<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google introduces News Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:57:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will. M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64288</link>
		<dc:creator>Will. M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64288</guid>
		<description>Your &quot;We look out to look in&quot; sounded sooo familiar, so I thought I&#039;d try to find out if those words were used before.  On the Quotations Book website I found these:

 &quot;Our roots are in the dark; the earth is our country. Why did we look up for blessing -- instead of around, and down? What hope we have lies there. Not in the sky full of orbiting spy-eyes and weaponry, but in the earth we have looked down upon. Not from above, but from below. Not in the light that blinds, but in the dark that nourishes, where human beings grow human souls.&quot;
Ursula K. Le Guin

&quot;Look up, and not down; Out and not in; Forward and not back; And lend a hand.&quot;  Edw. Everett Hale

&quot;The world looks at preachers out of church to know what they mean in it.&quot;  Richard Cecil

And, &quot;Things are as they are.  Looking out into the universe at night we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.&quot;  Alan Watts

I think any idea - google, wikipedia, etc. - will stand or fail on its own merits; on whether folks find it useful or not, and for how long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;We look out to look in&#8221; sounded sooo familiar, so I thought I&#8217;d try to find out if those words were used before.  On the Quotations Book website I found these:</p>
<p> &#8220;Our roots are in the dark; the earth is our country. Why did we look up for blessing &#8212; instead of around, and down? What hope we have lies there. Not in the sky full of orbiting spy-eyes and weaponry, but in the earth we have looked down upon. Not from above, but from below. Not in the light that blinds, but in the dark that nourishes, where human beings grow human souls.&#8221;<br />
Ursula K. Le Guin</p>
<p>&#8220;Look up, and not down; Out and not in; Forward and not back; And lend a hand.&#8221;  Edw. Everett Hale</p>
<p>&#8220;The world looks at preachers out of church to know what they mean in it.&#8221;  Richard Cecil</p>
<p>And, &#8220;Things are as they are.  Looking out into the universe at night we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.&#8221;  Alan Watts</p>
<p>I think any idea &#8211; google, wikipedia, etc. &#8211; will stand or fail on its own merits; on whether folks find it useful or not, and for how long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shifty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64289</link>
		<dc:creator>Shifty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64289</guid>
		<description>Florian, try what I told Laguna2 a few comments up:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-148968&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florian, try what I told Laguna2 a few comments up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-148968" rel="nofollow">Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64287</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64287</guid>
		<description>hmm - seems that I am not able to read this comment. I am online from germany - and every time I hit the link &quot;Comment from Dr. Phil Plait&quot; I get  redirected to the &quot;Google News Deutschland&quot; site... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm &#8211; seems that I am not able to read this comment. I am online from germany &#8211; and every time I hit the link &#8220;Comment from Dr. Phil Plait&#8221; I get  redirected to the &#8220;Google News Deutschland&#8221; site&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vanderschel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64286</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vanderschel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64286</guid>
		<description>I must be missing something.  (This is about the Google feature, not anything the BA is doing.)  If I follow the BA&#039;s &quot;so I did&quot; link, I see his comment on a Google page below a link to the article.  However, I have not discovered a way to find Phil&#039;s comment without the link he provided.  E.g., if I load the article page itself, there is no indication there that the BA has responded.  (Not too surprising, since it is National Geo&#039;s page.)  The Google page with the BA&#039;s comment is titled &quot;Comments by People in the News&quot;.   I don&#039;t see a way of getting there from either the article or a Google News search that actually finds the article.  (E.g., search on &quot;Mercury&quot; and &quot;Plait&quot;.)  So how does one get there?  Is there a script that I need in a bookmark or something like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be missing something.  (This is about the Google feature, not anything the BA is doing.)  If I follow the BA&#8217;s &#8220;so I did&#8221; link, I see his comment on a Google page below a link to the article.  However, I have not discovered a way to find Phil&#8217;s comment without the link he provided.  E.g., if I load the article page itself, there is no indication there that the BA has responded.  (Not too surprising, since it is National Geo&#8217;s page.)  The Google page with the BA&#8217;s comment is titled &#8220;Comments by People in the News&#8221;.   I don&#8217;t see a way of getting there from either the article or a Google News search that actually finds the article.  (E.g., search on &#8220;Mercury&#8221; and &#8220;Plait&#8221;.)  So how does one get there?  Is there a script that I need in a bookmark or something like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Schauer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64285</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Schauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64285</guid>
		<description>It is simply refreshing to get astronomy &quot;news&quot;  of interest from a qualified, uncensored source.  A very sincere thanks for taking the time keeping some of us amateurs well informed with your excellent insights and efforts.  Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is simply refreshing to get astronomy &#8220;news&#8221;  of interest from a qualified, uncensored source.  A very sincere thanks for taking the time keeping some of us amateurs well informed with your excellent insights and efforts.  Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarrySDonald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64284</link>
		<dc:creator>LarrySDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64284</guid>
		<description>It seems like an excellent idea. I&#039;ve had friends in family in the media off and on growing up and went through that normal phase of &quot;Every article I know anything much about I can spot tons of mistakes in - they&#039;re miscovering everything I know about&quot; and then on to &quot;Hey, why am I thinking the stuff I *don&#039;t* know about is covered better?&quot;. I&#039;m not saying &quot;better&quot; as in matching my opinion, but things that are plain fact, like saying &quot;Phil can bench press 300 lbs&quot; when we know good and well he doesn&#039;t (ok, so perhaps he can - but I&#039;m guessing no). Letting those involved correct mistakes and keeping everyone honest seems like a good, if controversial, move. Open season for everyones comment is good too, but I think there&#039;s lot to be said for a &quot;people who actually know this&quot; area beside the news. It could be killed of easily by, say, the agencies actually calling up those that might be invited to comment and taking their opinions to heart, but I&#039;m not holding my breath so inviting those ref:ed or mentioned to comment seems like a fine solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like an excellent idea. I&#8217;ve had friends in family in the media off and on growing up and went through that normal phase of &#8220;Every article I know anything much about I can spot tons of mistakes in &#8211; they&#8217;re miscovering everything I know about&#8221; and then on to &#8220;Hey, why am I thinking the stuff I *don&#8217;t* know about is covered better?&#8221;. I&#8217;m not saying &#8220;better&#8221; as in matching my opinion, but things that are plain fact, like saying &#8220;Phil can bench press 300 lbs&#8221; when we know good and well he doesn&#8217;t (ok, so perhaps he can &#8211; but I&#8217;m guessing no). Letting those involved correct mistakes and keeping everyone honest seems like a good, if controversial, move. Open season for everyones comment is good too, but I think there&#8217;s lot to be said for a &#8220;people who actually know this&#8221; area beside the news. It could be killed of easily by, say, the agencies actually calling up those that might be invited to comment and taking their opinions to heart, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath so inviting those ref:ed or mentioned to comment seems like a fine solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laguna2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-64283</link>
		<dc:creator>Laguna2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/google-introduces-news-commentary/#comment-64283</guid>
		<description>Thanks Shifty. I have to remember that workaround...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Shifty. I have to remember that workaround&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
