<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want: Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extraordinary Clocks and Watches &#124; Gulali Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-181604</link>
		<dc:creator>Extraordinary Clocks and Watches &#124; Gulali Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-181604</guid>
		<description>[...] (images via 1, 2, 3, 4) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (images via 1, 2, 3, 4) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Time Is It? (pics) &#124; Whaza.net</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-179631</link>
		<dc:creator>What Time Is It? (pics) &#124; Whaza.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-179631</guid>
		<description>[...] (images via 1, 2, 3, 4) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (images via 1, 2, 3, 4) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j m rowland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-135004</link>
		<dc:creator>j m rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-135004</guid>
		<description>9
9
obscured by reflected light glare
FAIL!
BAD geek, BAD geek! 
No cheeto for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9<br />
9<br />
obscured by reflected light glare<br />
FAIL!<br />
BAD geek, BAD geek!<br />
No cheeto for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talk Like A Physicist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ultimate clock for a physicist. - you gotta have this : Physics, math and Pi clocks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-121578</link>
		<dc:creator>Talk Like A Physicist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ultimate clock for a physicist. - you gotta have this : Physics, math and Pi clocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-121578</guid>
		<description>[...] 9 clock Via Astropixie and Bad Astronomy and Triple Nine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9 clock Via Astropixie and Bad Astronomy and Triple Nine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62487</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62487</guid>
		<description>Here is a gadget that uses this clock:

http://scripts.tropicalpcsolutions.com/html/gadgets/9clock.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a gadget that uses this clock:</p>
<p><a href="http://scripts.tropicalpcsolutions.com/html/gadgets/9clock.html" rel="nofollow">http://scripts.tropicalpcsolutions.com/html/gadgets/9clock.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: printzen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62486</link>
		<dc:creator>printzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62486</guid>
		<description>A better representation of the number 7 using three nines is: 9/.9 - sqrt(9) = 7 exactly.  This avoids any need for discussion about whether .9 recurring is or is not equivalent to 1 (at least in reference to the &quot;3 nines clock&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better representation of the number 7 using three nines is: 9/.9 &#8211; sqrt(9) = 7 exactly.  This avoids any need for discussion about whether .9 recurring is or is not equivalent to 1 (at least in reference to the &#8220;3 nines clock&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62485</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62485</guid>
		<description>Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kraus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62484</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kraus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62484</guid>
		<description>What is the meaning of a time of day that is plus or minus 3:00 o&#039;clock, or any of the other times that involve a square root.  For example, the 4:00 spot could also be -2:00, since -3+1=-2.

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the meaning of a time of day that is plus or minus 3:00 o&#8217;clock, or any of the other times that involve a square root.  For example, the 4:00 spot could also be -2:00, since -3+1=-2.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anotherplayaguy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62483</link>
		<dc:creator>Anotherplayaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62483</guid>
		<description>Ronan,

Thanks for the input, but I am confused by F(6) which seems to equal 8.  Why is that?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronan,</p>
<p>Thanks for the input, but I am confused by F(6) which seems to equal 8.  Why is that?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62482</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62482</guid>
		<description>My sister has a backwards clock.  The hands run in reverse direction and I think all the figures are mirror images.  Besides a good gimmick, it would suit in a traditional barber&#039;s shop.

I didn&#039;t quite catch in a [30 Rock] episode where the girls were discussing these two guys they might date, one of the guys was shown explaining laboriously he has a watch he is real proud of, that shows the time in pie slices, I think he -may- have meant analogue style... don&#039;t do it, lady!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister has a backwards clock.  The hands run in reverse direction and I think all the figures are mirror images.  Besides a good gimmick, it would suit in a traditional barber&#8217;s shop.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t quite catch in a [30 Rock] episode where the girls were discussing these two guys they might date, one of the guys was shown explaining laboriously he has a watch he is real proud of, that shows the time in pie slices, I think he -may- have meant analogue style&#8230; don&#8217;t do it, lady!  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62481</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62481</guid>
		<description>I want this clock so when you get the information you better tell me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want this clock so when you get the information you better tell me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mango</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-2/#comment-62480</link>
		<dc:creator>Mango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62480</guid>
		<description>I clicked though to the comments on this just to see if there might be a Holy War on the &quot;0.999.... = 1&quot; issue.  I&#039;m happy to see that there isn&#039;t.  Maybe because the readership here understands the implication of mathematical proof better than other places on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I clicked though to the comments on this just to see if there might be a Holy War on the &#8220;0.999&#8230;. = 1&#8243; issue.  I&#8217;m happy to see that there isn&#8217;t.  Maybe because the readership here understands the implication of mathematical proof better than other places on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "bad"</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62479</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "bad"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62479</guid>
		<description>[...] online community. The best part is ... it&#039;s all 100% free! Check them out here: Join Hey Nielsen!  Want: Part III&#160;saved by 1 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;jetsetshow bookmarked on 01/06/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online community. The best part is &#8230; it&#8217;s all 100% free! Check them out here: Join Hey Nielsen!  Want: Part III&nbsp;saved by 1 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;jetsetshow bookmarked on 01/06/08 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62478</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62478</guid>
		<description>Co-worker had one.  Loved it.  Bought one for youngest LurchGS replacement&#039;s birthday, and sent one to LurchGS&#039; immediate paternal progenitor for the end-of-year celebration.

Sadly, overlooked ordering one for self. Oh well, I can always stop in Youngest&#039;s room for a time check</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Co-worker had one.  Loved it.  Bought one for youngest LurchGS replacement&#8217;s birthday, and sent one to LurchGS&#8217; immediate paternal progenitor for the end-of-year celebration.</p>
<p>Sadly, overlooked ordering one for self. Oh well, I can always stop in Youngest&#8217;s room for a time check</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luk3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62477</link>
		<dc:creator>Luk3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62477</guid>
		<description>1984 was a very well written book. George Orwell is amazing. Also what is that clock going by it make no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1984 was a very well written book. George Orwell is amazing. Also what is that clock going by it make no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links of the Week (2008/01) :: cimddwc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62430</link>
		<dc:creator>Links of the Week (2008/01) :: cimddwc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62430</guid>
		<description>[...] A clock with only nines (via Bad Astronomy) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A clock with only nines (via Bad Astronomy) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronan Cunniffe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62476</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronan Cunniffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62476</guid>
		<description>@Luke:

Write 1/3 as a decimal.
Multiply by 3.
Discuss. :-)

Ronan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Luke:</p>
<p>Write 1/3 as a decimal.<br />
Multiply by 3.<br />
Discuss. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ronan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62475</link>
		<dc:creator>LUke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62475</guid>
		<description>Fergus already pointed this out on how 6.999 repeating does equal 7 but the equation &lt;a href=&quot;http://streetlessons.com/484-the-perfect-clock-for-nerds.html#comment-23830&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; was a little easier for me to understand, so:

n=0.9 repeating
10n=9.9 repeating
10n-n=9
9n=9
n=1


I&#039;ve heard of this, but never seen the proof for it...interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fergus already pointed this out on how 6.999 repeating does equal 7 but the equation <a href="http://streetlessons.com/484-the-perfect-clock-for-nerds.html#comment-23830" rel="nofollow">here</a> was a little easier for me to understand, so:</p>
<p>n=0.9 repeating<br />
10n=9.9 repeating<br />
10n-n=9<br />
9n=9<br />
n=1</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard of this, but never seen the proof for it&#8230;interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergus Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62474</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergus Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62474</guid>
		<description>22 = floor(sqrt(sqrt(gamma(9)))) +  9 - .9bar

I don&#039;t think &quot;gamma&quot; and &quot;floor&quot; are cheating if &quot;bar&quot; and &quot;factorial&quot; are allowed :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22 = floor(sqrt(sqrt(gamma(9)))) +  9 &#8211; .9bar</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;gamma&#8221; and &#8220;floor&#8221; are cheating if &#8220;bar&#8221; and &#8220;factorial&#8221; are allowed <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergus Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62473</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergus Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62473</guid>
		<description>20 = floor(sqrt(sqrt(factorial(9))))-sqrt(9)-.9bar
23 = floor(sqrt(sqrt(factorial(9)))) - 9/9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 = floor(sqrt(sqrt(factorial(9))))-sqrt(9)-.9bar<br />
23 = floor(sqrt(sqrt(factorial(9)))) &#8211; 9/9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phineas J. Whoopie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62472</link>
		<dc:creator>Phineas J. Whoopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62472</guid>
		<description>Great fun, but seriously, people who own these should not be walking around unsupervised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great fun, but seriously, people who own these should not be walking around unsupervised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62471</link>
		<dc:creator>chris H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62471</guid>
		<description>even though the answers to the equasions are all ready known,  how most of those answers pan out I dont know

all i can say when i see that language called math is WHAT THE?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even though the answers to the equasions are all ready known,  how most of those answers pan out I dont know</p>
<p>all i can say when i see that language called math is WHAT THE?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronan Cunniffe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronan Cunniffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62470</guid>
		<description>Oops.  Some of those got away...

6 = sqrt(F(6+6))-6
12 = F(6*6/6)

Ronan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  Some of those got away&#8230;</p>
<p>6 = sqrt(F(6+6))-6<br />
12 = F(6*6/6)</p>
<p>Ronan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronan Cunniffe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62469</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronan Cunniffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62469</guid>
		<description>1 = F((6+6)/6)
2 = sqrt(F(6+6))/6
3 = F(6+6 - F(6))
4 = 6+6-F(6)
5 = F(6-(6/6))
6 = F(6) - F(6/6)
7 = F(6) - F(6/6)
8 = F(6) + (6-6)
9 = F(6) + (6/6)
10 = F(6) + F(6) - 6
11 = F(6) + (F(F(6)) mod 6)
12 = F(6+6)
13 = F(6+(6/6))

I started trying to finish Evolving Squid&#039;s solution, but things rapidly multiplied out of control...  11 gave me serious paws for thought.

Ronan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 = F((6+6)/6)<br />
2 = sqrt(F(6+6))/6<br />
3 = F(6+6 &#8211; F(6))<br />
4 = 6+6-F(6)<br />
5 = F(6-(6/6))<br />
6 = F(6) &#8211; F(6/6)<br />
7 = F(6) &#8211; F(6/6)<br />
8 = F(6) + (6-6)<br />
9 = F(6) + (6/6)<br />
10 = F(6) + F(6) &#8211; 6<br />
11 = F(6) + (F(F(6)) mod 6)<br />
12 = F(6+6)<br />
13 = F(6+(6/6))</p>
<p>I started trying to finish Evolving Squid&#8217;s solution, but things rapidly multiplied out of control&#8230;  11 gave me serious paws for thought.</p>
<p>Ronan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crudely Wrott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-62468</link>
		<dc:creator>Crudely Wrott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/04/want-part-iii/#comment-62468</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the miracle of analog devices. You needn&#039;t know the delineations that the hands are passing, you only need to know their relative positions on the dial. That, plus knowing whether it is day or night, tells you the time at a glance.

That&#039;s why analog (needle) gauges are still predominant in race cars. They are in airplanes too. Even those with glass cockpits display critical indicators such as artificial horizon and rate of climb as digitally simulated analog instruments. They are simply more intuitive and can be understood at a glance even under demanding circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the miracle of analog devices. You needn&#8217;t know the delineations that the hands are passing, you only need to know their relative positions on the dial. That, plus knowing whether it is day or night, tells you the time at a glance.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why analog (needle) gauges are still predominant in race cars. They are in airplanes too. Even those with glass cockpits display critical indicators such as artificial horizon and rate of climb as digitally simulated analog instruments. They are simply more intuitive and can be understood at a glance even under demanding circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:28:12 -->
