<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feed up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlacKats</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51460</link>
		<dc:creator>BlacKats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51460</guid>
		<description>Bloglines Beta is much better than the baseline bloglines... I&#039;ll have to check out Google Reader though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloglines Beta is much better than the baseline bloglines&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to check out Google Reader though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aerik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51459</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51459</guid>
		<description>Same w/ google reader, mick.  It&#039;s web-based, and even has an offline version now, with the reader tool thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same w/ google reader, mick.  It&#8217;s web-based, and even has an offline version now, with the reader tool thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51458</guid>
		<description>Netvibes is the way to go. You can use it from any PC without having to install any blogreader software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netvibes is the way to go. You can use it from any PC without having to install any blogreader software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51453</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51453</guid>
		<description>Though you&#039;ve already updated the post to say that you&#039;ll be trying Google Reader, I&#039;d like to also cast a vote for it, anyway.

I&#039;ve tried various online aggregators (including BlogLines), but none of them worked as well for me as Google Reader, since I keep track of 150+ different feeds. I suppose that I just never noticed the delay that some people are complaining about because I don&#039;t always check my feeds at the same time everyday, plus I&#039;ve got quite a few, so it doesn&#039;t affect me all that much.

On top of that, I&#039;m constantly switching between computers (including a few that have DeepFreeze installed) so having everything online is a must. If I run into a better aggregator, I&#039;ll definitely switch, but there&#039;s not one at the moment that works as well for me.

Go for Google Reader, BA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though you&#8217;ve already updated the post to say that you&#8217;ll be trying Google Reader, I&#8217;d like to also cast a vote for it, anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried various online aggregators (including BlogLines), but none of them worked as well for me as Google Reader, since I keep track of 150+ different feeds. I suppose that I just never noticed the delay that some people are complaining about because I don&#8217;t always check my feeds at the same time everyday, plus I&#8217;ve got quite a few, so it doesn&#8217;t affect me all that much.</p>
<p>On top of that, I&#8217;m constantly switching between computers (including a few that have DeepFreeze installed) so having everything online is a must. If I run into a better aggregator, I&#8217;ll definitely switch, but there&#8217;s not one at the moment that works as well for me.</p>
<p>Go for Google Reader, BA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aerik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51457</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51457</guid>
		<description>I dunno, EvilBob.  It isn&#039;t really slow to me.  The design problems, however, are easily fixed with the &quot;better greader&quot; firefox extension or using the Stylish extension, one of many stylesheets available from &lt;a href=&quot;http://userstyles.org/&quot; title=&quot;User Styles&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;User Styles&lt;/a&gt;.  But like I pointed out above, one of it&#039;s main benefits is that you can force a secure connection (even the blog sharing widget).  Also, you can export an opml file of all your feeds to use on other services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, EvilBob.  It isn&#8217;t really slow to me.  The design problems, however, are easily fixed with the &#8220;better greader&#8221; firefox extension or using the Stylish extension, one of many stylesheets available from <a href="http://userstyles.org/" title="User Styles" rel="nofollow">User Styles</a>.  But like I pointed out above, one of it&#8217;s main benefits is that you can force a secure connection (even the blog sharing widget).  Also, you can export an opml file of all your feeds to use on other services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilBob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51455</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51455</guid>
		<description>After reading all the comments here, I went and tried Google Reader for a couple of days - and promptly went back to Bloglines. I found Google reader to be slow to use, fairly messy to look at, and not as clean and easy to use as Bloglines. Just my 2c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading all the comments here, I went and tried Google Reader for a couple of days &#8211; and promptly went back to Bloglines. I found Google reader to be slow to use, fairly messy to look at, and not as clean and easy to use as Bloglines. Just my 2c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Robitaille</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51456</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Robitaille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51456</guid>
		<description>Write your own in php!

I used MagpieRSS: RSS for PHP (http://magpierss.sourceforge.net/) to write my own. If you want to know what it looks like:
http://www.carlrobitaille.org/rssfeeds/

Carl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Write your own in php!</p>
<p>I used MagpieRSS: RSS for PHP (<a href="http://magpierss.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://magpierss.sourceforge.net/</a>) to write my own. If you want to know what it looks like:<br />
<a href="http://www.carlrobitaille.org/rssfeeds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carlrobitaille.org/rssfeeds/</a></p>
<p>Carl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51454</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51454</guid>
		<description>this IS timely.


I&#039;d gotten tired of using my browser to read the various (5 ) Blogs I pay any attention to.  So, for the past week or so, I&#039;ve been yutzing around with RSS readers.

Of course, there are dozens and dozens for Windows and Mac each... and a few for Linux.

I&#039;m afraid I rather skimped on searching and testing the Windows readers.  None was appealing &quot;out of the box&quot;.  Long story... less long, I focused on the Mac.

After a week, I can say I&#039;ve focused it down to three possibilities.  NetNewsWire, Vienna, and Shrook.  At this point, it&#039;s come down to esthetics, and how well *I* interface with *it* - that is, pure personal preference.  Each is fast, easy to use, imports feeds (Shrook will not only import from OPML, but directly from NetNewsWire- a nice touch).  The others lost out because they were klunky, slow (Google Reader, oddly, was very slow for me), or so old as to be lacking in what might be termed as &quot;standard features&quot;

yeah, I&#039;m a day late, and a dollar ($1.24 in Boulder) short.  But I like airing my opinions as well as the next guy - and I can occasionally use somebody&#039;s blog for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this IS timely.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d gotten tired of using my browser to read the various (5 ) Blogs I pay any attention to.  So, for the past week or so, I&#8217;ve been yutzing around with RSS readers.</p>
<p>Of course, there are dozens and dozens for Windows and Mac each&#8230; and a few for Linux.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I rather skimped on searching and testing the Windows readers.  None was appealing &#8220;out of the box&#8221;.  Long story&#8230; less long, I focused on the Mac.</p>
<p>After a week, I can say I&#8217;ve focused it down to three possibilities.  NetNewsWire, Vienna, and Shrook.  At this point, it&#8217;s come down to esthetics, and how well *I* interface with *it* &#8211; that is, pure personal preference.  Each is fast, easy to use, imports feeds (Shrook will not only import from OPML, but directly from NetNewsWire- a nice touch).  The others lost out because they were klunky, slow (Google Reader, oddly, was very slow for me), or so old as to be lacking in what might be termed as &#8220;standard features&#8221;</p>
<p>yeah, I&#8217;m a day late, and a dollar ($1.24 in Boulder) short.  But I like airing my opinions as well as the next guy &#8211; and I can occasionally use somebody&#8217;s blog for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aerik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51452</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51452</guid>
		<description>I use Google Reader within Firefox.  It&#039;s nice because in either Firefox or Opera you can use custom css to make it look however you want, and google reader can be forced into a secure connection at https://www.google.com/reader/view .

And since I started using it and getting into feeds, it&#039;s never gone down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Google Reader within Firefox.  It&#8217;s nice because in either Firefox or Opera you can use custom css to make it look however you want, and google reader can be forced into a secure connection at <a href="https://www.google.com/reader/view" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/reader/view</a> .</p>
<p>And since I started using it and getting into feeds, it&#8217;s never gone down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51451</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51451</guid>
		<description>I use, as a couple others have mentioned, Opera for my feeds. Don&#039;t know how to export the feeds themselves as that would have been helpful when I got a new computer.

Whatever you choose, Phil, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use, as a couple others have mentioned, Opera for my feeds. Don&#8217;t know how to export the feeds themselves as that would have been helpful when I got a new computer.</p>
<p>Whatever you choose, Phil, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thadd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51450</link>
		<dc:creator>Thadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51450</guid>
		<description>That might be the reason, but its certainly strange that for whatever reason, I have not gotten an RSS update from digg in over four hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That might be the reason, but its certainly strange that for whatever reason, I have not gotten an RSS update from digg in over four hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godless Geek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51449</link>
		<dc:creator>Godless Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51449</guid>
		<description>Thadd,

Some sites don&#039;t do immediate RSS updates the instant a new post goes up, and the aggregators themselves don&#039;t scan the sites every 10 seconds for new posts.  I think it&#039;s really more of the first than the second, because I have some sites show up more quickly than others.  It seems especially true for sites who run their feeds through a service like FeedBurner, because then FeedBurner has to update their feed for the site from the site&#039;s original feed before it gets aggregated to feed readers.

How it affects you I guess really depends on how many sites you keep up with.  I&#039;m currently subscribed to 55 feeds.  Some I just scan for stuff that catches my eye, some I read every word on.  If I tried to keep up with 55 sites the old fashioned way, I&#039;d never do anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thadd,</p>
<p>Some sites don&#8217;t do immediate RSS updates the instant a new post goes up, and the aggregators themselves don&#8217;t scan the sites every 10 seconds for new posts.  I think it&#8217;s really more of the first than the second, because I have some sites show up more quickly than others.  It seems especially true for sites who run their feeds through a service like FeedBurner, because then FeedBurner has to update their feed for the site from the site&#8217;s original feed before it gets aggregated to feed readers.</p>
<p>How it affects you I guess really depends on how many sites you keep up with.  I&#8217;m currently subscribed to 55 feeds.  Some I just scan for stuff that catches my eye, some I read every word on.  If I tried to keep up with 55 sites the old fashioned way, I&#8217;d never do anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thadd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51448</link>
		<dc:creator>Thadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51448</guid>
		<description>I am ok with Google reader, I tried it after all the talk here, and it worked for like a day, but it seems like it doesn&#039;t really catch updates quickly.  For instance, it still does not have the latest post on BA up on my account.  Its bothering me, because I feel like I need to go check all the sites anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am ok with Google reader, I tried it after all the talk here, and it worked for like a day, but it seems like it doesn&#8217;t really catch updates quickly.  For instance, it still does not have the latest post on BA up on my account.  Its bothering me, because I feel like I need to go check all the sites anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51443</link>
		<dc:creator>Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51443</guid>
		<description>but Google is the Evil that M$ was in the 90s! or going there fast ...

If you use Thunderbird for Emails anyway, use the Feedreader in there, it&#039;s really nice.

Opera has a nice aggregator, too, although on my platform (sparc-linux) it leaks memory, so I can&#039;t use it.

Currently I use akregator (KDE) for the few blogs that have relevant pictures as part of their content and not just text.

For pure text-content blogs (i.e. where I ignore the pictures), I prefer newsbeuter. ncurses-interface, fast, nice, cool, the way I want it in my screen-session between mutt, abook, slrn, irssi and elinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but Google is the Evil that M$ was in the 90s! or going there fast &#8230;</p>
<p>If you use Thunderbird for Emails anyway, use the Feedreader in there, it&#8217;s really nice.</p>
<p>Opera has a nice aggregator, too, although on my platform (sparc-linux) it leaks memory, so I can&#8217;t use it.</p>
<p>Currently I use akregator (KDE) for the few blogs that have relevant pictures as part of their content and not just text.</p>
<p>For pure text-content blogs (i.e. where I ignore the pictures), I prefer newsbeuter. ncurses-interface, fast, nice, cool, the way I want it in my screen-session between mutt, abook, slrn, irssi and elinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godless Geek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51447</link>
		<dc:creator>Godless Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51447</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What does Google have that Sage doesnâ€™t?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The ability for me to get my feeds from any computer no matter where I am.

I&#039;m sometimes on my work computer, sometimes on my home computer, sometimes on a different computer altogether.  All I have to do is log in to Google and there are my feeds and my settings.  You can get the Google Reader Notifier addon for Firefox and have notification of new posts from Firefox as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What does Google have that Sage doesnâ€™t?</p></blockquote>
<p>The ability for me to get my feeds from any computer no matter where I am.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sometimes on my work computer, sometimes on my home computer, sometimes on a different computer altogether.  All I have to do is log in to Google and there are my feeds and my settings.  You can get the Google Reader Notifier addon for Firefox and have notification of new posts from Firefox as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coreburn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51446</link>
		<dc:creator>Coreburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51446</guid>
		<description>Google Reader definately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Reader definately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Witkiss</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51445</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Witkiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51445</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to put a vote in for FeedGhost.  It has great search and tagging facilities and can either use the Outlook style of reading or the Google style.

The great thing is that it synchronises across different computers.  The company are also working on an online version as well.

Take a look at www.feedghost.com

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to put a vote in for FeedGhost.  It has great search and tagging facilities and can either use the Outlook style of reading or the Google style.</p>
<p>The great thing is that it synchronises across different computers.  The company are also working on an online version as well.</p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.feedghost.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.feedghost.com</a></p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorg Willekens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51444</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorg Willekens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51444</guid>
		<description>I use Thunderbird... It presents the blogs/posts as email.  I like it that way.  Never tried Google reader, but Thunderbird does the job fine for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Thunderbird&#8230; It presents the blogs/posts as email.  I like it that way.  Never tried Google reader, but Thunderbird does the job fine for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51442</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51442</guid>
		<description>I use the feed reader in Mozilla Thunderbird it is great, loads quickly and the best thing is that Thunderbird is a great email client too, the two are joined together making reading my emails, from various accounts(uni and personal) and all my blogs very convenient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the feed reader in Mozilla Thunderbird it is great, loads quickly and the best thing is that Thunderbird is a great email client too, the two are joined together making reading my emails, from various accounts(uni and personal) and all my blogs very convenient!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToSeek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51421</link>
		<dc:creator>ToSeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51421</guid>
		<description>I use Sage with Firefox at the office and NetNewsWire at home on my Macintosh.

My only beef with Sage is that when you ask it to open an item, it always opens it in the topmost browser window. This means that if you open up a blog entry and then because it takes a while you decide to look at something else, the something else gets wiped out as soon as Sage finally opens up, even if you&#039;re in a different window from the one you were in when you asked Sage to look at something (does that make sense?).

NetNewsWire is lovely when it works but has the habit of crashing at random about once a week. No long-term negative effects from same, though.

Might take a look at Google Reader due to the groundswell of support here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Sage with Firefox at the office and NetNewsWire at home on my Macintosh.</p>
<p>My only beef with Sage is that when you ask it to open an item, it always opens it in the topmost browser window. This means that if you open up a blog entry and then because it takes a while you decide to look at something else, the something else gets wiped out as soon as Sage finally opens up, even if you&#8217;re in a different window from the one you were in when you asked Sage to look at something (does that make sense?).</p>
<p>NetNewsWire is lovely when it works but has the habit of crashing at random about once a week. No long-term negative effects from same, though.</p>
<p>Might take a look at Google Reader due to the groundswell of support here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51422</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51422</guid>
		<description>I only have 9 live bookmarks because I&#039;ve only ever found 9 RSS feeds that were interesting enough to bother reading on a regular basis.  This blog is one of them.

The others are:  Google Earth Hacks, Order of the Stick, Astronomy Cast, four friends&#039; blogs, and the report feed for Earthquakes Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only have 9 live bookmarks because I&#8217;ve only ever found 9 RSS feeds that were interesting enough to bother reading on a regular basis.  This blog is one of them.</p>
<p>The others are:  Google Earth Hacks, Order of the Stick, Astronomy Cast, four friends&#8217; blogs, and the report feed for Earthquakes Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptico</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51420</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51420</guid>
		<description>Firefox&#039;s Sage reader.  Works fine for me.

What does Google have that Sage doesn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox&#8217;s Sage reader.  Works fine for me.</p>
<p>What does Google have that Sage doesn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51419</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51419</guid>
		<description>9 sets of live bookmarks in firefox.

I find I don&#039;t need my feeds to be aggregated - it&#039;s a quick mouseover the bookmarks and I can see what&#039;s new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 sets of live bookmarks in firefox.</p>
<p>I find I don&#8217;t need my feeds to be aggregated &#8211; it&#8217;s a quick mouseover the bookmarks and I can see what&#8217;s new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51418</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51418</guid>
		<description>Another vote for NetNewsWire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote for NetNewsWire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/comment-page-3/#comment-51427</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/10/09/feed-up/#comment-51427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still using old BlogLines.  Make sure you are using www.bloglines.com not beta.bloglines.com when logging in.

I tried Google Reader when Bloglines stopped updating for awhile.  I hated it.  It imported my OPML just fine.  But as far as trying to read feeds, I found it extremely non-intuitive to mark a folder as read, or preventing myself from re-reading stuff that I had already scrolled by.  The beta Bloglines seemed to be trying to clone this, and after leaving a rather scathing feedback about what I absolutely hated about it, they&#039;ve fixed those.  But I still prefer the old Bloglines.  And that&#039;s what I was using when I read this.

I&#039;ve currently got 1001 feeds right now.  It used to be higher, and evidently some feeds have gone 404 or something.  I can only remember getting rid of one feed in the past months.

And if it was something I was actually running on my machine, I&#039;d be in a real hurt right now.  MY machine is currently sitting across from me with the PS stripped out of it awaiting the return of a new/repaired/refurbished PS from New Egg.  As it is, I&#039;m doing a remote terminal connection to my old machine that I have setup for my kids.  2.4GHZ, 3 GB memory versus the 800MHZ and 128MB of the laptop I&#039;m actually typing on.  So I&#039;m glad I&#039;m being able to keep up online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still using old BlogLines.  Make sure you are using <a href="http://www.bloglines.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloglines.com</a> not beta.bloglines.com when logging in.</p>
<p>I tried Google Reader when Bloglines stopped updating for awhile.  I hated it.  It imported my OPML just fine.  But as far as trying to read feeds, I found it extremely non-intuitive to mark a folder as read, or preventing myself from re-reading stuff that I had already scrolled by.  The beta Bloglines seemed to be trying to clone this, and after leaving a rather scathing feedback about what I absolutely hated about it, they&#8217;ve fixed those.  But I still prefer the old Bloglines.  And that&#8217;s what I was using when I read this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve currently got 1001 feeds right now.  It used to be higher, and evidently some feeds have gone 404 or something.  I can only remember getting rid of one feed in the past months.</p>
<p>And if it was something I was actually running on my machine, I&#8217;d be in a real hurt right now.  MY machine is currently sitting across from me with the PS stripped out of it awaiting the return of a new/repaired/refurbished PS from New Egg.  As it is, I&#8217;m doing a remote terminal connection to my old machine that I have setup for my kids.  2.4GHZ, 3 GB memory versus the 800MHZ and 128MB of the laptop I&#8217;m actually typing on.  So I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m being able to keep up online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 19:36:31 -->
