F. Anyone see where this is going? No?

Well, anyone familiar with the phrase CTHULHU FHTAGN? Of course you are. And there’s your C F for you. Of course it’s completely speculative, like all the other theories about Cloverfield out there, but just the thought of a Cthulhu movie is enough to send me into a dizzying spin of awesome overdose.

Thoughts?

If its ‘Godzilla 2′ I’m going to laugh my arse off.

Have I watched Dr. Who? One reason I didn’t respond sooner was because I was watching tonight’s episode. I have been a Dr. Who fan from the 4th Doctor to present. My “willing suspension of disbelief” gland works quite well. And let’s put this really into perspective — one of my all-time favorite movies is Flash Gordon. (Flash! A-ah!)

One minor quibble, though
“…it seems pretty stupid to watch it and point out all the ‘reality’ errors.” Um, have you read any of BA’s movie reviews?

Cheers!

Qd, I am one person who is definitely going to disagree about Voyager (assuming you mean Star Trek: Voyager). I sat through the entire series and want that time back. However, it did provide one line so stupid and full of bad anatomy that it still makes me chuckle. I can’t remember the exact dialogue but B’Elanna had just punched a crewman in the face. In order to describe the severity of the punch. someone said she’d punched the crewman (a human) so hard it almost sent bone fragments into his cerebellum! Yet, said crewman still had a recognizable face and was able to walk upright. Wow!

Loud noises, scary camera shaking, and a suspiciously “Godzilla-like” bellowing outside, followed by the head of Lady Liberty?

Am I thinking of the same thing?

BA: You can go ahead and watch the first season of Heroes, it’s good stuff. The season finale was a bit anti-climactic but overall I really enjoyed watching it. Things that happen actually find resolution, unlike Lost.

For science fiction, I personally don’t think it gets any better than Stargate: Atlantis.

I think the way it’s being marketed is fun. The trailer was great! I don’t watch Lost, though I did watch the first pilot episode. I thought it was quite cool, but I know a rehash of “Gilligan’s Island” when I see one. I knew instantly it would suffer from what X-Files and Star Trek: Voyager did — no clue of where to go with the series. So I dropped it, and that’s the same reason I’ll wait to watch any of Heroes, too.

It’s blairwitch project meets Godzilla. What’s the fuss all about?

It really annoys me how this JJ fella uses cheap gimmicks, charades, travesties and viral marketing to sell this thing just like he did with LOST, that clusterfark of a TV show.

There are no answers to the riddles there. There is no revolutionary movie here.

Stop being so gullible. If this #@$@#) succeeds there will be no more trailers in the future: every company will try and hide the content of their movies just to appeal to the moran’s curiosity. This is really annoying.

Holly crap, I need more coffee.

What principles will they be filming? …and the misspelling was made twice.

Could be fodder for The Bad Astronomer to review.

With over 5 months until “Cloverfield” (or whatever J.J. Abrams is going to really call it) it’s quite conceivable that there could be some “pick-ups,” second unit stuff, or even principle photography.