<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opposition to Mars</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Amato</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60069</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Amato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60069</guid>
		<description>I read the April 29th BA blog about weather the sun caused global warming or not. I found it very interesting and there is no doubt that much more reseach is needed to determine if the sun is contributing to global warming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the April 29th BA blog about weather the sun caused global warming or not. I found it very interesting and there is no doubt that much more reseach is needed to determine if the sun is contributing to global warming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Amato</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60068</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Amato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60068</guid>
		<description>In response to Mike Lonergan's suggestion that I read the April 29th blog, I found the article to be very interesting. A lot more reserach will be needed to determine if the sun has anything to do with global warming. Thanks Mike for giving me the heads up on that interesting blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Mike Lonergan&#8217;s suggestion that I read the April 29th blog, I found the article to be very interesting. A lot more reserach will be needed to determine if the sun has anything to do with global warming. Thanks Mike for giving me the heads up on that interesting blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet_Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60067</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet_Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60067</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;here has been no noticeable upper trend in sunlight for 50 years or more.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, no, it's been increasing 0.05 percent per decade since the 1970s. Before that we don't know because you really need satellites to measure with that precision.

I'm not saying it's driving GW, but there *is* a small increase. If it has been going on through the 20th century, then it could be a factor if only as something to exacerbate AGW.

I'm just sayin'. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>here has been no noticeable upper trend in sunlight for 50 years or more.</i></p>
<p>Well, no, it&#8217;s been increasing 0.05 percent per decade since the 1970s. Before that we don&#8217;t know because you really need satellites to measure with that precision.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s driving GW, but there *is* a small increase. If it has been going on through the 20th century, then it could be a factor if only as something to exacerbate AGW.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet_Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60066</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet_Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60066</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now, let me be clear. Mars is small, and far away. Even through a decent telescope it’s not much more than an butterscotch-colored disk, with only a few features detectable&lt;/i&gt;

I showed Mars to a friend's wife a few years back during a previous opposition. She sniffed and said, "I thought I'd be able to see the storms." Mind you, I didn't force this. She *asked* to see it, having heard about it on the news. I dragged the scope (a 16.5" Dobsonian) out just to show her.

I've never shown off anything through the scope since. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now, let me be clear. Mars is small, and far away. Even through a decent telescope it’s not much more than an butterscotch-colored disk, with only a few features detectable</i></p>
<p>I showed Mars to a friend&#8217;s wife a few years back during a previous opposition. She sniffed and said, &#8220;I thought I&#8217;d be able to see the storms.&#8221; Mind you, I didn&#8217;t force this. She *asked* to see it, having heard about it on the news. I dragged the scope (a 16.5&#8243; Dobsonian) out just to show her.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never shown off anything through the scope since. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60065</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60065</guid>
		<description>Michael Amato posts:

[[&lt;i&gt;This indicates to me that Jupiter must also be warming up because more storms indicate warmer temperatures. Come to think of it, Mars seems to have more dust storms than it used to when I was younger. I wonder if the sun is up to no good.&lt;/i&gt;]]

They found hot spots on Jupiter; they have not found global warming on Jupiter.  The hot spots have probably been there (the phenomenon, I mean, not the individual columns) for billions of years.  As for big dust storms on Mars, google "Mars Mariner dust 1971."

The sun can't be responsible for current global warming on any planet since there has been no noticeable upper trend in sunlight for 50 years or more.  We've been measuring Total Solar Irradiance from satellites like Nimbus-7 and the Solar Maximum Mission for many decades now, and have good proxies before that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Amato posts:</p>
<p>[[<i>This indicates to me that Jupiter must also be warming up because more storms indicate warmer temperatures. Come to think of it, Mars seems to have more dust storms than it used to when I was younger. I wonder if the sun is up to no good.</i>]]</p>
<p>They found hot spots on Jupiter; they have not found global warming on Jupiter.  The hot spots have probably been there (the phenomenon, I mean, not the individual columns) for billions of years.  As for big dust storms on Mars, google &#8220;Mars Mariner dust 1971.&#8221;</p>
<p>The sun can&#8217;t be responsible for current global warming on any planet since there has been no noticeable upper trend in sunlight for 50 years or more.  We&#8217;ve been measuring Total Solar Irradiance from satellites like Nimbus-7 and the Solar Maximum Mission for many decades now, and have good proxies before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Vector</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60064</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Vector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60064</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;a 2.4 meter mirror in space can see even relatively dim stars in a fraction of a second exposure time&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To be complete, it also helps when you have a really really good CCD, cooled to like -80 degrees C., and you take minutes to read it out.  It's amazing how low much lower the noise can be than in your $500 digital camera.

I don't actually know how long the readout takes on WFPC2, but it's about 2 minutes to read out the 16 megapixels of ACS Wide Field Channel, and it's likely similar.  Though of course for ACS right now it's 2 minutes plus the time between now and Servicing Mission 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>a 2.4 meter mirror in space can see even relatively dim stars in a fraction of a second exposure time</p></blockquote>
<p>To be complete, it also helps when you have a really really good CCD, cooled to like -80 degrees C., and you take minutes to read it out.  It&#8217;s amazing how low much lower the noise can be than in your $500 digital camera.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t actually know how long the readout takes on WFPC2, but it&#8217;s about 2 minutes to read out the 16 megapixels of ACS Wide Field Channel, and it&#8217;s likely similar.  Though of course for ACS right now it&#8217;s 2 minutes plus the time between now and Servicing Mission 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lonergan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60063</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lonergan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/18/opposition-to-mars/#comment-60063</guid>
		<description>Here's a  nice trick to play on the kiddies:  Take them out Dec 24, point to that red dot in the sky, and proclaim, "Hey, look!  It's Rudolph!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a  nice trick to play on the kiddies:  Take them out Dec 24, point to that red dot in the sky, and proclaim, &#8220;Hey, look!  It&#8217;s Rudolph!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
