<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Aliens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:20:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nerdcore &#8212; links for 2007-09-04</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47352</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerdcore &#8212; links for 2007-09-04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47352</guid>
		<description>[...] Bad Astronomy Blog Â» Hollywood Aliens Hollywood Aliens, wissenschaftlich betrachtet&#8230; (tags: alien film science-fiction wissenschaft weltraum) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad Astronomy Blog Â» Hollywood Aliens Hollywood Aliens, wissenschaftlich betrachtet&#8230; (tags: alien film science-fiction wissenschaft weltraum) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neatorama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hollywood Aliens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47351</link>
		<dc:creator>Neatorama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hollywood Aliens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47351</guid>
		<description>[...] based on life as we know it on Earth. The clip is from of the UK show Cosmos: A Beginnerâ€™s Guide. Link  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] based on life as we know it on Earth. The clip is from of the UK show Cosmos: A Beginnerâ€™s Guide. Link  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaiYeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47348</link>
		<dc:creator>KaiYeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47348</guid>
		<description>A small question from a dumb reader, John Kennell: do you mean he should watch the Cosmos series that this clip was part of or the series that the name (Or indeed any offhand mention of the word) makes most of us think of? And if you mean the second one, are you talking about way of speaking or actual, deep-NYC-pausing-between-words physical voice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small question from a dumb reader, John Kennell: do you mean he should watch the Cosmos series that this clip was part of or the series that the name (Or indeed any offhand mention of the word) makes most of us think of? And if you mean the second one, are you talking about way of speaking or actual, deep-NYC-pausing-between-words physical voice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kennell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47349</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kennell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47349</guid>
		<description>Phil,

You lack the historical context of a true professional. Or do you? Don&#039;t let your wit overwhelm you. &#039;Science is fun!!!&#039; No, it&#039;s not, not always. Sometimes science is dead serious. Be serious when necessary. The stupid-ass movie aliens you talk about in this... whatever it is, are passe. You have a stronger voice than this. Use it.

Watch &#039;Cosmos&#039; again. And again, and again...

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>You lack the historical context of a true professional. Or do you? Don&#8217;t let your wit overwhelm you. &#8216;Science is fun!!!&#8217; No, it&#8217;s not, not always. Sometimes science is dead serious. Be serious when necessary. The stupid-ass movie aliens you talk about in this&#8230; whatever it is, are passe. You have a stronger voice than this. Use it.</p>
<p>Watch &#8216;Cosmos&#8217; again. And again, and again&#8230;</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElevatedSteve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47350</link>
		<dc:creator>ElevatedSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47350</guid>
		<description>I  thought that the creatures in The Abyss were Earth creatures. We just never discovered them before because they were so far under water. That wouldn&#039;t really quallify them as alien, would it? It would also explain why they appeared very much like earth creatures ... they evolved from some Jellyfish like creature in the same way we evolved from some monkey like creature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  thought that the creatures in The Abyss were Earth creatures. We just never discovered them before because they were so far under water. That wouldn&#8217;t really quallify them as alien, would it? It would also explain why they appeared very much like earth creatures &#8230; they evolved from some Jellyfish like creature in the same way we evolved from some monkey like creature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaiYeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47347</link>
		<dc:creator>KaiYeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47347</guid>
		<description>I think you mean the AndrOmEda Strain, drbuzz0. We are nowhere near understanding all non-terrestrial species, but Vegans like myself are carbon-based, although physically very different from humans. For one thing, none of you guys can shape-shift... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean the AndrOmEda Strain, drbuzz0. We are nowhere near understanding all non-terrestrial species, but Vegans like myself are carbon-based, although physically very different from humans. For one thing, none of you guys can shape-shift&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drbuzz0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/comment-page-1/#comment-47346</link>
		<dc:creator>drbuzz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/28/hollywood-aliens/#comment-47346</guid>
		<description>Nice... But I do have to take issue with a couple of things said there.

&quot;Aliens might not be carbon based:&quot;

That&#039;s possible, but if there is life elsewhere, my money is on organicly based.   There are more known carbon-based compounds than all others.  Carbon seems to be a uniquely good element for easily making very complex chemicals.   And organic compounds have been found in abundance in the solar system and beyond.   Stuff as complex as amino acids in comets, but also huge amounts of methane and other simple compounds.   Carbon is common, reactive and just perfect for this.

Could life be based on other chemicals?   Possibly, but I would think it is unlikely.  Carbon/hydrogen based chemicals just seem to naturally react in the ways that would possibly create life.   Other chemicals:  not really seen doing such varied and complex things in nature.


Also:  In the Andramada Strain they say intelligent life might be as small as a flea.   Again, possible, but unlikely.   This would really only be possible if it were somehow structured on an atomic basis, and not organic.   As mentioned above, I&#039;d expect life would most probably be carbon based.  It might be very different than life on earth.  It may not even have cells or something...  But it&#039;ll probably still be based on some of the same basic chemicals.   Probably..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230; But I do have to take issue with a couple of things said there.</p>
<p>&#8220;Aliens might not be carbon based:&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s possible, but if there is life elsewhere, my money is on organicly based.   There are more known carbon-based compounds than all others.  Carbon seems to be a uniquely good element for easily making very complex chemicals.   And organic compounds have been found in abundance in the solar system and beyond.   Stuff as complex as amino acids in comets, but also huge amounts of methane and other simple compounds.   Carbon is common, reactive and just perfect for this.</p>
<p>Could life be based on other chemicals?   Possibly, but I would think it is unlikely.  Carbon/hydrogen based chemicals just seem to naturally react in the ways that would possibly create life.   Other chemicals:  not really seen doing such varied and complex things in nature.</p>
<p>Also:  In the Andramada Strain they say intelligent life might be as small as a flea.   Again, possible, but unlikely.   This would really only be possible if it were somehow structured on an atomic basis, and not organic.   As mentioned above, I&#8217;d expect life would most probably be carbon based.  It might be very different than life on earth.  It may not even have cells or something&#8230;  But it&#8217;ll probably still be based on some of the same basic chemicals.   Probably..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
