DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Cloverfield Review
io9: firehose o’ scifi »

Why we love xkcd

Like I need more reason to love xkcd. He goes and draws this comic:

If you don’t read xkcd or have it in your feedreader, then you are not a true Cool Web Person.

Sorry. That’s just an objective fact.

Share

January 20th, 2008 11:08 PM by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Humor, Skepticism | 34 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

34 Responses to “Why we love xkcd”

  1. 1.   Pete Says:
    January 20th, 2008 at 11:14 pm

    “Sorry. That’s just an objective fact.”

    But can it be confirmed by experiment?

  2. 2.   Cameron Says:
    January 20th, 2008 at 11:25 pm

    Heh…It’s on my RSS list, right next to BA Blog. I opened this one and thought of you. Then I clicked on yours, and lo and behold, here this is.

  3. 3.   bjswift Says:
    January 20th, 2008 at 11:29 pm

    I was wondering how long it would be until you posted about this comic! Turns out, not long at all.. :)

  4. 4.   PerryG Says:
    January 20th, 2008 at 11:48 pm

    I love how he doesn’t even bother putting a scale on the y-axis!

  5. 5.   tigerhawkvok Says:
    January 20th, 2008 at 11:53 pm

    You know that if you hover over any of his comics, they all have alt-text, yes? Most are quite funny and really add to the joke. This one:

    “But THIS guy, he might be for real!”

  6. 6.   Quiet_Desperation Says:
    January 20th, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    then you are not a true Cool Web Person.

    So Cool Web people read crudely drawn web comics of dubious humor?

    Huh.

    I was on the Internets before there was a web, and when some folks still called it ARPANET from time to time. I think I need no web comic requirement.

  7. 7.   Ghede Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 1:20 am

    So Cool Web people read crudely drawn web comics of dubious humor?

    Damn straight we do.

  8. 8.   andy Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 2:43 am

    It works better when you can see the comic title (and the mouseover text…)

  9. 9.   lizzyshoe Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 3:21 am

    I was just about to send this to you too. Hooray for xkcd, being the most eloquent of comic-blogs.

  10. 10.   Cal Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 4:24 am

    “I was on the Internets before there was a web, and when some folks still called it ARPANET from time to time. I think I need no web comic requirement.”

    That doesn’t make you a Cool Web Person, just an OLD Web Person.

  11. 11.   Lugosi Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 4:54 am

    I wasn’t before, but NOW I’m a true Cool Web Person!!!

  12. 12.   Doug Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 5:23 am

    Having a Cectic RSS feed is also important for one’s coolness factor.
    The latest one reminds me of BA movie reviews: http://cectic.com/101.html

  13. 13.   Mike Torr Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 5:51 am

    I have Cectic AND xkcd. I must be supercool.

    Does the fact that I have every xkcd cartoon ever on my hard disk make me “hypercool”? :)

    Has anyone sent this to Randi yet?

  14. 14.   buczas Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 6:00 am

    1. Visited xkcd.com
    2. Laughed
    3. Visited badastronomy.com
    4. Saw the same thing
    5. Felt creepy

    Conclusion: One Brain rules us all!

  15. 15.   No One of Consequence Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 6:50 am

    As if by supernatural powers, when I read the comic at XKCD today, I was sure that I would be seeing it elsewhere — and I’m 2 for 2 on the sites I’ve checked since then.

  16. 16.   Michelle Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 7:08 am

    I’m not a big fan of XKCD. I RARELY find it funny. Overall I think it’s bland.

  17. 17.   Pieter Kok Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 7:14 am

    xkcd is rarely funny, and this one is no exception.

  18. 18.   Rav Winston Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 7:16 am

    This is excellent– I am now an officially cool person, as pronounced by the BadAstronomer himself!

  19. 19.   The Powe of XKCD « Archaeoporn Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 8:11 am

    [...] the early morning hours of January 21, 2008, it has found its way onto Skepchick, Pharyngula, and Bad Astronomy.  Three of the biggest skeptics out there, that might actually be a supernatural [...]

  20. 20.   thadd Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 8:15 am

    Tigerhawkvok, now I have to go back and reread every XKCD ever.

    (This comment will of course be held for moderation)

  21. 21.   Rudism Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 8:36 am

    All he says is that if you don’t read xkcd, then you’re NOT cool. This does not imply that reading xkcd makes you cool.

    (!A -> !B) != (A -> B)

  22. 22.   Sean O'Hara Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 10:03 am

    If I have to read that to make me cool, I’ll be over with he dorks.

  23. 23.   Johnny Vector Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 11:21 am

    BTW, your coolness is reduced by a factor of pi if you say “alt text” when you mean “title text”. Just because Mozilla got it wrong back in the day doesn’t mean you have to now.

    Kids today.

    Sheesh.

  24. 24.   Mike Marsh Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    The latest Bunny is also right up your alley: http://bunny.frozenreality.co.uk/index.php?id=1083

  25. 25.   Mena Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    How about Indexed, particularly this one.

  26. 26.   Impium Orexis Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 1:18 pm

    Last night is the first time I ever looked at that site. I read every one of them. It took me a while. Some were funny, some weren’t. One or two even went over my head. It was worth the time it took.

  27. 27.   Martin Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    As a person over 30, I’m by definition incapable of being either “cool” or “in” – or so it is said by teenagers today. So I don’t exactly care if my coolness factor is further reduced and stick calling the text in question an “alt text”. Believe it or not, back in the computer stone ages there were web browsers incapable of displaying images – such as lynx. These browsers displayed the text – “alt text” – as an alternative to the elusive images…

  28. 28.   Johnny Vector Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Martin, take a look at the page source. You will wee that the text displayed is not in fact “alt text”, it is “title text”. Text specified by the ALT tag is to be displayed instead of the image. The text in the TITLE tag is available for display in addition to the image. Some browsers put TITLE text in the status bar, but most put it in a tooltip.

    Mozilla used to put ALT text in a tooltip for several versions, but that was wrong, and really farked up those of us who actually tried to write useful ALT tags. Y’know, for people browsing with Lynx, and/or text-to-speech readers, or with image loading turned off. Fortunately that’s been fixed, by the death of Mozilla if nothing else.

    My mother once accused me of pedanticness. I explained that the word was “pedantry”.

  29. 29.   crucified in space Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    You might wonder what it would actually take to have supernatural powers be confirmed by experiment. This might give you an idea of how unbiased the scientific method can be:
    http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/propaganda/

  30. 30.   XKCD hits the sweet spot « Dusty Loft Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    [...] Bad Astronomer Phil Plait says it’s why we love XKCD, Rebecca at Skepchick posted it and PZ Myers at Pharyngula would wear it on a [...]

  31. 31.   Egaeus Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 10:59 pm

    Having spent hours of sleeping time reading the entire archives of XKCD, I can authoritatively state that it’s freaking hilarious. Either that, or I’ve gone completely insane to the point that while sitting in front of my computer by myself, I am able to laugh so hard at something unfunny that I begin to tear up. The electromagnetic spectrum was particularly funny. He’s just like me, but much funnier.

  32. 32.   gyokusai Says:
    January 22nd, 2008 at 6:42 am

    LOL, when I first encountered XKCD, I too browsed the whole archive until the sun came up, and hammered my friends with emails linking to XKCD cartoons for weeks!

    It’s just gorgeous.

    ^_^J.

  33. 33.   Eric Says:
    January 22nd, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    I too can join the ranks of those who discovered xkcd, browsed the entire site in one sitting, and then sent link after link to my (more and more annoyed) friends.

    (I still move the hyphen when I hear people say it.)

  34. 34.   “The Next Uri Geller” – 3rd show :: cimddwc Says:
    January 22nd, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    [...] (via BA) [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us