<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The naked signs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:57:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shqiponja Mehmeti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-130145</link>
		<dc:creator>Shqiponja Mehmeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-130145</guid>
		<description>It is true. Zodiac is BAD ASTRONOMY (for those who don´t believe the Zodiac).

But Zodiac is GOOD ASTROLOGY (bothe for those who do, and do not believe it).

Arstology is a belief which has no scientific ground. Astrology is not a science. But maybe it tryes to give to people the same effect or amount of belief as the science has... But because it is not one, makes it bad as a science. Astronomy therefore is a science.

But I have a question, didn´t astrology study stars in teh biggining?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true. Zodiac is BAD ASTRONOMY (for those who don´t believe the Zodiac).</p>
<p>But Zodiac is GOOD ASTROLOGY (bothe for those who do, and do not believe it).</p>
<p>Arstology is a belief which has no scientific ground. Astrology is not a science. But maybe it tryes to give to people the same effect or amount of belief as the science has&#8230; But because it is not one, makes it bad as a science. Astronomy therefore is a science.</p>
<p>But I have a question, didn´t astrology study stars in teh biggining?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shqiponja mehmeti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-110884</link>
		<dc:creator>shqiponja mehmeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-110884</guid>
		<description>Replay to Seo:Hi Seo! If you were answering to me, I want to say that I have nothing against that some people like it this way, why not? But I have send a message to Phil Plate for some time ago and got no response. I was wondering if maybe somebody here could help me with that question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replay to Seo:Hi Seo! If you were answering to me, I want to say that I have nothing against that some people like it this way, why not? But I have send a message to Phil Plate for some time ago and got no response. I was wondering if maybe somebody here could help me with that question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shqiponja mehmeti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-110281</link>
		<dc:creator>shqiponja mehmeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-110281</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but who are you talking to, Seo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but who are you talking to, Seo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-98928</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-98928</guid>
		<description>Well some like this way, Buy I think you should consider the another side of the toppic too. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well some like this way, Buy I think you should consider the another side of the toppic too. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horoscopes Aries</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-97481</link>
		<dc:creator>Horoscopes Aries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-97481</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Horoscopes Aries&lt;/strong&gt;

(Blogger now has backlinks - very similar to the trackback feature in Movable Type. The TrackBack specification was created by Six Apart,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Horoscopes Aries</strong></p>
<p>(Blogger now has backlinks &#8211; very similar to the trackback feature in Movable Type. The TrackBack specification was created by Six Apart,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shqiponja mehmeti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-96047</link>
		<dc:creator>shqiponja mehmeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-96047</guid>
		<description>Phil Plate doesn ´t comunicate with members..? Is there somebody who understand what is the meaning of this site? Is it a debate site, a science site, or another kind of &quot;science&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Plate doesn ´t comunicate with members..? Is there somebody who understand what is the meaning of this site? Is it a debate site, a science site, or another kind of &#8220;science&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shqiponja mehmeti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/comment-page-2/#comment-96044</link>
		<dc:creator>shqiponja mehmeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/19/the-naked-signs/#comment-96044</guid>
		<description>Reply, Carsten:
Now when the webmaster is kind is there something you want to say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply, Carsten:<br />
Now when the webmaster is kind is there something you want to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
