Are you making up stuff? That sounds like randomly selected jargon and pseudojargon strung together.

An axiometric (Kerr type) distribution would lead to a jet like ejection? Maybe with a flux capacitor utilizing dilithium crystals…

“C-field” stands for Creation field. It is a scalar field.

In the conditions of strong gravity obtaining in the neighborhood of compact massive objects the value of the field can be locally raised. This leads to creation of matter along with the creation of negative c-field energy. The latter also has negative stresses which have the effect of blowing the spacetime outwards (as in an inflationary model) with the result that the created matter is thrown out in an explosion.

In such pockets of creation ( minibangs or mini-creation events). a an axi-symmetric (Kerr type) distribution would lead to jet like ejection along the symmetric axis. creation takes place in the vicinity of already present massive ob jects.

Thus, galaxies beget galaxies!

I’m not certain what you mean, how can matter be created out of nothing?

(And what’s the C-field?)

Just curious what is meant.

Matter being created out of the negative energy C-field and ejectedc as a quasar?

M87 has a blue spike coming out of its center and this spike contains a number of small, compact objects. Further out along the jet isa radio, X-ray galaxy (M 84) with swept back X-ray isophotes indicating travel out along the jet. It is closely accompanied by a high redshift (z ~ 1) quasar. Further out is a very bright radio, X-ray quasar with flanking quasars around z = 1. This is all set in an extended line of X-ray sources and older, more evolved galaxies!

Thing is, M87 sits at the gravitational center of the Virgo cluster, so it’s not moving relative to the cluster. I wonder if some other galaxy swept past it, causing the jet to bend around? Or it may just be motion of the gas between galaxies itself doing that.

Or maybe theres some technical limitation that I’m not aware of that would limit all this. But there you are.

energy that screams out from the vicinity of the black hole.

Bad physics from the BA – in space, no one can hear you scream! Sorry, I couldn’t resist it

A sufficiently advanced civilization wouldn’t have to even bother with galactic nuclei…
Just send out billions or trillions of probes, thousands or millions to every galaxy that can be detected, and see what there is to see. Doesn’t matter how far away they are – certain portions of the scientific population will constantly volunteer (or be volunteered) to enter long term statis to wait for their galactic probes’ data results – teams of entities waking/reentering stasis/re-awakening time after time as every new potentially interesting solar system is encountered. (Via onboard very, very smart AI, of course)

They’ll have had lots of time – many billions of years to explore in that way. And it doesn’t matter if *we* detect any type of hardware or EM signals. They don’t care about contacting us anytime soon – they just want the probe data. Maybe a billion years from now a new “contact” probe will come back to see if anyone is left, and if it’s worthwhile to even start some kind of conversation.

M87: A Bull’s-eye for SETI?

ABSTRACT:

Postbiological life might operate (communicate, organize, travel, colonize) on a larger scale than a single galaxy—possibly on the scale of the supercluster. The most advanced postbiological civilizations in our Local Supercluster may have developed in the Virgo Cluster, a rich cluster where intergalactic communication and travel would be easiest. If these advanced civilizations wanted to contact new civilizations elsewhere in the Supercluster they might collectively broadcast from one central location, for the sake of efficiency and to make it easy to find. A powerful, centrally located beacon would tend to replace all others in the Supercluster. This could explain the failure of SETI. The most likely location for this beacon is the giant elliptical galaxy M87.

It’s a VLA (as opposed to VLBA) NRAO image and danged if it doesn’t look like it’s spinning around! Like a fire hose that’s gotten away from the fireman and is soaking everybody with X-rays!
Way frakkin’ cool!
Rich in Charlottesville

Whatever. We didn’t find it.

Molecular positronium doesn’t really make much sense. It’d be like asking for molecular electronium. (Am I correct in thinking positronium and anti-hydrogen [or for that matter any other anti-element]) are two entirely different things?

> Dagnappit. I meant to change that before posting. I fixed it. It’s actually about 40 degrees off from being right at us.

Well, okay, so we’re probably within the octant that it’s pointing. In nothing else, it’s an accute angle. It’s aiming right for us, assuming that it’s an exceptionally poor marksman. It just… keeps… missing… the… target!

“Follow him!” “Sir, we have the advantag–” “FOLLOW HIM!”

Now here’s a brain-busting Class III civilization theoretical structure for you: a Dyson sail positioned to catch and utilize the material in an active galaxy’s jet (for whatever reason). Just a thought.

Also, could the counter-jet be weaker in some way than the one we can visualize? I recall seeing jets from pulsars that are weaker in one direction then another, but I don’t know if that translates to similarities in jets from supermassive black holes.