<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cruisin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47884</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47884</guid>
		<description>I should have read this days ago.. DrBuzz0 is funny!

But, lest some folk think otherwise..

in  no particular order:

Alaskan water - even &quot;inland&quot; is plenty deep.  In fact, typically about as deep as the adjoining mountains are tall.  Plenty of room for any modern submarine to maneuver - albeit slowly.

Pirates are *very* unlikely in Alaskan waters.  99% of all vessels are well armed (ok, not the vessels themselves, but the crew certainly is)

If you fall overboard, don&#039;t worry about the ship stopping for you.  Oh, it will, but it takes TIME to stop those things.  It will be MUCH faster to send a small boat back for you.  This time of year, in those waters.. you might have 15-30 minutes of survival time before hypothermia pulls the plug on you.

Hugging the shoreline or blowing smoke.. neither is effective at all in the modern era (haven&#039;t been for years... munitions can target via radar, thermal, electronic signature...)


On the good side, of course, if the ship DOES sink and you don&#039;t make it to a lifeboat, the shore is bare miles away at worst.  Even better, there are very few sharks to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have read this days ago.. DrBuzz0 is funny!</p>
<p>But, lest some folk think otherwise..</p>
<p>in  no particular order:</p>
<p>Alaskan water &#8211; even &#8220;inland&#8221; is plenty deep.  In fact, typically about as deep as the adjoining mountains are tall.  Plenty of room for any modern submarine to maneuver &#8211; albeit slowly.</p>
<p>Pirates are *very* unlikely in Alaskan waters.  99% of all vessels are well armed (ok, not the vessels themselves, but the crew certainly is)</p>
<p>If you fall overboard, don&#8217;t worry about the ship stopping for you.  Oh, it will, but it takes TIME to stop those things.  It will be MUCH faster to send a small boat back for you.  This time of year, in those waters.. you might have 15-30 minutes of survival time before hypothermia pulls the plug on you.</p>
<p>Hugging the shoreline or blowing smoke.. neither is effective at all in the modern era (haven&#8217;t been for years&#8230; munitions can target via radar, thermal, electronic signature&#8230;)</p>
<p>On the good side, of course, if the ship DOES sink and you don&#8217;t make it to a lifeboat, the shore is bare miles away at worst.  Even better, there are very few sharks to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaiYeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47883</link>
		<dc:creator>KaiYeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47883</guid>
		<description>Um... INTERESTING advice, drbuzz0. I really doubt that the pirates will know who BA is. And you don&#039;t have to worry about him showing off for girls as he&#039;s married. Are you by any chance a shipwreck buff? Because I thought I was the only one! (Scientific brain activates) Here&#039;s a test: What was Britanic&#039;s original name and why was it changed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; INTERESTING advice, drbuzz0. I really doubt that the pirates will know who BA is. And you don&#8217;t have to worry about him showing off for girls as he&#8217;s married. Are you by any chance a shipwreck buff? Because I thought I was the only one! (Scientific brain activates) Here&#8217;s a test: What was Britanic&#8217;s original name and why was it changed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MouseOnMars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47882</link>
		<dc:creator>MouseOnMars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47882</guid>
		<description>I only have one request. Can you ask Randi of he&#039;s ever had a sceptical look at the Pharmaceutical industry and it&#039;s Science ? I&#039;ve seen articles defending Pharma Science in the Skeptical Inquirer, but they always cite the &quot;peer reviewed&quot; nature of Pharma Science. The drug trails that those papers are based on are highly expensive procedures that only the drug companies can afford. Does the &quot;it&#039;s been peer reviewed&quot; confirmation pass everything ?

Oh, and look at the stars up there.. low light pollution ?

MouseOnMars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only have one request. Can you ask Randi of he&#8217;s ever had a sceptical look at the Pharmaceutical industry and it&#8217;s Science ? I&#8217;ve seen articles defending Pharma Science in the Skeptical Inquirer, but they always cite the &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; nature of Pharma Science. The drug trails that those papers are based on are highly expensive procedures that only the drug companies can afford. Does the &#8220;it&#8217;s been peer reviewed&#8221; confirmation pass everything ?</p>
<p>Oh, and look at the stars up there.. low light pollution ?</p>
<p>MouseOnMars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergeant Zim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47881</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergeant Zim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47881</guid>
		<description>Johan,  I noticed the last line of the article: &quot;A permanent name has been proposed by the discoverers to the International Astronomical Union, and they are awaiting the decision of this body before announcing the name.  Stay Tuned!&quot;


Nibiru anyone?  *Laughs maniacally* BUWAHAHAHAHAAA!

If nothing else, it would give George Noory and the rest of the conspiracy theorists of the world something to talk about for the next 1000 years or so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johan,  I noticed the last line of the article: &#8220;A permanent name has been proposed by the discoverers to the International Astronomical Union, and they are awaiting the decision of this body before announcing the name.  Stay Tuned!&#8221;</p>
<p>Nibiru anyone?  *Laughs maniacally* BUWAHAHAHAHAAA!</p>
<p>If nothing else, it would give George Noory and the rest of the conspiracy theorists of the world something to talk about for the next 1000 years or so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47880</guid>
		<description>ABR, the big question for me now is: in 200 years will it be okay for a children&#039;s program to have a character named &quot;General Happybomb the friendly terrorist&quot;? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABR, the big question for me now is: in 200 years will it be okay for a children&#8217;s program to have a character named &#8220;General Happybomb the friendly terrorist&#8221;? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47879</link>
		<dc:creator>ABR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47879</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kevin F.  Now I&#039;m going to have the Wiggles bouncing around in my head for the rest of the afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kevin F.  Now I&#8217;m going to have the Wiggles bouncing around in my head for the rest of the afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47878</guid>
		<description>On the subject of pirates - while we&#039;re on it - there&#039;s a good article on modern-day pirating in the latest Smithsonian Magazine.

Sounds like they&#039;re trouble unless it happens to be Captain Feathersword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of pirates &#8211; while we&#8217;re on it &#8211; there&#8217;s a good article on modern-day pirating in the latest Smithsonian Magazine.</p>
<p>Sounds like they&#8217;re trouble unless it happens to be Captain Feathersword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47877</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47877</guid>
		<description>I thought that pirates was much to busy these days, making illegal copies of DVDs, to roam the seas and pillage ships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that pirates was much to busy these days, making illegal copies of DVDs, to roam the seas and pillage ships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47876</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47876</guid>
		<description>Looks like a steerable propeller to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a steerable propeller to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drbuzz0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47875</link>
		<dc:creator>drbuzz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47875</guid>
		<description>Older and smaller ones use propellers in the traditional sense, but many of the new ones use Azipods:  http://www.marinelog.com/IMAGES/podazipod.jpg

I wouldn&#039;t want phil sucked into either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Older and smaller ones use propellers in the traditional sense, but many of the new ones use Azipods:  <a href="http://www.marinelog.com/IMAGES/podazipod.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.marinelog.com/IMAGES/podazipod.jpg</a></p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want phil sucked into either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47874</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47874</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Pirates: If you are boarded by pirates, just cooperate and give them what they want. Generally pirates do not want to kill the passengers and certainly not sink the ship. They just want the loot. And generally they donâ€™t want to get a reputation for killing non-resisting passengers because that will only end up making things harder for them in the future. (If people start resisting it makes the whole thing harder).&lt;/i&gt;

Pirates aren&#039;t a huge concern in Canadian and American waters between Vancouver and Anchorage.

&quot;Stop and give us the loot or we&#039;ll harpoon you like a whale!!&quot;

Most cruise ships don&#039;t have propellers in the traditional sense.  They use something different whose name escapes me at the moment.  You wouldn&#039;t want to be sucked into it, but it&#039;s different from the traditional rotating fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pirates: If you are boarded by pirates, just cooperate and give them what they want. Generally pirates do not want to kill the passengers and certainly not sink the ship. They just want the loot. And generally they donâ€™t want to get a reputation for killing non-resisting passengers because that will only end up making things harder for them in the future. (If people start resisting it makes the whole thing harder).</i></p>
<p>Pirates aren&#8217;t a huge concern in Canadian and American waters between Vancouver and Anchorage.</p>
<p>&#8220;Stop and give us the loot or we&#8217;ll harpoon you like a whale!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Most cruise ships don&#8217;t have propellers in the traditional sense.  They use something different whose name escapes me at the moment.  You wouldn&#8217;t want to be sucked into it, but it&#8217;s different from the traditional rotating fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drbuzz0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47873</link>
		<dc:creator>drbuzz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47873</guid>
		<description>Phil Rememeber:  If you fall overboard while the ship is underway, swim like hell AWAY from the ship.   Obviously yell and scream and stuff to try to hopefully get the attention of someone, but the thing you also have to bear in mind is that (especially if you are near the stern) you could get drawn into the props by the massive current they generate.

This happened to those who tried to escape the Britannic shortly after it began to sink.   So remember, swim away from the side of the ship with all you&#039;ve got and try to splash and yell too.   Hopefully someone saw you go over anyways, because in Alaskan waters you don&#039;t have more than a few minutes before you&#039;re going to seize up from hypothermia, even in the summer.

Hopefully they&#039;ll signal a man overboard alert which will mean they&#039;ll shut down the engines and send a rescuer down, possibly on a life boat... or lower a rope ladder once its safe

Anyways... it&#039;s a bad situation no matter how you cut it, so don&#039;t try to impress the ladies by showing how well you can swim and diving off the deck.   THAT IS WHAT THE POOL IS FOR!

Also... remember that if you break the law in international waters you are no doubt going to have some jurisdictional dicey situations.  That stuff is governed by a hodge podge of treaties and presidents going back centuries.   For this reason, it often doesn&#039;t get prosecuted at all.  And stuff like smoking the wacky weed would not really be illegal because it&#039;s not in violation of general international law or common law anything...

Also:  RED SKY IN THE MORNING SAILOR TAKE WARNING.  RED SKY AT NIGHT SAILORS DELIGHT!


Pirates:  If you are boarded by pirates, just cooperate and give them what they want.  Generally pirates do not want to kill the passengers and certainly not sink the ship.  They just want the loot.  And generally they don&#039;t want to get a reputation for killing non-resisting passengers because that will only end up making things harder for them in the future.   (If people start resisting it makes the whole thing harder).

This is not without exception, but unless you are better armed, you pretty much can&#039;t do much and are safest handing whatever you got over.... even your telescope if you have to.    The worst case senerio is they would kidnap you for ransom.   So do NOT tell them you are Phil Plait, the Bad Astronomer.


Submarines:   Sailing in a zig-zag pattern does not actually do any good against U-boats, that&#039;s just a myth.  And doing so does make the trip take longer, which only helps the U-boats get a hit.   If you think you are shadowed by a submarine, you may want to just stick to hugging the coast.   It can be risky, but a submarine needs much deeper water to operate underwater safely than a surface ship needs.

If all else fails and you are being tailed by a submarine or a torpedo boat, you can play chicken and turn around.   Such vessels can be easily destroyed by ramming.   But that should be a last resort.


If there is an iceberg ahead and the ship does not have enough time to avoid it then the best thing to do may be to go straight for it and try to hit it with the bow, but try to slow as much as possible.   This is counter-intuitive, but it&#039;s better to hit dead on than try to turn and run the risk of scrapping down the side of the ship.

If the ship is under attack from aircraft, it may be possible to inject large amounts of something like glycerol or another simple chemical into the engines.   If done properly this can create a massive smoke screen which will make accurate targeting difficult optically.  Of course this does not effect radar.   If you can try to get the ship wedged between rock outcroppings or against the shore, then the returns from these will make it hard to pick out the hull on the radar.

Keep a lookout for mines.   It&#039;s less than perfect, but they do sometimes break the surface or make an apparent effect on wave action.    Be vigilant for them, because mines are a merciless enemy who knows no rule of law and is blind to who you are.


This may seem counter-intuitive, but if you are going up against a battle ship or a gun destroyer, and you&#039;re in an unarmed cruise ship, do NOT RUN AWAY!   Come as close to them as possible.   The guns are less effective close up than far away and they may have a limit to how far down or up they can come.   These are basically indirect fire weapons.   If you&#039;re right up next to them they&#039;ll basically be limited to small arms.   You can sideswipe them.  That may be the best offensive maneuver.

Torpedoes:
Keep a lookout for these and inform the bridge of any potential bubble trials.   The thing to remember is that defensive maneuvers can be effective, but you need to see it ASAP to have a chance.   Try to make a turn and come back toward the torpedo so you can pull off to the side.    But one thing to bare in mind is that you don&#039;t want to do this if you think it might make the torpedo hit your vessel broadside.   That&#039;s worse.

Modern torpedoes however do not necessarily go for the ship.  They may try to get UNDER the ship and explode with a high power blast and shock wave which will break the ship&#039;s keel.    The most effective place is the center.   If you can get the explosion close enough to the bow or stern you may be able to be lifted up with minimal damage.

But remember that the stern has it&#039;s own issues.   This is where your rudders, props and such are.   If those get jammed you are a sitting duck.


If you find yourself lost on an uninhabited island, well that&#039;s a whole issue onto itself and I will be sure to post what you need to now a bit later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Rememeber:  If you fall overboard while the ship is underway, swim like hell AWAY from the ship.   Obviously yell and scream and stuff to try to hopefully get the attention of someone, but the thing you also have to bear in mind is that (especially if you are near the stern) you could get drawn into the props by the massive current they generate.</p>
<p>This happened to those who tried to escape the Britannic shortly after it began to sink.   So remember, swim away from the side of the ship with all you&#8217;ve got and try to splash and yell too.   Hopefully someone saw you go over anyways, because in Alaskan waters you don&#8217;t have more than a few minutes before you&#8217;re going to seize up from hypothermia, even in the summer.</p>
<p>Hopefully they&#8217;ll signal a man overboard alert which will mean they&#8217;ll shut down the engines and send a rescuer down, possibly on a life boat&#8230; or lower a rope ladder once its safe</p>
<p>Anyways&#8230; it&#8217;s a bad situation no matter how you cut it, so don&#8217;t try to impress the ladies by showing how well you can swim and diving off the deck.   THAT IS WHAT THE POOL IS FOR!</p>
<p>Also&#8230; remember that if you break the law in international waters you are no doubt going to have some jurisdictional dicey situations.  That stuff is governed by a hodge podge of treaties and presidents going back centuries.   For this reason, it often doesn&#8217;t get prosecuted at all.  And stuff like smoking the wacky weed would not really be illegal because it&#8217;s not in violation of general international law or common law anything&#8230;</p>
<p>Also:  RED SKY IN THE MORNING SAILOR TAKE WARNING.  RED SKY AT NIGHT SAILORS DELIGHT!</p>
<p>Pirates:  If you are boarded by pirates, just cooperate and give them what they want.  Generally pirates do not want to kill the passengers and certainly not sink the ship.  They just want the loot.  And generally they don&#8217;t want to get a reputation for killing non-resisting passengers because that will only end up making things harder for them in the future.   (If people start resisting it makes the whole thing harder).</p>
<p>This is not without exception, but unless you are better armed, you pretty much can&#8217;t do much and are safest handing whatever you got over&#8230;. even your telescope if you have to.    The worst case senerio is they would kidnap you for ransom.   So do NOT tell them you are Phil Plait, the Bad Astronomer.</p>
<p>Submarines:   Sailing in a zig-zag pattern does not actually do any good against U-boats, that&#8217;s just a myth.  And doing so does make the trip take longer, which only helps the U-boats get a hit.   If you think you are shadowed by a submarine, you may want to just stick to hugging the coast.   It can be risky, but a submarine needs much deeper water to operate underwater safely than a surface ship needs.</p>
<p>If all else fails and you are being tailed by a submarine or a torpedo boat, you can play chicken and turn around.   Such vessels can be easily destroyed by ramming.   But that should be a last resort.</p>
<p>If there is an iceberg ahead and the ship does not have enough time to avoid it then the best thing to do may be to go straight for it and try to hit it with the bow, but try to slow as much as possible.   This is counter-intuitive, but it&#8217;s better to hit dead on than try to turn and run the risk of scrapping down the side of the ship.</p>
<p>If the ship is under attack from aircraft, it may be possible to inject large amounts of something like glycerol or another simple chemical into the engines.   If done properly this can create a massive smoke screen which will make accurate targeting difficult optically.  Of course this does not effect radar.   If you can try to get the ship wedged between rock outcroppings or against the shore, then the returns from these will make it hard to pick out the hull on the radar.</p>
<p>Keep a lookout for mines.   It&#8217;s less than perfect, but they do sometimes break the surface or make an apparent effect on wave action.    Be vigilant for them, because mines are a merciless enemy who knows no rule of law and is blind to who you are.</p>
<p>This may seem counter-intuitive, but if you are going up against a battle ship or a gun destroyer, and you&#8217;re in an unarmed cruise ship, do NOT RUN AWAY!   Come as close to them as possible.   The guns are less effective close up than far away and they may have a limit to how far down or up they can come.   These are basically indirect fire weapons.   If you&#8217;re right up next to them they&#8217;ll basically be limited to small arms.   You can sideswipe them.  That may be the best offensive maneuver.</p>
<p>Torpedoes:<br />
Keep a lookout for these and inform the bridge of any potential bubble trials.   The thing to remember is that defensive maneuvers can be effective, but you need to see it ASAP to have a chance.   Try to make a turn and come back toward the torpedo so you can pull off to the side.    But one thing to bare in mind is that you don&#8217;t want to do this if you think it might make the torpedo hit your vessel broadside.   That&#8217;s worse.</p>
<p>Modern torpedoes however do not necessarily go for the ship.  They may try to get UNDER the ship and explode with a high power blast and shock wave which will break the ship&#8217;s keel.    The most effective place is the center.   If you can get the explosion close enough to the bow or stern you may be able to be lifted up with minimal damage.</p>
<p>But remember that the stern has it&#8217;s own issues.   This is where your rudders, props and such are.   If those get jammed you are a sitting duck.</p>
<p>If you find yourself lost on an uninhabited island, well that&#8217;s a whole issue onto itself and I will be sure to post what you need to now a bit later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip From Australia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47852</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip From Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47852</guid>
		<description>Name dropper. I&#039;mjealous.

Well, I&#039;ll head off and hang with Derick and Swoopy. With my Aussie treats. (see... I can do it too).

Philip from Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name dropper. I&#8217;mjealous.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ll head off and hang with Derick and Swoopy. With my Aussie treats. (see&#8230; I can do it too).</p>
<p>Philip from Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47853</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47853</guid>
		<description>We want videos! More &quot;Science, science! Send money!&quot;

Think you&#039;ll do whale watching?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want videos! More &#8220;Science, science! Send money!&#8221;</p>
<p>Think you&#8217;ll do whale watching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47855</guid>
		<description>Ah, yet again reading your blog causes the green-eyed monster to rear its ugly head again. *Sigh* We&#039;re well acquainted now and there is so very little left to discuss with him. Oh, I guess there&#039;s always board games.

Seriously though, have fun.

*Muttering to self*: I wonder what he&#039;ll do if Colbert takes him up on his challenge while he&#039;s away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yet again reading your blog causes the green-eyed monster to rear its ugly head again. *Sigh* We&#8217;re well acquainted now and there is so very little left to discuss with him. Oh, I guess there&#8217;s always board games.</p>
<p>Seriously though, have fun.</p>
<p>*Muttering to self*: I wonder what he&#8217;ll do if Colbert takes him up on his challenge while he&#8217;s away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard B. Drumm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47854</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard B. Drumm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 03:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47854</guid>
		<description>Jealous. Yep. Jealous that you get to do stuff like this and my wife busts my chops for going next weekend to Bear Mountain on the Va/West Va border. I&#039;ll be there 2 nights (with Saturday reserved for a little sidewalk astronomy with the EPO folks at NRAO&#039;s Green Bank Radio Astronomy Observatory) and she&#039;s pissed! Says I owe her one. Oh well... I hope it&#039;s clear, dangnabbit! I have a 300mm Nikkor I want to train on Cygnus...
Have fun, Phil!
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jealous. Yep. Jealous that you get to do stuff like this and my wife busts my chops for going next weekend to Bear Mountain on the Va/West Va border. I&#8217;ll be there 2 nights (with Saturday reserved for a little sidewalk astronomy with the EPO folks at NRAO&#8217;s Green Bank Radio Astronomy Observatory) and she&#8217;s pissed! Says I owe her one. Oh well&#8230; I hope it&#8217;s clear, dangnabbit! I have a 300mm Nikkor I want to train on Cygnus&#8230;<br />
Have fun, Phil!<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inoculated Mind</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47856</link>
		<dc:creator>Inoculated Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47856</guid>
		<description>Jealous.

But I&#039;ll be on one of those cruises someday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jealous.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll be on one of those cruises someday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47857</link>
		<dc:creator>PJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47857</guid>
		<description>I must have obviously missed something...whappen to your cruise to Galapagos?

Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have obviously missed something&#8230;whappen to your cruise to Galapagos?</p>
<p>Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaiYeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47858</link>
		<dc:creator>KaiYeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47858</guid>
		<description>As pirates say, fair winds and following seas, me matey! Have fun, &#039;cause I&#039;ll be starting school and you&#039;ll be in the Galapagos! Razzle frazzle...
Troy- thanks for teaching me a new word:
Chicanery, noun, cheating or deception: deception or trickery, especially by the clever manipulation of language
(Encarta Dictionary Tools)
That would make a great movie, by the way. I can see the tagline: &quot;Hidden in the waves- danger beyond belief!&quot; You should pitch it, I&#039;d pay to see it, as long as the BA played himself. (I just saw the latest Scooby-Doo movie and solved almost all of the mystery by myself, so I&#039;m hooked on exotic adventures!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As pirates say, fair winds and following seas, me matey! Have fun, &#8217;cause I&#8217;ll be starting school and you&#8217;ll be in the Galapagos! Razzle frazzle&#8230;<br />
Troy- thanks for teaching me a new word:<br />
Chicanery, noun, cheating or deception: deception or trickery, especially by the clever manipulation of language<br />
(Encarta Dictionary Tools)<br />
That would make a great movie, by the way. I can see the tagline: &#8220;Hidden in the waves- danger beyond belief!&#8221; You should pitch it, I&#8217;d pay to see it, as long as the BA played himself. (I just saw the latest Scooby-Doo movie and solved almost all of the mystery by myself, so I&#8217;m hooked on exotic adventures!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Ryan Decker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47860</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Ryan Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47860</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll love the trip! If you make it up to Fairbanks pop me an email, I&#039;d love to meet the man who&#039;s been knocking sense into all the goofballs. Plus, should be some good Aurora activity this week. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll love the trip! If you make it up to Fairbanks pop me an email, I&#8217;d love to meet the man who&#8217;s been knocking sense into all the goofballs. Plus, should be some good Aurora activity this week. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47859</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47859</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not certain but it looks like the internet service they provide is called Connect@Sea, which is something like $10-$25 per day and has speed similar to dial-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not certain but it looks like the internet service they provide is called Connect@Sea, which is something like $10-$25 per day and has speed similar to dial-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47861</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47861</guid>
		<description>Have a great time on the cruise! I do apologize for the weather here in Vancouver today though. It&#039;s been rather a pathetic excuse for a summer this year. Hopefully it will clear up as you head up the coast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a great time on the cruise! I do apologize for the weather here in Vancouver today though. It&#8217;s been rather a pathetic excuse for a summer this year. Hopefully it will clear up as you head up the coast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Panzer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47862</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Panzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47862</guid>
		<description>Johan,

You&#039;re referring to the KBO now known as &quot;Eris&quot;, and yes, as Alex said it&#039;s triggered a recategorization of Pluto.  Pluto, Eris, and the asteroid Ceres are all now classified as &quot;dwarf planets&quot;.  This all happened late last summer or thereabouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johan,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re referring to the KBO now known as &#8220;Eris&#8221;, and yes, as Alex said it&#8217;s triggered a recategorization of Pluto.  Pluto, Eris, and the asteroid Ceres are all now classified as &#8220;dwarf planets&#8221;.  This all happened late last summer or thereabouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Whiteside</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47863</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Whiteside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47863</guid>
		<description>I think that planet&#039;s been named, and has triggered a recategorisation of Pluto, since the article was written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that planet&#8217;s been named, and has triggered a recategorisation of Pluto, since the article was written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/comment-page-1/#comment-47866</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/02/cruisin/#comment-47866</guid>
		<description>Hey (might have mailed this once but nvm here goes)

What is our take on this :
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm

just wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey (might have mailed this once but nvm here goes)</p>
<p>What is our take on this :<br />
<a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm" rel="nofollow">http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm</a></p>
<p>just wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 19:30:10 -->
