<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trek teaser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:58:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darth Robo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64522</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Robo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64522</guid>
		<description>Sorry, um, what was your name again?

:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, um, what was your name again?</p>
<p>:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boba Fett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64521</link>
		<dc:creator>Boba Fett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64521</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. Ever. I am not one of you pathetic loser, queer, geek, nerds who gives a rat&#039;s ass about anything related to Star trek, which only has a mediocre cult following and is quickly losing that, too. I have always loved astronomy, but I get laid. Poor you. All of you. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. Ever. I am not one of you pathetic loser, queer, geek, nerds who gives a rat&#8217;s ass about anything related to Star trek, which only has a mediocre cult following and is quickly losing that, too. I have always loved astronomy, but I get laid. Poor you. All of you. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64518</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64518</guid>
		<description>720 and 1080p HD trailers are available on the official Paramount website, now.

http://www.paramount.com/startrek/

December is too far away. Will make a nice Birthday/Christmas gift, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>720 and 1080p HD trailers are available on the official Paramount website, now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/" rel="nofollow">http://www.paramount.com/startrek/</a></p>
<p>December is too far away. Will make a nice Birthday/Christmas gift, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64520</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64520</guid>
		<description>So funny that fans could possibly be worried about some kind of stable &quot;canon&quot; being maintained across 40 or so years of Star Trek shows, movies and spinoff TV shows.

The original series didn&#039;t even have a &quot;canon&quot; since the people at NBC probably reasoned that the individual episodes of this late night campy scifi TV series would never be seen again comparatively, never mind go into endless syndicated repeats.

For what it&#039;s worth, as a fan I don&#039;t consider anything beyond the fourth Trek movie to be &quot;canon&quot;, especially Next Gen, DS9, Voyager and Enterprise. Sure I watched many episodes of those mostly-awful series, but they haven&#039;t aged well and sure as heck don&#039;t hold a candle to the goofy fun of the original series that inspired them. On the other hand, I don&#039;t get my panties in a bunch that Paramount slapped the name &quot;Star Trek&quot; on those awful series, any more than I&#039;m upset about all the crappy licensed Trek &quot;novels&quot; cramming science fiction bookshelves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So funny that fans could possibly be worried about some kind of stable &#8220;canon&#8221; being maintained across 40 or so years of Star Trek shows, movies and spinoff TV shows.</p>
<p>The original series didn&#8217;t even have a &#8220;canon&#8221; since the people at NBC probably reasoned that the individual episodes of this late night campy scifi TV series would never be seen again comparatively, never mind go into endless syndicated repeats.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, as a fan I don&#8217;t consider anything beyond the fourth Trek movie to be &#8220;canon&#8221;, especially Next Gen, DS9, Voyager and Enterprise. Sure I watched many episodes of those mostly-awful series, but they haven&#8217;t aged well and sure as heck don&#8217;t hold a candle to the goofy fun of the original series that inspired them. On the other hand, I don&#8217;t get my panties in a bunch that Paramount slapped the name &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; on those awful series, any more than I&#8217;m upset about all the crappy licensed Trek &#8220;novels&#8221; cramming science fiction bookshelves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64519</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64519</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read through all the posts yet, but how about this:  They make any old movie they want to, and then at the end, after the credits, the screen lights up, and the camera pans around to reveal a movie theater with Shatner, Nimoy, and whoever else is still around (and a bunch of red shirts), sitting in the front row.  As they get up and file out, one of them says &quot;Was there *anything* in that movie that was historically accurate?&quot;  Another of the group replies &quot;No, but it was fun.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read through all the posts yet, but how about this:  They make any old movie they want to, and then at the end, after the credits, the screen lights up, and the camera pans around to reveal a movie theater with Shatner, Nimoy, and whoever else is still around (and a bunch of red shirts), sitting in the front row.  As they get up and file out, one of them says &#8220;Was there *anything* in that movie that was historically accurate?&#8221;  Another of the group replies &#8220;No, but it was fun.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64517</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64517</guid>
		<description>For the record, I loved the teaser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I loved the teaser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/comment-page-1/#comment-64516</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/01/18/trek-teaser/#comment-64516</guid>
		<description>All the people complaining absolutely astound me.

YOU. KNOW. NOTHING. You don&#039;t know ANYTHING concrete about what this movie is going to be about. All you know is the cast, the characters, the film crew, and some vague idea of &quot;it&#039;s set in multiple time periods and has Romulans in it&quot;. And judging by Mr &quot;OMGZtheEnterpriseisbeingbuiltintheteaserthatmeanstheyrethrowingoutTEHCANNON!!!11&quot; up the top of the comments, it looks like a lot of you don&#039;t even know THAT. (Captain Pike will be in the movie, played by Bruce Greenwood.)

The way that absolutely ANY new development will invariably set off a couple of dozen people wailing &quot;OH NOES, the sky is falling!!!&quot; absolutely sickens me. No wonder Star Trek has such a bad reputation. With fans like these, who needs antis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the people complaining absolutely astound me.</p>
<p>YOU. KNOW. NOTHING. You don&#8217;t know ANYTHING concrete about what this movie is going to be about. All you know is the cast, the characters, the film crew, and some vague idea of &#8220;it&#8217;s set in multiple time periods and has Romulans in it&#8221;. And judging by Mr &#8220;OMGZtheEnterpriseisbeingbuiltintheteaserthatmeanstheyrethrowingoutTEHCANNON!!!11&#8243; up the top of the comments, it looks like a lot of you don&#8217;t even know THAT. (Captain Pike will be in the movie, played by Bruce Greenwood.)</p>
<p>The way that absolutely ANY new development will invariably set off a couple of dozen people wailing &#8220;OH NOES, the sky is falling!!!&#8221; absolutely sickens me. No wonder Star Trek has such a bad reputation. With fans like these, who needs antis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
