Comments on: A wiki of lies

By: Lili

Lili — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:03:59 +0000

Are there any sites that provide rebuttals against the claims at creationwiki? I thought that perhaps evowiki would but it appears that they do not have replies to creationwiki.

By: Lars

Lars — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:54:31 +0000

I have just pointed someone to the Creationwiki. He was starting to spread his young earth and creation babble in Wikipedia, so I had to kick him out.

I hope he won’t come back. I really hope that he goes over to Creationwiki and stays there.

By: folcrom

folcrom — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:26:37 +0000

Leave it be and let it go.
People have the right to believe whatever they want to,
even if it is creationist rubbish.
You would have more luck teaching a sheep to walk on its hind legs and read poetry.
Folcrom.

By: ATM

ATM — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:47:01 +0000

Arg! They’ve gone and nicked the Stargate!

By: Freiddie

Freiddie — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:03:54 +0000

The Redshift Quantization is BLANK – they must have forgot. I understood nearly nothing in that website, and hopefully it doesn’t poison my mind. By the way, they are STEALING the “science”-related words (that includes the title of that wiki) again.

By: Peter Sturtevant

Peter Sturtevant — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:46:38 +0000

Phil, How does Google ads get away with splashing a non-movable Ford ad over your first paragraph? What bloody cheek.
Peter

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:07:53 +0000

Perhaps there is room for small edits here an there just to change the tone of the articles. They’re even negative about “Theistic Evolutionism,” listing it among anti-creation ideas.

Anyway, I might try to put together a page pointing out how the persecution they feel they are experiencing is not an evil conspiracy by the NSF but merely a matter of long-standing Constitutional law.