Comments on: Dennis Miller and Richard Hoagland

By: Ficheye

Ficheye — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:34:36 +0000

Oh, thank you lord for finding other people who ALSO think Richard C. Hoagland is nuts. The face on Mars, the Cydonia region…everytime there would be a more refined photo he would find an excuse to say that it’s not the true information, we need an even BETTER photo. And those ,bad, bad, NASA people… spies, I tell ya…. they are faking it! The whole space program is bunk!!

I love to listen to late night radio, a dalliance that is sometimes informative and inspirational, if you can stand the commercials. Most of the stuff is bunk…I tell ya!

But Hoagland has brought a whiney, cheesy element to an already dubious source of information, preying on all the issues Michael Shermer of the Skeptics Society has brought forth recently. Although I think Shermer takes all the fun out of a grayish life we live these days, Hoagland moves in reverse, seeking the great universal source of Velveeta. Or is that dark matter? I digress.

By: American Spirit

American Spirit — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:33:51 +0000

Hello Phil,

Have you seen the madness on Bara’s blog in which he seems to think that it was you using the name “Professor Fulcanelli” to write a review of Dark Mission on Amazon?

He does not mention your name, but then in the comments he slips and says “But what do Dr. Phil’s mendacious and very personal attacks on Richard have to do with the “norms of scientific debate?”

By: Joe

Joe — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:29:23 +0000

I’m reading Dark Mission right now. Great read. Just as good as Hoagland’s first book.

By: Folcrom

Folcrom — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:46:28 +0000

I always thought that RCH qualified as being metally ill.
After all, aren’t his claims delusional.
Especially so, as he actually believes them himself.
Folcrom.

By: MH

MH — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:34:29 +0000

“What I find interesting that gets lost in the discussion is that the perception of 9/11=Iraq was growing on its own,”

NOT on it’s own. The administration was, within hours of the attacks, telling its people (specifically Richard Clarke) to look for evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11.

By: Nigel Depledge

Nigel Depledge — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:21:15 +0000

He claimed that Iapetus was artificial because it has a huge ridge (RCH called it a wall) running around its equator. Cassini recently recorded a series of images in a very close flyby of Iapetus that clearly shows the natural form of the ridge. This was assembled into a rather cool video by the Cassini imaging team. He just sets himself up to be shown to be wrong.

By: Redx

Redx — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:34:01 +0000

*delusions