Astronomy is arguably the most beautiful of the sciences. I’m biased, of course, but it’s nearly impossible to gaze upon a picture of a galaxy, a moon, a nebula, and not see in it something compellingly artistic. Sometimes it’s the color, sometimes the shape, and sometimes it’s the knowledge that we can understand the subject of the picture itself.
Science doesn’t take away from the beauty of nature. It enhances it, multiplies it.
There are so many incredible astronomical photographs released every year that picking ten as the most beautiful is a substantial task. But it becomes easier when you consider the science behind the image as well. Does this image tell us more than that one? Was the scientific result drawn from an image surprising, or did it firm up a previously considered hypothesis?
Still, there’s something to be said for a simple, drop dead gorgeous picture.
So here I present my Top Ten Astronomy Pictures for 2007.
A note: I tried to avoid repeating using images that were too similar to the ones I posted last year, so you may be surprised at some of my picks, or some pictures I didn’t pick. You may even disagree with me, so if you have a favorite that missed being on this list, leave a link in the comments! I just bet ten images aren’t enough for most people anyway.
All of the pictures here are clickable, and link to higher resolution versions; some substantially so.
Enjoy.
Number 10: A Comet Bursts Forth
I remember when I first heard of Comet Holmes: I’d received an email in October from a BABloggee telling me about it, and I couldn’t wait for the sky to darken so I could see it with my own eyes. Naked eye comets are rare, but a run-of-the-mill faint one to suddenly brighten by a factor of a million; well, that’s a must-see.
People all over the world took pictures of the comet’s outburst (the cause of which is still something of a mystery). For a while, the outburst appeared as a circular shell surrounding the comet, though eventually a more tail-like appearance took shape… but it was still just plain ol’ odd.
This picture was taken on November 29, 2007 by the gifted astrophotographer Tamas Ladanyi (he also has another picture taken on December 5 which shows the motion of the comet, too). This remarkable shot covers several degrees of sky; by this time the comet was getting difficult to see with the unaided eye (it got fainter as the debris cloud expanded), and at the time the cloud was bigger than the full Moon in the sky. I love the starry background in this picture, and the small open cluster of stars on the right.
As I write this, Comet Holmes is still fading away. But will it brighten again? In 1892, just after it was first discovered, Holmes had an outburst very similar to this modern one. So even as it dims and moves into the outer solar system, is it gearing up for another exciting run?
I’ve written quite a bit about this comet, if you want the background info, and I even made a video.
Number 9: A Black Hole on Mars
[Update (January 20, 2010: I was just informed I had the wrong link to the original image in my post! Oops. I fixed it below.]
What is it about Mars that draws us in? Even through a big telescope it’s small, distant, and fuzzy. But when you gaze up on it in the night sky it’s a bright bloody beacon, a glaring eye staring back at you. No wonder the ancients thought it the god of war!
We’ve been exploring the Red Planet for decades now, and we have learned so much about it. Sometime over the past few decades, Mars transformed from an astronomical object to a place, an actual location where we can go and look around.
And even though terabytes of data have been taken, Mars still has a surprise or two up its sleeve.
Update: I had originally described this hole as a skylight to a cavern, but that turns out to be incorrect. I would normally keep the incorrect text here and strike it through so you could see my mistake, but the way I had written it makes that hard. So instead, I’ll simply delete the incorrect text, admit my mistake, thank commenter AJ Milne for pointing it out, and post the correct description!
When I saw this image, my jaw dropped. Other images of the surface showed black spots suspected to be cavern entrances or pits, but they showed featureless black holes. But then I saw this picture, and once again Mars reinforced the idea that it’s a place.
The picture (taken with the HiRISE camera on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter) shows a pit crater, a collapsed shaft going down into the surface of Mars. It’s on the side of a volcano, and similar features are seen in Hawaiian volcanoes. Most likely they form when magma under the surface subsides, and the ground above it collapses.
In this hi-res picture, with the Sun off to the side, we can see rocks and debris littering the floor. It looks like the pit leads to a tunnel off to the right, but that may be an illusion caused by the shadowing. It tricked me at first! But it’s probable that this does not lead to an underground cavern. Still, I’ve stood at cavern entrances in Virginia and Kentucky (and a sinkhole, once) that aren’t too different in appearance from this pit, bringing home the fact that Mars, like Earth, is an actual world.
When I look at this picture my sense of exploration, of wanting to walk into that pit and poke around, is nearly overwhelming. I can’t help thinking that Jules Verne would have felt at home standing at the lip of that crater.
Number 8: The Wonderful
The red giant star Mira is called "The Wonderful" because it brightens and dims noticeably to the naked eye, sometimes going from quite bright to total invisibility in just a few weeks. Mira is a star on its death bed; it is in the final stages of sloughing off its outer layers, and in a few hundred thousand years the entire envelope of the star will have been ejected, leaving only a naked and very hot white dwarf star.
It’s been studied extensively for decades, centuries– but when the Galex spacecraft pointed its ultraviolet camera at the sky near Mira, astronomers got quite a surprise.
Mira is like a comet! But a lot, lot bigger: the tail of Mira is 13 light years (130 trillion kilometers/80 trillion miles) long.
The tail is really the gas ejected by the star as it dies. As Mira moves through space, the gas between the stars slows the ejected material, forming the long streamer. It reminds me of The Little Astronomer’s hair flowing behind her as she runs. But Mira is moving substantially faster than my daughter can run; it’s tooling along at 140 kilometers/second (90 miles/second). It’s taken the star 30,000 years to move the length of its tail. In the picture, the motion is left to right, so the left-hand side of the tail is the oldest. On the right you can actually see the bow shock as the star plows through the gas between stars.
This image isn’t the highest resolution, or the prettiest of the lot. But it has so much to say. Mira is much like the way the Sun will be in a few billion years when its time runs out, for one, so by studying this image we are perhaps peering into our own future. But it also tells us that even a familiar object can surprise us, when we look at it with different eyes.
For far more detail on the story of this remarkable object, read my blog entry on it.
Number 7: The Lover’s Embrace of Arp 87
Galaxies seem like immutable giants of the cosmos; serene, majestic, and unmoving. But that’s an illusion. Everything in space is in motion, including galaxies. As you can imagine, when you take a collection of several hundred billion stars and set it in motion, it can be pretty hard to stop it. Galaxies move through space at numbing speeds, and the forces built up are mighty.
But then, sometimes, another galaxy gets in the way.
Then those vast forces come into play. Gravity twists and pulls at the galaxies as they dance past each other. And, as if they resist the inevitable recession of their partner, they reach out to one another in what looks like a tender embrace, but is in reality a stark (if lovely) portent of the destruction wrought on both galaxies.
Arp 87 is the name given to the system of two galaxies, NGC 3808A and NGC 3808B. They passed each other just as the age of dinosaurs was starting to get going on Earth, 200 million years ago. The gravity of B (the cigar-shaped galaxy on the left) drew out a long tentacle from the much larger A (the spiral on the right), and it appears as if the passage also wrapped the tendril around B, perhaps more than once. It’s also possible the tendril flared out, separating into streams that only appear to entwine the smaller galaxy.
The pair is 300 million light years away, and the power of the Hubble Space Telescope is clear when that forbidding distance is taken in. We can see reddish gas clouds collapsing to form stars in the galaxies, and we can (just barely) tell that NGC 3808B is looking a little disturbed. Will the two galaxies continue to separate, or will gravity eventually win, drawing them together? Perhaps the latter. In a few hundred million years the merged remnant will settle down and look like a normal galaxy once again. And while this may look like a totally alien tableau, keep in mind that the Milky Way Galaxy has suffered through such collisions in the past… and will again: the Andromeda Galaxy is bearing down on us. In a couple of billion years, the fireworks here will begin.
My original blog entry about Arp 87 is here.
Number 6: Lightning at Weikerscheim Observatory
Astronomy only plays a tangential role in this picture… you can see stars in the sky, and the observatory is pretty obvious. But it’s the terrestrial drama that steals the show.
Jens Hackmann took this stunning picture of a lightning storm near the Weikerscheim Observatory; the 300 second exposure is enough to see the stars streak and the observatory lit up by ambient light. Sometimes, when it’s cloudy, observing is difficult… but you can still get incredible pictures.
Number 5: A Meeting of the Moons
Jupiter is fantastically massive, and its fearsome gravity holds thrall over a retinue of moons that might otherwise be called planets in their on right. By far, the most interesting of its family are the moons Europa and Io. Europa is an ice world, covered in a thick sheet of ice that might reach down to depths of over perhaps several kilometers. It’s nearly a dead certainty that underneath that forbidding icecap is an ocean of water, kept liquid from energy input by gravitational stress as Europa passes by her sister moons. Of all the real estate in the solar system, many astronomers have their money on Europa as the best place to look for alien life.
Io, on the other hand, is perhaps the worst place for life. It has an incredibly high sulfur content, for one thing. For another, the same gravitational heating that keeps Europa’s ocean liquid also keeps Io’s interior molten, but it gives the moon a cosmic case of indigestion.
Io is wracked with volcanoes. They are almost constantly erupting, spewing molten sulfur over a kilometer high in the low gravity, and plumes of dust and gas blast hundreds of kilometers off the surface. This activity was first discovered when the Voyager 1 probe passed the moon in 1979, but subsequent space probes have gotten even more detailed images. When the New Horizons Pluto probe passed Jupiter in March 2007 for a gravity boost, it snapped a beautiful picture of the sisters.
Europa is the crescent on the lower left, and Io (obviously) is the one on the upper right. The plume you see is from the volcano Tvashtar, which has been active for quite some time now. If you look right at the bottom of the plume, you can see molten sulfur glowing red. Two other volcanoes appear to be making some noise as well.
While they appear to be close together, the two moons were actually nearly 800,000 kilometers apart when this picture was taken; Io was on one side of Jupiter and Europa on the other, but from the spacecraft’s perspective they were next to each other in the sky. This picture is actually a composite of two images; one was greyscale and had high resolution, and the other was in color but had lower resolution. By merging the two, we can see more details than we could from the color image alone, and we get the benefit of having the colors enhance the scene.
When I first saw this image, I knew right away the two moons were not close together at all. My secret? I saw that the dark side of Europa was truly dark, but Io’s dark side was lighter. That meant that Io was positioned such that Jupiter was illuminating its otherwise dark half, while Europa must have been on the other side of Jupiter, where it was dark. Sometimes, you can tell a lot just by looking at a image and picturing the geometry in your head.
Funny: I almost picked a movie sequence of Tvashtar erupting for this Top Ten list, but I had to cull it due to the other images I liked better. Plus, the animation is 752 kb, and I didn’t want to choke my server. But you can see it on Emily Lakdawalla’s Planetary Society Blog. It’s worth watching!
Number 4: Dark Matter Makes an Appearance
It’s baffling, and a little humbling, to think that what we can see, taste, and feel makes up only a tiny fraction of the Universe. Normal matter only constitutes 4% of the cosmic budget, with dark energy eating up a whopping 73%. The remaining 23% belongs to the mysterious dark matter: some exotic form of material that does not emit light, but does exert a gravitational force. Astronomers knew it was out there for decades; it pulled on galaxies and clusters and galaxies, changing their speeds. We just couldn’t see it!
But the gravity of dark matter has a subtle effect: it acts like a lens, bending the path of light coming from objects behind it. We can use telescopes to map out the location of normal matter, and then measure the distortion of background objects from the intervening dark matter. When that is done, spectacular results emerge.
In this Hubble image, the white dots are entire galaxies. They are part of a cluster called CL0024+1652, which is a whopping 5 billion light years away. The blue glow is the location of the dark matter, revealed by its distortion of the shapes of more distant galaxies behind it. The dark matter is in the shape of a ring surrounding the cluster, which indicates that a long time ago, CL0024 suffered a mighty blow, colliding head-on with another cluster. The dark matter from the two clusters passed right through each other, and their gravity caused the material to form the ring shape. We’re seeing this right down the barrel of the collision.
This image is a stunning confirmation of the existence of dark matter, and our understanding of how it works. Many people — who don’t understand the science — claim dark matter doesn’t exist, and that astronomers are making it all up. Well, there’s a giant smoke ring in the sky indicating they are quite wrong.
However, that’s not to say we understand everything about such events. In a picture I almost picked for the Top Ten, we see evidence that there are holes in our knowledge.
In this composite image of the galaxy cluster Abell 520 using Chandra, CFHT, and the Subaru telescope, red is normal matter heated to millions of degrees, and blue shows the location of the dark matter. The problem is, where the normal matter is densest the dark matter is least dense, and vice-versa. That’s the opposite of what’s expected here. Perhaps dark matter particles interact with each other differently than we think, or there was some odd factor in the cluster collision that’s throwing a monkey wrench into the works.
There’s a lot more about dark matter to learn, and images like these will help us solve these mysteries. Right now there a lot we don’t know… but we’ll figure it out. That’s why astronomy is so much fun.
Number 3: Chaos in Vela
I have long been a fan of Davide De Martin from Sky Factory. He takes images from professional observatories and stitches them together to make images of indescribable beauty, elegance, and wonder. His work is, simply, breathtaking.
This image shows the devastation wrought when a star explodes. The Vela Supernova Remnant formed when a massive star 800 light years away blew up 11,000 years ago. Expanding at a ferocious velocity, it is now 8 degrees across in the sky — 16 times the apparent width of the Moon, and about the size of your outstretched fist! David’s mosaic shows a stunning amount of detail, tracing the variety of shapes and patterns the expanding gas makes as it slams into the interstellar junk floating around it.
And if that’s not enough, the full-size image he has on his site is well over a billion pixels in size. Think about that the next time you brag about your digital camera.
I wrote more about David and his Vela image on my blog.
Number 2: STEREO Eclipse
Technically, this one is not a picture, but I had to include it anyway. It’s just so cool!
Studying the Sun seems like a pretty good idea; as the major source of light and heat for our planet, it’s a good thing that we try to understand it. And the Sun is a star, with all that implies: it’s huge in size, and frightening in its energy production.
To better understand it and the complicated nature of its surface activity, NASA launched a pair of satellites that can take pictures of the Sun simultaneously from different angles, providing a 3D view of our nearest star. They’re called the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory, or (haha) STEREO.
One satellite orbits the Sun ahead of the Earth, and the other behind. They stay in the same orbital plane as the Earth does in its travels around the Sun, and that means that sometimes you get interesting geometric situations which arise. The STEREO team realized that there would be a time when the Moon would pass in front of the Sun as seen by one of the spacecraft. Solar eclipses are rare on Earth, but from STEREO’s vantage it would be even more unusual.
From the Earth, the Sun is about 400 times farther away than the Moon, and is also about 400 times the Moon’s physical size. These two characteristics cancel out, meaning the Sun and Moon are about the same apparent size in the sky, so every solar eclipse has the Moon slipping in front of the Sun, with the dark disk of the Moon just barely (if even) covering the bright disk of the Sun.
That is, every solar eclipse as seen from the Earth.
But STEREO was receding from the Earth and Moon. To it, the Moon appeared much smaller than we see it, stuck as we are on the surface of our planet. The Sun, however, was still at about the same distance, and therefore looked the same size as we see it. This means that, to STEREO, the Moon appeared far smaller than the Sun.
Not long after launch, the situation arose that the Moon would pass directly in front of the Sun as seen from one of the spacecraft. STEREO turned its eye that way, and recorded what may be the most remarkable footage of a solar eclipse ever taken.
This sequence shows something we can never see from the Earth: a shrunken Moon passing in front of the Sun. Technically, it’s not even really an eclipse; it’s a transit (when something small crosses in front of something large). That video, only 8 seconds long, is incredible. We see the Sun and Moon literally every day, of course, and it totally shook me to see them look so different.
That’s why I chose this sequence. I love seeing the familiar become unfamiliar, grasping a new perspective on the everyday, the ordinary. You see? There is something new under the Sun.
By the way, STEREO has taken some truly excellent images of the sky, including an astonishing sequence of Comet McNaught.
And the Number One Astronomy Picture of 2007 is…
The Beautiful Face of IC 342
I am a sucker for spiral galaxies, especially ones that are face-on. They are sweeping, majestic, chillingly beautiful, and utterly mesmerizing. There are many such grand design spirals in the sky, and astronomers are almost all familiar with the roster: M81, M51, M101, and others. But there is one that is a bit less seen, less well known. That’s because it hides itself, tucked away in a part of the sky where stars and dust are thick, obscured by the fog of our own Galaxy.
But it is no less gorgeous for being demure.
This creature is IC 342, a nearby spiral lying only 11 million light years away, very close on a galactic scale. If IC342 were located in a region of the sky where our own Milky Way didn’t interfere with the view so much, it would be one of the most celebrated objects in the sky, and would most likely sport a proper name and not just a numerical designation. But because we see it through so much murk, it remains mostly unknown.
What a misfortune! It is a spectacular object. The power of the Mayall 4-meter telescope at Kitt Peak in Arizona reveals the true beauty of this galaxy. Almost all the stars in the image are actually in our Galaxy, much closer than IC 342 (imagine looking out a dirty window to see a bird sitting on a fence to get an idea of what’s going on). But look at it! The arms trace out the births of countless stars, punctuated by glowing red gas as the young stars heat their cocoons. Dark dust lanes hide the stars behind them, mimicking the way the Milky Way dust hides IC 342 itself. You can trace the magnificent arms all the way in to the center, where they meet in a pinwheel of colossal proportions.
In the highest resolution images (click here if you dare!) the picture is even more boggling: you can see far more distant galaxies in the background, some edge-on spirals, and even one ring galaxy. Huge clumps of star-forming regions in IC 342 reveal themselves, and you can spot places where the spiral arms split into separate spurs. Even the foreground stars, so much closer to home, provide a polychromatically spangled vista against which the much more regal spiral lies.
All in all, a devastating picture. The colors, the features, the composition… and it shows us that sometimes, beauty and grandeur can be missed, even when it’s in your own back yard.
And that’s why it’s my Number One Astronomy Picture of 2007.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:12 am
Marvelous selection, BA! Unfortunately, the eclipse movie doesn’t seem to be available any longer. Even so, what remains still fills me with wonder about what is out there. The image demonstrating dark matter is simply amazing with the clustering of all those galaxies as well as the final image of IC342. I loaded the entire image and spent some time viewing it at its maximum size. Its like staring down into a well. Looking at even a small patch reveals so many faint and impossibly far-off galaxies.
It gives me shivers thinking about it.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:16 am
Submitted to Reddit. This post is worthy of climbing to the top of both Digg and Reddit.
A great end of year present from the BA. Thanks.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:33 am
Heh. I forgot to change the privacy settings on the video. It’s fixed now, and should work.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:52 am
Re the Mars Reconaissance Image of the ’skylight’, it’s cool, but the source site doesn’t seem to think it is such a thing. See http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/images/2007/details/cut/PSP_004847_1745_cut_b.jpg … and http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_004847_1745 — where the text sez: “This time the pit was imaged from the west. Since the picture was taken at about 2:30 p.m. local (Mars) time, the sun was also shining from the west. We can now see the eastern wall of the pit catching the sunlight… This confirms that this pit is essentially a vertical shaft cut through the lava flows on the flank of the volcano. Such pits form on similar volcanoes in Hawaii and are called “pit craters.” They generally do not connect to long open caverns but are the result of deep underground collapse. From the shadow of the rim cast onto the wall of the pit we can calculate that the pit is at least 78 meters (255 feet) deep. The pit is 150 x 157 meters (492 x 515 feet) across.”
December 13th, 2007 at 7:55 am
Great selection! I remember it was one of these Top 10 galleries that first lured me into this site.
Still, a little surprised that Comet McNaught didn’t make it on the list. Sure, unlike Comet Holmes, McNaught was nothing but a “normal” great comet we’ll get to see (or for us northerners, not see) every 2-3 decades… but some of the pictures I’ve seen were absolutely stunning. In the “maybe not as beautiful, but nonetheless mind-boggling” arena, McNaught also faired well, e.g., with pictures of its tail visible from the northern hemisphere, long after the head of the comet sunk down yonder.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:02 am
Fantastic images, all of them!
I’m a little surprised that Comet McNaught didn’t get a mention in the 2007 or 2006 images, but comets were featured in both, so I guess it’s alright.
Nevertheless, I’ll go ahead and post some links to various APOD images of it, just for the fun of it! You can never have too many nice astronomy images. 
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070122.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070201.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070120.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070119.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070118.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070117.html
Keep up the good work!
December 13th, 2007 at 8:10 am
Thank you, thank you, thank you! For next year, I vote for a top 20…
December 13th, 2007 at 8:14 am
That hole in Mars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why didn’t I see that picture before????????????????????????
I have seen those that show the holes as a black discs on the surface but, details within the tunnel/cavern?! That’s amazing…and to think that it was taken by an orbiter…WOW!
December 13th, 2007 at 8:17 am
I think there’s a typo in the length of Mira’s tail. 80 Million miles should probably be 80 TRillion miles.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:24 am
…why was there no mention about the rings around uranus?
December 13th, 2007 at 8:34 am
So, is the MOND/dark-matter debate largely settled, with dark-matter winning?
December 13th, 2007 at 8:37 am
Foretopman: So many trillions would add up to nearly 12 LIGHT YEARS, so I expect the 80 million is accurate.
I just have to say, it’s a darn good thing I have a 500 GB Hard drive on this iMac, ’cause I have to save these,,,
Maybe we should send some to Dubya and waken his inner child???
I agree, spelunking on Mars would be so fracking COOOOLL! I can see a number of good SciFi stories in this,,,
GAry 7
December 13th, 2007 at 8:55 am
Phil:
Thanks for the “Year in Review”! Great stuff.
This is why Astronomy is the greatest science!
What pretty pix come out of Chemistry? Biology? (Maybe that new Jerboa?) Geology? Uh, can’t think of any.
But Astronomy rocks!
Thanks 10^6!
Rich
December 13th, 2007 at 8:56 am
Oops! No, it’s 80 trillion. The tail is indeed 13 light years long. I fixed it.
I didn’t realize the hole on Mars isn’t really a cavern. I didn’t find that link until almost literally the last minute (the image I had was “orphaned”, sent to me by a friend) and didn’t read it carefully enough. I’ll fix that section in a moment.
As for McNaught, I had one in mind, but couldn’t secure permission to use the image. There was another image I liked, but it wasn’t high enough resolution. You can see the pitfalls of creating this list…
December 13th, 2007 at 9:05 am
RBD: I’m going to pretend I didn’t read that.
December 13th, 2007 at 9:06 am
Great pics! Makes me wish I had not given up on astronomy 10 years ago!
December 13th, 2007 at 9:13 am
[...] ♦ Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 9:13 am
>>TBA
>> but couldn’t secure permission to use the image
Ahh, I see. I feel better
December 13th, 2007 at 9:19 am
So many awesome photos, so few PC desktops!
December 13th, 2007 at 9:21 am
w00ts
December 13th, 2007 at 9:35 am
I’m a bit confused about #7, mostly because time confuses me
BA says: “They passed each other just as the age of dinosaurs was starting to get going on Earth, 200 million years ago. … The pair is 300 million light years away”
So does this mean they actually passed each other 500 million years ago, but the light emitted by these galaxies at that time reached Earth during the age of the dinosaurs — 200 million years ago?
Regarding #3 and billion-pixel digital cameras — people have in fact been collecting billion-pixel images from digicams here on Earth, using a robotic picture-taker and stitching software. See gigapan.org for more details — some of the images there are multiple gigapixels, and truly stunning. My personal favorite is probably this one: http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=162
December 13th, 2007 at 9:42 am
One of the best top tens I’ve enjoyed.
December 13th, 2007 at 9:43 am
One more comment re the Mars pit thing: y’know, I know it goes entirely without saying a guy like Phil P would simply fix something like that, when it’s pointed out, but still, I gotta highlight the contrast with a certain other mindset anyway:
I can think of any number of folk (*cough Hoagland*) who, when choosing between what the evidence actually shows and what they want to believe would absolutely go with the latter. A face on Mars is simply way cooler than no face on Mars, in their opinion, so that’s what they’ll say is there, even when you bring them higher res images debunking it… hell, presumably, even if you were to fly them to the surface and let ‘em look around…
And like a few of us have reflected: it’d be awesome to go spelunking, such a place as that photo shows. No slight is intended against the folk who said so here (I feel exactly the same way), but I can also easily imagine other folk so enthralled with that same vision that they’d pull a Hoagland on this very image, for just that reason. And insist, all evidence to the contrary, to the very end, that yes, that’s still a skylight. And, y’know, that there’s probably a spreading labyrinth of caverns connected to it, right there. Just because, y’know, that’s what they’d *like* to believe. Because it’d be cooler.
And a guy like Phil P, when you show him the shadow says something different at a different angle of the sun will simply say: oops. Missed that. Sinkhole it is.
Which is an attitude which, really, is way cooler, so long as I’m on the subject of what’s cool.
December 13th, 2007 at 9:43 am
“The Vela Supernova Remnant formed when a massive star 800 light years away blew up 11,00 years ago.”
Looks like you’re missing a zero there.
December 13th, 2007 at 9:46 am
If the galaxies of Arp 87 had passed each other 200 million years ago, and are 300 million light-years away, we wouldn’t know about it for another 100 million years. Maybe it happened 500 million years ago?
December 13th, 2007 at 9:49 am
I’m slightly confused by #7.
BA says: “They passed each other just as the age of dinosaurs was starting to get going on Earth, 200 million years ago. … The pair is 300 million light years away”.
Does this mean that they actually passed each other 500 million years ago, and that the light produced while they were passing reached each during the age of dinosaurs, 200 million years ago? Time confuses me
Re #3: some people have in fact taken stunning gigapixel photos with their digital cameras here on Earth, thanks to the Gigapan project, which used a robotic picture-taker and software stitching. See gigapan.org for more details. I’m particularly fond of this one: http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=283
December 13th, 2007 at 10:09 am
Wonderful wonderful list. Thanks for doing it again.
December 13th, 2007 at 10:15 am
[...] This is from The Bad Astronomer’s Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 10:30 am
Nice collection, Phil!
But there is a minor misspelling:
“Weikersheim” without the “c”;)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weikersheim
December 13th, 2007 at 10:40 am
Nuts. I checked and rechecked for typos, and yt there they are. Grrr.
I hate to keep fixing them, because every time I edit the post, people who get it through email or an RSS feed get a repeat copy. I’ll save up the list and make the changes later to avoid flooding them.
So if you find one, comment!
December 13th, 2007 at 10:51 am
I don’t usually like top ten lists, but this one has me spellbound. It was nice to see the objects of some of my fave posts of yours all in one spot.
Was #6 ~really~ a 300 second exposure?!
Oh, and I’m with PK-definitely a top 20 next year.
December 13th, 2007 at 10:58 am
[...] out the Bad Astronomy Blog » Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. I think my favourite is [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 11:08 am
[...] Organic added an interesting post today on Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007Here’s a small reading [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 11:28 am
[...] sjurecka wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 11:42 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 By The Bad Astronomer There’sa lot more about dark matter to learn, and images like these will help us solve these mysteries. Right now there a lot we don’t know… but we’ll figure it out. That’s why astronomy is so much fun. … Bad Astronomy Blog – http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
BA: (About pit crater on Mars) “When I look at this picture my sense of exploration, of wanting to walk into that pit and poke around, is nearly overwhelming. I can’t help thinking that Jules Verne would have felt at home standing at the lip of that crater.”
Yes. May I come along too? I can translate Mr. Verne’s French. I’ll also sweep up, do the dishes, carry supplies, whatever you need.
Amazing pictures!
December 13th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 1:05 pm
My daughter really loved this. She caught me reading it and was instantly fascinated. Oh what questions a 4 year old comes up with! Blogs like this one I’m sure produce many future astronomers.
December 13th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
>>Does this mean that they actually passed each other 500 million years ago, and that the light produced while they were passing reached each during the age of dinosaurs, 200 million years ago? Time confuses me <<
Me too!
I believe we reference the event from the time WE observe it. I’m sure there are technical, relativistic (and simply pragmatic) reasons we do this, but I’ll let someone more versed than I explain in more detail.
Then we’ll BOTH know!
December 13th, 2007 at 1:30 pm
Since Phil imlied that others may have different choices, I’d like to throw in one that would make my top 10 list this year. It’s the Carina Star Formation panorama from HST (which Phil featured here a few months ago). Here’s the link to the APOD version: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070425.html
If you start looking at the high resolution version it’s easy to get lost for hours in all of the details of this one. I have a large hardcopy that I pass around my classes while I’m talking about star or planet formation and say “Here. This is the sort of environment where star formation happens.”
December 13th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
[...] Publié le 13 décembre 2007 par Dr. Goulu Une année que j’attendais ça : le blog Bad Astronomy a publié son “Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007″ et il y a une fois encore des [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
#3 is probably my favourite out of those. #7 and #9 are my runner ups.
December 13th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 3:17 pm
Very nice selection, BA. This annual event is already a classic in my book.
December 13th, 2007 at 3:34 pm
[...] via ESA/Hubble – arp 87 grazie a Bad Astronomy [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 3:35 pm
[...] via New Horizons – Io and Europa Meet Again grazie a Bad Astronomy [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 3:39 pm
I love pretty much all of your posts, Phil. I love the skepticism posts, I love the much needed anti-science watchdogging, and I love the more technical astronomy posts. But this is just…wow. I’ve been looking at cool astronomy pictures since the fifth grade, and it NEVER gets old. Perfect for a yuletide meditation, too. The humbling wonder, the awe I feel must be something like what religious devotees feel in their “spiritual ecstasy,” except the objects of my awe are the real wonders of the universe. Thanks for helping bring them to us here on earth!
I was not familiar with ring galaxies, so I looked at the full resolution picture of IC 342, and I think I spotted it. Is it the gold colored ring just below and right of IC 342? I would’ve mistaken it for a planetary nebula.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:05 pm
Rob C. wrote:
“My daughter really loved this. She caught me reading it and was instantly fascinated. Oh what questions a 4 year old comes up with! Blogs like this one I’m sure produce many future astronomers.”
Not presuming to speak for Phil, but this is one of the nicest posts I’ve read on his blog.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
the best reason I ever seen to be an atheist thank you so very much!
December 13th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Billions and billions of pixels making up a gallery of galaxies.
It has been said that “a picture is worth a thousand words”, this quotation is not totally true all the time. Some of the text descriptions, in this thread, make for some very interesting reading along with looking at images that can make one speechless.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:57 pm
What about a calendar? Are there copyright issues with that?
December 13th, 2007 at 5:00 pm
[...] Pictures: “Bad Astronomy’s Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 5:03 pm
I had actually started to miss the astronomy on here and them BAM!
No disappointment here.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:04 pm
Though I should point out that, technically, there are 18 days left in 2007, which does not preclude the possibility of a better picture emerging.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:29 pm
Oh, these are great. Why didn’t I find your blog years ago?
December 13th, 2007 at 6:26 pm
During the middle of a boring and repetitive conference call I needed something to keep me awake. This post did not disappoint. The word “awesome” has become a cliche’. It should be reserved for things like this that really do inspire awe.
Thanks Phil.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:09 pm
I love seeing the sun like that. Seeing it as a 3d rotating sphere makes my head feel funny in a good way.
Glad there were no lunar eclipse pics. Everytime I see that red moon I curse my weak body for sleeping through it.
//I lie, I want to see the red moon.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:30 pm
So much better than religion.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:51 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. I love end of the year lists. [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 8:55 pm
Excellent post. Some truly breathtaking images.
That being said, I have to take issue with the discussion of #4. I’m in no way an expert when it comes to astronomy or astrophysics, but I was under the impression that the existence of dark matter is one (albeit the most popular) among several hypotheses that are attempting to account for large-scale gravitational anomolies. One can certainly doubt the prospects of these alternative hypotheses/models, but saying things like “Many people — who don’t understand the science — claim dark matter doesn’t exist, and that astronomers are making it all up.” is utterly uncharitable and contrary to honest scientific inquiry and debate. I hope this doesn’t come off as overly harsh, but it just annoys me when legitmate debate is passed off as merely the product of ignorance, or perhaps worse.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:55 pm
I would have to say that, while these images are breathtaking, The author’s (Bad Astronomer?, sorry I’m new here) descriptions and captions, and sense of awe and wonder, are what drew me in even more. Reminds me of when me and the old man would take a 4″ telescope out in the winters as a kid. He had the same way with words…
December 13th, 2007 at 9:07 pm
[...] From Badastronomy.com. Bad in a good way. Link [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
Top 10: Imágenes de astrononomía del 2007…
No creo que sea necesario añadir algo. A disfrutar ……
December 13th, 2007 at 9:36 pm
Beautiful…but what it has to do with being an atheist escapes me.
I will send my students to this link for some sweet extra-credit goodness.
December 13th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
[...] images for the year 2007. Several of the images are simply stunning but all are worthy of a viewing.read more | digg story do somethingSubscribeDiggdel.icio.usFacebookRedditStumbleUpon Posted by gregor [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
[...] one of my favorite end-of-the-year retrospectives is the Bad Astronomy Top 10 Astronomy Photos of the Year. This year had another bumper crop of photos that’ll make you stare at your screen and [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 10:50 pm
[...] el sitio Bad Astronomy publicaron un top de las mejores 10 imagenes relacionadas con la astronomía en el 2007. Cada una [...]
December 13th, 2007 at 11:55 pm
I just had an astrophysics final, and came out mentally sore and slightly disenchanted with space sciences. Looking at these images reminded me why we choose to do this stuff. This blog is definitely a new addition to my RSS reader. Thanks Phil!
December 14th, 2007 at 12:37 am
[...] truly appreciate the skies above, sometimes we need to rely on some sources beyond our senses. I think I may have to revisit [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 1:32 am
Fantastic selection, Phil! I’ve really dug many of the HiRISE images, and your #1 is amazing, but the interactive version of the Vela remnant simply takes the cake. Utter slackjawed wonder and awe is the only possible human reaction to that, I reckon.
December 14th, 2007 at 2:06 am
[...] 10 Astronomy Pictures of 2007 Check out the Bad Astronomer’s blog for his Top 10. Its pretty [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 3:20 am
[...] As a sort of penance for the wrongness of the previous post, feast your eyes on some of the wonders of the Cosmos. [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 4:25 am
I never realized that the sun looks like that… Brilliant selection of photos.
December 14th, 2007 at 4:31 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 4:44 am
I would call this collection “shock and awe”…really great shots and compliments for the tough selection. I’m sure it was quite difficult to make choices. I will show this great pictures to my daughter (3 years old) who already loves stars and planets, she will be delighted. Think that she already knows the name of all the solar planets and knows how to find them on the starry night software. Those nerdy kids can really suprise me. The Vela supernova is for me the top, it brings me in a different state of mind and consciousness!!
December 14th, 2007 at 6:37 am
[...] Esta es la foto de la galaxia IC 342, muchas más acá [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 6:43 am
Great aesthetic sense.
Beautiful in so many ways.
Thanks.
December 14th, 2007 at 6:55 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 Astronomy is arguably the most beautiful of the sciences. I’m biased, of course, but it’s nearly impossible to gaze upon a picture of a galaxy, a moon, a nebula, and not see in it something compellingly artistic. Sometimes it’s the color, sometimes the shape, and sometimes it’s the knowledge that we can understand the subject of the picture itself. [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 7:19 am
Hi, Phil. I don’t know anything about astronomy. I followed a link to your site to see pretty pictures.
But I wanted you to know that you did an excellent job of explaining the photos. I not only learned a lot from visiting your site, I was able to see the passion and sheer joy you derive from astronomy, making it more compelling for me as a reader. Thank you so much for that gift!
December 14th, 2007 at 7:53 am
[...] Top 10 Astronomy Pictures of 2007 — Very cool to see… Especially #2 about the [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 8:27 am
just amazing! I like galaxy pictures and Mira comet. My mind do not understand these things
December 14th, 2007 at 8:28 am
Richard B. Drumm said:
“What pretty pix come out of Chemistry? Biology?”
Er, well, how about these:
http://www.ims.uconn.edu/~pburkhard/protein-ligand.html
http://www.biozentrum.unibas.ch/~burkhard/de-novo.html
http://www.esrf.eu/UsersAndScience/Publications/Highlights/2004/SB/SB3
http://www.genomics.rug.nl/Structuur_wg_web_contribution_071201.pdf
http://life.nthu.edu.tw/~b830356/5S_RNA.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060805131526.htm
And Wikipedia has a good article on the science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_crystallography
December 14th, 2007 at 8:37 am
Not sure which HiRISE image the cool ‘hole’ is from – but I’m fairly sure it isn’t http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_004847_1745 – the hole in that one is not as well lit, nor as detailed as the one in your Top Ten Phil
Doug
December 14th, 2007 at 8:48 am
[...] Top 10 Astronomy Pictures of 2007 I used to love astronomy when I was younger and it is something I’d like to get back into when time permits. However for now I’ll just enjoy these awesome photos. [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 9:53 am
Oh, really nice
December 14th, 2007 at 10:33 am
[...] Several of the images are simply stunning but all are worthy of a viewing. futurama xxx cartoonsread more | digg [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 11:08 am
Stunning photos all, and I really liked the video of the sun.
Thank you! and happy holidays.
December 14th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Me parecen muy buenas e impresinantes estas imagenes. Felicito al creador de la pagina.
Rafael Testa, Venezuela
December 14th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Ragutis said:
“Fantastic selection, Phil! I’ve really dug many of the HiRISE images, and your #1 is amazing, but the interactive version of the Vela remnant simply takes the cake. Utter slackjawed wonder and awe is the only possible human reaction to that, I reckon.”
Seconded!
December 14th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
[...] images for the year 2007. Several of the images are simply stunning but all are worthy of a viewing.read more | digg [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 12:57 pm
Inspired choices BA. MERRY CHRISTMAS!
December 14th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
stereo eclipse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqCR8PoVlS4
December 14th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
[...] Lo mejor del cosmos 2007. [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
[...] of the images are simply stunning but all are worthy of a viewing. dragonball z sailor moon pornoread more | digg [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Great work!
December 14th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
[...] Several of the images are simply stunning but all are worthy of a viewing. X Men last stand horribleread more | digg story RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Cartoons Fans Lounge [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 8:37 pm
[...] Top 10 Astronomy Pictures of the Year. I love the lightning behind the observatory. That’s some good luck with a five minute [...]
December 14th, 2007 at 9:35 pm
I’d just like to say great list and I personaly think #3 is the best
and really like #8 as well…
Maybe it’s just me but looking at the top right hand corner of the high res version from #1 I see something a little wierd… the right of light around the one star looks like it has a square corner cut out of it :S
@ColinM
I don’t think it was 500 million years ago, I think it “They passed each other just as the age of dinosaurs was starting” implys that it was durring that time that they started to pass and I think he ment in one picture not stitched together as you are refering to.
December 14th, 2007 at 11:16 pm
The picture of vela is great, but the first thing I notice is the Schmidt ghost in the upper right.
December 15th, 2007 at 7:21 am
[...] Bad Astronomy Blog ? Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 (tags: astronomy photography) [...]
December 15th, 2007 at 10:19 am
Fantastic! Thank you.
December 15th, 2007 at 12:11 pm
I love your blog, and this is the perfect article to show to friends who don’t have the patience to read the regular entries. Some really fantastic things here, and it just shows that even though we’ve “mastered” spaceflight, we still have a long, long way to go.
December 15th, 2007 at 7:51 pm
No evidence of ET life yet?
Can’t find anybody yet, huh?
Why do you waste our time like this?
Chai
December 15th, 2007 at 9:41 pm
awsome!
December 16th, 2007 at 1:22 am
[...] is one of the Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. Not bad, [...]
December 16th, 2007 at 10:03 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 Wow. Is number six available as wallpaper? [...]
December 16th, 2007 at 11:10 am
For STEREO movie of the eclipse try this page:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2007/12mar_stereoeclipse.htm
December 16th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
Wow, BA! I’m just an interested civilian; linked to your list from Towleroad.com and have just spent a most enjoyable, educational and entertaining 90 min reading, viewing and perusing the comments. Thank you very, very much! I would think the reality of our cosmos as seen in these pics would inspire awe in the believer and non-believer equally….words are inadequate. I’m fwding your list to my brother, nephew and several friends who share my general interests and curiosity about the universe we live in. Thanks for a fantastic post and Happy Holidays to you and yours!
December 16th, 2007 at 12:45 pm
[...] Top ten astronomy pictures of 2007 No Comments Leave a Commenttrackback addressYou must log in to post a comment. [...]
December 16th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
[...] Science doesn’t take away from the beauty of nature. It enhances it, multiplies it. Read and see more [...]
December 16th, 2007 at 4:38 pm
Wow,
Fantastic Photos. Astronomy is fantastic. As technology advances we can understand and learn so much more. I can’t wait till the new wave of telescopes are finished around 2015.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:01 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 Bad Astronomy Blog [...]
December 17th, 2007 at 3:34 pm
[...] las 10 mejores fotografías astronómicas de 2006 según Bad Astronomy Blog. La lista de este año acaba de ser publicada y tiene cosas verdaderamente [...]
December 17th, 2007 at 5:30 pm
[...] They’ve now put out their Pictures of the Year 2007. Phil Plait has his top ten list over at the Bad Astronomy website. [...]
December 17th, 2007 at 7:18 pm
I like the description of Mars as a *place*. It really is a kind of paradigm shift, if you think about it. We will probably visit (and stay) there someday, rather than just observe it.
Nice job, Phil.
December 18th, 2007 at 4:18 am
[...] not preceded by events of such cosmic magnitude, I would in all likelihood have linked to these ten best astronomical images of 2007. This is truly mind-expanding (to go along with the girth expanding you might be experiencing as [...]
December 18th, 2007 at 9:55 am
[...] Astronomy pictures [...]
December 18th, 2007 at 3:21 pm
[...] finally, here are two great lists of the top astrophotos in 2007, from Bad Astronomy and Astronomy Picture of the [...]
December 18th, 2007 at 9:03 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 1:06 am
[...] in one place: the Top 10 cliche dorm room posters. There is some serious wow to be found in these Top 10 astronomy posters of 2007. The Top 10 hottest women in tech can only really be followed by the sequel. A much more soothing [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 2:11 am
[...] Ohhhh… Ahhhh… BadAstronomy has the years Top Ten Astronomy Pics. [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 4:53 am
[...] imágenes astronómicas recibidas por los principales observatorios. De paso, echa una ojeada al Top 10 de fotografías astronómicas de [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 12:06 pm
[...] spunto dal post comparso su Bad Astronomy vorremmo proporvi anche 10 tra le più belle immagini astronomiche del [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 | Bad Astronomy Blog [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 5:12 pm
[...] gente de Bad Astronomy se ha trabajado un ránking muy especial, el de las mejores imágenes de astronomía del año que se va. Para ellos, la ganadora es esta IC342, una galaxia en espiral que se encuentra a 11 [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 8:23 pm
[...] Link via the Bad Astronomy Blog. [...]
December 19th, 2007 at 9:45 pm
[...] Neptune switch places? And finally, here are two great lists of the top astrophotos in 2007, from Bad Astronomy and Astronomy Picture of the [...]
December 20th, 2007 at 3:09 am
[...] 10. Bad Astronomy – 2007 – link [...]
December 20th, 2007 at 5:16 am
[...] en Bad Astronomy también han seleccionado las mejores fotos astronómicas del [...]
December 20th, 2007 at 5:17 am
[...] Bad Astronomy Blog » Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 There are so many incredible astronomical photographs released every year that picking ten as the most beautiful is a substantial task. But it becomes easier when you consider the science behind the image as well. Does this image tell us more than that on (tags: astronomy photos visualisation interesting gallery space) [...]
December 20th, 2007 at 2:21 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 “There are so many incredible astronomical photographs released every year that picking ten as the most beautiful is a substantial task. But it becomes easier when you consider the science behind the image as well. Does this image tell us more than that o [...]
December 20th, 2007 at 11:25 pm
[...] Bad Astronomy Blog » Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 #5, 4, 3 and 1 are jawdropping. (tags: astronomy imagery space) [...]
December 21st, 2007 at 5:12 am
[...] Bad Astronomy Blog » Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 21st, 2007 at 4:32 pm
[...] A list of the top 10 astronomy images of 2007, including entwined galaxies and a dying star. [...]
December 21st, 2007 at 7:59 pm
Everytime I see new pictures from astrophotographers and NASA I am always surprised and amazed. It just keeps getting better all the time. Thank you for your list and your passion that helps us to realize how small we truly are physically compared to the other magnificent energies out there in space.
December 21st, 2007 at 9:19 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 (tags: astronomy science photography photos space) [...]
December 21st, 2007 at 10:22 pm
[...] The Bad Astronomer has posted his top 10 astronomy photos of 2007. [...]
December 22nd, 2007 at 6:59 am
Amazing Universe always brings us surprizes. Very very nice photos.
December 23rd, 2007 at 2:47 am
[...] en jaaroverzichten. Collega Phil Plait van de Bad Astronomy Blogs heeft enige tijd geleden een top-10 gepubliceerd van mooiste sterenfoto’s van 2007. Da’s uiteraard ’zijn persoonlijke keuze, maar ik vind ze zo prachtig dat ik ze hier [...]
December 23rd, 2007 at 7:51 pm
Ah..they look like crap. Totally phoney.
Bah Humbug!
Just kiddin’…loved ‘em.
December 24th, 2007 at 9:48 am
[...] The so-called Bad Astronomer picked the top 10 astronomy pictures of 2007. [...]
December 24th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
[...] en las fotos de astronomía, que son un valor seguro. Hay un par de listas que merecen la pena. La primera es la que ha realizado Phil Plait, de Bad Astronomy. De hecho, esta lista es doble, ya que además [...]
December 24th, 2007 at 8:20 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 26th, 2007 at 7:16 pm
[...] fin de año comienzan los famosos “top ten”… pues yo también aquí les dejo un link con el top ten de las mejores fotografías astronómicas del [...]
December 26th, 2007 at 8:29 pm
[...] you feel like having your mind nicely blown, check out these astronomical photos taken this year. I like the astral comet with the 13 light-year tail, myself. But the pictures of [...]
December 26th, 2007 at 8:30 pm
[...] The Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007- from the Bad Astronomy Blog. The interestingness of this blog starts with the beauty of the images, moves to the humility that [...]
December 26th, 2007 at 10:02 pm
[...] starp š?s bildes nep?rliecin?ja, tad v?l var apl?kot citu kosmisko bilžu desmitnieku blog? badastronomy.com (ar? izvilku [...]
December 27th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
[...] much as I’d like, but I can’t resist sharing one of Phil’s recent posts with you. The Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 is beautiful glimpse of what human exploration of the universe has uncovered recently. I’m [...]
December 27th, 2007 at 11:44 pm
I think one of the things I like most about being a star gazer is how nice it is to get lost in all the wondering. To let the mundane of our self emposed issues fall away and simply enjoy the beauty that is beyond. Thank-you for some dream time and other wordly experience of this list.
December 28th, 2007 at 3:54 am
Find a new home for the the few sane humans that do not want to come back to the hell called earth.
December 28th, 2007 at 3:39 pm
[...] Bad Astronomy [...]
December 28th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
[...] As 10 melhores fotografias astronómicas de 2007 Bad Astronomy. [...]
December 28th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Wow!
December 28th, 2007 at 10:31 pm
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
December 29th, 2007 at 3:10 pm
[...] Link: Bad Astronomy [...]
December 29th, 2007 at 10:33 pm
[...] pictures coming from telescopes across — and above — the world, so I put together a Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 on my blog, Bad [...]
December 31st, 2007 at 2:52 am
[...] 16. Badastronomy’den Y?l?n En ?yi Astronomi Foto?raflar? [...]
December 31st, 2007 at 11:11 am
[...] Just one link today: Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. [...]
December 31st, 2007 at 1:29 pm
[...] Bad Astronomy Blog wrote an interesting post today on Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007Here’s a quick excerpt Astronomy is arguably the most beautiful of the sciences. I’m biased, of course, but it’s nearly impossible to gaze upon a picture of a galaxy, a moon, a nebula, and not see in it something compellingly artistic. Sometimes it’s the color, sometimes the shape, and sometimes it’s the knowledge that we can understand the subject of the picture itself. Science doesn’t take away from the beauty of nature. It enhances it, multiplies it. There are so many incredible astronomical photographs release [...]
January 1st, 2008 at 10:49 pm
Very nice pictures.
That being said, I also want to say that it is regrettable that the comment
“Many people — who don’t understand the science — claim dark matter doesn’t exist, and that astronomers are making it all up.”
was made in the blog. To me, this doesn’t sound like being put forward by a true “skeptic”. If anything, it is a really pale argument in any debating by claiming the other party doesn’t know “the science”.
Look forward to better science in Astronomy in the new year!
January 2nd, 2008 at 10:41 am
[...] 16. Badastronomy’den Y?l?n En ?yi Astronomi Foto?raflar? [...]
January 2nd, 2008 at 6:01 pm
[...] The best astronomy pictures of 2007. [...]
January 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 pm
i need image / picture satelit in the orbit
for my training design
T Q …
i wait
January 3rd, 2008 at 3:52 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
January 5th, 2008 at 7:31 am
[...] Top 10 Astronomy Pictures – I’ve never been a huge astronomy fan. Yeah, the Universe is fascinating and full of mystery; but there’s something inherently unknowable about it that – for some reason – distracts me from its splendour. Nonetheless, these images are truly captivating. [...]
January 5th, 2008 at 8:58 am
[...] 16. Badastronomy’den Y?l?n En ?yi Astronomi Foto?raflar? [...]
January 6th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
[...] (among scientific sites, anyway) blog. One of his most popular posts of the year highlighted ten of the best celestial eye candy of 2007. Instead of reposting all of his selections, I recommend spending a few minutes reading through his [...]
January 7th, 2008 at 2:22 am
[...] Seguir viendo en Bad Astronomy [...]
January 8th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
[...] ??? ????? ?? ??? 10 ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ??? ???????. ???????? ??? ???????? ????? ???? ???, ???? ??????? ??? ????????????? ???? ????, ??? ??? ????? ??? ?????????????? ??????????? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ???, ????????????? ?? ?????, ??????????? ?? ??????? ??????. [...]
January 9th, 2008 at 2:13 am
My thanks too for the effort and knowledge that went into compiling the list (and the also-rans). it brightened my morning more than somewhat.
However, like Jingchun Chen above, I didn’t find this comment helpful:
“Many people — who don’t understand the science — claim dark matter doesn’t exist, and that astronomers are making it all up. Well, there’s a giant smoke ring in the sky indicating they are quite wrong.”
For starters, there are alternative minority theories, such as MOND.
Secondly, as a devotee of Karl Popper’s philosophy of science, what I have read of “Dark Matter” gives me pause for thought. Popper’s central concept is of scientific method as a series of conjectures and refutations. Scientists make conjectures that generate predictions which can then be tested experimentally. If the experiement agrees with the prediction, then the theory is corroborated, but never proved; there’s always another experiement round the corner which may result in a refutation of the theory. Thus did Newton’s theory of gravitation prove wanting after a few hundred years of nothing but corroborative observations.
Popper also draws attention to those theories that make tough predictions that then turn out to be correct eg General Relativity predicted that light would be bent around the Sun, an effect that had not been observed at that time.
Dark Matter theory clearly started life as a patch to hold existing cosmological theories together. Patches are acceptable and sometimes necessary, but Popper counsels caution when the patch creates additional problems of verification. The lack of progress in identifying the Dark Matter is just such a probleem of verification.
It reminds me of the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, which provides links between the branches of mathematics known as algebraic geometry and complex analysis. This was stated, without proof, in 1955 and became an important building block for further analysis, but researchers using it always had to state “assuming that the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture is true,” rather like an auditor’s exception to a set of financial accounts. As far as I understand, and the maths involved is beyond all but the most gifted in the field, in 1994, Andrew Wiles proved the T-S conjecture (unlike science, you can prove things in maths as it is an axiomatic structure) on the way to proving Fermat’s Last Theorem and thereby put a whole raft of mathematics on a sounder basis.
We seem to have be at a similar stage with Dark Matter, but without astronomers acknowledging that it remains a conjecture/hypothesis.
New evidence seems to be moving in the right direction in terms of Popper’s “conjectures and refutations” model. However, I have read elsewhere that the “…giant smoke ring…” is now viewed with suspicion. The fact that Mr Plait jumps on this piece of evidence with such glee does suggest an underlying insecurity.
To sum up: “Many people….claim dark matter doesn’t exist…” Well, this person thinks that dark matter is the best candidate around as an explanation of what astronomers observe. So guys: it’s fine to devote your lives to lines of research that depend on the dark matter hypothesis and to win a livelihood based on that assumption. But, please don’t overstate the theoretical verification of your dark matter patch on cosmological theory.
January 9th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
Trully Awsome!!!!!! And a great many people think we are alone! A Big Space with simple little minds!
January 11th, 2008 at 6:34 am
My Lord! Awesome photos! Personally I like pictures number 3 and 6 the most. Expecially 6 is really stunning! Great pictures you have found. Thanks for sharing.
January 11th, 2008 at 8:06 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
January 11th, 2008 at 10:57 am
[...] Yeah, you know Travis Rector: he makes pretty pictures. In fact, in my opinion, he made the prettiest picture of 2007! He also put together the image of Jupiter you see [...]
January 11th, 2008 at 11:43 am
[...] Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 Qui, su questo sito Bad Astronomy Blog ? Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 Ci sono le 10 pi? bella immagini astronomiche del 2007. Degna di nota ? quella del [...]
January 13th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Thank you for the wonderful work! I know nothing about astronomy, but I look at the sky every night with awe. I love how you manage to write about the most complex mysteries of astrophysics in a way that even I can understand and enjoy what you’re talking about.
January 14th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
[...] Bad Astronomy came out with a list of Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 The last one is [...]
January 16th, 2008 at 10:05 am
[...] some Eye Candy courtesy of Bad Astronomy. Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007. Be sure to look at the full resolution pictures. Amazing! Also fun fact: we have more accurate maps [...]
January 19th, 2008 at 7:25 am
[...] 10. Bad Astronomy – 2007 – link [...]
January 19th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
[...] As 10 melhores fotos de astronomia de 2007 5 magníficas fotos do pôr-do-sol no norte da Noruega Como seria a visão que Deus teria [...]
January 27th, 2008 at 12:28 am
All I can say is; Wow. Thanks for compiling this list, I had a great time looking through the pictures, amazed.
January 31st, 2008 at 2:06 pm
[...] Enero 31, 2008 por achtung! Ya pasada la euforia del cambio de año, les dejo las mejores imágenes atronómicas del 2007. [...]
February 19th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
First off, I’m not an astronomer, I’m an archaeologist, so my astronomy knowledge is limited to the more cultural aspects.
Anyway, I clicked on the huge, honkin’ IC342 picture, and started looking at it in detail. When I got to the extreme right of the very top aspect, I found something rather odd. There’s a very large, bright double star system (the two are almost “touching”) with several smaller stars around it. Then, about half an “inch” to the left of it, there’s smaller star not quite parallel to the bigger two. Anyway, in between the two, there’s a black, “right angle” square-ish looking thing that cuts into the light of the larger star system. The smaller star looks to be in front of it, along the top line of the right angle (one line is horizontal and the other is vertical, making a fairly close looking right angle). I’m nowhere close to an astronomer, but I’ve never heard of a real “right angle” in astronomical pictures, outside of the red system that apparently almost as close to geometically perfect as possible.
But it’s just such an odd looking thing that I had to ask about it. It could be a trick with the camera or I’m just seeing things that aren’t there (like a mirage). At any rate, I did want to ask about it, because it is very strange looking. It’s just “black,” but you can make thefaint outline of something with definition. My guess is that it is a glitch in either the camera or the editing process, but that’s just me.
Madi
March 5th, 2008 at 11:08 am
The universe is about 42.777 trillion light years times 81 in size. There are about 938 universis around ours . Ours is mostly jade green with magneta color with only 3% of the galaxies in our universe having life in them. 201 of the other universis contain oxygen
March 8th, 2008 at 9:59 pm
3% of the galaxies in our universe have life? Aren’t we still without evidence of life anywhere else but our galaxy; and planet? I figure I would have heard about more life on the news.
March 29th, 2008 at 11:29 am
[...] Bad Astronomy Blog » Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 [...]
March 30th, 2008 at 8:09 am
good work,good pictures
April 4th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
[...] dejo con las 10 imágenes astronómicas más destacadas del año pasado, este es el enlace original donde lo tenéis todo explicado (en inglés), de todos modos enlazo cada imagen a una explicación [...]
April 12th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
[...] Top 10 Astronomy Pictures of 2007: or, 10 reasons we should fund the space program. [...]
May 2nd, 2008 at 12:10 am
Great pix, great site!
You should check out the work of an artist called Peter Mckay – he makes images like this with potatoes and cellophane in his bedroom!
May 27th, 2008 at 8:09 am
[...] Dešimt gražiausi? astronomini? fotografij? 2007 metais – ?IA> [...]
June 24th, 2008 at 10:03 am
This is so amazing! I like number 8 very much.
July 11th, 2008 at 8:44 am
Elegant!
August 26th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
[...] also found this link on Phil’s site, with the top astronomy photos of 2007. Here is a really cool hole found on [...]
October 13th, 2008 at 11:42 am
[...] the STEREO spacecraft, shows the Moon transiting the Sun (and I liked it so much it was part of my Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007), and is part of a jaw-dropping [...]
October 27th, 2008 at 5:22 am
The images are heavenly.
October 27th, 2008 at 8:51 am
[...] 10 sameZombie’s Inventory Wrath of the Lich King – [spectacular video intro] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures – [space] What hyperinflation looks like (Zimbabwe) – [unreal] A Robot Made From Disposable [...]
October 27th, 2008 at 11:30 am
[...] Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007 | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine (tags: Science astronomy space) [...]
October 27th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
Las mejores fotos astronómicas del 2007
Discovery ha elegido el top ten de las mejores fotos astronómicas del último año. Una colección para admirar.
October 28th, 2008 at 9:24 am
In Spanish:
¿A quién le interesa?
¿por qué cuando se muestran fotografías de galaxias estrellas, planetas o cuerpos espaciales lejanos, no aparecen aquellos que debieran aparecer en primer plano?
October 28th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Las mejores fotos astronómicas del 2007
Discovery Magazine ha seleccionado 10 imágenes como las mejores fotografías astronómicas del último año.
La astronomía es probablemente una de las más bella de las ciencias, sobre todo a la vista de algunas de las fotografías que selecciona …
October 29th, 2008 at 4:41 am
[...] comparaţia, sunt probabil sub influenţa ştirilor de azi.Mai multe imagini şi poveştile lor aici. Taguri: imagini, lume, NASA, pericol, planeta, spatiu, [...]
October 29th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
[...] por su web y podreis ver 9 mas, a cada cual mas [...]
October 31st, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Gracias por el esfuerzo de vuestro trabajo que nos permite apreciar que hermoso y grande es nuestro sistema solar, he visitado esta página con mi sobrina que está en el colegio, nosotras somos de Lima y sería muy interesante que pudeiran de alguna manera tener una traductor de vuestra página para poder leer y conocer con detalle todo lo que escriben detallando los conocimientos que tiene a la fecha del universo.
Felicidades !!!
November 3rd, 2008 at 1:24 pm
This is absolutely beautiful. Quality in the web… Thank you very much to give sense to this invention: internet… Thank you, thanks again. Apart of more sensations, one of my feelings after read and look with atention your work, is that it helps me to understand our Creator. I am a believer and things like this drawn me closer to the Wise and Brilliant mind of God. Please, I’d like to read more about it. You have a lovely dedication.
November 5th, 2008 at 2:36 pm
[...] supernovas he llegado a este recopilatorio de las mejores fotos astronómicas de 2007. La foto de arriba retrata la supernova Vela, o mejor dicho, los restos tras la supernova. Toda esa [...]
November 6th, 2008 at 12:21 am
It makes mi so small and so big in the same time!!!
December 25th, 2008 at 6:02 am
[...] sure you look at the [...]
March 6th, 2009 at 3:38 am
These images are very beautiful and many of the descriptions is to know. I like space and everything associated with it
although I 11m, as is Lithuania.
But I have a telescope, and is sometimes seen through it, but not Don ‘t go, I observe in these photos. I prefer to fly away into space, it is my dream (:
March 22nd, 2009 at 9:36 am
[...] 2007, and the utterly incredible solar eclipse animation that was so freaking cool I put it in my Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2007, [...]
April 21st, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Amazing really amazing, space has something special… I really like number 3
October 14th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Nice images.
November 30th, 2009 at 1:51 am
Real amazing. I like all of it.
February 7th, 2010 at 7:13 am
Fantastic Photos. Astronomy is fantastic. As technology advances we can understand and learn so much more. I can’t wait till the new wave of telescopes are finished around 2015.