<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timeline of astronomy blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:17:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68115</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68115</guid>
		<description>As CC Peterson says, it is a work in progress (I&#039;ve added a note making that clearer now).

Derek Lyons, I don&#039;t think there is any need for you to be abusive. You are mostly correct that it is an ‘interactive timeline of some space and astronomy blogs that I like&#039;. I couldn&#039;t possibly claim to be aware of every astronomy-related blog in existence. On the original post I had said that it included the blogs on my links page and a few others I had found. I don&#039;t think it is fair to add the &#039;mostly popular&#039; though. Some of the blogs may very well be popular now (e.g. this one, Star Stryder, Slacker Astronomy etc) but were only a few posts old when I originally found them and added them to my links page, blog roll or specifically mentioned them in a post. The list wasn&#039;t compiled based on popularity. There are many blogs on there that don&#039;t have the super-stardom of Phil&#039;s blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As CC Peterson says, it is a work in progress (I&#8217;ve added a note making that clearer now).</p>
<p>Derek Lyons, I don&#8217;t think there is any need for you to be abusive. You are mostly correct that it is an ‘interactive timeline of some space and astronomy blogs that I like&#8217;. I couldn&#8217;t possibly claim to be aware of every astronomy-related blog in existence. On the original post I had said that it included the blogs on my links page and a few others I had found. I don&#8217;t think it is fair to add the &#8216;mostly popular&#8217; though. Some of the blogs may very well be popular now (e.g. this one, Star Stryder, Slacker Astronomy etc) but were only a few posts old when I originally found them and added them to my links page, blog roll or specifically mentioned them in a post. The list wasn&#8217;t compiled based on popularity. There are many blogs on there that don&#8217;t have the super-stardom of Phil&#8217;s blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccpetersen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68114</link>
		<dc:creator>ccpetersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68114</guid>
		<description>I responded to this yesterday, but I guess my comments were sent to the spam bin and BA didnt&#039; see them...

anyway, if this one gets through...

this is  less about &quot;who was first&quot; as it is about someone trying to trace back the earliest blogs about astronomy.  it&#039;s not about definitions, per se... although several of us have been writing web pages since the early 90s -- I started my web page in 1992, with updates from HST observations, space news, etc. before going to blogging format as soon as it became feasible to do so.

Looks to me like Stuart&#039;s work is a &quot;work in progress&quot; and not a definitive listing of blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I responded to this yesterday, but I guess my comments were sent to the spam bin and BA didnt&#8217; see them&#8230;</p>
<p>anyway, if this one gets through&#8230;</p>
<p>this is  less about &#8220;who was first&#8221; as it is about someone trying to trace back the earliest blogs about astronomy.  it&#8217;s not about definitions, per se&#8230; although several of us have been writing web pages since the early 90s &#8212; I started my web page in 1992, with updates from HST observations, space news, etc. before going to blogging format as soon as it became feasible to do so.</p>
<p>Looks to me like Stuart&#8217;s work is a &#8220;work in progress&#8221; and not a definitive listing of blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fischer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68113</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68113</guid>
		<description>It all depends on the definition of weblog: If it&#039;s a site where brief content with links is added all the time, with the latest news usually on top, I would say my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~dfischer/mirror&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cosmic Mirror&lt;/a&gt; qualifies - which has been running without a break since October 1996 (and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~dfischer/mirror1-10.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;original format&lt;/a&gt; was even &#039;bloggier&#039; than today&#039;s).

In any case my &lt;a href=&quot;http://cosmos4u.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cosmos 4 U&lt;/a&gt; - now in the &#039;official blog format&#039; - might qualify as the youngest astronomy blog. It addresses the active astronomy enthusiast who want&#039;s to observe and/or see other observers&#039; achievements ASAP or wants to fiddle around on the computer - I was looking in vain for a blog or news ticker with exactly that approach and so I had to launch one myself ...

Daniel Fischer
Germany</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on the definition of weblog: If it&#8217;s a site where brief content with links is added all the time, with the latest news usually on top, I would say my <a href="http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~dfischer/mirror" rel="nofollow">Cosmic Mirror</a> qualifies &#8211; which has been running without a break since October 1996 (and the <a href="http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~dfischer/mirror1-10.html" rel="nofollow">original format</a> was even &#8216;bloggier&#8217; than today&#8217;s).</p>
<p>In any case my <a href="http://cosmos4u.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Cosmos 4 U</a> &#8211; now in the &#8216;official blog format&#8217; &#8211; might qualify as the youngest astronomy blog. It addresses the active astronomy enthusiast who want&#8217;s to observe and/or see other observers&#8217; achievements ASAP or wants to fiddle around on the computer &#8211; I was looking in vain for a blog or news ticker with exactly that approach and so I had to launch one myself &#8230;</p>
<p>Daniel Fischer<br />
Germany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens 'Spacejens' Rydholm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens 'Spacejens' Rydholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68112</guid>
		<description>The Daily Illuminator of Steve Jackson Games, while not astronomy based, might be the oldest still active blog. The entry from April 15, 2007 mentions this.

http://www.sjgames.com/ill/past.columns.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Daily Illuminator of Steve Jackson Games, while not astronomy based, might be the oldest still active blog. The entry from April 15, 2007 mentions this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sjgames.com/ill/past.columns.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sjgames.com/ill/past.columns.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lyons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68111</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68111</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to say he&#039;s full of excrement - Transterrestrial Musings was online (at a different domain and only indifferently updated) as early as 97/98 or so.  There was a huge explosion of space travel blogs around 2000 or so when rumours of Bush intending a big new space initiative began circulatiing.  (Those most quickly died.)

This is really an &#039;interactive timeline of some space and astronomy blogs that I like and that are more-or-less popular&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say he&#8217;s full of excrement &#8211; Transterrestrial Musings was online (at a different domain and only indifferently updated) as early as 97/98 or so.  There was a huge explosion of space travel blogs around 2000 or so when rumours of Bush intending a big new space initiative began circulatiing.  (Those most quickly died.)</p>
<p>This is really an &#8216;interactive timeline of some space and astronomy blogs that I like and that are more-or-less popular&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bønez_brigade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68110</link>
		<dc:creator>bønez_brigade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68110</guid>
		<description>Well, after scrolling way back in time (it takes ~10 minutes), I can verify that no science blogs were found for Newton, Galileo, Copernicus, etc.

Before year 1, the app switches to &quot;1BC&quot; (not BCE, BTW).  And no, there was no year 0, so take that you &quot;year-2000-was-the-millenium&quot; people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after scrolling way back in time (it takes ~10 minutes), I can verify that no science blogs were found for Newton, Galileo, Copernicus, etc.</p>
<p>Before year 1, the app switches to &#8220;1BC&#8221; (not BCE, BTW).  And no, there was no year 0, so take that you &#8220;year-2000-was-the-millenium&#8221; people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebegood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-68109</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebegood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/01/timeline-of-astronomy-blogs/#comment-68109</guid>
		<description>Say, umm, not to change the subject or anything, but there&#039;s an &quot;X&quot; rated ad right there in the middle of the &#039;blog timeline&#039; blog....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say, umm, not to change the subject or anything, but there&#8217;s an &#8220;X&#8221; rated ad right there in the middle of the &#8216;blog timeline&#8217; blog&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
