<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Schoe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-479715</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-479715</guid>
		<description>On Stephen&#039;s advice I installed Stellarium and it is doing eactly what I had epected Google Sky to do. it allows me to define a location and a time and it shows me the stars, constellations and planets that I can see at that moment.

Maybe Stellarium is for simple star-gazers like me and Google is throwing in 100+ other tools for the people who want to know more. But for me Stellarium is doing exactly what I like: showing and naming what I can see on a given bright night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Stephen&#8217;s advice I installed Stellarium and it is doing eactly what I had epected Google Sky to do. it allows me to define a location and a time and it shows me the stars, constellations and planets that I can see at that moment.</p>
<p>Maybe Stellarium is for simple star-gazers like me and Google is throwing in 100+ other tools for the people who want to know more. But for me Stellarium is doing exactly what I like: showing and naming what I can see on a given bright night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA Dude</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-121687</link>
		<dc:creator>NASA Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-121687</guid>
		<description>The software is called Stellarium not Solarium, and it is great. I just wanted to correct the comment b/c I found this page via Google and had a hard time finding the correct site. So this is for those who might mispell the software the same way Aaron and I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The software is called Stellarium not Solarium, and it is great. I just wanted to correct the comment b/c I found this page via Google and had a hard time finding the correct site. So this is for those who might mispell the software the same way Aaron and I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-97887</link>
		<dc:creator>mp3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-97887</guid>
		<description>What I’d like to see is “3D Sky” (move through the universe) or even “4D Sky” (move through time as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I’d like to see is “3D Sky” (move through the universe) or even “4D Sky” (move through time as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sneezy Melon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46690</link>
		<dc:creator>Sneezy Melon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46690</guid>
		<description>Google Sky is a charming addition to Google&#039;s league of mapping web apps. Integration with Google Earth just made it all better. Here is some more info -

http://redspinach.blogspot.com/2008/03/google-sky-astro-gaze-through-your.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Sky is a charming addition to Google&#8217;s league of mapping web apps. Integration with Google Earth just made it all better. Here is some more info -</p>
<p><a href="http://redspinach.blogspot.com/2008/03/google-sky-astro-gaze-through-your.html" rel="nofollow">http://redspinach.blogspot.com/2008/03/google-sky-astro-gaze-through-your.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acomplia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46613</link>
		<dc:creator>Acomplia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46613</guid>
		<description>What I’d like to see is “3D Sky” (move through the universe) or even “4D Sky” (move through time as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I’d like to see is “3D Sky” (move through the universe) or even “4D Sky” (move through time as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cialis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46689</link>
		<dc:creator>Cialis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46689</guid>
		<description>[…] You can indeed add images using open source software, but stay tuned to the Space Telescope website[…]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] You can indeed add images using open source software, but stay tuned to the Space Telescope website[…]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Christian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46688</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46688</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments.

First, many of the software programs you state, do not have actual sky data in them. They are, like planetarium data, a representation of the sky taken from catalog data or fabricated. Sky in Google Earth has real astronomical data. It took several years to obtain the SLOAN data and the Digitized Sky survey occurred only once.

Earth Scientists have all kinds of orbiting satellites. Landsat has been taking data of the planet for 30 years. Give us 30 years of continuous sky coverage with fleets of satellites and we will be able to bring you the same sort of nearly perfect sky data as you see on earth. OR.... use simulated data like the other programs if pretty is all you want. Hubble cannot possibly cover the sky at  its native resolution even ONE TIME in 30 years.

We have an angular sky scale offered by my group at Space Telescope.
You can indeed add images using open source software, but stay tuned to the Space Telescope website, we will have something easy for you to use soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments.</p>
<p>First, many of the software programs you state, do not have actual sky data in them. They are, like planetarium data, a representation of the sky taken from catalog data or fabricated. Sky in Google Earth has real astronomical data. It took several years to obtain the SLOAN data and the Digitized Sky survey occurred only once.</p>
<p>Earth Scientists have all kinds of orbiting satellites. Landsat has been taking data of the planet for 30 years. Give us 30 years of continuous sky coverage with fleets of satellites and we will be able to bring you the same sort of nearly perfect sky data as you see on earth. OR&#8230;. use simulated data like the other programs if pretty is all you want. Hubble cannot possibly cover the sky at  its native resolution even ONE TIME in 30 years.</p>
<p>We have an angular sky scale offered by my group at Space Telescope.<br />
You can indeed add images using open source software, but stay tuned to the Space Telescope website, we will have something easy for you to use soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46687</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46687</guid>
		<description>If you want a good interactive surface mapping program, use Google Earth, but if you want a good sky/space mapping, stick to software that is made to deal with its innate complexities like Solarium and Celestia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want a good interactive surface mapping program, use Google Earth, but if you want a good sky/space mapping, stick to software that is made to deal with its innate complexities like Solarium and Celestia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google: From Earth To The Stars &#124; TechPark.net</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46686</link>
		<dc:creator>Google: From Earth To The Stars &#124; TechPark.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46686</guid>
		<description>[...] news on badastronomy.com, Tehrani Tagged:astronomy, google earth, sky, starsShare/Bookmark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news on badastronomy.com, Tehrani Tagged:astronomy, google earth, sky, starsShare/Bookmark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46685</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46685</guid>
		<description>I came here tonight because I read about the vast empty hole in space and I expected to find Dr Plait looking into it.  (Boom-boom!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came here tonight because I read about the vast empty hole in space and I expected to find Dr Plait looking into it.  (Boom-boom!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46684</link>
		<dc:creator>Ry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46684</guid>
		<description>True
www.stellarium.org

More polished but google is now set on taking over the universe, so they will probably gobble up stellarium.

http://www.googleskydownload.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True<br />
<a href="http://www.stellarium.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.stellarium.org</a></p>
<p>More polished but google is now set on taking over the universe, so they will probably gobble up stellarium.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.googleskydownload.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.googleskydownload.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46683</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46683</guid>
		<description>im a nerd
eheheheheheh@@@@@@@@@@2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im a nerd<br />
eheheheheheh@@@@@@@@@@2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46682</link>
		<dc:creator>bren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46682</guid>
		<description>hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46681</link>
		<dc:creator>bren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46681</guid>
		<description>i like to sniff my own ass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like to sniff my own ass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46680</guid>
		<description>Crapist program in the world!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crapist program in the world!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferdy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46679</link>
		<dc:creator>ferdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46679</guid>
		<description>Saya menjadi lebih banyak mengetahui tentang alam sekitar,.....terima kasih.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saya menjadi lebih banyak mengetahui tentang alam sekitar,&#8230;..terima kasih.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webb Telescope Pictures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News Updates 8.27.07</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46678</link>
		<dc:creator>Webb Telescope Pictures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News Updates 8.27.07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46678</guid>
		<description>[...] Sky upgrade among astronomers, geographers and web users is as varied as it gets. Phil at the Bad Astronomy Blog thinks it needs work and suggests several improvements. Hopefully they will make it into future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sky upgrade among astronomers, geographers and web users is as varied as it gets. Phil at the Bad Astronomy Blog thinks it needs work and suggests several improvements. Hopefully they will make it into future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46677</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46677</guid>
		<description>I been doing a little research and the Beams may be Aurigids. Since they will be here by the end of the month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I been doing a little research and the Beams may be Aurigids. Since they will be here by the end of the month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46676</guid>
		<description>I agree with the person who notes they probably dropped this early to beat MSFT. I alos agree it is kinda neat, but quite cheesy and a bit sloppy in execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the person who notes they probably dropped this early to beat MSFT. I alos agree it is kinda neat, but quite cheesy and a bit sloppy in execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Astronomy &#171; SpaceWatch Michigan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46675</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Astronomy &#171; SpaceWatch Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46675</guid>
		<description>[...] For other views of this application from astronomers, we invite you to read Dr. Pamela Gay&#8217;s Star Stryder blog and Dr. Phil Plait&#8217;s Bad Astronomy blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For other views of this application from astronomers, we invite you to read Dr. Pamela Gay&#8217;s Star Stryder blog and Dr. Phil Plait&#8217;s Bad Astronomy blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GÃœNEÅžÄ°N TAM Ä°Ã‡Ä°NDE &#187; Google SKY &#124; GÃ¶klere DÃ¶nen GÃ¶zler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46674</link>
		<dc:creator>GÃœNEÅžÄ°N TAM Ä°Ã‡Ä°NDE &#187; Google SKY &#124; GÃ¶klere DÃ¶nen GÃ¶zler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46674</guid>
		<description>[...] ProgramÄ± Ã§ok beÄŸenmeyen ve daha ÅŸimdiden teknik hatalar bulanlar da var. Ä°ÅŸte kaliteli bir eleÅŸtiri yazÄ±sÄ± (Ä°ngilizce) http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/08/22/google-sky/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ProgramÄ± Ã§ok beÄŸenmeyen ve daha ÅŸimdiden teknik hatalar bulanlar da var. Ä°ÅŸte kaliteli bir eleÅŸtiri yazÄ±sÄ± (Ä°ngilizce) <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/08/22/google-sky/" rel="nofollow">http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/08/22/google-sky/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46673</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46673</guid>
		<description>Here are some pics... http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery.fcgi?p=12&amp;gid=17603004</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some pics&#8230; <a href="http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery.fcgi?p=12&#038;gid=17603004" rel="nofollow">http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery.fcgi?p=12&#038;gid=17603004</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46672</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46672</guid>
		<description>Above HD 33203... I am starting to think that these are space junk or something is wrong with the cam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Above HD 33203&#8230; I am starting to think that these are space junk or something is wrong with the cam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46671</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46671</guid>
		<description>There is another one above the Messier 37 that could also be the one ABC was talking about. Hmm just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another one above the Messier 37 that could also be the one ABC was talking about. Hmm just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/comment-page-2/#comment-46670</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/22/google-sky/#comment-46670</guid>
		<description>Guess what ABC news said, &quot;10 billion light-years away there is a large empty black space and it is 1 billion light years across of emptiness, one astronomer called it a freak of nature.&quot; Well I found it and it is right near the Eskimo Nebula and the 56 Gem. Well there are more... are they going to find them to? Well here are the locations of the other four... 1. NGC 2266, HD 45504, and NGC 2248 the space is between these. 2. In the center of NGC 2192, HD 47270, HD 41467. 3. To the right of NGC 2281 (again this is the blue beam). 4. Directly below HD 50420. (Another blue beam). I don&#039;t know what the deal is but I thought it was so cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what ABC news said, &#8220;10 billion light-years away there is a large empty black space and it is 1 billion light years across of emptiness, one astronomer called it a freak of nature.&#8221; Well I found it and it is right near the Eskimo Nebula and the 56 Gem. Well there are more&#8230; are they going to find them to? Well here are the locations of the other four&#8230; 1. NGC 2266, HD 45504, and NGC 2248 the space is between these. 2. In the center of NGC 2192, HD 47270, HD 41467. 3. To the right of NGC 2281 (again this is the blue beam). 4. Directly below HD 50420. (Another blue beam). I don&#8217;t know what the deal is but I thought it was so cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 20:41:09 -->
