<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s pass over Mercury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Rockin' Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-2/#comment-68030</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Rockin' Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68030</guid>
		<description>You bunch of heathens! It looks like the Virgin Mary.
The God of Justice and Mercy is going to send you all to Hell for not seeing this right off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bunch of heathens! It looks like the Virgin Mary.<br />
The God of Justice and Mercy is going to send you all to Hell for not seeing this right off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UriShare - Mercury is copyrighted</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-2/#comment-68029</link>
		<dc:creator>UriShare - Mercury is copyrighted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68029</guid>
		<description>[...] Mercury is copyrightedThe bad astronomer has found that Mercury, turns out, is copyrighted. Bigfoot on mars planetary copyright, terrible state of planetary affairs.    Submitted: 3 days ago  Category: Science  Submitter: RssFeed   Website: www.badastronomy.com  Report this link: Click here to report   Comments: 0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mercury is copyrightedThe bad astronomer has found that Mercury, turns out, is copyrighted. Bigfoot on mars planetary copyright, terrible state of planetary affairs.    Submitted: 3 days ago  Category: Science  Submitter: RssFeed   Website: <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.badastronomy.com</a>  Report this link: Click here to report   Comments: 0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-2/#comment-68028</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68028</guid>
		<description>Argyl -- yes, a lot of the things held by some (not all!) neopagans to be ancient texts, rituals, beliefs, etc. are not actually ancient.  If you trace them they usually go back to Robert Graves, Gerald Gardner, Madame Blavatsky, or Eliphas Levi.

I heard somewhere (great source, that!) that there are people who think the Necronomicon was a real book.  Somebody apparently put a fake ad for a copy into a bibliographic journal and was swamped with offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argyl &#8212; yes, a lot of the things held by some (not all!) neopagans to be ancient texts, rituals, beliefs, etc. are not actually ancient.  If you trace them they usually go back to Robert Graves, Gerald Gardner, Madame Blavatsky, or Eliphas Levi.</p>
<p>I heard somewhere (great source, that!) that there are people who think the Necronomicon was a real book.  Somebody apparently put a fake ad for a copy into a bibliographic journal and was swamped with offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argyl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-2/#comment-68027</link>
		<dc:creator>Argyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68027</guid>
		<description>If there is no term like areology for Mercury, I&#039;d like to suggest hermology, in keeping with areology, geology, etc. That is, greek based words for the study of land formations. (Mars - Ares, Mercury - Hermes.)

I think hermetology and hermetiscism and such have already been taken long ago for alchemical pseudosciences, after Hermes Trismegistus, some sort of mythical Greek alchemist and &quot;god of secret wisdom&quot; like Imhotep in Ancient Egypt. I think though that both are based on Hermes (the god after which Mercury was named in Greek) and Thoth (the god of wisdom and scribes in ancient Egypt). Indeed the 42 Books of Thoth seem to be ones of the most sought after items by magick believers today.

For some reason the priests of ancient Egypt never preserved any of these purported books, and while 5000 year old writings of their religious beliefs have been unearthed,  there&#039;s no written evidence about these 42 books until the late 19th century when ancient Egypt became a fashionable thing to write about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is no term like areology for Mercury, I&#8217;d like to suggest hermology, in keeping with areology, geology, etc. That is, greek based words for the study of land formations. (Mars &#8211; Ares, Mercury &#8211; Hermes.)</p>
<p>I think hermetology and hermetiscism and such have already been taken long ago for alchemical pseudosciences, after Hermes Trismegistus, some sort of mythical Greek alchemist and &#8220;god of secret wisdom&#8221; like Imhotep in Ancient Egypt. I think though that both are based on Hermes (the god after which Mercury was named in Greek) and Thoth (the god of wisdom and scribes in ancient Egypt). Indeed the 42 Books of Thoth seem to be ones of the most sought after items by magick believers today.</p>
<p>For some reason the priests of ancient Egypt never preserved any of these purported books, and while 5000 year old writings of their religious beliefs have been unearthed,  there&#8217;s no written evidence about these 42 books until the late 19th century when ancient Egypt became a fashionable thing to write about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argyl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68026</link>
		<dc:creator>Argyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68026</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve thought that it must be such. But when viewing other &quot;illusions&quot;, like the cube drawn with lines it&#039;s easy to switch between seeing it either way. I&#039;m always disturbed that I need to flip a picture around to see what it actually represents... sort of makes me like laser and radar measurements more that photographs, since the data can be represented unambigously.

When I&#039;ve seen the photos with the light from the &quot;right&quot; direction, I can understand the craters, and in this case Mercury more, the illusion of pancakes is really annoying. Of course most images are published with north at top, at least I think that&#039;s the case? Also the illusion of the phone handset is less prominent when you see it with the topography right. It&#039;s a depression and a central peak that might have formed from a low angle impact.

I don&#039;t think the amount of double craters so far seen in pictures is a coincidence. Of course, I&#039;m just an amateur, what do I know about planetary geology. There&#039;s a term for martian geology, Areology. What&#039;s the term for Mercurean geology? Hermology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve thought that it must be such. But when viewing other &#8220;illusions&#8221;, like the cube drawn with lines it&#8217;s easy to switch between seeing it either way. I&#8217;m always disturbed that I need to flip a picture around to see what it actually represents&#8230; sort of makes me like laser and radar measurements more that photographs, since the data can be represented unambigously.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;ve seen the photos with the light from the &#8220;right&#8221; direction, I can understand the craters, and in this case Mercury more, the illusion of pancakes is really annoying. Of course most images are published with north at top, at least I think that&#8217;s the case? Also the illusion of the phone handset is less prominent when you see it with the topography right. It&#8217;s a depression and a central peak that might have formed from a low angle impact.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the amount of double craters so far seen in pictures is a coincidence. Of course, I&#8217;m just an amateur, what do I know about planetary geology. There&#8217;s a term for martian geology, Areology. What&#8217;s the term for Mercurean geology? Hermology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Killian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68025</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68025</guid>
		<description>Argyl: It&#039;s a psychological effect. We&#039;re used to seeing things lit from above, since that&#039;s where the sun is and where generally you have the room lights. So if you see an aerial photo of a crater, and the sun is off the top of the frame, you see it as a crater. Your brain interprets the shadow at top and the highlight at the bottom correctly.

But if the sun is off the bottom of the frame, your brain interprets the highlight at the top to be a bump, a reflection from the sun off the top of the frame, and the shadow at the bottom to be a shadow off of what your brain is now interpreting as a hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argyl: It&#8217;s a psychological effect. We&#8217;re used to seeing things lit from above, since that&#8217;s where the sun is and where generally you have the room lights. So if you see an aerial photo of a crater, and the sun is off the top of the frame, you see it as a crater. Your brain interprets the shadow at top and the highlight at the bottom correctly.</p>
<p>But if the sun is off the bottom of the frame, your brain interprets the highlight at the top to be a bump, a reflection from the sun off the top of the frame, and the shadow at the bottom to be a shadow off of what your brain is now interpreting as a hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argyl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68024</link>
		<dc:creator>Argyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68024</guid>
		<description>Why is it that every planetary image I see where the sun shines from the right or bottom, the craters look like pancakes sticking out? I always need to flip those images 180 degrees to to see the topography correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that every planetary image I see where the sun shines from the right or bottom, the craters look like pancakes sticking out? I always need to flip those images 180 degrees to to see the topography correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isnochys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kopiergeschützt und Gelacht</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68023</link>
		<dc:creator>Isnochys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kopiergeschützt und Gelacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68023</guid>
		<description>[...] hat folgende Bilder zur Diskussion gestellt. Den mit Kopierrechten versehenen Merkur:  Sowie einen uns an(aus?)lachenden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hat folgende Bilder zur Diskussion gestellt. Den mit Kopierrechten versehenen Merkur:  Sowie einen uns an(aus?)lachenden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Bray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68020</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68020</guid>
		<description>I think it might be &quot;Chairface Chippendale&quot; that villain from the Tick Comics and cartoon that wrote the first 3 letters of his name on the moon with a giant laser before he was stopped. Obviously, he tried again on Mercury. Or, perhaps that &quot;Spider&quot; that you showed the other day bit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it might be &#8220;Chairface Chippendale&#8221; that villain from the Tick Comics and cartoon that wrote the first 3 letters of his name on the moon with a giant laser before he was stopped. Obviously, he tried again on Mercury. Or, perhaps that &#8220;Spider&#8221; that you showed the other day bit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NelC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68022</link>
		<dc:creator>NelC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68022</guid>
		<description>Well, look, rock C on the fake moon picture, C on Mercury, obviously Nasa recycled the rock to stand in for Mercury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look, rock C on the fake moon picture, C on Mercury, obviously Nasa recycled the rock to stand in for Mercury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68021</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68021</guid>
		<description>giant bacteria   o0 ???
maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>giant bacteria   o0 ???<br />
maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68019</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68019</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s obiously the remaining upper (or lower) half of an H. From the original name of the planet: &quot;Hermes&quot; not &quot;Mercury&quot;!

P.S.: We *must* rename Neptune to Poseidon to get the P back at the end of our planetary list! Not kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obiously the remaining upper (or lower) half of an H. From the original name of the planet: &#8220;Hermes&#8221; not &#8220;Mercury&#8221;!</p>
<p>P.S.: We *must* rename Neptune to Poseidon to get the P back at the end of our planetary list! Not kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68018</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68018</guid>
		<description>Well, it isn&#039;t Slartbartfarst&#039;s initials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it isn&#8217;t Slartbartfarst&#8217;s initials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Thorsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68017</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Thorsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68017</guid>
		<description>I guess we really are property - intellectual property...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we really are property &#8211; intellectual property&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68014</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68014</guid>
		<description>blah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spankermatic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68015</link>
		<dc:creator>Spankermatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68015</guid>
		<description>Ah  - thanks Jack for that step back into Sega Mega Drive history.  Your l33t skilz roxor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah  &#8211; thanks Jack for that step back into Sega Mega Drive history.  Your l33t skilz roxor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68016</guid>
		<description>Spankermatic says: &quot;I meant to say &#039;bases&#039; but my mind was elsewhere.&quot;

Yes, all your bases are belong to us.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spankermatic says: &#8220;I meant to say &#8216;bases&#8217; but my mind was elsewhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, all your bases are belong to us.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Strong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68010</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68010</guid>
		<description>You realize where this is going.....

Someone is going to count craters and estimate that the copyright notice has been there 20 million years longer than American copyright terms.

The RIAA and MPAA will then lobby the government for an emergency 20 million year copyright term extention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You realize where this is going&#8230;..</p>
<p>Someone is going to count craters and estimate that the copyright notice has been there 20 million years longer than American copyright terms.</p>
<p>The RIAA and MPAA will then lobby the government for an emergency 20 million year copyright term extention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spankermatic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68013</link>
		<dc:creator>Spankermatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68013</guid>
		<description>Ah yes Barton - I bow to your superior knowledge.  I meant to say &quot;bases&quot; but my mind was elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes Barton &#8211; I bow to your superior knowledge.  I meant to say &#8220;bases&#8221; but my mind was elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aiabx</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68012</link>
		<dc:creator>aiabx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68012</guid>
		<description>It looks like a banana to me - the symbol of intelligent design!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a banana to me &#8211; the symbol of intelligent design!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68011</guid>
		<description>Becca Stareyes says: &quot;“I’ll just bet that if we follow those planets, we’ll find Planet X.” — Duck Dodgers.

Aaaarrrghhh! You beat me to it!

OK, how about Mercury has a pierced septum and a nose ring?

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becca Stareyes says: &#8220;“I’ll just bet that if we follow those planets, we’ll find Planet X.” — Duck Dodgers.</p>
<p>Aaaarrrghhh! You beat me to it!</p>
<p>OK, how about Mercury has a pierced septum and a nose ring?</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menglander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68009</link>
		<dc:creator>menglander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68009</guid>
		<description>It is the FSM smiling back at us!!  You can even see some of His Noodly Appendages on both sides!

-M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the FSM smiling back at us!!  You can even see some of His Noodly Appendages on both sides!</p>
<p>-M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68008</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68008</guid>
		<description>Mercury is obviously part of the Colbert Nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercury is obviously part of the Colbert Nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoaoXP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68007</link>
		<dc:creator>JoaoXP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68007</guid>
		<description>Oh, such a cute little pig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, such a cute little pig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-68006</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/lets-pass-over-mercury/#comment-68006</guid>
		<description>Cytosine is a nucleotide.  Proteins are made of amino acids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cytosine is a nucleotide.  Proteins are made of amino acids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 22:34:26 -->
