DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« LOL Trek
Asteroid to miss Earth January 29 »

Oh noes! Another blog contest!

A trackback from another blog led me to the somewhat lamentable discovery that Performancing is holding another best blog contest… and both PZ and I are on their list.

However, I think I’ll be spared any nail-biting last-minute tie-breaking deals: the category is for Science and Technology, which means we’re up against monster sites Engadget, Ars Technica, and Gizmodo.

I think I won’t worry too much about this one. :-)

Share

January 5th, 2008 3:00 PM by Phil Plait in About this blog, Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science | 32 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

32 Responses to “Oh noes! Another blog contest!”

  1. 1.   BrianMcL Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 3:51 pm

    As a new reader of your site (thanks to the previous contest with climateaudit.org) may I wish you the best of luck anyway.

    Excellent site, it deserves a higher profile and the more publicity it gets the better.

  2. 2.   BaldApe Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 3:52 pm

    One of my many mottoes is “Don’t worry about what other people think until you discover evidence that they do.”

    You have my utmost respect. That should be enough. :-)

  3. 3.   Michelle Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

    Agh! Gizmodo is there too? I’m in a pickle.

    I absolutely adore Gizmodo… And I adore the BA too!

  4. 4.   The Bad Astronomer Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    Michelle, as long as you don’t vote for Pharyngula! Sheesh!
    :-)

  5. 5.   Seamyst Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Just voted for you! Actually, you’re way ahead right now, at 36% of the vote. Next is Ars Technica, at 17%. It doesn’t say how many votes have been submitted, though.

  6. 6.   Michael Lonergan Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    Could the BA be the Ron Paul of Bloggers and launch a BA Revolution to win the vote?

  7. 7.   Matt Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    I don’t know, the BA seems like he’s much more rational than Ron Paul, and a funnier guy, too. If BA does win the vote, well then, against such heavyweights I think this will more than make up for Phil’s prior loss to PZ!

  8. 8.   bigjohn Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    Even though there are a couple of good blogs on the list, I will vote for you anyway…although PZ’s blog is pretty good, too…hmmm…

  9. 9.   Michael Lonergan Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 7:30 pm

    Just voted. The BA is wayyyyyyyyy out in front.

  10. 10.   The Bad Astronomer Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 8:55 pm

    Well, like I said before, I don’t think it’ll last. Those tech sites are huge, with far more readers than this blog. Once they hear about this (I only found out by accident; it would be nice if someone involved had mentioned it to me!) it’ll go differently, I bet.

  11. 11.   Richard B. Drumm Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    Phil:
    Have a good time in Austin! Wish I could be there…
    Voted for BA, of course, and here’s the current standing:

    Pharyngula – 14%
    Ars Technica – 12%
    Gizmodo – 9%
    Engadget – 12%
    Bad Astronomy – 47%
    The Apple Blog – 1%
    Other – 4%

    So far so good! Your toll is equal to the top 4 other blogs!
    Rich

  12. 12.   Michael Lonergan Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    BA, you’re so humble! :)

  13. 13.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 9:50 pm

    BA: Just voted. You’re up to 49% at 11.45 PM, 1/5/08.

    GAry 7

  14. 14.   Matt Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    Just voted for BA myself, still at 49% at 12:36 AM EST 1/6/08

  15. 15.   Chris Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 10:49 pm

    It’s 12:40 am, EST, 2008/01/06, and you’re still at 49%! Happy to help out the cause!

  16. 16.   Remek Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 11:08 pm

    BA- “Those tech sites are huge…”

    Agreed, plus they have it rather easier because of the massive amount of widely distributed marketing materials/press releases/’insider leaks’ they more easily and constantly have to sift thru and refresh.

    It’s rather unfair to lump both together, IMO.

    For example, just look at just a couple of examples for science – sciencedaily.com & physorg.com. Even with the amount of updates sciencedaily.com keeps up with in articles, journal additions, and press releases, they don’t touch other, important, individual science-related updates that places like the scienceblogs compendium site (as well as your site) add to science-related info.

    Seems to me sites like engadget.com and gizmodo.com have much easier resources to keep up with their commercial technology/gadget focus than a comprehensive science-only site would. (plus they have lots of companies more or less throwing money at them in terms of advertising space revenue -vs- what a science-only site could count on)

  17. 17.   PZ Myers Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 11:22 pm

    Hey, I’m also up for “most controversial“, with Perez Hilton and Daily Kos. I doubt that I stand much of a chance there, either.

  18. 18.   Janine Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    So, should there be a blog war again?

  19. 19.   ExGeekDogTrainer Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 1:31 am

    I just voted (for BA, of course!), but you’re slipping. Even worse, however – PZ’s coming up fast. I worry about what tomorrow will bring and in so many other ways… – g^2

    Pharyngula 34%
    Ars Technica 8%
    Gizmodo 5%
    Engadget 8%
    Bad Astronomy 41%
    The Apple Blog 2%
    Other: 3%

  20. 20.   RinzeWind Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 1:43 am

    “However, I think I’ll be spared any nail-biting last-minute tie-breaking deals: the category is for Science and Technology, which means we’re up against monster sites Engadget, Ars Technica, and Gizmodo.”

    Which is sad: when publishing a blog, everybody has the same amount of potential readers. It’s only the quality of the writings that will help the winner.

    Said that, it’s even sadder that the old gadgets blogs (which are a review of a review of a review) keep turning up in this contests.

  21. 21.   Marko Pyhajarvi Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 2:47 am

    Come on, Phil. You’re blog will beat Gizmodo! ;)

  22. 22.   DrFlimmer Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 3:44 am

    Just voted, but Pharyngula is ahead with 41% to BA 38%, that’s not how it meant to be ;-)

  23. 23.   lexcarter Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 8:48 am

    I am supporting PZ in the “most controversial” contest.
    and BA in the “science contest”. this is in accordance with my belliefs.
    it is only when i have to choose, between BA vs PZ that i have to
    stand up as a true BA fan.

  24. 24.   Matt Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 9:58 am

    Nooo, 50% PZ to 34% BA! We must avert our eyes from the skies for just long enough for one button press, to vote for our favorite astronomer!

  25. 25.   KaiYeves Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Don’t worry, I think your site rocks no matter what.

  26. 26.   dan Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Dear Blogger:

    This is for your information and is not intended as a spam post.

    Find out how you can promote your blog and/or website at no cost (really!) at:

    http://college-scholarships.com/free_website_promotion_program.htm

    You’ll learn how I achieved #1 rankings for my websites in Google, Yahoo, and MSN.
    The program is absolutely without cost and it really works.

    See the proof at:

    http://college-scholarships.com/free_website_promotion_program.htm

    Best Wishes,

    Dan

  27. 27.   tobiasthecommie Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 11:22 am

    but it is a spam post

  28. 28.   Laguna Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 11:50 am

    Now Pharyngula takes the lead with 51%.
    Bad Astronomy is behind with 34%.
    The others? Not even worth to notice!

  29. 29.   Barton Paul Levenson Says:
    January 7th, 2008 at 6:07 am

    I voted for ya, BA, but at this point Pharyngula is way ahead.

  30. 30.   The Centipede Says:
    January 7th, 2008 at 8:24 am

    Fanged God, not this again. ;)

  31. 31.   1800 Says:
    July 3rd, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    4sLwJr fjosahfjk hajkfhs jkahfshafuksahfuas f8syaifa765978thsgjknd sjkgdjksbgjkds

  32. 32.   1800flowers Says:
    July 8th, 2008 at 10:57 am

    qVYw3t fasfs fsf safsafasf afsfsafas

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us