<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rose to bloom again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57187</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;mÂ ofÂ twoÂ mindsÂ aboutÂ theÂ returnÂ ofÂ Rose....

AsÂ aÂ generalÂ rule,Â returningÂ charactersÂ =Â **BAD**.Â Â It&#039;sÂ veryÂ hardÂ toÂ bringÂ offÂ successfullyâ€“Â IÂ thinkÂ largelyÂ becauseÂ theÂ CharacterÂ needsÂ toÂ haveÂ grownÂ duringÂ theÂ hiatusÂ andÂ thatÂ almostÂ neverÂ happens.Â 

OnÂ theÂ otherÂ hand,Â IÂ amÂ oneÂ ofÂ thoseÂ rareÂ AmericanÂ malesÂ whoÂ *automatically*Â dislikesÂ blondes.Â I&#039;mÂ farÂ moreÂ likelyÂ toÂ reactÂ wellÂ toÂ aÂ brunetteÂ (seeÂ XenaÂ orÂ ErinÂ Yun)Â thanÂ IÂ amÂ toÂ aÂ PamelaÂ AndersonÂ character.Â InÂ fact,Â atÂ firstÂ IÂ dislikedÂ RoseÂ intensely.Â Fortunately,Â though,Â sheÂ wentÂ fromÂ beingÂ aÂ ratherÂ petulentÂ angst-drivenÂ teenagerÂ toÂ anÂ insightfulÂ youngÂ lady,Â withÂ immenseÂ innerÂ strength.Â Now,Â RoseÂ isÂ onÂ theÂ shortÂ listÂ ofÂ &quot;AcceptableÂ BlondeÂ Characters&quot;

WhetherÂ sheÂ remainsÂ there...

(AsÂ forÂ Leela/RoseÂ -Â Remember,Â RoseÂ wasÂ essentiallyÂ supernaturalÂ whenÂ sheÂ toastedÂ theÂ Daleks,Â whereasÂ LeelaÂ wasÂ justÂ aÂ babeÂ whoÂ neededÂ toÂ eatÂ moreÂ inÂ aÂ leatherÂ bikini.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;mÂ ofÂ twoÂ mindsÂ aboutÂ theÂ returnÂ ofÂ Rose&#8230;.</p>
<p>AsÂ aÂ generalÂ rule,Â returningÂ charactersÂ =Â **BAD**.Â Â It&#8217;sÂ veryÂ hardÂ toÂ bringÂ offÂ successfullyâ€“Â IÂ thinkÂ largelyÂ becauseÂ theÂ CharacterÂ needsÂ toÂ haveÂ grownÂ duringÂ theÂ hiatusÂ andÂ thatÂ almostÂ neverÂ happens.Â </p>
<p>OnÂ theÂ otherÂ hand,Â IÂ amÂ oneÂ ofÂ thoseÂ rareÂ AmericanÂ malesÂ whoÂ *automatically*Â dislikesÂ blondes.Â I&#8217;mÂ farÂ moreÂ likelyÂ toÂ reactÂ wellÂ toÂ aÂ brunetteÂ (seeÂ XenaÂ orÂ ErinÂ Yun)Â thanÂ IÂ amÂ toÂ aÂ PamelaÂ AndersonÂ character.Â InÂ fact,Â atÂ firstÂ IÂ dislikedÂ RoseÂ intensely.Â Fortunately,Â though,Â sheÂ wentÂ fromÂ beingÂ aÂ ratherÂ petulentÂ angst-drivenÂ teenagerÂ toÂ anÂ insightfulÂ youngÂ lady,Â withÂ immenseÂ innerÂ strength.Â Now,Â RoseÂ isÂ onÂ theÂ shortÂ listÂ ofÂ &#8221;AcceptableÂ BlondeÂ Characters&#8221;</p>
<p>WhetherÂ sheÂ remainsÂ there&#8230;</p>
<p>(AsÂ forÂ Leela/RoseÂ -Â Remember,Â RoseÂ wasÂ essentiallyÂ supernaturalÂ whenÂ sheÂ toastedÂ theÂ Daleks,Â whereasÂ LeelaÂ wasÂ justÂ aÂ babeÂ whoÂ neededÂ toÂ eatÂ moreÂ inÂ aÂ leatherÂ bikini.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherRob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57186</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57186</guid>
		<description>Looks like the took the Children in Need video off youtube. :-(

And speaking of Torchwood, the &quot;adult&quot; stuff doesn&#039;t bother me because it&#039;s adult. It just sometimes seems like they&#039;re sticking it in just to say, hey, look, we&#039;re not Doctor Who. Which is not a good reason for it. I do like the show though.

And Martha rocks. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the took the Children in Need video off youtube. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And speaking of Torchwood, the &#8220;adult&#8221; stuff doesn&#8217;t bother me because it&#8217;s adult. It just sometimes seems like they&#8217;re sticking it in just to say, hey, look, we&#8217;re not Doctor Who. Which is not a good reason for it. I do like the show though.</p>
<p>And Martha rocks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57185</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57185</guid>
		<description>Oooh, a lone fat-headed Sontaran... big deal... Rose destroyed a whole Dalek army with her gorgeous, flashing, Bad Wolf eyes, remember? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, a lone fat-headed Sontaran&#8230; big deal&#8230; Rose destroyed a whole Dalek army with her gorgeous, flashing, Bad Wolf eyes, remember? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ellis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57184</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57184</guid>
		<description>Rose is for girls. If you want a real man&#039;s Dr Who companion, you need Leela  - she once took out a Sontaran single handed armed only with a knife.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdWjkxbzXJ0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose is for girls. If you want a real man&#8217;s Dr Who companion, you need Leela  &#8211; she once took out a Sontaran single handed armed only with a knife.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdWjkxbzXJ0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdWjkxbzXJ0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57183</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57183</guid>
		<description>There are only a very few ways they could make this work well and a whole lot more ways this could go wrong. Iâ€™m hoping for the best with Rose&#039;s return.

I wrote more thoughts about this on my blog too that youâ€™re welcome to check out if you like.

Peace,

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only a very few ways they could make this work well and a whole lot more ways this could go wrong. Iâ€™m hoping for the best with Rose&#8217;s return.</p>
<p>I wrote more thoughts about this on my blog too that youâ€™re welcome to check out if you like.</p>
<p>Peace,</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Killian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57182</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57182</guid>
		<description>Lee:

I&#039;ll explain later.

:^P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll explain later.</p>
<p>:^P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57181</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57181</guid>
		<description>@QD

I don&#039;t think the objections were to the &quot;adult&quot; content &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt;, just that it seemed to have been shovelled in at the expense of other elements of good writing: to the extent that the bed-hopping was too often the main impediment to saving the Earth from whatever-was-imperilling-it-so-gravely-that-week. That said, the last episode attracted some ire for its overstretching of the suspension of disbelief: by the climate and law of the time it was set, the last scene should have resulted in riots and courts martial...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@QD</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the objections were to the &#8220;adult&#8221; content <i>per se</i>, just that it seemed to have been shovelled in at the expense of other elements of good writing: to the extent that the bed-hopping was too often the main impediment to saving the Earth from whatever-was-imperilling-it-so-gravely-that-week. That said, the last episode attracted some ire for its overstretching of the suspension of disbelief: by the climate and law of the time it was set, the last scene should have resulted in riots and courts martial&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57179</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57179</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A Rose by any other nameâ€¦&lt;/i&gt;

Geeze, I remember when Kevin Rose was &#039;the guy who discovered the Windows Messenger&quot; hack.

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A Rose by any other nameâ€¦</i></p>
<p>Geeze, I remember when Kevin Rose was &#8216;the guy who discovered the Windows Messenger&#8221; hack.</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57180</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57180</guid>
		<description>&gt;&quot;the rather, um, â€œadultâ€ storylines didnâ€™t sit well with some folk, and Torchwoodâ€™s Capt Jack was a lot darker and more miserable than DWâ€™s Capt Jack too. &quot;

That one of the reason&#039;s I&#039;m a fan. You need some conflict within the ranks of the &quot;good guys&quot;. I want some ambiguity. As you can guess, I&#039;m eating up the new Battlestar Galactica.

And I&#039;m 42. I rather not have all my fiction sanitized to the level of pre-teens, you know? Seems so many SF fans get turned off by anything remotely spicy. That&#039;s a weird reaction in my never humble opinion.

The adult stuff was a bad thing there? The country that gave us a comedy show with full frontal nudity (well, almost) in the 1970s? Wow. And I thought the US was repressed. :) What the hell happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&#8221;the rather, um, â€œadultâ€ storylines didnâ€™t sit well with some folk, and Torchwoodâ€™s Capt Jack was a lot darker and more miserable than DWâ€™s Capt Jack too. &#8221;</p>
<p>That one of the reason&#8217;s I&#8217;m a fan. You need some conflict within the ranks of the &#8220;good guys&#8221;. I want some ambiguity. As you can guess, I&#8217;m eating up the new Battlestar Galactica.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m 42. I rather not have all my fiction sanitized to the level of pre-teens, you know? Seems so many SF fans get turned off by anything remotely spicy. That&#8217;s a weird reaction in my never humble opinion.</p>
<p>The adult stuff was a bad thing there? The country that gave us a comedy show with full frontal nudity (well, almost) in the 1970s? Wow. And I thought the US was repressed. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  What the hell happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57178</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57178</guid>
		<description>A Rose by any other name...

http://www.galacticast.com/2007/04/16/rose-by-any-other-name/

Hi-larryous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Rose by any other name&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.galacticast.com/2007/04/16/rose-by-any-other-name/" rel="nofollow">http://www.galacticast.com/2007/04/16/rose-by-any-other-name/</a></p>
<p>Hi-larryous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57177</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57177</guid>
		<description>Quiet_Desperation: Torchwood was given rather a hard time here in Blighty; the rather, um, &quot;adult&quot; storylines didn&#039;t sit well with some folk, and Torchwood&#039;s Capt Jack was a lot darker and more miserable than DW&#039;s Capt Jack too. But some of the storylines were excellent, very sharp and touching writing, and the characters were just starting to develop nicely, so high hopes for Season 2, when Martha (as everyone knows by now) will join the gang. I know Torchwood has got a very big and dedicated following in the US, which is great! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quiet_Desperation: Torchwood was given rather a hard time here in Blighty; the rather, um, &#8220;adult&#8221; storylines didn&#8217;t sit well with some folk, and Torchwood&#8217;s Capt Jack was a lot darker and more miserable than DW&#8217;s Capt Jack too. But some of the storylines were excellent, very sharp and touching writing, and the characters were just starting to develop nicely, so high hopes for Season 2, when Martha (as everyone knows by now) will join the gang. I know Torchwood has got a very big and dedicated following in the US, which is great! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet_Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57176</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet_Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57176</guid>
		<description>How &#039;bout some love for Torchwood, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How &#8217;bout some love for Torchwood, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua J. Slone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57169</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua J. Slone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57169</guid>
		<description>If there&#039;s one thing you can count on from Doctor Who, it&#039;s that things the Doctor says are impossible (like resuming communications with a separated parallel universes) are never really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one thing you can count on from Doctor Who, it&#8217;s that things the Doctor says are impossible (like resuming communications with a separated parallel universes) are never really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selina Morse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57175</link>
		<dc:creator>Selina Morse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57175</guid>
		<description>To be fair, this spoiler wasn&#039;t released by Phil. A UK newpaper printed it this morning and it was confirmed by the BBC by lunchtime today (GMT).

There had been many hints that this was going to happen - even Noel Clarke (Mickey Smith in the series) had hinted at it some time ago.

There have also been rumours of a feature film. Now that would knock spots off any futurama cinema flick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, this spoiler wasn&#8217;t released by Phil. A UK newpaper printed it this morning and it was confirmed by the BBC by lunchtime today (GMT).</p>
<p>There had been many hints that this was going to happen &#8211; even Noel Clarke (Mickey Smith in the series) had hinted at it some time ago.</p>
<p>There have also been rumours of a feature film. Now that would knock spots off any futurama cinema flick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Graham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57174</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57174</guid>
		<description>Shane, I loved the Children in Need special as well, but one thing bugs me... why wasn&#039;t the celery affected by the &quot;time differential&quot; that aged the 5th doctor? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane, I loved the Children in Need special as well, but one thing bugs me&#8230; why wasn&#8217;t the celery affected by the &#8220;time differential&#8221; that aged the 5th doctor? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Killian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57173</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57173</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really mind the 13-episode seasons, considering they&#039;re 45-minute episodes and thus the equivalent of a 26-episode classic season.

Rose&#039;s last story was so beautiful that I hope they don&#039;t ruin it by bringing her back. By that, I mean I hope they bring her back in a profound and meaningful way, something worthy of her legacy.

Apparently, the 2009 hiatus is because David Tennant is going do to Hamlet for a year. So that should put to rest all of the new Doctor rumors. And as of the 2010 season, he&#039;ll have played the Doctor for longer than anyone save Tom Baker (at least for years; the early Doctors might have him in terms of hours worth of episodes).

I LOVED the Children In Need special. And I&#039;m thankful it was Steven Moffatt who wrote it. I love his episodes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really mind the 13-episode seasons, considering they&#8217;re 45-minute episodes and thus the equivalent of a 26-episode classic season.</p>
<p>Rose&#8217;s last story was so beautiful that I hope they don&#8217;t ruin it by bringing her back. By that, I mean I hope they bring her back in a profound and meaningful way, something worthy of her legacy.</p>
<p>Apparently, the 2009 hiatus is because David Tennant is going do to Hamlet for a year. So that should put to rest all of the new Doctor rumors. And as of the 2010 season, he&#8217;ll have played the Doctor for longer than anyone save Tom Baker (at least for years; the early Doctors might have him in terms of hours worth of episodes).</p>
<p>I LOVED the Children In Need special. And I&#8217;m thankful it was Steven Moffatt who wrote it. I love his episodes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57172</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57172</guid>
		<description>If anyone REALLY wants to drown in Spoliers - and see pix of Billie filming! - then this is the place to go...

http://www.gallifreyone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=153761&amp;page=8#282

but ONLY go there if you want to read some serious spoilers, and discussion by very dedicated hardcore Who fans! If you&#039;re put off by that kind of thing then don&#039;t go there. You have been warned!! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone REALLY wants to drown in Spoliers &#8211; and see pix of Billie filming! &#8211; then this is the place to go&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gallifreyone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=153761&#038;page=8#282" rel="nofollow">http://www.gallifreyone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=153761&#038;page=8#282</a></p>
<p>but ONLY go there if you want to read some serious spoilers, and discussion by very dedicated hardcore Who fans! If you&#8217;re put off by that kind of thing then don&#8217;t go there. You have been warned!! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreyDuck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57171</link>
		<dc:creator>GreyDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57171</guid>
		<description>I dunno. As much as I liked Rose, I was hoping that they&#039;d keep the door shut on that whole thing. Not everything has to come back &#039;round again, dammit. This sort of makes the entire previous season&#039;s &quot;Martha watches Ten pine for Rose&quot; thread that much more annoying instead of any more poignant.

Guh. If you want to bring someone back, bring back Ace. *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. As much as I liked Rose, I was hoping that they&#8217;d keep the door shut on that whole thing. Not everything has to come back &#8217;round again, dammit. This sort of makes the entire previous season&#8217;s &#8220;Martha watches Ten pine for Rose&#8221; thread that much more annoying instead of any more poignant.</p>
<p>Guh. If you want to bring someone back, bring back Ace. *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57170</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57170</guid>
		<description>Wow -- hope there&#039;s nobody coming along who&#039;s hoping not to be spoiled, eh?  This isn&#039;t so much a spoiler warning as a spoiler flaunting -- &quot;Beware, therearespoilersaheadHERE THEY ARE!!!&quot;

Less cool than usual, dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8212; hope there&#8217;s nobody coming along who&#8217;s hoping not to be spoiled, eh?  This isn&#8217;t so much a spoiler warning as a spoiler flaunting &#8212; &#8220;Beware, therearespoilersaheadHERE THEY ARE!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Less cool than usual, dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boosterz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57168</link>
		<dc:creator>Boosterz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57168</guid>
		<description>I only recently discovered the new Dr. Who series.  I was a big fan of the original.  Also, I&#039;m not ashamed to admit I&#039;ve got a raging Billie Piper crush now too. :-)

I need to add Torchwood to my netflix Q.  It sounds like that one will be really good to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only recently discovered the new Dr. Who series.  I was a big fan of the original.  Also, I&#8217;m not ashamed to admit I&#8217;ve got a raging Billie Piper crush now too. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I need to add Torchwood to my netflix Q.  It sounds like that one will be really good to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Graham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57167</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57167</guid>
		<description>Hiatus? For a year? Say it ain&#039;t so. The long pause between seasons is long enough already - but an extra year? Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiatus? For a year? Say it ain&#8217;t so. The long pause between seasons is long enough already &#8211; but an extra year? Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57166</guid>
		<description>I wonder how they&#039;ll manage getting Rose back in, it should be interesting it could very good, or it could be a bit gack.  Personally as someone whose first doctor was Tom Baker I got a bit fed up with three seasons of perfect size 10 (UK) poppets with wonderful skin doing the doe eyed thing at the Doctor so I&#039;ve got high hopes of Donna bringing a bit more vim and vigour as a Doctor&#039;s Companion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how they&#8217;ll manage getting Rose back in, it should be interesting it could very good, or it could be a bit gack.  Personally as someone whose first doctor was Tom Baker I got a bit fed up with three seasons of perfect size 10 (UK) poppets with wonderful skin doing the doe eyed thing at the Doctor so I&#8217;ve got high hopes of Donna bringing a bit more vim and vigour as a Doctor&#8217;s Companion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57165</guid>
		<description>One thing this Yank notices about the way the Doctor&#039;s new series have been developed is that they very much are attuned to the fans, both new and old.  The Children in Need special made my eyes mist as I thought of the legacy that this show wields.  I found a t-shirt that says &quot;Everybody remembers their first Doctor&quot;, and as I sit here at a maternity hospital waiting for my first granddaughter (hey, wasn&#039;t she the First Doctor&#039;s companion? :) ) it holds a double meaning, but I know to which Doctor it is inferring.  My first Doctor was Tom Baker, but enjoyed Peter Davison just as much.  Now my son can&#039;t wait for BBCAmerica or our local PBS and watched the latest episodes posted on YouTube.  I&#039;m still a big Trek fan, and enjoyed all the Star Wars sextet (didn&#039;t say they were equally good, but I did enjoy them!), but Doctor who has a staying power that literally spans generations.  Who knew a Time Lord could be timeless!  And, oh yes, Rose rox my sox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing this Yank notices about the way the Doctor&#8217;s new series have been developed is that they very much are attuned to the fans, both new and old.  The Children in Need special made my eyes mist as I thought of the legacy that this show wields.  I found a t-shirt that says &#8220;Everybody remembers their first Doctor&#8221;, and as I sit here at a maternity hospital waiting for my first granddaughter (hey, wasn&#8217;t she the First Doctor&#8217;s companion? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) it holds a double meaning, but I know to which Doctor it is inferring.  My first Doctor was Tom Baker, but enjoyed Peter Davison just as much.  Now my son can&#8217;t wait for BBCAmerica or our local PBS and watched the latest episodes posted on YouTube.  I&#8217;m still a big Trek fan, and enjoyed all the Star Wars sextet (didn&#8217;t say they were equally good, but I did enjoy them!), but Doctor who has a staying power that literally spans generations.  Who knew a Time Lord could be timeless!  And, oh yes, Rose rox my sox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57164</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57164</guid>
		<description>Gah!

Look, I liked Rose, but the not-so-subtle romantic tension between her and the Doctor drove me absolutely *crazy*.

Considering the way Rose left the show, I hope this means the Cybermen are going to be back again, in addition to the Sontarans. *That* would rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah!</p>
<p>Look, I liked Rose, but the not-so-subtle romantic tension between her and the Doctor drove me absolutely *crazy*.</p>
<p>Considering the way Rose left the show, I hope this means the Cybermen are going to be back again, in addition to the Sontarans. *That* would rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Mann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57163</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57163</guid>
		<description>Sally Sparrow for Companion!

I do like Martha more than Rose, though, but think she might be a better fit for Torchwood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally Sparrow for Companion!</p>
<p>I do like Martha more than Rose, though, but think she might be a better fit for Torchwood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 15:55:09 -->
