<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mars to get an asteroid impact?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:14:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60524</link>
		<dc:creator>Jet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60524</guid>
		<description>The discovered asteroid headed towards Mars has already created a learning enviornment for people on Earth.  It is true that we have many ways of determining facts about space and space objects that at first glance would seem impossible to determine.  One known fact is that objects passing close to planets are unlikely to become orbiting moons.  It can be infered by this information that the moons in our solar system exist due to different reasons althoghether.  It might be a stretch, but imact hits seen on the different planets seem to indicate that the planets were long since here prior to the impacts.  This leads to an idea that accreation was not the way the planets were created.  Besides, if the big bang created pockets of dust and gas made out of hydrogen which later formed the galaxies, it would be so unlikely because the explosion would have ripped any imagined atoms to bits.  Similar suspicions exist about dust and gas forming to create solar systems.
Jet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discovered asteroid headed towards Mars has already created a learning enviornment for people on Earth.  It is true that we have many ways of determining facts about space and space objects that at first glance would seem impossible to determine.  One known fact is that objects passing close to planets are unlikely to become orbiting moons.  It can be infered by this information that the moons in our solar system exist due to different reasons althoghether.  It might be a stretch, but imact hits seen on the different planets seem to indicate that the planets were long since here prior to the impacts.  This leads to an idea that accreation was not the way the planets were created.  Besides, if the big bang created pockets of dust and gas made out of hydrogen which later formed the galaxies, it would be so unlikely because the explosion would have ripped any imagined atoms to bits.  Similar suspicions exist about dust and gas forming to create solar systems.<br />
Jet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60523</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60523</guid>
		<description>Using older imagery from before initial discovery it sounds like JPL has been able to refine the impact probability to 1 in 25.

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using older imagery from before initial discovery it sounds like JPL has been able to refine the impact probability to 1 in 25.</p>
<p><a href="http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60522</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60522</guid>
		<description>Is radar used to determine the distance of this asteroid?  How otherwise are they able to determine its size and distance so accurately?  And I&#039;m impressed with how accurate the ephemeride data is for these objects and have wondered how they are able to make such accurate measurements of inclination, eccentricity, mean longitude, etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is radar used to determine the distance of this asteroid?  How otherwise are they able to determine its size and distance so accurately?  And I&#8217;m impressed with how accurate the ephemeride data is for these objects and have wondered how they are able to make such accurate measurements of inclination, eccentricity, mean longitude, etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60521</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60521</guid>
		<description>Harry,

The Moon evidently has had its share of meteorite hits; it&#039;s carpeted in craters. :)

The likelihood depends first on the close passage of a potential impactor. Second is the Moon&#039;s diameter. This presents a circular cross-section through which an asteroid&#039;s path may pass. The larger the cross-section, the larger the chance that a path may pass through it. And of course, the Moon&#039;s gravity plays a role, because it bends the paths of passing rocks toward it. So as you are aware, the stronger the gravitational field, the more that an asteroid will be attracted and the greater the chance that it&#039;ll collide.

So from this it&#039;s obvious that, for a population of asteroids with paths that come near the Earth-Moon system, Earth will get more hits on average. (But then again, most meteors are small and disintegrate as they plow through our atmosphere. The Moon has more large craters because it has no air and very slow erosion processes.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry,</p>
<p>The Moon evidently has had its share of meteorite hits; it&#8217;s carpeted in craters. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The likelihood depends first on the close passage of a potential impactor. Second is the Moon&#8217;s diameter. This presents a circular cross-section through which an asteroid&#8217;s path may pass. The larger the cross-section, the larger the chance that a path may pass through it. And of course, the Moon&#8217;s gravity plays a role, because it bends the paths of passing rocks toward it. So as you are aware, the stronger the gravitational field, the more that an asteroid will be attracted and the greater the chance that it&#8217;ll collide.</p>
<p>So from this it&#8217;s obvious that, for a population of asteroids with paths that come near the Earth-Moon system, Earth will get more hits on average. (But then again, most meteors are small and disintegrate as they plow through our atmosphere. The Moon has more large craters because it has no air and very slow erosion processes.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60520</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60520</guid>
		<description>What are the chances a meteor could hit our Moon?  Would Moon&#039;s weak gravitational field rule out much of a chance this could happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the chances a meteor could hit our Moon?  Would Moon&#8217;s weak gravitational field rule out much of a chance this could happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60519</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60519</guid>
		<description>Harry,

Such an asteroid impact could easily eject some smallish fragments at escape velocity.

They could also be put on an elliptical orbit. However, with this is scenario the elliptical path, intersecting the planetary surface, would necessarily bring the ejecta right back into the surface. (If a chunk of ejecta could be made to explode in-two at just the right place on its trajectory, with just the right energy, with the fragments separating in just the right direction, then one piece&#039;s path could be adjusted to put it on a non-intersecting ellipse. This is essentially a two-stage rocket, with the first stage being the initial asteroid impact.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry,</p>
<p>Such an asteroid impact could easily eject some smallish fragments at escape velocity.</p>
<p>They could also be put on an elliptical orbit. However, with this is scenario the elliptical path, intersecting the planetary surface, would necessarily bring the ejecta right back into the surface. (If a chunk of ejecta could be made to explode in-two at just the right place on its trajectory, with just the right energy, with the fragments separating in just the right direction, then one piece&#8217;s path could be adjusted to put it on a non-intersecting ellipse. This is essentially a two-stage rocket, with the first stage being the initial asteroid impact.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fischer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-2/#comment-60518</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/20/mars-to-get-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-60518</guid>
		<description>Care for an amazing conspiracy story woven around this asteroid and several other - true or made-up - space news snippets of recent days? Buckle up and have a look at http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1058.htm ...

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care for an amazing conspiracy story woven around this asteroid and several other &#8211; true or made-up &#8211; space news snippets of recent days? Buckle up and have a look at <a href="http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1058.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1058.htm</a> &#8230;</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
