<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 WD5 != MO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:26:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pyro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62421</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62421</guid>
		<description>Hmm there are some rumors about WD-5...missed Mars but now it have some chance to hit us, I mean &#039;earth&#039;. Is that true ?
And sorry about my English :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm there are some rumors about WD-5&#8230;missed Mars but now it have some chance to hit us, I mean &#8216;earth&#8217;. Is that true ?<br />
And sorry about my English <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62420</link>
		<dc:creator>Viz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62420</guid>
		<description>Hey dudes,

Forget it abt colliding with mars, its not interested in mars anymore coz its heading straight for us! Well if it is gonna hit and missed mars at Jan 30 , can anyone tell me the approximate days left for it to collide here :-) .. coz if its less and hittin my area.. time to party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dudes,</p>
<p>Forget it abt colliding with mars, its not interested in mars anymore coz its heading straight for us! Well if it is gonna hit and missed mars at Jan 30 , can anyone tell me the approximate days left for it to collide here <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  .. coz if its less and hittin my area.. time to party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facelift on Mars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62419</link>
		<dc:creator>Facelift on Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62419</guid>
		<description>The odds were 1 in 25 on 12/28/07; 1 in 28 on 1/2/08; 1 in 40 on 1/8/08 and 1 in 10,000 on 1/9/08.

1 in 40 to 1 in 10,000 in one day?

I think I&#039;ll activate the Bad Astrology Credo here and state with all certainty that 2007 WD5 will track the bottom of Valles Marineris like a ball bearing up a pinball chute.

Of course, that&#039;s just me, but then again, Andy Puckett, the asteroid&#039;s pre-discovery imager, sure did move from Chicago to Anchorage awfully fast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The odds were 1 in 25 on 12/28/07; 1 in 28 on 1/2/08; 1 in 40 on 1/8/08 and 1 in 10,000 on 1/9/08.</p>
<p>1 in 40 to 1 in 10,000 in one day?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll activate the Bad Astrology Credo here and state with all certainty that 2007 WD5 will track the bottom of Valles Marineris like a ball bearing up a pinball chute.</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s just me, but then again, Andy Puckett, the asteroid&#8217;s pre-discovery imager, sure did move from Chicago to Anchorage awfully fast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62418</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62418</guid>
		<description>I thought the &#039;Mars Observer&#039; probe exploded ..

So in inanswer (ithink) toTom&#039;s question :

# Tom on 04 Jan 2008 at 8:05 am  :
&quot;I would be curious to know where MO went after its flyby…?&quot;

Bits of it went here ...

    .... and here

                    ... and there


                                             .... and wa-aay over there! ;-)


I liked the idea someone mentioned here of seeing if the probes already orbiting Mars (Mars Odyssey, Mars Reconnisance Orbiter, Mars Express, etc ..) can get a good look at it whether hitting or missing. Great thinking.

I very much doubt its the Mars Observer&#039;s remains ... or Ameilia Airhart&#039;s (spelling?)  ... but Hoffa&#039;s body? Hmmn ... maybe! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the &#8216;Mars Observer&#8217; probe exploded ..</p>
<p>So in inanswer (ithink) toTom&#8217;s question :</p>
<p># Tom on 04 Jan 2008 at 8:05 am  :<br />
&#8220;I would be curious to know where MO went after its flyby…?&#8221;</p>
<p>Bits of it went here &#8230;</p>
<p>    &#8230;. and here</p>
<p>                    &#8230; and there</p>
<p>                                             &#8230;. and wa-aay over there! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I liked the idea someone mentioned here of seeing if the probes already orbiting Mars (Mars Odyssey, Mars Reconnisance Orbiter, Mars Express, etc ..) can get a good look at it whether hitting or missing. Great thinking.</p>
<p>I very much doubt its the Mars Observer&#8217;s remains &#8230; or Ameilia Airhart&#8217;s (spelling?)  &#8230; but Hoffa&#8217;s body? Hmmn &#8230; maybe! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62417</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62417</guid>
		<description>Gary Ansorge writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;BArton, that should be clockwise, because the planet has a Velocity of say, 18 miles/sec, while the inner debris has a velocity of 18+ miles/sec. As the inner debris impacts the proto planet, it should spin the planet in the clockwise direction.&lt;/i&gt;]]

I think you might have that wrong.  From the frame of reference of the planet, it isn&#039;t moving at all.  Counterclockwise around the sun is &quot;forward.&quot;  Debris hitting on the &quot;left&quot; -- closer to the sun -- hits harder, debris hitting on the &quot;right&quot; hits less hard.  Consequently the net torque should be counterclockwise as seen from the north pole.  I wish I could do diagrams on this thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Ansorge writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>BArton, that should be clockwise, because the planet has a Velocity of say, 18 miles/sec, while the inner debris has a velocity of 18+ miles/sec. As the inner debris impacts the proto planet, it should spin the planet in the clockwise direction.</i>]]</p>
<p>I think you might have that wrong.  From the frame of reference of the planet, it isn&#8217;t moving at all.  Counterclockwise around the sun is &#8220;forward.&#8221;  Debris hitting on the &#8220;left&#8221; &#8212; closer to the sun &#8212; hits harder, debris hitting on the &#8220;right&#8221; hits less hard.  Consequently the net torque should be counterclockwise as seen from the north pole.  I wish I could do diagrams on this thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62416</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62416</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;ve been through this: the Pope&#039;s actual palace is not a world-class place to operate telescopes professionally, anyway.  I think their actual serious astronomy is mostly in South America or Mexico or Arizona or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ve been through this: the Pope&#8217;s actual palace is not a world-class place to operate telescopes professionally, anyway.  I think their actual serious astronomy is mostly in South America or Mexico or Arizona or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/comment-page-1/#comment-62415</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/2007-wd5-mo/#comment-62415</guid>
		<description>Amelia Earhart is in the Delta Quadrant.  Voyager runs into her - not the Voyager 10, I mean, but the 24th century starship of the same name.

As a couple dozen dirty-minded Renaissance artists showed us, Mars needs women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amelia Earhart is in the Delta Quadrant.  Voyager runs into her &#8211; not the Voyager 10, I mean, but the 24th century starship of the same name.</p>
<p>As a couple dozen dirty-minded Renaissance artists showed us, Mars needs women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
