DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Pro? Am? Pro? Am?
Is it hot in here, or is it just me? »

BREAKING NEWS: Shuttle belly damaged; uncertain how badly

A small 3-inch gouge on the belly of the Shuttle Endeavour was detected by observers on the International Space Station as the Shuttle passed by for a visual inspection before docking.

It’s not clear how serious this is; they will use the new, longer robotic arm to inspect the Shuttle on Sunday. it will use a laser to determine the depth and breadth of the gouge, along with several other suspicious marks. The big one is on the starboard side aft.

At just under a minute into the launch, a piece of debris — possibly ice from outside the external fuel tank — was seen striking the Shuttle near this position, and a small spray of debris was detected just after the impact.

The gouge isn’t as deep or as wide as others have been in the past where the Shuttle has landed safely, but of course any damage is cause for concern (especially after the 2003 loss of Columbia due to foam falling off the main tank and impacting the leading edge of the Shuttle wing, damaging the structure there).

More news can be found on the site NASASpaceflight.com

Share

August 10th, 2007 7:06 PM by Phil Plait in NASA | 11 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

11 Responses to “BREAKING NEWS: Shuttle belly damaged; uncertain how badly”

  1. 1.   Ray Says:
    August 10th, 2007 at 10:49 pm

    “The gouge isn’t as deep or as wide as others have been in the past where the Shuttle has landed safely, but of course any damage is cause for concern (especially after the 2003 loss of Columbia due to foam falling off the main tank and impacting the leading edge of the Shuttle wing, damaging the structure there).”

    I hope that this problem is minor. And, moreover, that this present Shuttle Misson lands back on Earth as planned….

  2. 2.   Paul S Says:
    August 10th, 2007 at 11:57 pm

    Whatever design(s) NASA and/or private corporations use for future orbital spacecraft, they NEED to make sure that the future designs do not have a large external tank that often drops pieces of insulation or ice onto the orbital part of the spacecraft at high speeds. That seems to cause more problems for the space shuttle than almost anything else.

  3. 3.   Bigfoot Says:
    August 11th, 2007 at 12:54 am

    It’s tragically ironic that with all of the explosive and extreme high temperatures that the shuttle must deal with on take-off and re-entry, both accidents to date have been initiated by COLD temperatures and inadequate attempts to deal with them.

    Here is hoping that Endeavor returns her crew safely back to Earth — I am sure she will, and that she has persevered with greater wounds in the past. Still, I am glad they are proactively checking and addressing any scars that need attention.

    Godspeed, Endeavor crew.

  4. 4.   Tom’s Astronomy Blog » Blog Archive » Shuttle Problem Says:
    August 11th, 2007 at 5:09 am

    [...] am hearing about a three inch gash in the heat shield on Shuttle Endeavour.  Phil from Bad Astronomy has a good post on it, with a picture.  We should be hearing more from NASA about it [...]

  5. 5.   StevoR Says:
    August 11th, 2007 at 9:57 pm

    Maybe having a schoolteacher on board is the kiss of death … ;-~

    Mind you I really hope NOT! Hoping ‘Endeavour ‘ gets back fine -at least we know about the problem & take steps to correct it.

    Perhaps the best idea is having the external tank below the orbiter as was one of the original plans?

  6. 6.   Stuart Says:
    August 12th, 2007 at 9:47 am

    Ironically, NASA’s [i]bragging[/i] that the new Constellation system puts the humans above and away from the SRB o-rings, and that it has no main tank to shed foam chunks.

    Yipee, they’ve fixed the problems that they caused in the first place! Now all we have to worry about is the hundreds of dangers inherent in space flight, not the “own goals” that the Shuttle designers scored.

  7. 7.   papertiger Says:
    August 12th, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    Thank God it isn’t serious. (t least it looks like a minor blemish to me)
    If it needs to be fixed I am sure they have the neccesary astro goop to fill a 3 inch divot.
    No worrys right?

  8. 8.   Space Shuttle Endeavour News « Round Here Says:
    August 13th, 2007 at 8:31 am

    [...] over at Bad Astronomy has an excellent photo of the damage. (I’m too lazy to go searching for any [...]

  9. 9.   Astrolink [Global Edition] » The Moon, the rocket, the Shuttle | Latest astronomy news in 11 languages Says:
    August 13th, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    [...] of the Shuttle, NASA is pondering what to do about the 3-inch gouge in a tile on the Shuttle’s belly; replace it in-flight (hard, time-consuming, never been done before) or leave it be and, [...]

  10. 10.   Lurchgs Says:
    August 13th, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    NASA obviously doesn’t know about the Handyman’s Secret Weapon (thank you, Red Green) – Duct Tape!

  11. 11.   Robert Says:
    August 16th, 2007 at 11:42 am

    I have seen a Tile, and if the damage is not too deep, the tile should be fine. they might out a filler in there, but that is just to protect it before re-entry. That and the coating of the other tiles will burn off then anyway.

    They want the gash not to be too deep, so they don’t have to replace a tile, It would be Very Hard to replace a tile in space. because the tolerance between tiles is so critical. you don’t want to replace a tile with one that would leek even more than the one you are replacing.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us