<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MESSENGER takes aim at Mercury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:07:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63203</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63203</guid>
		<description>Ed Davies posts:

[[&lt;i&gt;1e-12 bar is, unless I’m out by a factor of 1000 or something, 100 nPa (nano pascals). To put that in context, the pressure of the solar wind in the region of the Earth can be around 1 nPa or more (http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html). The solar wind must be nearly up to local atmospheric pressure at Mercury. That’d make for an interesting shape to the atmosphere, I’d have thought.&lt;/i&gt;]]

Good point!  I&#039;d love to see a simulation -- if they did it in color and 3D it would make for an interesting BA article photo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Davies posts:</p>
<p>[[<i>1e-12 bar is, unless I’m out by a factor of 1000 or something, 100 nPa (nano pascals). To put that in context, the pressure of the solar wind in the region of the Earth can be around 1 nPa or more (<a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html)" rel="nofollow">http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html)</a>. The solar wind must be nearly up to local atmospheric pressure at Mercury. That’d make for an interesting shape to the atmosphere, I’d have thought.</i>]]</p>
<p>Good point!  I&#8217;d love to see a simulation &#8212; if they did it in color and 3D it would make for an interesting BA article photo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Davies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63202</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63202</guid>
		<description>Oh, so the first of those two messages did get posted, but with a question mark instead of the superscript minus.

1e-12 bar is, unless I&#039;m out by a factor of 1000 or something, 100 nPa (nano pascals).  To put that in context, the pressure of the solar wind in the region of the Earth can be around 1 nPa or more (http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html).  The solar wind must be nearly up to local atmospheric pressure at Mercury.  That&#039;d make for an interesting shape to the atmosphere, I&#039;d have thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, so the first of those two messages did get posted, but with a question mark instead of the superscript minus.</p>
<p>1e-12 bar is, unless I&#8217;m out by a factor of 1000 or something, 100 nPa (nano pascals).  To put that in context, the pressure of the solar wind in the region of the Earth can be around 1 nPa or more (<a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html)" rel="nofollow">http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html)</a>.  The solar wind must be nearly up to local atmospheric pressure at Mercury.  That&#8217;d make for an interesting shape to the atmosphere, I&#8217;d have thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Davies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63201</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63201</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, 10 to the minus 12 bar makes sense.  Tenuous as you say.

As a similar experiment I tried typing the value using Unicode superscript characters but got a database error: &quot;WordPress database error: [Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE) for operation &#039;=&#039;]&quot;.  Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, 10 to the minus 12 bar makes sense.  Tenuous as you say.</p>
<p>As a similar experiment I tried typing the value using Unicode superscript characters but got a database error: &#8220;WordPress database error: [Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE) for operation '=']&#8220;.  Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Davies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63199</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63199</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, 10 to the minus 12 bar makes sense.  Tenuous as you say.

As a similar experiment, here&#039;s a form using Unicode superscript characters:  10?¹².  Let&#039;s see how that comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, 10 to the minus 12 bar makes sense.  Tenuous as you say.</p>
<p>As a similar experiment, here&#8217;s a form using Unicode superscript characters:  10?¹².  Let&#8217;s see how that comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robots are deadly. odds &#38; ends</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63200</link>
		<dc:creator>robots are deadly. odds &#38; ends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63200</guid>
		<description>[...] Messenger takes aim at Mercury (Bad Astronomy) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Messenger takes aim at Mercury (Bad Astronomy) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63198</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63198</guid>
		<description>No, looks like the BA web site software won&#039;t display superscript tags properly.  I know it does italics, but maybe it&#039;s only got the most basic HTML 1.0 set -- underline, italics, bold.  Undoubtedly subscript tags won&#039;t work either.  Let me try:  CO2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, looks like the BA web site software won&#8217;t display superscript tags properly.  I know it does italics, but maybe it&#8217;s only got the most basic HTML 1.0 set &#8212; underline, italics, bold.  Undoubtedly subscript tags won&#8217;t work either.  Let me try:  CO2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-63197</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/12/messenger-takes-aim-at-mercury/#comment-63197</guid>
		<description>Ed Davies writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;BPL: 10-12 bar is not tenuous. Earth’s surface atmospheric pressure is about 1 bar. Even 10-12 millibar is denser than Mars’ atmosphere which about 7 millibar. Guessing wildly, do you mean pascals?&lt;/i&gt;]]

Typo on my part.  I meant to write 10 to the -12th power bars.  Either I got the superscript tags wrong, or forgot them altogether, or this site won&#039;t show them.

I&#039;ll try down here:

10-12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Davies writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>BPL: 10-12 bar is not tenuous. Earth’s surface atmospheric pressure is about 1 bar. Even 10-12 millibar is denser than Mars’ atmosphere which about 7 millibar. Guessing wildly, do you mean pascals?</i>]]</p>
<p>Typo on my part.  I meant to write 10 to the -12th power bars.  Either I got the superscript tags wrong, or forgot them altogether, or this site won&#8217;t show them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try down here:</p>
<p>10-12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
