<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily static Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48857</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48857</guid>
		<description>You cannot patent a phrase or expression.  You can trademark it, but not patent it.

You cannot copyright the Hoon Hoax idea.  Ideas are not copyrighted, only the particular expression of them.  The words you put down on paper or electronic form to express the concept of the Moon Hoax are yours to protect, but the idea is free for others to take.

In any case, Phil would likely face legal issues to using any form of protection for Moon Hoax arguments, because Kaysing, Rene, Sibrel, et al have already beat him to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot patent a phrase or expression.  You can trademark it, but not patent it.</p>
<p>You cannot copyright the Hoon Hoax idea.  Ideas are not copyrighted, only the particular expression of them.  The words you put down on paper or electronic form to express the concept of the Moon Hoax are yours to protect, but the idea is free for others to take.</p>
<p>In any case, Phil would likely face legal issues to using any form of protection for Moon Hoax arguments, because Kaysing, Rene, Sibrel, et al have already beat him to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48858</guid>
		<description>James:

&gt; Pity, the concept of a faked moon landing is an idea and canâ€™t be copyrighted.

Well, that&#039;s the way it&#039;s supposed to be, AFAIK.  But, in these days when you can get a patent on &quot;one-click shopping&quot; (read &quot;using cookies to remember you&quot;) and using a &quot;sliding window&quot; to allow 2-digit years to mean something other than 1900-1999, one has to wonder.  I understand that patents have been granted on plants that have been discovered in nature.  (As opposed to grown in a lab via cross-breeding.)

Perhaps he should trademark specific phrases, like &quot;how come we don&#039;t see any stars&quot;, and &quot;you&#039;d never survive a trip through the Van Allen belt&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James:</p>
<p>&gt; Pity, the concept of a faked moon landing is an idea and canâ€™t be copyrighted.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s supposed to be, AFAIK.  But, in these days when you can get a patent on &#8220;one-click shopping&#8221; (read &#8220;using cookies to remember you&#8221;) and using a &#8220;sliding window&#8221; to allow 2-digit years to mean something other than 1900-1999, one has to wonder.  I understand that patents have been granted on plants that have been discovered in nature.  (As opposed to grown in a lab via cross-breeding.)</p>
<p>Perhaps he should trademark specific phrases, like &#8220;how come we don&#8217;t see any stars&#8221;, and &#8220;you&#8217;d never survive a trip through the Van Allen belt&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48856</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48856</guid>
		<description>Pity, the concept of a faked moon landing is an idea and can&#039;t be copyrighted.  But go right ahead and copyright any expression of an instance of faked moon landing.  Or you might try trademarking it.  You  in the faked moon landing business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity, the concept of a faked moon landing is an idea and can&#8217;t be copyrighted.  But go right ahead and copyright any expression of an instance of faked moon landing.  Or you might try trademarking it.  You  in the faked moon landing business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassmanpete</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48855</link>
		<dc:creator>bassmanpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48855</guid>
		<description>DaveKan, it would be interesting to see how Jon Kitna feels now, physically that is.

On St Valentine&#039;s Day 2003, a Friday, I was whacked by a dead branch falling off a huge gum tree in our neighbour&#039;s back yard. It hit me on the forehead &amp; nose (much to the amusement of a long time friend who always said I had a big schnozzle!), also hit my right upper arm ripping the sleeve off my shirt and leaving a large bruise.

The following day was the Avalon International Air Show for which we&#039;d had tickets for several months. With nose covered in flesh coloured plaster I was there, revelling in the roar of the jets &amp; the smell of aviation fuel, loving every minute of it &amp; feeling great. Woke up Sunday morning, felt like I&#039;d been hit by the proverbial truck. I had concussion &amp; felt lousy for a week.

My theory (in the sense that fundies say &quot;evolution&#039;s only a theory&quot;!) is that the excitement of going to the air show kept the concussion at bay for 24 hours. So, is there any info on what condition Mr Kitna is in now? I&#039;m quite happy to have my &quot;theory&quot; blasted out of the water :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveKan, it would be interesting to see how Jon Kitna feels now, physically that is.</p>
<p>On St Valentine&#8217;s Day 2003, a Friday, I was whacked by a dead branch falling off a huge gum tree in our neighbour&#8217;s back yard. It hit me on the forehead &amp; nose (much to the amusement of a long time friend who always said I had a big schnozzle!), also hit my right upper arm ripping the sleeve off my shirt and leaving a large bruise.</p>
<p>The following day was the Avalon International Air Show for which we&#8217;d had tickets for several months. With nose covered in flesh coloured plaster I was there, revelling in the roar of the jets &amp; the smell of aviation fuel, loving every minute of it &amp; feeling great. Woke up Sunday morning, felt like I&#8217;d been hit by the proverbial truck. I had concussion &amp; felt lousy for a week.</p>
<p>My theory (in the sense that fundies say &#8220;evolution&#8217;s only a theory&#8221;!) is that the excitement of going to the air show kept the concussion at bay for 24 hours. So, is there any info on what condition Mr Kitna is in now? I&#8217;m quite happy to have my &#8220;theory&#8221; blasted out of the water <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumhaskins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48847</link>
		<dc:creator>bumhaskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48847</guid>
		<description>Phil, I have been having a colorful discussion via e-mail with one Bart Sibrel. Since I don&#039;t want to put anything crude on the blog, I&#039;ll refrain from putting it up here, but I think you would get a kick out of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, I have been having a colorful discussion via e-mail with one Bart Sibrel. Since I don&#8217;t want to put anything crude on the blog, I&#8217;ll refrain from putting it up here, but I think you would get a kick out of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Folcrom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48848</link>
		<dc:creator>Folcrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48848</guid>
		<description>&gt;I wonderâ€¦ maybe I should copyright the Moon Hoax idea.

Phil, I see nothing wrong with you trying to copyright the Moon Hoax idea.   It would be wonderful to see Moon Hoax believers paying for their stupidity.

Cheers

Folcrom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I wonderâ€¦ maybe I should copyright the Moon Hoax idea.</p>
<p>Phil, I see nothing wrong with you trying to copyright the Moon Hoax idea.   It would be wonderful to see Moon Hoax believers paying for their stupidity.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Folcrom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48849</link>
		<dc:creator>tsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48849</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a nag strip.  Illiad uses them occasionally to get members.  Give it thirty seconds, and it will go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a nag strip.  Illiad uses them occasionally to get members.  Give it thirty seconds, and it will go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Killian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48852</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48852</guid>
		<description>Um, am I the only one who&#039;s getting a different comic when I click the link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, am I the only one who&#8217;s getting a different comic when I click the link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48851</link>
		<dc:creator>tsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48851</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh, those pesky morals!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s the skeptic mantra: &quot;If I only didn&#039;t have a conscience...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh, those pesky morals!</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s the skeptic mantra: &#8220;If I only didn&#8217;t have a conscience&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48850</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48850</guid>
		<description>Thanks David; I got it. :-)

Also, please refrain from using colorful words on the blog, please. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David; I got it. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, please refrain from using colorful words on the blog, please. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48854</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48854</guid>
		<description>Phil, you do realise that userfriendly is mocking moon hoaxers right?

The followup strip from today exapnds on the running joke of making fun of Stef the marketing douchebag for believing the moon hoax &lt;b&gt;[word deleted by The Bad Astronomer]&lt;/b&gt;.

http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/07sep/xuf010718.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, you do realise that userfriendly is mocking moon hoaxers right?</p>
<p>The followup strip from today exapnds on the running joke of making fun of Stef the marketing douchebag for believing the moon hoax <b>[word deleted by The Bad Astronomer]</b>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/07sep/xuf010718.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/07sep/xuf010718.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveKan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-48853</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveKan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/09/18/daily-static-moon/#comment-48853</guid>
		<description>Phil:  This is completely off topic, but I thought you might see this sooner by posting this in the comments rather than sending an email.

So anyway, I am a Detroit Lions fan and in the game on Sunday our quarterback, Jon Kitna, was knocked out of the game with a concussion in the 1st quarter.  In the 4th quarter the medical staff gave him an OK to go back in the game, which he did and led the Lions to a victory.  Here&#039;s where it gets interesting (for non-Lions fans), after the game Kitna attributed his returning to the game as a Miracle and that god had healed him.  Now, I love the guy, he is a great QB, but it drives me nuts when atheletes bring religion into the game.  In a Lions blog that I read a reporter wrote a story with a minor comment stating that he didn&#039;t think it was a miracle, just that Kitna is a tough player.  This little article has caused one of the religion good vs. religion bad comment wars that I am sure you are familiar with.  I joined in a little, but it was funny how the sames things that were said about one of your creationists posts were showing up on a football site.  Here is the link if you are interested...

http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2007/09/kitna_proves_toughness_on_off.html

Love the site, by the way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil:  This is completely off topic, but I thought you might see this sooner by posting this in the comments rather than sending an email.</p>
<p>So anyway, I am a Detroit Lions fan and in the game on Sunday our quarterback, Jon Kitna, was knocked out of the game with a concussion in the 1st quarter.  In the 4th quarter the medical staff gave him an OK to go back in the game, which he did and led the Lions to a victory.  Here&#8217;s where it gets interesting (for non-Lions fans), after the game Kitna attributed his returning to the game as a Miracle and that god had healed him.  Now, I love the guy, he is a great QB, but it drives me nuts when atheletes bring religion into the game.  In a Lions blog that I read a reporter wrote a story with a minor comment stating that he didn&#8217;t think it was a miracle, just that Kitna is a tough player.  This little article has caused one of the religion good vs. religion bad comment wars that I am sure you are familiar with.  I joined in a little, but it was funny how the sames things that were said about one of your creationists posts were showing up on a football site.  Here is the link if you are interested&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2007/09/kitna_proves_toughness_on_off.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2007/09/kitna_proves_toughness_on_off.html</a></p>
<p>Love the site, by the way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 15:37:14 -->
