<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taste my death ray, 3C321!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3C321: o ‘Raio da Morte’ do Buraco Negro Supermassivo em Galáxia Ativa Assassina Provoca o Apocalipse Cósmico na Galáxia Vizinha &#171; Eternos Aprendizes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-208006</link>
		<dc:creator>3C321: o ‘Raio da Morte’ do Buraco Negro Supermassivo em Galáxia Ativa Assassina Provoca o Apocalipse Cósmico na Galáxia Vizinha &#171; Eternos Aprendizes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-208006</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait explicou o fenômeno em detalhes em seu blog ‘Bad Astronomy’: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Plait explicou o fenômeno em detalhes em seu blog ‘Bad Astronomy’: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ULTIMATE astronomy quiz - Page 147 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-149085</link>
		<dc:creator>The ULTIMATE astronomy quiz - Page 147 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-149085</guid>
		<description>[...]  BA&#039;s Blog    __________________ - Learn a lot teaching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  BA&#8217;s Blog    __________________ &#8211; Learn a lot teaching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rosengarten</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59922</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rosengarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59922</guid>
		<description>OK, let&#039;s clear some air here.

 First &quot;Active&quot; is not being redefined by science as asserted above.  Active means the process is ongoing.  A sailboatd&#039;s sail is active, but there must be wind.  The black hole needs to have a stream of matter falling in to power the beam effect.

Second, we are looking at one frame of a moving picture.  These galaxies have been colliding for millions of years and the tidal forces are causing many clusters and possibly whole spiral arms to fall into the grational well.

Imagine the well known high speed film of the bullet hitting the apple.  One frame may show the bullet at one moment in the stream of moments and that photo would show the apple&#039;s first splash as the bullet strikes.

The composite photo shows several causes, and effects.
 * Gravity is disrupting both galaxies.
 * Spiral arms are being severly distorted.
 * Many clusters will be lost to the depths of space.
 * Many more clusters will be swallowed.

Ultimately, both black holes will capture each other and ultimately the pair will consume the remaining stars, nebulas and dust in the general area, except for the outermost clusters with high radial velocities which are destined to escape.

The &quot;sound&quot; of a galaxy would be the frequencies at which it resonates.  A flute or a piano string vibrates, that vibration is its sound.  Objects tend to have frequencies that reinforce energy movement, and other frequencies at which energy is dampened or absorbed.  A gravitationally connected web of rotating particles would tend to produce all frequencies, like an irregular galaxy or a supercluster.

A spiral would have positive reinforcements at a whole number ration as dictated by the number of arms, assuming the arms are roughly the same size.  Thus, that galaxy would have a dominant note corresponding to this frequency, on the order of thousands of years per cycle.

Since there are no physical connections between solar masses the effect would be very subtle and it would take millions of years for standing waves to be created by the millions of gravitional vortices.

If the galaxy is spinning in a circle and not pulled by an outside disruptive force the arms should even out and form a barred spiral with the bar&#039;s size relative to the vibrational frequncy of the galaxy.

It it possible that two galaxies of the same size and orientation, in close proximity, might actually cross gravity waves harmoniously and actually affect each other, a cosmic tuning up perhaps.

Well, keep on thinking!

We need more critical thinkers... especially at voting time!

John Rosengarten, Chicago USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, let&#8217;s clear some air here.</p>
<p> First &#8220;Active&#8221; is not being redefined by science as asserted above.  Active means the process is ongoing.  A sailboatd&#8217;s sail is active, but there must be wind.  The black hole needs to have a stream of matter falling in to power the beam effect.</p>
<p>Second, we are looking at one frame of a moving picture.  These galaxies have been colliding for millions of years and the tidal forces are causing many clusters and possibly whole spiral arms to fall into the grational well.</p>
<p>Imagine the well known high speed film of the bullet hitting the apple.  One frame may show the bullet at one moment in the stream of moments and that photo would show the apple&#8217;s first splash as the bullet strikes.</p>
<p>The composite photo shows several causes, and effects.<br />
 * Gravity is disrupting both galaxies.<br />
 * Spiral arms are being severly distorted.<br />
 * Many clusters will be lost to the depths of space.<br />
 * Many more clusters will be swallowed.</p>
<p>Ultimately, both black holes will capture each other and ultimately the pair will consume the remaining stars, nebulas and dust in the general area, except for the outermost clusters with high radial velocities which are destined to escape.</p>
<p>The &#8220;sound&#8221; of a galaxy would be the frequencies at which it resonates.  A flute or a piano string vibrates, that vibration is its sound.  Objects tend to have frequencies that reinforce energy movement, and other frequencies at which energy is dampened or absorbed.  A gravitationally connected web of rotating particles would tend to produce all frequencies, like an irregular galaxy or a supercluster.</p>
<p>A spiral would have positive reinforcements at a whole number ration as dictated by the number of arms, assuming the arms are roughly the same size.  Thus, that galaxy would have a dominant note corresponding to this frequency, on the order of thousands of years per cycle.</p>
<p>Since there are no physical connections between solar masses the effect would be very subtle and it would take millions of years for standing waves to be created by the millions of gravitional vortices.</p>
<p>If the galaxy is spinning in a circle and not pulled by an outside disruptive force the arms should even out and form a barred spiral with the bar&#8217;s size relative to the vibrational frequncy of the galaxy.</p>
<p>It it possible that two galaxies of the same size and orientation, in close proximity, might actually cross gravity waves harmoniously and actually affect each other, a cosmic tuning up perhaps.</p>
<p>Well, keep on thinking!</p>
<p>We need more critical thinkers&#8230; especially at voting time!</p>
<p>John Rosengarten, Chicago USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59921</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59921</guid>
		<description>...Kinda looks like that planet eating thing in that one Star Trek adventure.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Kinda looks like that planet eating thing in that one Star Trek adventure&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tadpole</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59920</link>
		<dc:creator>tadpole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59920</guid>
		<description>I have heard that certain galaxies do in fact make a noise, although it may not be a &quot;kaboom&quot;, more like a sonor sort of sound.  How true is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard that certain galaxies do in fact make a noise, although it may not be a &#8220;kaboom&#8221;, more like a sonor sort of sound.  How true is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lonergan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59919</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lonergan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59919</guid>
		<description>So, that&#039;s where Saddam hid his weapons of mass destruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, that&#8217;s where Saddam hid his weapons of mass destruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Centipede</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59918</link>
		<dc:creator>The Centipede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59918</guid>
		<description>Gary:

You&#039;re taking me too seriously.  I still vote for &quot;Earth-shattering kaboom.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re taking me too seriously.  I still vote for &#8220;Earth-shattering kaboom.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: En bild säger mer än tusen ord.. &#124; Dalkvist.se</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59917</link>
		<dc:creator>En bild säger mer än tusen ord.. &#124; Dalkvist.se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59917</guid>
		<description>[...] Men om man vet lite mer om vad som är på bilden så blir den så mycket mer, info bla från badastronomy. Bilden visar två galaxer båda är av klassen aktiva galaxen, dvs de har aktiva massiva svarta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Men om man vet lite mer om vad som är på bilden så blir den så mycket mer, info bla från badastronomy. Bilden visar två galaxer båda är av klassen aktiva galaxen, dvs de har aktiva massiva svarta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59916</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59916</guid>
		<description>And for a bit of Bad Astronomy...

Our major local newspaper, La Presse, has an article on this:

http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20071218/CPSCIENCES/712171511/-1/CPSCIENCES

Now, we have 3 major paper in town.  One is mostly on political/business/economy subjects(Le Devoir), the second deals with the famous people, the hockey games and assorted petty crimes (Le Journal de Montreal.

And then there&#039;s La Presse.  Which is supposed to be a good paper.  Has a science section once a week, etc.  I would expect them to threat this properly.  But sadly, they close off with this :

&quot;...les deux galaxies en question sont très proches, éloignées de 20 000 années lumière seulement, soit la même distance qui sépare la Terre de la Voie Lactée, note la Nasa.&quot;

Let me translate for you all: &quot;...those two galaxies are quite close, only 20 000 light-years apart, which is the same distance between planet Earth and the Milky Way, according to Nasa.&quot;

Sorry about the crappy translation, but you get the idea.  I&#039;d like to see the &quot;raw&quot; Nasa press release to see why somebody could mis-interpret it so badly.

Apparently, we are doomed too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for a bit of Bad Astronomy&#8230;</p>
<p>Our major local newspaper, La Presse, has an article on this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20071218/CPSCIENCES/712171511/-1/CPSCIENCES" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20071218/CPSCIENCES/712171511/-1/CPSCIENCES</a></p>
<p>Now, we have 3 major paper in town.  One is mostly on political/business/economy subjects(Le Devoir), the second deals with the famous people, the hockey games and assorted petty crimes (Le Journal de Montreal.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s La Presse.  Which is supposed to be a good paper.  Has a science section once a week, etc.  I would expect them to threat this properly.  But sadly, they close off with this :</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;les deux galaxies en question sont très proches, éloignées de 20 000 années lumière seulement, soit la même distance qui sépare la Terre de la Voie Lactée, note la Nasa.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me translate for you all: &#8220;&#8230;those two galaxies are quite close, only 20 000 light-years apart, which is the same distance between planet Earth and the Milky Way, according to Nasa.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry about the crappy translation, but you get the idea.  I&#8217;d like to see the &#8220;raw&#8221; Nasa press release to see why somebody could mis-interpret it so badly.</p>
<p>Apparently, we are doomed too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59914</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59914</guid>
		<description>Thanks all, very helpful explanations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all, very helpful explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59915</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59915</guid>
		<description>Chris:
Look up &quot;synchrotron radiation&quot; in Wikipedia. That should give you a very good insight into the dynamics of black hole radiation. As neutral particles are ripped to shreads by the gravitational &quot;gradient&quot;, they become ionized and are then subject to the rotating magnetic field of the black hole and are accelerated away from the hole at its poles. This is in addition the aforementioned compression effects. There is always a &quot;gradient&quot; near any massive body. It&#039;s the difference between the acceleration experienced by your feet(closer to the center of mass) vs your head.On earth, this is so small as to be(nearly) undetectable, but near a black holes event horizon it becomes humongous and capable of tearing apart individual atoms.

Centipede:
The inward spiral of two black holes might, at least momentarily, create a &quot;wormhole&quot; in the space between the two, just before they merge but that&#039;s purely theoretical.

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:<br />
Look up &#8220;synchrotron radiation&#8221; in Wikipedia. That should give you a very good insight into the dynamics of black hole radiation. As neutral particles are ripped to shreads by the gravitational &#8220;gradient&#8221;, they become ionized and are then subject to the rotating magnetic field of the black hole and are accelerated away from the hole at its poles. This is in addition the aforementioned compression effects. There is always a &#8220;gradient&#8221; near any massive body. It&#8217;s the difference between the acceleration experienced by your feet(closer to the center of mass) vs your head.On earth, this is so small as to be(nearly) undetectable, but near a black holes event horizon it becomes humongous and capable of tearing apart individual atoms.</p>
<p>Centipede:<br />
The inward spiral of two black holes might, at least momentarily, create a &#8220;wormhole&#8221; in the space between the two, just before they merge but that&#8217;s purely theoretical.</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59913</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59913</guid>
		<description>Chris posts:

[[&lt;i&gt;Okay, please don’t laugh me off the site, but I thought that a black hole created such a massively powerful gravitational pull that not even light could escape, hence, black hole.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;I don’t get how something can then be ejected at nearly light speed if light itself cannot escape. Am I obtuse or can someone help me out on this?&lt;/i&gt;]]

The jet is not coming from &lt;i&gt;inside&lt;/i&gt; the black hole.  It&#039;s coming from a ring of material falling into the black hole from just outside it.  You&#039;re quite correct that material from inside the event horizon can never get out again, unless it&#039;s an alien starship with a faster-than-light drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris posts:</p>
<p>[[<i>Okay, please don’t laugh me off the site, but I thought that a black hole created such a massively powerful gravitational pull that not even light could escape, hence, black hole.</i></p>
<p><i>I don’t get how something can then be ejected at nearly light speed if light itself cannot escape. Am I obtuse or can someone help me out on this?</i>]]</p>
<p>The jet is not coming from <i>inside</i> the black hole.  It&#8217;s coming from a ring of material falling into the black hole from just outside it.  You&#8217;re quite correct that material from inside the event horizon can never get out again, unless it&#8217;s an alien starship with a faster-than-light drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Centipede</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59912</link>
		<dc:creator>The Centipede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59912</guid>
		<description>Question: if the death ray was actually propagating through a medium through which sound would travel, what noise would it make?

I vote for &quot;FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMMMM.&quot;-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: if the death ray was actually propagating through a medium through which sound would travel, what noise would it make?</p>
<p>I vote for &#8220;FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMMMM.&#8221;-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galactic Attactic &#171; The Mendicant Bug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59911</link>
		<dc:creator>Galactic Attactic &#171; The Mendicant Bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59911</guid>
		<description>[...] Bad Astronomy: Taste my death ray, 3c321! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad Astronomy: Taste my death ray, 3c321! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n9891q</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59910</link>
		<dc:creator>n9891q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59910</guid>
		<description>@Tod -
Hoover is (was?) the dominant brand of vacuum cleaner in Britain, so that&#039;s what they call vacuum cleaners over there - hoovers that are hoovering up the dirt.  Although it seems odd to adopt a brand name like that (please pass me a Kleenex - achoo!), you can find older articles in which such use is cited and Xerox them, but if you get a headache from the dust in the library, you can take a (Bayer) aspirin for relief.   Now back to my computer with windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tod -<br />
Hoover is (was?) the dominant brand of vacuum cleaner in Britain, so that&#8217;s what they call vacuum cleaners over there &#8211; hoovers that are hoovering up the dirt.  Although it seems odd to adopt a brand name like that (please pass me a Kleenex &#8211; achoo!), you can find older articles in which such use is cited and Xerox them, but if you get a headache from the dust in the library, you can take a (Bayer) aspirin for relief.   Now back to my computer with windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Centipede</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59909</link>
		<dc:creator>The Centipede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59909</guid>
		<description>&gt; What happens when two black holes collide or one “absorbs” the other?

Earth-shattering kaboom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; What happens when two black holes collide or one “absorbs” the other?</p>
<p>Earth-shattering kaboom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alchemyst</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alchemyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59908</guid>
		<description>Both of these black holes are active; absorbing the galaxy around them.  In a few 100000 years, these two galaxies could completely join and the black holes could collide.

What happens when two black holes collide or one &quot;absorbs&quot; the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of these black holes are active; absorbing the galaxy around them.  In a few 100000 years, these two galaxies could completely join and the black holes could collide.</p>
<p>What happens when two black holes collide or one &#8220;absorbs&#8221; the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59907</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59907</guid>
		<description>@pfc:  Maybe I&#039;m dense but I don&#039;t get the connection between a vacuum cleaner and a black hole&#039;s gravitational pull.  And I must have lived a sheltered life as this is the *first* time I&#039;ve heard that expression.  But then I was brought up by a mom who &quot;kirbyed&quot; our carpets.  Hoover = suck?  Now that&#039;s a stretch.  Just as bad as when I underwood my paper essays or palomar the heavens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pfc:  Maybe I&#8217;m dense but I don&#8217;t get the connection between a vacuum cleaner and a black hole&#8217;s gravitational pull.  And I must have lived a sheltered life as this is the *first* time I&#8217;ve heard that expression.  But then I was brought up by a mom who &#8220;kirbyed&#8221; our carpets.  Hoover = suck?  Now that&#8217;s a stretch.  Just as bad as when I underwood my paper essays or palomar the heavens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59906</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59906</guid>
		<description>Chris,
Light and matter cannot escape from within the Event Horizon, but the accretion disk and Death Ray jets are outside of this distance. I&#039;m sure someone will write a more detailed answer, but I wanted to get the simple version out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
Light and matter cannot escape from within the Event Horizon, but the accretion disk and Death Ray jets are outside of this distance. I&#8217;m sure someone will write a more detailed answer, but I wanted to get the simple version out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59905</link>
		<dc:creator>pfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59905</guid>
		<description>@Chris - I&#039;ll try to explain with a couple of analogies.

You&#039;re right that a black hole creates such a strong pull that light can&#039;t escape. But that&#039;s only very, very close to the black hole (about 2 miles for every solar mass.) Farther out, it&#039;s just like a star - matter will orbit around it. Imagine a bunch of slowly moving gas or dust falling in towards the black hole, from all different directions. As it falls closer, it starts to spin, or orbit, faster (like an ice skater pulling in their arms as they spin). At the same time, it starts to flatten in the plane of the orbit and eventually forms a disk. The same thing happens with stars (and the disk goes on to form planets!)

Now as all this matter falls inwards and spins, it&#039;s being compressed. So the density of the matter increases, and it bangs and rubs against itself and starts to heat up. But most of it is still way too far away to get pulled into the black hole for good - its rotation keeps it from falling in too quickly, but the friction does sap some of its energy so it only slowly spirals into the center.

So why the jets? I don&#039;t believe the actual physics is that well understood yet, but imagine what happens if you squeeze a wet bar of soap too tightly - it pops out of your hand. This at least shows that a gentle squeeze over a large area (the whole disk) can lead to a small amount of matter being ejected at high speed, perpendicular to the direction of the force. (Of course, for that analogy to work you have to think of your hand and the soap as all being part of the disk.) Just remember that almost all of the matter is way too far away from the black hole to be gobbled up, and the fact that it&#039;s heated up means there&#039;s a lot of energy to be tapped. That&#039;s why black hole accretion disks tend to be visible at high frequencies - UV and X-rays.

Hope this helps. Any professional scientists feel free to add/correct.

P.S. &quot;hoovering&quot; = http://www.hoover.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris &#8211; I&#8217;ll try to explain with a couple of analogies.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that a black hole creates such a strong pull that light can&#8217;t escape. But that&#8217;s only very, very close to the black hole (about 2 miles for every solar mass.) Farther out, it&#8217;s just like a star &#8211; matter will orbit around it. Imagine a bunch of slowly moving gas or dust falling in towards the black hole, from all different directions. As it falls closer, it starts to spin, or orbit, faster (like an ice skater pulling in their arms as they spin). At the same time, it starts to flatten in the plane of the orbit and eventually forms a disk. The same thing happens with stars (and the disk goes on to form planets!)</p>
<p>Now as all this matter falls inwards and spins, it&#8217;s being compressed. So the density of the matter increases, and it bangs and rubs against itself and starts to heat up. But most of it is still way too far away to get pulled into the black hole for good &#8211; its rotation keeps it from falling in too quickly, but the friction does sap some of its energy so it only slowly spirals into the center.</p>
<p>So why the jets? I don&#8217;t believe the actual physics is that well understood yet, but imagine what happens if you squeeze a wet bar of soap too tightly &#8211; it pops out of your hand. This at least shows that a gentle squeeze over a large area (the whole disk) can lead to a small amount of matter being ejected at high speed, perpendicular to the direction of the force. (Of course, for that analogy to work you have to think of your hand and the soap as all being part of the disk.) Just remember that almost all of the matter is way too far away from the black hole to be gobbled up, and the fact that it&#8217;s heated up means there&#8217;s a lot of energy to be tapped. That&#8217;s why black hole accretion disks tend to be visible at high frequencies &#8211; UV and X-rays.</p>
<p>Hope this helps. Any professional scientists feel free to add/correct.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8220;hoovering&#8221; = <a href="http://www.hoover.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hoover.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59904</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59904</guid>
		<description>Okay, please don&#039;t laugh me off the site, but I thought that a black hole created such a massively powerful gravitational pull that not even light could escape, hence, black hole.

 I don&#039;t get how something can then be ejected at nearly light speed if light itself cannot escape. Am I obtuse or can someone help me out on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, please don&#8217;t laugh me off the site, but I thought that a black hole created such a massively powerful gravitational pull that not even light could escape, hence, black hole.</p>
<p> I don&#8217;t get how something can then be ejected at nearly light speed if light itself cannot escape. Am I obtuse or can someone help me out on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59903</link>
		<dc:creator>GregA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59903</guid>
		<description>@Tod,

I suspect he was avoiding the more common nomenclature of &quot;black holes sucking matter&quot; because Black Holes definitely do not suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tod,</p>
<p>I suspect he was avoiding the more common nomenclature of &#8220;black holes sucking matter&#8221; because Black Holes definitely do not suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59902</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59902</guid>
		<description>At 48 years old I remember when evidence of the existence of black holes had been announced and how many thought it was just a bunch of scientists getting a little ahead of themselves. After all, a force in the universe our Universe that consumes everything including light? Rdiculous.
I&#039;ve been fascinated with black holes since I first heard of them and I&#039;m like a kid in a candy shop in todays world where the science around black holes is growing almost weekly.
Thank you to  Bad Astronomy for weeding out the.....uh......weeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 48 years old I remember when evidence of the existence of black holes had been announced and how many thought it was just a bunch of scientists getting a little ahead of themselves. After all, a force in the universe our Universe that consumes everything including light? Rdiculous.<br />
I&#8217;ve been fascinated with black holes since I first heard of them and I&#8217;m like a kid in a candy shop in todays world where the science around black holes is growing almost weekly.<br />
Thank you to  Bad Astronomy for weeding out the&#8230;..uh&#8230;&#8230;weeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard B. Drumm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59901</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard B. Drumm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59901</guid>
		<description>Phil:
The National Geographic website credits the NRAO&#039;s VLA with part of the radio data. I&#039;d hate to see the folks at the foot of Mount Jefferson not get their props. Izzis so? Dr. Mark Adams would be the one to contact to check.
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil:<br />
The National Geographic website credits the NRAO&#8217;s VLA with part of the radio data. I&#8217;d hate to see the folks at the foot of Mount Jefferson not get their props. Izzis so? Dr. Mark Adams would be the one to contact to check.<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/comment-page-1/#comment-59900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/17/taste-my-death-ray-3c321/#comment-59900</guid>
		<description>Speaking of scientists using words differently, what the heck is &quot;hoovering&quot; as mentioned above in the first sentence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of scientists using words differently, what the heck is &#8220;hoovering&#8221; as mentioned above in the first sentence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:57:05 -->
