<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LOLscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:25:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Zh.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-227431</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Zh.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-227431</guid>
		<description>as they say... perhaps Schrödinger&#039;s Cat is the key to Theory Of Everything, no lucky rabbit&#039;s foot required and all this hadron speeding around CERN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as they say&#8230; perhaps Schrödinger&#8217;s Cat is the key to Theory Of Everything, no lucky rabbit&#8217;s foot required and all this hadron speeding around CERN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re #20! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-146013</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re #20! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-146013</guid>
		<description>[...] are so many humor-impaired people out there: that was a joke! I&#8217;m kidding. I love biologists; without them I&#8217;d have nothing to make fun of at all without it being [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are so many humor-impaired people out there: that was a joke! I&#8217;m kidding. I love biologists; without them I&#8217;d have nothing to make fun of at all without it being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anomalous4</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-58574</link>
		<dc:creator>anomalous4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-58574</guid>
		<description>@Blake Stacey:

I joined the livejournal group a couple of months ago, but it wasn&#039;t very active, so I decided to run &quot;LOLScience&quot; up the flickr flagpole and see if anyone saluted it. I guess they have. And I&#039;m more than pleased by how many like minds have jumped in, both on flickr and on livejournal, and how many blogs - including Scientific American&#039;s 60-Second Science, at least 3 of Seed&#039;s science blogs, and a number of personal blogs - as well as New Scientist Magazine - have come out to playI

teh seekrit is out: SCIENCE IS TEH FU-U-U-U-U-UN-NE-E-E-E-E-EH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Blake Stacey:</p>
<p>I joined the livejournal group a couple of months ago, but it wasn&#8217;t very active, so I decided to run &#8220;LOLScience&#8221; up the flickr flagpole and see if anyone saluted it. I guess they have. And I&#8217;m more than pleased by how many like minds have jumped in, both on flickr and on livejournal, and how many blogs &#8211; including Scientific American&#8217;s 60-Second Science, at least 3 of Seed&#8217;s science blogs, and a number of personal blogs &#8211; as well as New Scientist Magazine &#8211; have come out to playI</p>
<p>teh seekrit is out: SCIENCE IS TEH FU-U-U-U-U-UN-NE-E-E-E-E-EH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anomalous4</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-58573</link>
		<dc:creator>anomalous4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-58573</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to out myself. I&#039;m the guilty party responsible for the Rise of the Dreaded LOLScience on flickr.

I also plead guilty to being way too amused by LOLstuff, maybe &lt;i&gt;because&lt;/i&gt; it&#039;s so silly and idiotic.

Whatever. A couple of months ago I tagged four of my flickr posts with &quot;LOLScience,&quot; and just for the hell of it I did a search a couple of days later for the tag and my four were the only ones that came up. So I said, &quot;I can fix that,&quot; and set up the flickr group.

When New Scientist joined a couple of weeks later, it shocked my socks off! I figured I&#039;d pull in a few scientists, a few scientists-by-training like myself, and a few curious LOLsters from among flickr members, but that was about all. Glad to see there are more scientists-with-the-sillies out there besides me!

p.s. Phil, you rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to out myself. I&#8217;m the guilty party responsible for the Rise of the Dreaded LOLScience on flickr.</p>
<p>I also plead guilty to being way too amused by LOLstuff, maybe <i>because</i> it&#8217;s so silly and idiotic.</p>
<p>Whatever. A couple of months ago I tagged four of my flickr posts with &#8220;LOLScience,&#8221; and just for the hell of it I did a search a couple of days later for the tag and my four were the only ones that came up. So I said, &#8220;I can fix that,&#8221; and set up the flickr group.</p>
<p>When New Scientist joined a couple of weeks later, it shocked my socks off! I figured I&#8217;d pull in a few scientists, a few scientists-by-training like myself, and a few curious LOLsters from among flickr members, but that was about all. Glad to see there are more scientists-with-the-sillies out there besides me!</p>
<p>p.s. Phil, you rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMDubbin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-58572</link>
		<dc:creator>AMDubbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-58572</guid>
		<description>That rung my nerd bell.

/biologist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That rung my nerd bell.</p>
<p>/biologist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photon Wavelength - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-58571</link>
		<dc:creator>Photon Wavelength - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-58571</guid>
		<description>[...] familiar with the general stuff, so don&#039;t expect me to be specific. I am working off my book (conveniently pictured in the BA&#039;s blog!) so if I get it wrong it&#039;s my fault.  All photoreceptors require an two protiens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] familiar with the general stuff, so don&#8217;t expect me to be specific. I am working off my book (conveniently pictured in the BA&#8217;s blog!) so if I get it wrong it&#8217;s my fault.  All photoreceptors require an two protiens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man on the Moon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/comment-page-1/#comment-58570</link>
		<dc:creator>Man on the Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/07/lolscience/#comment-58570</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s my biology book! How&#039;d it...oh.

Darn publishers printing more than one copy...

That really is the edition--should be six--that I used for General Biology about three years ago now. We did all thousand something pages (it was alot, I&#039;m not going to look it up right now) and thirty...chapters in 10 weeks one summer. Probably the most intense class I&#039;ve ever taken, but very well worth it.

Now if I could just find a good physics book and teacher...I wonder if the cat has a physics book. Maybe a hard one to hold the door open?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my biology book! How&#8217;d it&#8230;oh.</p>
<p>Darn publishers printing more than one copy&#8230;</p>
<p>That really is the edition&#8211;should be six&#8211;that I used for General Biology about three years ago now. We did all thousand something pages (it was alot, I&#8217;m not going to look it up right now) and thirty&#8230;chapters in 10 weeks one summer. Probably the most intense class I&#8217;ve ever taken, but very well worth it.</p>
<p>Now if I could just find a good physics book and teacher&#8230;I wonder if the cat has a physics book. Maybe a hard one to hold the door open?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
