DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« The galaxy that ate Detroit
The reality of 2007 TU24 »

WD5 missed Mars? Maybe.

I was just sitting here a little while wondering if the asteroid WD5 missed Mars, and if it did, how much did its orbit change. Then I fired up my feed reader and saw that Emily wrote about this in her usual thorough and interesting manner, thus obviating any need for me to so, other than point you to her. So there. Bottom line, though: it almost certainly missed, but its orbit changed quite a bit, we probably won’t recover it for years, but it’s a small rock and space is big, so it doesn’t pose much of a danger to anyone.

So, any doomsday criers out there (I’m looking at you, TU24dotORG): give it a rest.

Share

February 5th, 2008 11:00 AM by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Astronomy, Science | 12 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

12 Responses to “WD5 missed Mars? Maybe.”

  1. 1.   Ray M Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 11:18 am

    Ya know, I think TU24dotORG might have had a point. Why, just today we’ve had thick fog, heavy rain, and thunder and lightning – typical of the things he so wisely told us to look out for.

    So much for your scepticism, Mr Plait! :-)

  2. 2.   Celtic_Evolution Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    speaking of TU24.org… visited that site lately? It’s been reduced to a forums page that’s gotten pretty overrun with sane people pretty much asking tu24 to explain him/herself. And the backpeddaling and revisionist history being spouted out is the highest of high comedy. Even no, a week after the event when nothing, not a SINGLE thing that can be scientifically attributed in any way to that asteroid’s passing, that was claimed by tu24.org, has come to pass… he STILL refuses to admit he was dead solid wrong.

    The argument he and others supporting him make over and over again is to “prove that it DIDN’T have an effect”, with absolutely no understanding of the logical fallacy of that request.

    It’s a hoot.

  3. 3.   Sespetoxri Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    The part I find particularly amusing is for the past couple weeks they’ve been posting images of the magnetosphere of the Earth and looking at how perturbed the magnetosphere appears to be… they’ll post an image, then another an hour later, and marvel at the vast differences between the two. They will then talk about the massive ‘spikes’ in the magnetosphere, and shiver at the consequences of such a close pass of an asteroid.

    I, of course, posted on their forum suggesting they simply look at images of the magnetosphere from a month before, six months before, one year before, etc and verify that what they’re seeing is actually abnormal. They’re looking at a dynamic shift in an image and attributing it to TU24 without any actual knowledge of what is causing those shifts. I suggested it could be perfectly normal, or perhaps it’s perfectly normal two months after the leonids, or it’s perfectly normal at this point in the Earth’s orbit around the sun… regardless of why it looks like it looks, that they are not qualified to make a judgement as they have neither the educational background to do so or previous images to compare it with.

    I suggested, quite politely, that Nua (the gender and geographically questionable administrator) contact a reputable scientist to visit their forums and perhaps shed a bit of light on the activity of the magnetosphere. I got a couple nods in my direction from some of the more reasonable posters there, but the more ‘froth-at-the-mouth’ types conveniently ignored my sensible suggestion and continue to make their armchair scientist analyses.

    The issue here is, in my armchair psychologist opinion, they desperately want to make something out of nothing and will not look too closely at their ‘theories’ for fear of finding all the gaping holes.

    Sometimes no matter how sensible you are or how heartfelt your attempt, you just can’t save people from themselves.

  4. 4.   Michelle Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Now now Celtic, how dare you being so ignorant? TU24dotORG posted it on the day the asteroid went by: THE WEATHER WAS CRAZYYYYYYYYYY

    …Now here I thought it’s been crazy all winter.

    (Psst: TU24 is a girl, don’T be a sexist. Gasp.)

  5. 5.   Thad Hatchett Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    I wonder if during their rants they’ve even noticed asteroid 2008 CT1 that quietly glided by today at a mere 135,000 km. A quarter the distance of TU24 (source MPC)

  6. 6.   Celtic_Evolution Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    That IS true, Michelle… it’s 50 degrees F. here in upstae NY in February! Can’t be coincidence. How totally block-headed of me. Must be the heat is getting to me. ;)

    But wait! That’s not even the record high for this day here. That would be 63 degrees F. in 1991. I wonder what asteroid went whizzing past that year, frogging up the works?… can someone look that up for me?

  7. 7.   Ian Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    Please don’t point that out to them. I’ve already seen a few members of there sliding into babbling about how all the newly found asteroids demonstrate that the 2012 Mayan calendar stuff must be true.

  8. 8.   Michelle Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    @Ian: Yea, because there obviously wasn’t any asteroids before 2012 neared. <<

  9. 9.   Law Mom Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    TU24 had a huge effect. It was pitch black outside at closest approach. A mere six hours later the sky was flooded with visible light. I saw it with my own eyes.

    Coincidence? I think not.

  10. 10.   Lugosi Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 5:15 pm

    Any bets on how long before there’s a wd5.org website?

  11. 11.   MrQhuest Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 5:42 pm

    TU24′s website now automatically redirects to their forum. Not a word elsewhere…. interesting. Did they apologize, or admit they were wrong when I wasn’t looking?

  12. 12.   Sespetoxri Says:
    February 5th, 2008 at 6:27 pm

    Nothing except the same old rhetoric, MrQhuest. Personally I’ve given up trying to talk reason and science over there. They’ve decided they want to believe what they wish and won’t be gainsaid by little things like science and common sense.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us