<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Italian UFO</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boltzman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-179511</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boltzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-179511</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen; Old topic, but for your future "UFO" debunking pleasure. ;-)   

It's a television satellite in a highly elliptical geosynchronous orbit near the ecliptic. Such an orbit describes an analemma in the sky. In this case, one lobe of the stretched figure-eight is seen in front of the Moon.

It's round because it's out of focus. And any typical video of a satellite passing in front of the Moon will appear about the size seen in this video.

The author of the video was told all this by an astronomer but chose to ignore that rather obvious and conclusive determination--opting for the indeterminant "UFO" instead. A balloon, near or far in random air, would not have remained in front of the Moon's small 30 arc/sec but a moment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geosynchronous_orbit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen; Old topic, but for your future &#8220;UFO&#8221; debunking pleasure. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a television satellite in a highly elliptical geosynchronous orbit near the ecliptic. Such an orbit describes an analemma in the sky. In this case, one lobe of the stretched figure-eight is seen in front of the Moon.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s round because it&#8217;s out of focus. And any typical video of a satellite passing in front of the Moon will appear about the size seen in this video.</p>
<p>The author of the video was told all this by an astronomer but chose to ignore that rather obvious and conclusive determination&#8211;opting for the indeterminant &#8220;UFO&#8221; instead. A balloon, near or far in random air, would not have remained in front of the Moon&#8217;s small 30 arc/sec but a moment.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geosynchronous_orbit" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geosynchronous_orbit</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mckenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59417</link>
		<dc:creator>Mckenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59417</guid>
		<description>I personally think it's a balloon but I still believe in intelligent life forms, because to think that we are the only ones in the universe is as stupid as planting 1,000,000,000 flowers and thinking only one will grow. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think it&#8217;s a balloon but I still believe in intelligent life forms, because to think that we are the only ones in the universe is as stupid as planting 1,000,000,000 flowers and thinking only one will grow. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mckenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59416</link>
		<dc:creator>Mckenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59416</guid>
		<description>I mean but not bug in third sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean but not bug in third sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mckenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mckenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59415</guid>
		<description>It's most likely a balloon. My next guess is photoshop. Then the bug theory, bug then we all might be wrong. I mean, you could say it's ANYTHING when your only proof is no one ahs proved it doesn't exist!
lol I love Harry Potter, for those who don't get it, that's what Hermione says to Luna Lovegoods dad. lol sorry I'm getting off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s most likely a balloon. My next guess is photoshop. Then the bug theory, bug then we all might be wrong. I mean, you could say it&#8217;s ANYTHING when your only proof is no one ahs proved it doesn&#8217;t exist!<br />
lol I love Harry Potter, for those who don&#8217;t get it, that&#8217;s what Hermione says to Luna Lovegoods dad. lol sorry I&#8217;m getting off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59414</guid>
		<description>I like the Balloon theory,  but in the spirit of debunking the huge kilometers wide craft floating over the moon..... Where is the huge shadow it would cast on the surface of our favorite natural satellite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Balloon theory,  but in the spirit of debunking the huge kilometers wide craft floating over the moon&#8230;.. Where is the huge shadow it would cast on the surface of our favorite natural satellite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishscribe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59413</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishscribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59413</guid>
		<description>It's a childs' balloon, guys and girls. Unless I'm mistaken, the object isn't absolutely round, it appears at times to have that "pear-shape" an inflated balloon has. We only see this occaisionally, because of course the baloon is tumbleing as it is blown across the sky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a childs&#8217; balloon, guys and girls. Unless I&#8217;m mistaken, the object isn&#8217;t absolutely round, it appears at times to have that &#8220;pear-shape&#8221; an inflated balloon has. We only see this occaisionally, because of course the baloon is tumbleing as it is blown across the sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59404</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/14/italian-ufo/#comment-59404</guid>
		<description>ugghh. I want my four minutes back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugghh. I want my four minutes back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
