<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That sense of&#8230; Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiGravity Physics Explained &#124; AboutPhysics.info</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-241469</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiGravity Physics Explained &#124; AboutPhysics.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-241469</guid>
		<description>[...] That sense of… Enterprise &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That sense of… Enterprise | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newjet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64350</link>
		<dc:creator>newjet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64350</guid>
		<description>Hey .the turbines make sense, you need thrust to get moving like a jet with little fuel that that injects particles threw the blades as particles that will fire up the magnetic warp coils that will generate a quantum magnetic field around the exaust for plasma to be jetted. The impulse engine is very simple,it is a cooling system or rad for the plasma exaust that is a turbine itself ,like a hydro turbine that very slowly turns with steam from the plasma that is again connected to the main warp coil to generate cooling for the engines.I don&#039;t have a place to send you pictures of these types of engines, but you will need a quantum computer before you can get an engine like this to work, they are coming soon.Oh, and by the way if you want to know about the gravity around the ship just take a magnet and set up some needles pushing up in a negative field with a paper connected , there, there is you anti gravity, in a very small example. I know somethings about these engine designs, they are generally simple,you just need that quantum computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey .the turbines make sense, you need thrust to get moving like a jet with little fuel that that injects particles threw the blades as particles that will fire up the magnetic warp coils that will generate a quantum magnetic field around the exaust for plasma to be jetted. The impulse engine is very simple,it is a cooling system or rad for the plasma exaust that is a turbine itself ,like a hydro turbine that very slowly turns with steam from the plasma that is again connected to the main warp coil to generate cooling for the engines.I don&#8217;t have a place to send you pictures of these types of engines, but you will need a quantum computer before you can get an engine like this to work, they are coming soon.Oh, and by the way if you want to know about the gravity around the ship just take a magnet and set up some needles pushing up in a negative field with a paper connected , there, there is you anti gravity, in a very small example. I know somethings about these engine designs, they are generally simple,you just need that quantum computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Bruchmann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64349</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Bruchmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64349</guid>
		<description>Actually we use mm/Hg in aviation.  Pressure altitude or field elevation is set that way.  Standard pressure is 29.92&quot; or 1013mm of Hg.  Most small aircraft altimeters have only inches / Hg in their Kohlsman window, but larger commercial ones normally have mm as well.
There was a line in Stargate SG-1 in the episode &quot;the other guys&quot; where one of the scientists, realising how precarious the situation is, states that &quot;we may as well be wearing red shirts.&quot;
And my cell phone is MORE advanced than Kirk&#039;s communicator!  I have a calculator and a camera in mine.  Now if I could just figure out how to use them!  :)  I&#039;ll go ask the 4 y.o. next door....
This is a lively debate now, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually we use mm/Hg in aviation.  Pressure altitude or field elevation is set that way.  Standard pressure is 29.92&#8243; or 1013mm of Hg.  Most small aircraft altimeters have only inches / Hg in their Kohlsman window, but larger commercial ones normally have mm as well.<br />
There was a line in Stargate SG-1 in the episode &#8220;the other guys&#8221; where one of the scientists, realising how precarious the situation is, states that &#8220;we may as well be wearing red shirts.&#8221;<br />
And my cell phone is MORE advanced than Kirk&#8217;s communicator!  I have a calculator and a camera in mine.  Now if I could just figure out how to use them!  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;ll go ask the 4 y.o. next door&#8230;.<br />
This is a lively debate now, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64348</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64348</guid>
		<description>JediBear posts:

[[&lt;i&gt; mmHg is a perfectly serviceable unit of measure for atmospheric pressure, and is still used in the 21st Century.&lt;/i&gt;]]

&lt;i&gt;WHERE?&lt;/i&gt;  I haven&#039;t seen it used for years, and it certainly isn&#039;t used in the scientific literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JediBear posts:</p>
<p>[[<i> mmHg is a perfectly serviceable unit of measure for atmospheric pressure, and is still used in the 21st Century.</i>]]</p>
<p><i>WHERE?</i>  I haven&#8217;t seen it used for years, and it certainly isn&#8217;t used in the scientific literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB of Brisbane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64347</link>
		<dc:creator>JB of Brisbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64347</guid>
		<description>AIABX writes, &quot;Ummm… I’m afraid I may be overgeeking here, but I seem to recall the the Enterprise was built at the Planitia shipyards on Mars. Or did I hallucinate that after too many cheetos?&quot;

To my ST knowledge, the Enterprise-D (NCC-1701-D) from ST:TNG was constructed at Planetia Utopia on Mars. By contrast, I remember Commodore Robert April in &quot;The Counter-Clock Incident&quot; (Animated Series) saying that he was there &quot;at the San Francisco Navy Yards&quot; when the original Enterprise&#039;s &quot;unit components were built.&quot;

I don&#039;t mean to outgeek you, but there it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIABX writes, &#8220;Ummm… I’m afraid I may be overgeeking here, but I seem to recall the the Enterprise was built at the Planitia shipyards on Mars. Or did I hallucinate that after too many cheetos?&#8221;</p>
<p>To my ST knowledge, the Enterprise-D (NCC-1701-D) from ST:TNG was constructed at Planetia Utopia on Mars. By contrast, I remember Commodore Robert April in &#8220;The Counter-Clock Incident&#8221; (Animated Series) saying that he was there &#8220;at the San Francisco Navy Yards&#8221; when the original Enterprise&#8217;s &#8220;unit components were built.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to outgeek you, but there it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JediBear</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64346</link>
		<dc:creator>JediBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64346</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nobody wore a red uniform in TMP. They all had those awful grey-white things that looked like a cross between a leotard and a leisure suit &quot;

Point. A meaningless point, to be sure, but a technicality which should be acknowledged in case anyone actually cares.

&quot;I can think of an exception — the medical technology. If you remember the episode “Journey to Babel,” they needed a relative of Sarek’s to transfuse blood to the poor guy — apparently the 23rd century hadn’t come up with a blood substitute. &quot;

Or they didn&#039;t have any blood substitute in stock which was appropriate to Sarek&#039;s physilology. Modern medicine doesn&#039;t have a vulcan blood substitute either, so no points there.

&quot;And I remember Doctor McCoy in another episode giving an atmospheric pressure reading from a tricorder in “millimeters of mercury.” Any climatologist or meteorologist in the 23rd century should be using pascals, or at least millibars.&quot;

Units of measure are not a matter of technological advance. mmHg is a perfectly serviceable unit of measure for atmospheric pressure, and is still used in the 21st Century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nobody wore a red uniform in TMP. They all had those awful grey-white things that looked like a cross between a leotard and a leisure suit &#8221;</p>
<p>Point. A meaningless point, to be sure, but a technicality which should be acknowledged in case anyone actually cares.</p>
<p>&#8220;I can think of an exception — the medical technology. If you remember the episode “Journey to Babel,” they needed a relative of Sarek’s to transfuse blood to the poor guy — apparently the 23rd century hadn’t come up with a blood substitute. &#8221;</p>
<p>Or they didn&#8217;t have any blood substitute in stock which was appropriate to Sarek&#8217;s physilology. Modern medicine doesn&#8217;t have a vulcan blood substitute either, so no points there.</p>
<p>&#8220;And I remember Doctor McCoy in another episode giving an atmospheric pressure reading from a tricorder in “millimeters of mercury.” Any climatologist or meteorologist in the 23rd century should be using pascals, or at least millibars.&#8221;</p>
<p>Units of measure are not a matter of technological advance. mmHg is a perfectly serviceable unit of measure for atmospheric pressure, and is still used in the 21st Century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64345</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64345</guid>
		<description>We all know the red shirt thing.  A landing party consists of three bridge crewmembers and one person in a red shirt that we never saw before.  The three guys from the bridge live to the end of the show.

I recall reading a review - I didn&#039;t study the episode in question - where there were -two- folks in red shirt, a woman and a black guy, and the aliens did a thing to them and only the black guy came out alive.  I hope I got that straight.

So if you are the -only- red-shirt person in a scene, is when you ask the captain if you can make a phone call to your loved ones.  Otherwise, you could be lucky, and you don&#039;t want to reduce your chances by admitting you -have- loved ones.  Or plans to quit the service and go into the shoe business.  Or musical ability.  (Unless you are good at funeral tunes, then you can play out at the end of the show.  Picard and Riker, for instance, have those skills.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the red shirt thing.  A landing party consists of three bridge crewmembers and one person in a red shirt that we never saw before.  The three guys from the bridge live to the end of the show.</p>
<p>I recall reading a review &#8211; I didn&#8217;t study the episode in question &#8211; where there were -two- folks in red shirt, a woman and a black guy, and the aliens did a thing to them and only the black guy came out alive.  I hope I got that straight.</p>
<p>So if you are the -only- red-shirt person in a scene, is when you ask the captain if you can make a phone call to your loved ones.  Otherwise, you could be lucky, and you don&#8217;t want to reduce your chances by admitting you -have- loved ones.  Or plans to quit the service and go into the shoe business.  Or musical ability.  (Unless you are good at funeral tunes, then you can play out at the end of the show.  Picard and Riker, for instance, have those skills.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64344</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64344</guid>
		<description>JediBear writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;“Modern technology is actually more advanced than is shown on Star Trek”
Based on what?
” except for the gizmos granted: Warp drive, antigravity, transporter and some medical gadgets.”
Some gizmos? /Everything/ aboard a 23rd-century Starship is more advanced than anything we had in the 80s, and only the most recent advances in 21st-century technology are starting to eclipse some of the less important advances of 24th-Century technology.&lt;/i&gt;]]

I can think of an exception -- the medical technology.  If you remember the episode &quot;Journey to Babel,&quot; they needed a relative of Sarek&#039;s to transfuse blood to the poor guy -- apparently the 23rd century hadn&#039;t come up with a blood substitute.  And I remember Doctor McCoy in another episode giving an atmospheric pressure reading from a tricorder in &quot;millimeters of mercury.&quot;  Any climatologist or meteorologist in the 23rd century should be using pascals, or at least millibars.

Then there&#039;s the fact that soldiers shoot at each other with guns -- where are the robot soldiers?  How long will human soldiers survive as an institution once governments can field robots that can seek, aim, fire and take down thirty or so opponents every second?  The idea of Han Solo getting behind the battle droid in &quot;The Empire Strikes Back&quot; and shooting it while it&#039;s distracted makes for nice special effects, but it isn&#039;t terribly realistic.  (Yes, I know we&#039;re discussing Star Trek and not Star Wars.  Just making a point about robot soldiers.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JediBear writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>“Modern technology is actually more advanced than is shown on Star Trek”<br />
Based on what?<br />
” except for the gizmos granted: Warp drive, antigravity, transporter and some medical gadgets.”<br />
Some gizmos? /Everything/ aboard a 23rd-century Starship is more advanced than anything we had in the 80s, and only the most recent advances in 21st-century technology are starting to eclipse some of the less important advances of 24th-Century technology.</i>]]</p>
<p>I can think of an exception &#8212; the medical technology.  If you remember the episode &#8220;Journey to Babel,&#8221; they needed a relative of Sarek&#8217;s to transfuse blood to the poor guy &#8212; apparently the 23rd century hadn&#8217;t come up with a blood substitute.  And I remember Doctor McCoy in another episode giving an atmospheric pressure reading from a tricorder in &#8220;millimeters of mercury.&#8221;  Any climatologist or meteorologist in the 23rd century should be using pascals, or at least millibars.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the fact that soldiers shoot at each other with guns &#8212; where are the robot soldiers?  How long will human soldiers survive as an institution once governments can field robots that can seek, aim, fire and take down thirty or so opponents every second?  The idea of Han Solo getting behind the battle droid in &#8220;The Empire Strikes Back&#8221; and shooting it while it&#8217;s distracted makes for nice special effects, but it isn&#8217;t terribly realistic.  (Yes, I know we&#8217;re discussing Star Trek and not Star Wars.  Just making a point about robot soldiers.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64343</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64343</guid>
		<description>--- Avi said: &lt;i&gt;The collection of intersteller deuterium is to provide...&lt;/i&gt;

Hmm. Someone got themselves a &quot;Build Your Own Treknobabble&quot; kit for Christmas. :-)

Personally, I think the ship collect the subether hoopa juju and routes it through a pentagonal transfusion crystal to create an intense physical/metaphysical reaction that warps the quantum modality of the intersecting timepsaces surrounding the starship&#039;s imprint on the adjacent reality dimensions.

Or they could just paint the hull with Cavorite.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavorite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212; Avi said: <i>The collection of intersteller deuterium is to provide&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Hmm. Someone got themselves a &#8220;Build Your Own Treknobabble&#8221; kit for Christmas. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Personally, I think the ship collect the subether hoopa juju and routes it through a pentagonal transfusion crystal to create an intense physical/metaphysical reaction that warps the quantum modality of the intersecting timepsaces surrounding the starship&#8217;s imprint on the adjacent reality dimensions.</p>
<p>Or they could just paint the hull with Cavorite.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavorite" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavorite</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64342</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64342</guid>
		<description>Re: Cloverfield, until Phil posts it in its own entry: Marcus Theatres is refusing to show it (at least in parts of Wisconsin), due to a disagreement of some kind between the distributor &amp; Marcus. Darn it.

Re: the Enterprise name going the wrong direction. Good catch! Ties in with why I said it looked more like the TMP saucer than the TOS saucer. Even the concave curve of the suacer in the pic above is TMP-styled... it was a convex curve leading up to the bridge dome in TOS. (This becomes obvious to anyone who&#039;s built models of both versions, and should have been obvious to the new movie&#039;s producers. Unless, as I suggested, this is the E getting uprated just prior to TMP.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Cloverfield, until Phil posts it in its own entry: Marcus Theatres is refusing to show it (at least in parts of Wisconsin), due to a disagreement of some kind between the distributor &amp; Marcus. Darn it.</p>
<p>Re: the Enterprise name going the wrong direction. Good catch! Ties in with why I said it looked more like the TMP saucer than the TOS saucer. Even the concave curve of the suacer in the pic above is TMP-styled&#8230; it was a convex curve leading up to the bridge dome in TOS. (This becomes obvious to anyone who&#8217;s built models of both versions, and should have been obvious to the new movie&#8217;s producers. Unless, as I suggested, this is the E getting uprated just prior to TMP.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Bruchmann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64341</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Bruchmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64341</guid>
		<description>I second Avi&#039;s explanation as to how warp drive works.  The warp field is measured in &#039;cochrans&#039;, or millicochrans.  A field of 1 cochran will move a ship at warp 1.  And yes, they are &#039;scoops&#039;, not scopes, 1 typo... lol.
Impulse drive is like standard Newtonian physics, by comparison, although it&#039;s WAY more efficient than our rockets, of course.  Internally Metered Pulse drive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Avi&#8217;s explanation as to how warp drive works.  The warp field is measured in &#8216;cochrans&#8217;, or millicochrans.  A field of 1 cochran will move a ship at warp 1.  And yes, they are &#8216;scoops&#8217;, not scopes, 1 typo&#8230; lol.<br />
Impulse drive is like standard Newtonian physics, by comparison, although it&#8217;s WAY more efficient than our rockets, of course.  Internally Metered Pulse drive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Chapman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-2/#comment-64340</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64340</guid>
		<description>The collection of intersteller deuterium is to provide the matter part of the matter/antimatter reaction. The engine core combines a stream of deuterium with a stream of antideuterium. A dilithium crystal regulates the reaction (though no one has ever explained why it wasn&#039;t vapourised by the reaction). The resultant plasma is shunted via magneticly constricted tubes out through the warp pylons to the engine nacelles. The individual warp coils in the nacelles use the warp plasma to create a &#039;subspace&#039; field around the ship. By manipulating the cycle of warp field creation from one coil to the next, you can shape the field and propel the ship. Think of a catepillar-type system where a piece of subspace is grabbed at the front of the nacelle and released at the rear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The collection of intersteller deuterium is to provide the matter part of the matter/antimatter reaction. The engine core combines a stream of deuterium with a stream of antideuterium. A dilithium crystal regulates the reaction (though no one has ever explained why it wasn&#8217;t vapourised by the reaction). The resultant plasma is shunted via magneticly constricted tubes out through the warp pylons to the engine nacelles. The individual warp coils in the nacelles use the warp plasma to create a &#8216;subspace&#8217; field around the ship. By manipulating the cycle of warp field creation from one coil to the next, you can shape the field and propel the ship. Think of a catepillar-type system where a piece of subspace is grabbed at the front of the nacelle and released at the rear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64339</guid>
		<description>Wow, lots of good comments. I shouldn&#039;t have stayed away from this one so long.

Lars Bruchmann says: &quot;TOS did have a spinning effect going on. Looking at the rest of the nacelle it appears to be round, whereas the TMP nacelles were not round, but rectangular along the entire length.&quot;

When I saw &quot;TMP&quot; there, I immediately thought &quot;Turbo Molecular Pump&quot; which is what you&#039;d need to compress interstellar hydrogen to any sort of usable pressure. They&#039;re not turbines, like in jet engines, but gigantic turbo pumps!

-------------------------------

Radwaste says: &quot;I hope somebody who has been on an actual warship has something to do with combat scenes, dialog, and the way the bridge crew operates.&quot;

As corny as &quot;Forbidden Planet&quot; seems today, I&#039;m convinced that the reason so many consider it as seriously great SF is the interaction of the crew. It&#039;s hard to see Leslie Nielson without thinking &quot;Frank Drebin&quot; but the crew on the C57-D did have the look and feel of a submarine crew. I got into this in some detail in &quot;The Saucer Fleet&quot; (coming soon!)

-------------------------------

aiabx says: &quot;I seem to recall the the Enterprise was built at the Planitia shipyards on Mars. Or did I hallucinate that after too many cheetos?&quot;

The Enterprise &quot;E&quot; (TNG) was built around Mars. The original Big E (&quot;no bloody &#039;B&#039;, &#039;C&#039;, &#039;D&#039; or &#039;E&#039;&quot;) was built in the San Francisco Navy Yards. How they got it into space is not explained.

-------------------------------

Will. M says: &quot;I just spent the last eight minutes searching for a pix of Susan Oliver. I finally found ONE on the Internet Movie Database: it is a still from a Star Trek episode called People Are Alike All Over. &quot;

That&#039;s actually a Twilight Zone episode. Look up the original pilot &quot;The Menagerie&quot; or it&#039;s production incarnation, &quot;The Cage.&quot; She was Vena, the survivor of an earlier spaceship crash used as bait to get a breeding pair of humans.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, lots of good comments. I shouldn&#8217;t have stayed away from this one so long.</p>
<p>Lars Bruchmann says: &#8220;TOS did have a spinning effect going on. Looking at the rest of the nacelle it appears to be round, whereas the TMP nacelles were not round, but rectangular along the entire length.&#8221;</p>
<p>When I saw &#8220;TMP&#8221; there, I immediately thought &#8220;Turbo Molecular Pump&#8221; which is what you&#8217;d need to compress interstellar hydrogen to any sort of usable pressure. They&#8217;re not turbines, like in jet engines, but gigantic turbo pumps!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Radwaste says: &#8220;I hope somebody who has been on an actual warship has something to do with combat scenes, dialog, and the way the bridge crew operates.&#8221;</p>
<p>As corny as &#8220;Forbidden Planet&#8221; seems today, I&#8217;m convinced that the reason so many consider it as seriously great SF is the interaction of the crew. It&#8217;s hard to see Leslie Nielson without thinking &#8220;Frank Drebin&#8221; but the crew on the C57-D did have the look and feel of a submarine crew. I got into this in some detail in &#8220;The Saucer Fleet&#8221; (coming soon!)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>aiabx says: &#8220;I seem to recall the the Enterprise was built at the Planitia shipyards on Mars. Or did I hallucinate that after too many cheetos?&#8221;</p>
<p>The Enterprise &#8220;E&#8221; (TNG) was built around Mars. The original Big E (&#8220;no bloody &#8216;B&#8217;, &#8216;C&#8217;, &#8216;D&#8217; or &#8216;E&#8217;&#8221;) was built in the San Francisco Navy Yards. How they got it into space is not explained.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Will. M says: &#8220;I just spent the last eight minutes searching for a pix of Susan Oliver. I finally found ONE on the Internet Movie Database: it is a still from a Star Trek episode called People Are Alike All Over. &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s actually a Twilight Zone episode. Look up the original pilot &#8220;The Menagerie&#8221; or it&#8217;s production incarnation, &#8220;The Cage.&#8221; She was Vena, the survivor of an earlier spaceship crash used as bait to get a breeding pair of humans.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Marking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64338</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Marking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64338</guid>
		<description>This is the first I&#039;ve heard that the starships of Star Trek sucked in interstellar matter into the front of the two horizontal engine pylons.  So this is supposed to be a Bussard ramjet type of propulsion?  My previous understanding is that the engine pylons warp space ahead of the ship so that 2,400,000 kilometers get squeezed down to 1 kilometer.  Presumably the ship is propelled forward by its normal impulse engines at say 1 kilometer per second which actually becomes 2,400,000 kilometers per second = 8 times the speed of light = warp factor 2.

The role of antimatter and dilithium crystals in this method of propulsion is somewhat vague but the overall scheme was my impression on how the whole thing worked.  Did anyone else have the same understanding of the propulsion scheme on Star Trek?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first I&#8217;ve heard that the starships of Star Trek sucked in interstellar matter into the front of the two horizontal engine pylons.  So this is supposed to be a Bussard ramjet type of propulsion?  My previous understanding is that the engine pylons warp space ahead of the ship so that 2,400,000 kilometers get squeezed down to 1 kilometer.  Presumably the ship is propelled forward by its normal impulse engines at say 1 kilometer per second which actually becomes 2,400,000 kilometers per second = 8 times the speed of light = warp factor 2.</p>
<p>The role of antimatter and dilithium crystals in this method of propulsion is somewhat vague but the overall scheme was my impression on how the whole thing worked.  Did anyone else have the same understanding of the propulsion scheme on Star Trek?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tacticus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64337</link>
		<dc:creator>Tacticus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64337</guid>
		<description>imo paramount should just hand the entire setup to Ronald Moore to redo just like the new bsg stuff :)

let us have characters that are actually human(even if they are not) and not just cardboard cutouts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imo paramount should just hand the entire setup to Ronald Moore to redo just like the new bsg stuff <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>let us have characters that are actually human(even if they are not) and not just cardboard cutouts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will. M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64323</link>
		<dc:creator>Will. M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64323</guid>
		<description>I just spent the last eight minutes searching for a pix of  Susan Oliver; none of the Wikipedia or other on-line bios have a single image of her.  I finally found ONE on the Internet Movie Database: it is a still from a Star Trek episode called People Are Alike All Over.  She is in the background with a very young Roddy McDowell camera front.  She may have been a hottie, but it is hard to tell from this image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spent the last eight minutes searching for a pix of  Susan Oliver; none of the Wikipedia or other on-line bios have a single image of her.  I finally found ONE on the Internet Movie Database: it is a still from a Star Trek episode called People Are Alike All Over.  She is in the background with a very young Roddy McDowell camera front.  She may have been a hottie, but it is hard to tell from this image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet_Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64324</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet_Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64324</guid>
		<description>Meh...

Someone needs to do a Lensman series. Just about all space opera today is derived from those classics. The inertialess Bergenholm drive is still one of the best FTL doohickeys.

A single Third Stage Lensman could wake up,  pwn the entire Starfleet by 11 in the morning, and then go out and bring down the Borg during his lunch hour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lensman

But, oh, there&#039;s telepathy involved so I guess we&#039;re not supposed to like it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh&#8230;</p>
<p>Someone needs to do a Lensman series. Just about all space opera today is derived from those classics. The inertialess Bergenholm drive is still one of the best FTL doohickeys.</p>
<p>A single Third Stage Lensman could wake up,  pwn the entire Starfleet by 11 in the morning, and then go out and bring down the Borg during his lunch hour.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lensman" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lensman</a></p>
<p>But, oh, there&#8217;s telepathy involved so I guess we&#8217;re not supposed to like it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64333</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64333</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I like how they did the paint job on the hull before the ship was even fully constructed. Some janitors gonna flip when they get to deck 10 and find all that black paint that was supposed to be an “E” splattered all over the walls… &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Anyone who have spent just a few days on a construction site, will know that the ceiling panels will go in before plumbers, electricians, everyone and his dog have finished their work above them. Why would the future be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I like how they did the paint job on the hull before the ship was even fully constructed. Some janitors gonna flip when they get to deck 10 and find all that black paint that was supposed to be an “E” splattered all over the walls… </p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone who have spent just a few days on a construction site, will know that the ceiling panels will go in before plumbers, electricians, everyone and his dog have finished their work above them. Why would the future be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aiabx</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64332</link>
		<dc:creator>aiabx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64332</guid>
		<description>Ummm... I&#039;m afraid I may be overgeeking here, but I seem to recall the the Enterprise was built at the Planitia shipyards on Mars. Or did I hallucinate that  after too many cheetos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230; I&#8217;m afraid I may be overgeeking here, but I seem to recall the the Enterprise was built at the Planitia shipyards on Mars. Or did I hallucinate that  after too many cheetos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radwaste</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64336</link>
		<dc:creator>Radwaste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64336</guid>
		<description>Look at the ladder on the scaffold.

Well, I do hope somebody with a red shirt survives this time. I also hope somebody who has been on an actual warship has something to do with combat scenes, dialog, and the way the bridge crew operates. Nearly everyone gets it wrong because of the mistaken idea that the audience coming to see this flick won&#039;t know what&#039;s right.

For instance, the way an American submarine engages a target is amazing. It takes literally seconds to get to battle stations, because the whole boat is built and maintained to get there in seconds. There&#039;s a lot of suspense and cold calculating on the approach to the firing point. The skipper makes the call, then there&#039;s the flip of a switch, a pop-pssht-zhoom of the torpedo leaving, and then you continue calculations for any other targets and the one you fired on; you have a few minutes to figure out if what you did was right, as the Weapons Officer&#039;s guy steers the fish as long as he can. In the meantime, nobody gets to relax because the problem continues, uninterrupted by ads for Claritin, etc. For some reason, this has never been on-screen.
Something like it would be mandatory for the conduct of operations in space. Anybody in armor will tell you that the warhead usually wins if it reaches you, and so the object of battle is to shoot first and straight. That requires serious teamwork.

Modern technology is actually more advanced than is shown on Star Trek except for the gizmos granted: Warp drive, antigravity, transporter and some medical gadgets. Bad Astronomers of their day would easily find enemy vessels several AU away and engage them. They would also recognize that big ships like Enterprise don&#039;t have to close on a planet to wipe it out - they only have to nudge a bunch of big rocks in the right direction for a &quot;time-on-target&quot; solution.

There are lots of neat ideas still to be explored in the series, neglected in boy-girl, boy-boy, girl-girl fighting found in any bar on Earth. Yes, Susan Oliver was h-a-w-t on-screen and off, but space is the Final Frontier, man, let&#039;s show it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the ladder on the scaffold.</p>
<p>Well, I do hope somebody with a red shirt survives this time. I also hope somebody who has been on an actual warship has something to do with combat scenes, dialog, and the way the bridge crew operates. Nearly everyone gets it wrong because of the mistaken idea that the audience coming to see this flick won&#8217;t know what&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>For instance, the way an American submarine engages a target is amazing. It takes literally seconds to get to battle stations, because the whole boat is built and maintained to get there in seconds. There&#8217;s a lot of suspense and cold calculating on the approach to the firing point. The skipper makes the call, then there&#8217;s the flip of a switch, a pop-pssht-zhoom of the torpedo leaving, and then you continue calculations for any other targets and the one you fired on; you have a few minutes to figure out if what you did was right, as the Weapons Officer&#8217;s guy steers the fish as long as he can. In the meantime, nobody gets to relax because the problem continues, uninterrupted by ads for Claritin, etc. For some reason, this has never been on-screen.<br />
Something like it would be mandatory for the conduct of operations in space. Anybody in armor will tell you that the warhead usually wins if it reaches you, and so the object of battle is to shoot first and straight. That requires serious teamwork.</p>
<p>Modern technology is actually more advanced than is shown on Star Trek except for the gizmos granted: Warp drive, antigravity, transporter and some medical gadgets. Bad Astronomers of their day would easily find enemy vessels several AU away and engage them. They would also recognize that big ships like Enterprise don&#8217;t have to close on a planet to wipe it out &#8211; they only have to nudge a bunch of big rocks in the right direction for a &#8220;time-on-target&#8221; solution.</p>
<p>There are lots of neat ideas still to be explored in the series, neglected in boy-girl, boy-boy, girl-girl fighting found in any bar on Earth. Yes, Susan Oliver was h-a-w-t on-screen and off, but space is the Final Frontier, man, let&#8217;s show it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64335</guid>
		<description>Librarybuy:
&gt; There is a logical reason for those turbines, but the explanation
&gt; requires a lot of math, and I don’t have time..(heh)

Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Librarybuy:<br />
&gt; There is a logical reason for those turbines, but the explanation<br />
&gt; requires a lot of math, and I don’t have time..(heh)</p>
<p>Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niZmO_Man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64334</link>
		<dc:creator>niZmO_Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64334</guid>
		<description>J. J. Abrams at it again, chucks this beauty of a teaser in front of Cloverfield, damn stirrer. I was sitting with friends and we thought it was an Iron Man trailer. Abrams knows how to entertain. I&#039;m not a trekkie but this movie looks cool and will watch it

No Cloverfield review BA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. J. Abrams at it again, chucks this beauty of a teaser in front of Cloverfield, damn stirrer. I was sitting with friends and we thought it was an Iron Man trailer. Abrams knows how to entertain. I&#8217;m not a trekkie but this movie looks cool and will watch it</p>
<p>No Cloverfield review BA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peachy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64331</link>
		<dc:creator>peachy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64331</guid>
		<description>Hey!  The name curves the wrong way!
If I remember correctly, in the past, all the ships with saucers had the name of the ship follow the arc of the panels it was written on.  This one curves the other way.
And it&#039;s not just a bow in the saucer: The print crosses what should be concentric rings of panels.
Now it&#039;s ruined for me. (&quot;Worst CGI, EVER!&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  The name curves the wrong way!<br />
If I remember correctly, in the past, all the ships with saucers had the name of the ship follow the arc of the panels it was written on.  This one curves the other way.<br />
And it&#8217;s not just a bow in the saucer: The print crosses what should be concentric rings of panels.<br />
Now it&#8217;s ruined for me. (&#8220;Worst CGI, EVER!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2.71828ric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64330</link>
		<dc:creator>2.71828ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64330</guid>
		<description>I like how they did the paint job on the hull before the ship was even fully constructed.  Some janitors gonna flip when they get to deck 10 and find all that black paint that was supposed to be an &quot;E&quot; splattered all over the walls...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how they did the paint job on the hull before the ship was even fully constructed.  Some janitors gonna flip when they get to deck 10 and find all that black paint that was supposed to be an &#8220;E&#8221; splattered all over the walls&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfaniner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-64329</link>
		<dc:creator>alfaniner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/17/that-sense-of-enterprise/#comment-64329</guid>
		<description>No, I had not seen this before, and from this one picture I have much higher hopes for the film now.  It reminds me of a pic I saw a few years ago of a starship being constructed in the Newport News construction yard.  I didn&#039;t save it at the time and had been looking for a decent hi-res version of it ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I had not seen this before, and from this one picture I have much higher hopes for the film now.  It reminds me of a pic I saw a few years ago of a starship being constructed in the Newport News construction yard.  I didn&#8217;t save it at the time and had been looking for a decent hi-res version of it ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 12:53:54 -->
