DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« AAS #11: Pictures!
AAS #13: A History of (galactic) Violence »

AAS #12: Einstein’s Double Bulls-eye

The picture above shows a cosmic bulls-eye of epic alignment. But before I can tell you about it, I have to tell you about how the dart got thrown.

One of the more amazing aspects of looking into deep, deep space is that the path there is tortured and twisted. Space itself can be distorted by mass; it gets bent, like a road curves as it goes around a hill. And like a truck that must follow that road and steer around the hill, a photon must follow the curve of space.

Imagine a distant galaxy, billions of light years away. It emits light in all directions. One particular photon happens to be emitted almost — but not quite — in our direction. Left on its own, we’d never see it because it would miss the Earth by thousands or millions of light years.

But on its travels, it passes by another massive galaxy. This galaxy warps space, and the photon does what it must do: it follows that curve in pace, and changes direction… and it just so happens that the curve is just right to send it our way.

The intervening galaxy is essentially acting like a lens, bending the light. If the more distant galaxy is exactly behind the lensing galaxy, we see the light from that more distant galaxy distorted into a perfect ring, a circle of light surrounding the lens. We call this an Einstein Ring. If the farther galaxy is off to the side a bit, we see an arc instead of a complete ring. Gravitationally lensed arcs and rings are seen all over the sky, and they can be used to determine the mass of the intervening galaxy! The more mass, the more distorted the light from the farther galaxy. So the Universe has given us a nice method to let us weigh it.

In a surprising twist, astronomers have found a new type of lensed galaxy: a double ring! In a rare alignment, there are two distant galaxies aligned behind an intervening lensing galaxy. They’re like beads on a wire, lined up just right such that both more distant galaxies are lensed by the nearer one. In this case, the lens is about 3 billion light years away, and the other two are 6 and 11 billion light years away, an incredible distance.

This image is amazing, but it is also a powerful scientific tool. It allows us to measure not just the mass of the lensing galaxy, but also the amount of mysterious dark matter nearby. We cannot see the dark matter, but it too bends light, and contributes to the lensings. By observing lenses like this, we can take a sample of dark matter in the Universe, and that’s a crucial first step in understanding it. Even better, these double rings allows us to measure the amount of total mass not just in the nearest galaxy, as is usual, but also in the middle galaxy as well, since it distorts the light from the galaxy behind it (turns out it’s a rather lightweight one billion solar masses; our own Galaxy has more than 100 times that mass, so the middle galaxy is considered a dwarf).

This is a beautiful happenstance; it gives us a measure of the Universe at two points, with one being for free. In fact, Tommaso Treu, the astronomer at U.C. Santa Barbara who investigated this lens, points out that if we can find as few as 50 of these double rings, we can get a much better idea of the distribution of not just dark matter, but also the even more mysterious dark energy in the Universe. That’s one of the biggest goals of modern astronomy… and we may get a handle on it due to a coincidental ring toss.

Share

January 10th, 2008 9:03 AM Tags: dark energy, dark matter, Einstein, galaxies, gravitational lensing, gravity, Hubble, NASA
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Pretty pictures, Science | 19 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

19 Responses to “AAS #12: Einstein’s Double Bulls-eye”

  1. 1.   tacitus Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Very cool, but I have a question. Is the warping of the light done in enough of a predictable way that an image of the distant galaxies can be reconstituted from rings? I would guess not, but given the amazing stuff we can do with warped images these days (i.e. Hubble’s mirror problem) I was just wondering if anything can be done at all.

  2. 2.   Carey Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 9:36 am

    That’s like, pretty awesome and stuff.

  3. 3.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 10:46 am

    I guess that would also mean, the galaxies beyond the nearer galaxy can see us too??

    ACK! MAn all battle stations. The Aliens can see us!!!

    Cool Pics!

    GAry 7

  4. 4.   Dutch Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 10:56 am

    Wouldn’t it be interesting if we found out that the light that we are seeing from the most distant galaxy is actually from our own.

  5. 5.   The AstroDyke Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 11:02 am

    The discovery paper, submitted to The Astrophysical Journal is here:
    http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/science_paper/jackpot_submitted.pdf

  6. 6.   PsyberDave Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Does dark matter have the same gravitational properties as non-dark matter?

    Is dark matter just regular matter that is not very reflective and we can’t see it from here, or is it a wholly different kind of matter that is invisible altogether?

  7. 7.   Chris Lintott’s Universe » AAS: Taking it one STAGES at a time Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 11:15 am

    [...] from the STAGES survey of a galaxy supercluster. Pamela sums up my feelings here. Oh, and there was a double Einstein ring, [...]

  8. 8.   Barton Paul Levenson Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 11:16 am

    Dutch posts:

    [[Wouldn’t it be interesting if we found out that the light that we are seeing from the most distant galaxy is actually from our own.]]

    It would mean that many observations of the past decade or so were egregiously wrong. That effect only happens if the universe is “closed,” density-wise, and observations indicate that it is not.

    PsyberDave posts:

    [[Is dark matter just regular matter that is not very reflective and we can’t see it from here, or is it a wholly different kind of matter that is invisible altogether?]]

    No one is sure yet, but there are some abstruse physics reasons for thinking dark matter is non-baryonic (i.e., not what we’re used to calling matter). The likely contenders, if I’m not obsolete here, are mass-possessing neutrinos and exotic particles called “axions.”

  9. 9.   Astronomy Cast - AAS #13: A History of (galactic) Violence Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 11:57 am

    [...] its presence in two ways: its gravity changes the motion of the galaxies in the cluster, and it distorts the light from more distant galaxies due to gravitational lensing (see my last AAS post for info on [...]

  10. 10.   Jack Hagerty Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    tacitus: “given the amazing stuff we can do with warped images these days (i.e. Hubble’s mirror problem) I was just wondering if anything can be done at all.”

    Just to be pedantic, Hubble’s mirror was not warped. It was ground to the wrong figure. It was actually very, very precisely ground wrong; it just focused at the wrong spot. That’s why they were able to fix it by placing a corrective mirror in the optical path, exactly the way human vision problems are corrected.

    - Jack

  11. 11.   Jeffersonian Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 4:17 pm

    [retrieves skullcap from across room]

  12. 12.   blizno Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 6:58 pm

    Gary Ansorgeon 10 Jan 2008 at 10:46 am

    “I guess that would also mean, the galaxies beyond the nearer galaxy can see us too??

    ACK! MAn all battle stations. The Aliens can see us!!!”

    They are right now seeing us as we were 6+ billion years ago. I doubt that those distant aliens are alarmed enough to launch a faster-than-light attack against the dusty disk forming around proto-Sol.
    It’s only the aliens a few hundred light years away from us who might be alarmed by our harnessing the horse and eventually…the steam engine.

  13. 13.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    January 10th, 2008 at 7:30 pm

    ACK! The steam engine. It’ll put out everybody out of work,,,

    ,,,or not,,,

    GAry 7

  14. 14.   Kaptain K Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 1:37 am

    “…if we can find as few as 50 of these double rings…”

    Now there’s an optimist for you! We finally find ONE and he says “if we can find as few as 50″! :0

  15. 15.   YinYang0564 Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 2:16 am

    I think I have just read the best description of gravitational lensing I have seen. Thank you, Phil.

  16. 16.   Conservation of Trolls Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 8:46 am

    [...] I’m not even going to try to explain this, since Phil Plait explained the phenomenon perfectly here. [...]

  17. 17.   Allen Thomson Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 9:08 am

    Sort of an idle wonderment, but I wonder what astronomers would have made of such distorted images if GTR hadn’t been invented.

  18. 18.   Rob Says:
    January 12th, 2008 at 9:39 am

    Sort of an idle wonderment, but I wonder what astronomers would have made of such distorted images if GTR hadn’t been invented.

    Maybe that they’d discovered the Ringworld. :)

  19. 19.   Hubble spies eye in the sky | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 11:00 am

    [...] The "pupil" of the eye is actually a galaxy about 2.2 billion light years from Earth. That’s a fair bit! But it happens to sit almost directly between us and a much more more distant galaxy — one that is 11 billion light years away. As the light from the background galaxy passes by the nearer one, the gravity of the nearer one bends the path of that light, twisting it in what’s called a gravitational lens. [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us