<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shuttle launch delayed again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:14:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rainer Gerhards</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-61652</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer Gerhards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/#comment-61652</guid>
		<description>It is indeed the external part of the feedthrough connector that has been pulled. I &lt;a href=&quot;http://spacelaunch.gerhards.net/2007/12/atlantis-troubleshooting-continues.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;have some write-up&lt;/a&gt; on my blog, including an analogy that compares the current shuttle analysis with a situation we are all much more familiar with ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed the external part of the feedthrough connector that has been pulled. I <a href="http://spacelaunch.gerhards.net/2007/12/atlantis-troubleshooting-continues.html" rel="nofollow">have some write-up</a> on my blog, including an analogy that compares the current shuttle analysis with a situation we are all much more familiar with <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lonergan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-61651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lonergan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/#comment-61651</guid>
		<description>It must also be an emotional roller coaster for Dan Tani, who recently lost his mother.  He was scheduled to return home aboard Atlantis.  I&#039;m sure the crew appreciates the extra time taken to make sure they fly safely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must also be an emotional roller coaster for Dan Tani, who recently lost his mother.  He was scheduled to return home aboard Atlantis.  I&#8217;m sure the crew appreciates the extra time taken to make sure they fly safely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-61650</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/#comment-61650</guid>
		<description>Ah, I see, thanks Remek. I read an article somewhere that the ECOs themselves were pulled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see, thanks Remek. I read an article somewhere that the ECOs themselves were pulled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mc Atilla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-61649</link>
		<dc:creator>Mc Atilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/#comment-61649</guid>
		<description>Aw, that&#039;s a shame. But if you like putting people in space I&#039;m sure those people appreciate that you take care of their safety.
The experience of being one of the astronauts during this lead-up to launch must be a wild emotional roller coaster.

MA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, that&#8217;s a shame. But if you like putting people in space I&#8217;m sure those people appreciate that you take care of their safety.<br />
The experience of being one of the astronauts during this lead-up to launch must be a wild emotional roller coaster.</p>
<p>MA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-61648</link>
		<dc:creator>Remek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/#comment-61648</guid>
		<description>No, the ECO sensors aren&#039;t being touched - it&#039;s the passthrough connector on the tank surface itself being removed, along with the external connector and a bit of its cable for controlled cryo testing. They believe under cryo temps when the tank is fuelled, the pins between the outer passthrough and the external connector are losing contact. Testing indications are the ECO sensors themselves are working properly.

Accessing the ECO sensors or the internal harness would be a last resort because that means entering the tank itself, which means a rollback to VAB and de-stacking, causing an additional delay of 2-3 weeks at the minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the ECO sensors aren&#8217;t being touched &#8211; it&#8217;s the passthrough connector on the tank surface itself being removed, along with the external connector and a bit of its cable for controlled cryo testing. They believe under cryo temps when the tank is fuelled, the pins between the outer passthrough and the external connector are losing contact. Testing indications are the ECO sensors themselves are working properly.</p>
<p>Accessing the ECO sensors or the internal harness would be a last resort because that means entering the tank itself, which means a rollback to VAB and de-stacking, causing an additional delay of 2-3 weeks at the minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Krassenstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-61647</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Krassenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/29/shuttle-launch-delayed-again/#comment-61647</guid>
		<description>Better safe then sorry.  Fact is they will eventually accomplish their goals... even if it&#039;s in 2010 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better safe then sorry.  Fact is they will eventually accomplish their goals&#8230; even if it&#8217;s in 2010 <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
