Why we love xkcd

submit to reddit

Like I need more reason to love xkcd. He goes and draws this comic:

If you don’t read xkcd or have it in your feedreader, then you are not a true Cool Web Person.

Sorry. That’s just an objective fact.

January 20th, 2008 11:08 PM by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Humor, Skepticism | 34 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

34 Responses to “Why we love xkcd”

  1. 1.   Pete Says:

    “Sorry. That’s just an objective fact.”

    But can it be confirmed by experiment?

  2. 2.   Cameron Says:

    Heh…It’s on my RSS list, right next to BA Blog. I opened this one and thought of you. Then I clicked on yours, and lo and behold, here this is.

  3. 3.   bjswift Says:

    I was wondering how long it would be until you posted about this comic! Turns out, not long at all.. :)

  4. 4.   PerryG Says:

    I love how he doesn’t even bother putting a scale on the y-axis!

  5. 5.   tigerhawkvok Says:

    You know that if you hover over any of his comics, they all have alt-text, yes? Most are quite funny and really add to the joke. This one:

    “But THIS guy, he might be for real!”

  6. 6.   Quiet_Desperation Says:

    then you are not a true Cool Web Person.

    So Cool Web people read crudely drawn web comics of dubious humor?

    Huh.

    I was on the Internets before there was a web, and when some folks still called it ARPANET from time to time. I think I need no web comic requirement.

  7. 7.   Ghede Says:

    So Cool Web people read crudely drawn web comics of dubious humor?

    Damn straight we do.

  8. 8.   andy Says:

    It works better when you can see the comic title (and the mouseover text…)

  9. 9.   lizzyshoe Says:

    I was just about to send this to you too. Hooray for xkcd, being the most eloquent of comic-blogs.

  10. 10.   Cal Says:

    “I was on the Internets before there was a web, and when some folks still called it ARPANET from time to time. I think I need no web comic requirement.”

    That doesn’t make you a Cool Web Person, just an OLD Web Person.

  11. 11.   Lugosi Says:

    I wasn’t before, but NOW I’m a true Cool Web Person!!!

  12. 12.   Doug Says:

    Having a Cectic RSS feed is also important for one’s coolness factor.
    The latest one reminds me of BA movie reviews: http://cectic.com/101.html

  13. 13.   Mike Torr Says:

    I have Cectic AND xkcd. I must be supercool.

    Does the fact that I have every xkcd cartoon ever on my hard disk make me “hypercool”? :)
    Has anyone sent this to Randi yet?

  14. 14.   buczas Says:

    1. Visited xkcd.com
    2. Laughed
    3. Visited badastronomy.com
    4. Saw the same thing
    5. Felt creepy

    Conclusion: One Brain rules us all!

  15. 15.   No One of Consequence Says:

    As if by supernatural powers, when I read the comic at XKCD today, I was sure that I would be seeing it elsewhere — and I’m 2 for 2 on the sites I’ve checked since then.

  16. 16.   Michelle Says:

    I’m not a big fan of XKCD. I RARELY find it funny. Overall I think it’s bland.

  17. 17.   Pieter Kok Says:

    xkcd is rarely funny, and this one is no exception.

  18. 18.   Rav Winston Says:

    This is excellent– I am now an officially cool person, as pronounced by the BadAstronomer himself!

  19. 19.   The Powe of XKCD « Archaeoporn Says:

    […] the early morning hours of January 21, 2008, it has found its way onto Skepchick, Pharyngula, and Bad Astronomy.  Three of the biggest skeptics out there, that might actually be a supernatural […]

  20. 20.   thadd Says:

    Tigerhawkvok, now I have to go back and reread every XKCD ever.

    (This comment will of course be held for moderation)

  21. 21.   Rudism Says:

    All he says is that if you don’t read xkcd, then you’re NOT cool. This does not imply that reading xkcd makes you cool.

    (!A -> !B) != (A -> B)

  22. 22.   Sean O'Hara Says:

    If I have to read that to make me cool, I’ll be over with he dorks.

  23. 23.   Johnny Vector Says:

    BTW, your coolness is reduced by a factor of pi if you say “alt text” when you mean “title text”. Just because Mozilla got it wrong back in the day doesn’t mean you have to now.

    Kids today.

    Sheesh.

  24. 24.   Mike Marsh Says:

    The latest Bunny is also right up your alley: http://bunny.frozenreality.co.uk/index.php?id=1083

  25. 25.   Mena Says:

    How about Indexed, particularly this one.

  26. 26.   Impium Orexis Says:

    Last night is the first time I ever looked at that site. I read every one of them. It took me a while. Some were funny, some weren’t. One or two even went over my head. It was worth the time it took.

  27. 27.   Martin Says:

    As a person over 30, I’m by definition incapable of being either “cool” or “in” - or so it is said by teenagers today. So I don’t exactly care if my coolness factor is further reduced and stick calling the text in question an “alt text”. Believe it or not, back in the computer stone ages there were web browsers incapable of displaying images - such as lynx. These browsers displayed the text - “alt text” - as an alternative to the elusive images…

  28. 28.   Johnny Vector Says:

    Martin, take a look at the page source. You will wee that the text displayed is not in fact “alt text”, it is “title text”. Text specified by the ALT tag is to be displayed instead of the image. The text in the TITLE tag is available for display in addition to the image. Some browsers put TITLE text in the status bar, but most put it in a tooltip.

    Mozilla used to put ALT text in a tooltip for several versions, but that was wrong, and really farked up those of us who actually tried to write useful ALT tags. Y’know, for people browsing with Lynx, and/or text-to-speech readers, or with image loading turned off. Fortunately that’s been fixed, by the death of Mozilla if nothing else.

    My mother once accused me of pedanticness. I explained that the word was “pedantry”.

  29. 29.   crucified in space Says:

    You might wonder what it would actually take to have supernatural powers be confirmed by experiment. This might give you an idea of how unbiased the scientific method can be:
    http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/propaganda/

  30. 30.   XKCD hits the sweet spot « Dusty Loft Says:

    […] Bad Astronomer Phil Plait says it’s why we love XKCD, Rebecca at Skepchick posted it and PZ Myers at Pharyngula would wear it on a […]

  31. 31.   Egaeus Says:

    Having spent hours of sleeping time reading the entire archives of XKCD, I can authoritatively state that it’s freaking hilarious. Either that, or I’ve gone completely insane to the point that while sitting in front of my computer by myself, I am able to laugh so hard at something unfunny that I begin to tear up. The electromagnetic spectrum was particularly funny. He’s just like me, but much funnier.

  32. 32.   gyokusai Says:

    LOL, when I first encountered XKCD, I too browsed the whole archive until the sun came up, and hammered my friends with emails linking to XKCD cartoons for weeks!

    It’s just gorgeous.

    ^_^J.

  33. 33.   Eric Says:

    I too can join the ranks of those who discovered xkcd, browsed the entire site in one sitting, and then sent link after link to my (more and more annoyed) friends.

    (I still move the hyphen when I hear people say it.)

  34. 34.   “The Next Uri Geller” – 3rd show :: cimddwc Says:

    […] (via BA) […]

Leave a Reply