<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rose to bloom again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:05:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57187</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;mÂ ofÂ twoÂ mindsÂ aboutÂ theÂ returnÂ ofÂ Rose....

AsÂ aÂ generalÂ rule,Â returningÂ charactersÂ =Â **BAD**.Â Â It&#039;sÂ veryÂ hardÂ toÂ bringÂ offÂ successfullyâ€“Â IÂ thinkÂ largelyÂ becauseÂ theÂ CharacterÂ needsÂ toÂ haveÂ grownÂ duringÂ theÂ hiatusÂ andÂ thatÂ almostÂ neverÂ happens.Â 

OnÂ theÂ otherÂ hand,Â IÂ amÂ oneÂ ofÂ thoseÂ rareÂ AmericanÂ malesÂ whoÂ *automatically*Â dislikesÂ blondes.Â I&#039;mÂ farÂ moreÂ likelyÂ toÂ reactÂ wellÂ toÂ aÂ brunetteÂ (seeÂ XenaÂ orÂ ErinÂ Yun)Â thanÂ IÂ amÂ toÂ aÂ PamelaÂ AndersonÂ character.Â InÂ fact,Â atÂ firstÂ IÂ dislikedÂ RoseÂ intensely.Â Fortunately,Â though,Â sheÂ wentÂ fromÂ beingÂ aÂ ratherÂ petulentÂ angst-drivenÂ teenagerÂ toÂ anÂ insightfulÂ youngÂ lady,Â withÂ immenseÂ innerÂ strength.Â Now,Â RoseÂ isÂ onÂ theÂ shortÂ listÂ ofÂ &quot;AcceptableÂ BlondeÂ Characters&quot;

WhetherÂ sheÂ remainsÂ there...

(AsÂ forÂ Leela/RoseÂ -Â Remember,Â RoseÂ wasÂ essentiallyÂ supernaturalÂ whenÂ sheÂ toastedÂ theÂ Daleks,Â whereasÂ LeelaÂ wasÂ justÂ aÂ babeÂ whoÂ neededÂ toÂ eatÂ moreÂ inÂ aÂ leatherÂ bikini.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;mÂ ofÂ twoÂ mindsÂ aboutÂ theÂ returnÂ ofÂ Rose&#8230;.</p>
<p>AsÂ aÂ generalÂ rule,Â returningÂ charactersÂ =Â **BAD**.Â Â It&#8217;sÂ veryÂ hardÂ toÂ bringÂ offÂ successfullyâ€“Â IÂ thinkÂ largelyÂ becauseÂ theÂ CharacterÂ needsÂ toÂ haveÂ grownÂ duringÂ theÂ hiatusÂ andÂ thatÂ almostÂ neverÂ happens.Â </p>
<p>OnÂ theÂ otherÂ hand,Â IÂ amÂ oneÂ ofÂ thoseÂ rareÂ AmericanÂ malesÂ whoÂ *automatically*Â dislikesÂ blondes.Â I&#8217;mÂ farÂ moreÂ likelyÂ toÂ reactÂ wellÂ toÂ aÂ brunetteÂ (seeÂ XenaÂ orÂ ErinÂ Yun)Â thanÂ IÂ amÂ toÂ aÂ PamelaÂ AndersonÂ character.Â InÂ fact,Â atÂ firstÂ IÂ dislikedÂ RoseÂ intensely.Â Fortunately,Â though,Â sheÂ wentÂ fromÂ beingÂ aÂ ratherÂ petulentÂ angst-drivenÂ teenagerÂ toÂ anÂ insightfulÂ youngÂ lady,Â withÂ immenseÂ innerÂ strength.Â Now,Â RoseÂ isÂ onÂ theÂ shortÂ listÂ ofÂ &#8221;AcceptableÂ BlondeÂ Characters&#8221;</p>
<p>WhetherÂ sheÂ remainsÂ there&#8230;</p>
<p>(AsÂ forÂ Leela/RoseÂ -Â Remember,Â RoseÂ wasÂ essentiallyÂ supernaturalÂ whenÂ sheÂ toastedÂ theÂ Daleks,Â whereasÂ LeelaÂ wasÂ justÂ aÂ babeÂ whoÂ neededÂ toÂ eatÂ moreÂ inÂ aÂ leatherÂ bikini.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherRob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57186</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57186</guid>
		<description>Looks like the took the Children in Need video off youtube. :-(

And speaking of Torchwood, the &quot;adult&quot; stuff doesn&#039;t bother me because it&#039;s adult. It just sometimes seems like they&#039;re sticking it in just to say, hey, look, we&#039;re not Doctor Who. Which is not a good reason for it. I do like the show though.

And Martha rocks. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the took the Children in Need video off youtube. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And speaking of Torchwood, the &#8220;adult&#8221; stuff doesn&#8217;t bother me because it&#8217;s adult. It just sometimes seems like they&#8217;re sticking it in just to say, hey, look, we&#8217;re not Doctor Who. Which is not a good reason for it. I do like the show though.</p>
<p>And Martha rocks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57185</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57185</guid>
		<description>Oooh, a lone fat-headed Sontaran... big deal... Rose destroyed a whole Dalek army with her gorgeous, flashing, Bad Wolf eyes, remember? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, a lone fat-headed Sontaran&#8230; big deal&#8230; Rose destroyed a whole Dalek army with her gorgeous, flashing, Bad Wolf eyes, remember? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ellis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57184</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57184</guid>
		<description>Rose is for girls. If you want a real man&#039;s Dr Who companion, you need Leela  - she once took out a Sontaran single handed armed only with a knife.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdWjkxbzXJ0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose is for girls. If you want a real man&#8217;s Dr Who companion, you need Leela  &#8211; she once took out a Sontaran single handed armed only with a knife.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdWjkxbzXJ0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdWjkxbzXJ0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57183</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57183</guid>
		<description>There are only a very few ways they could make this work well and a whole lot more ways this could go wrong. Iâ€™m hoping for the best with Rose&#039;s return.

I wrote more thoughts about this on my blog too that youâ€™re welcome to check out if you like.

Peace,

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only a very few ways they could make this work well and a whole lot more ways this could go wrong. Iâ€™m hoping for the best with Rose&#8217;s return.</p>
<p>I wrote more thoughts about this on my blog too that youâ€™re welcome to check out if you like.</p>
<p>Peace,</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Killian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57182</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57182</guid>
		<description>Lee:

I&#039;ll explain later.

:^P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll explain later.</p>
<p>:^P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/comment-page-1/#comment-57181</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/11/27/rose-to-bloom-again/#comment-57181</guid>
		<description>@QD

I don&#039;t think the objections were to the &quot;adult&quot; content &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt;, just that it seemed to have been shovelled in at the expense of other elements of good writing: to the extent that the bed-hopping was too often the main impediment to saving the Earth from whatever-was-imperilling-it-so-gravely-that-week. That said, the last episode attracted some ire for its overstretching of the suspension of disbelief: by the climate and law of the time it was set, the last scene should have resulted in riots and courts martial...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@QD</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the objections were to the &#8220;adult&#8221; content <i>per se</i>, just that it seemed to have been shovelled in at the expense of other elements of good writing: to the extent that the bed-hopping was too often the main impediment to saving the Earth from whatever-was-imperilling-it-so-gravely-that-week. That said, the last episode attracted some ire for its overstretching of the suspension of disbelief: by the climate and law of the time it was set, the last scene should have resulted in riots and courts martial&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
